News

Facebook DIGG

Climate Change Policies Failing, NASA Scientist Warns Obama

by: James Randerson  |  Visit article original @ The Guardian UK

photo
NASA climate expert James Hansen. (Photo: Gareth Fuller / PA)

    Award-winning researcher James Hansen says new president's rhetoric must be backed by action.

    Current approaches to deal with climate change are ineffectual, one of the world's top climate scientists said Thursday in a personal new year appeal to Barack Obama and his wife Michelle on the urgent need to tackle global warming.

    With less than three weeks to go until Obama's inauguration, Prof James Hansen, head of Nasa's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, asked the recently appointed White House science adviser Prof John Holdren to pass the missive directly to the president-elect.

    Obama spoke repeatedly during his campaign about the need to tackle climate change, and environmentalists fervently hope he will live up to his promises to pursue green policies.

    The letter, from Hansen and his wife Anniek, is a personal plea to the first couple. It begins: "We write to you as fellow parents concerned about the Earth that will be inherited by our children, grandchildren, and those yet to be born ... Jim has advised governments previously through regular channels. But urgency now dictates a personal appeal."

    In a covering letter to Holdren, Hansen explains that he wrote the letter a few weeks ago while in London. His wife had suffered a heart attack ("fortunately we were near a very good hospital") and while they waited for doctors to give the go-ahead to fly back to the US he decided to compose his petition to the new first family.

    Hansen has been one of the most prominent advocates of action to tackle climate change since he first spoke on the issue at congressional hearings in the 1980s. His testimony to the senate featured in Al Gore's film An Inconvenient Truth and he has received numerous honours for his work on the issue, including the WWF's top conservation award.

    Hansen wrote that there is a "profound disconnect" between public policy on climate change and the magnitude of the problem as described by the science. He praised Obama's campaign rhetoric about "a planet in peril", but said that how the new president responds in office will be crucial. The letter contains a wish list of three policy measures to tackle global warming.

    Hansen lambasts the current international approach of setting targets to be met through "cap and trade" schemes as not up to the task. "This approach is ineffectual and not commensurate with the climate threat. It could waste another decade, locking in disastrous consequences for our planet and humanity," the Hansens wrote.

    The letter will make uncomfortable reading for officials in 10 north-eastern and middle-Atlantic states whose carbon cap and trade mechanism - the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative - got under way today. The scheme is the first mandatory, market-based greenhouse gas reduction programme in the US and it aims to cut greenhouse gas emissions from the power sector by 10% by 2018.

    Hansen advocates a three-pronged attack on the climate problem - all measures he has promoted before. First, he wants a moratorium and phase-out of coal-fired power stations - which he calls "factories of death" - that do not incorporate carbon capture and storage.

    "Coal is responsible for as much atmospheric carbon dioxide as the other fossil fuels combined, and its reserves make coal even more important for the long run," the Hansens wrote.

    Second, he proposes a "carbon tax and 100% dividend": a mechanism for putting a price on carbon without raising money for government coffers. The idea is to tax carbon at source, then redistribute the revenue equally among taxpayers, so high carbon users are penalised while low carbon users are rewarded.

    Finally, Hansen wants a renewed research effort into so-called fourth generation nuclear plants, which can use nuclear waste as fuel. "In our opinion [fourth generation nuclear power] deserves your strong support, because it has the potential to help solve past problems with nuclear power: nuclear waste, the need to mine for nuclear fuel, and release of radioactive material."

    Hansen argues that the current emphasis on reduction targets combined with carbon trading schemes make it too easy for countries to wriggle out of their commitments. He cites the example of Japan's increasing coal use - the dirtiest fuel in terms of carbon emissions. To offset these increases in emissions Japan has bought credits from China through the clean development mechanism - an instrument set up by the Kyoto protocol - yet China's emissions have continued to increase rapidly. China has now overtaken the US as the biggest polluter in the world.

    "Nobody realistically expects that the large readily available pools of oil and gas will be left in the ground. Caps will not cause that to happen - caps only slow the rate at which the oil and gas are used. The only solution is to cut off the coal source," the Hansens wrote.

»


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. TRUTHOUT HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR IS TRUTHOUT ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON TO MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Truthout, thanks for

Truthout, thanks for printing this. Anyone interested in Global Warming needs to check out Amory Lovin's work at RMI. We have the technology to move to a carbon-free climate. We now need the will power. I've critised Cap and Trade on other posts here. Nucs are not the answer either. Gore did a great job of alerting the world to the problem but he didn't define the solutions well. What we do to solve this problem is as important as addressing the problem. Our country needs to have this debate, along with the rest of the world. The problem we face is the huge energy lobby well established in our government. Truthout is a voice in the wilderness, but thanks for being a voice.

The people living on this

The people living on this little , delicate planet of ours will all have to believe that we can , we must stop burning anything to produce the energy we need . Not when the oil and gas runs out but today . If we care and love our children and the children yet to be born , we will make the change that is absolutly nessessary . I thank Mr. Hansen for all his work . May his letter be read and heard for the sake of us all.

to all the 'green' people I

to all the 'green' people I just hope that you know how Greenland got it's name; and if u do know then u should also know that climate changes on its own since the beginning of our planet and we the human kind have less than 1% to do with it; <--- this is the TRUTHOUT

I have friends whocan only

I have friends whocan only see Hansen as a promoter of Nukes..I am totally allarmed about passing 350 ppm co2...ow do I answer my anti nuke friends...I also am anti nuke,but love Hansen.

To the people who don't

To the people who don't believe that humans are altering the climate of the planet through burning carbon-based fuels: Relax. The more huffing and puffing you do about it, the more CO2 you put into the air (TIC). To the people who make an effort to save energy and buy non-toxic products: Happy New Year! And thank you Dr. Hansen for not shutting up about the biggest crisis humankind faces right now. We're one world people.

Death of Earth...coming soon

Death of Earth...coming soon to a planet near you. For all the people who don't think climate change is happening, or that humans pouring toxins into the air is just fine, please get a conscience, get an intellect and get a heart. Even if there was no manmade climate change, it is obvious that the human species is rapidly stripping the planet of all life. Forests, oceans, rivers, lakes, topsoil, entire ecosystems are bulldozed, paved and destroyed so humans can build more cities, shopping malls, etc. Cars are on the increase, but the Amazon Rainforest is half gone. Humans have a clear choice: give up relentless consumption and unchceked human population growth, or live on a dying planet. It's not a matter of opinion. Ecocide is being committed by humanity. It's now or never.

I was only talking about the

I was only talking about the global worming phenomenon which is not man-made; other things like pollution and toxic waist, yes we can stop it and we should but once again we CANNOT stop global worming/cooling cycles

Sorry folks, no can do.

Sorry folks, no can do. Carbon is not only the basis of life itself, but of my immense and getting immenser fortune. It's true that "forests, oceans, rivers, lakes, topsoil, entire ecosystems are bulldozed, paved and destroyed". However, my fellow right sort of people and I have gotten rich from that, so it isn't so bad. Creative destruction, eh? Moreover, we have set aside some nice outdoorsy sorts of places for our exclusive use; we at least need to get away from it all. Those wonderful shiny things like gold and copper can't be disappearing since they are all over the shops. At least the ones for us. Oh, and thanks, @unplugged for that lovely 1% stat. Don't know which rock you found it under, and don't doubt it's bogus, but will joyfully use it whenever possible. Ta ra, suckers!

"to all the 'green' people I

"to all the 'green' people I just hope that you know how Greenland got it's name" Greenland was given its name by Eric the Red, an exile from Norway, who picked the name Greenland to try and attract farmers. Greenland was not a "green land" Greenland's ice cap is hundreds of thousands of years old and covers over 80% of the island. The vast majority of land not under the ice sheet is rock and permafrost in the far north. it was never lush, and their existence was always harsh and meager, especially due to the Viking's disdain for other peoples and ways of living. They attempted to live a European lifestyle in an arctic climate, side by side with Inuit who easily outlasted them.

here is a little quote:

here is a little quote: "Studies of environmental conditions, climate, and their interactions have produced important new information relevant to Norse extinction in Greenland. Most revealing is the detailed evidence of climatic changes that occurred in the northwestern Atlantic beginning in the early 1300s. Changes in atmospheric temperature are recorded in such diverse materials as glacier ice derived from snow falling on the Greenland Ice Cap, fossil vegetation and pollen deposited annually in lake sediments, chemical signatures in isotopic composition of sea sediments, animal and human bones, and even the species of insect pests that accompanied Vikings and their animals as they settled new lands. These indicators clearly suggest that the climate was cooling in the 14th century, and that the Greenlandic environment had been depleted of its "natural capital"--its previously untapped grasslands and animal resources-over 500 years of farming practices in this delicate arctic climate.""Cores taken from the ocean bottom west of Iceland show evidence that the ocean conditions between the 8th and 12th centuries were relatively calm and that little sea ice was present to hinder navigation. The build-up of sea ice beginning in the 13th century correspond with evidence from ice cores whose layers of annual snowfall show isotopic evidence that the 14th century had the coldest climate known in Greenland during the past 700 years. Such conditions would have severely strained the farming resources of the Western Settlement and could well have caused its collapse."; like I said I am all for controlling pollution but we CANNOT change global warming/cooling cycles; one more proof is a history of GRAPE cultivation in Europe; this is my last post on this subject; knowledge will open your mind

Don't fall for the arguments

Don't fall for the arguments of those who claim we are powerless to stop global warming. The same people used to claim that global warming was a myth. Now some of them admit it is happening but claim it is unrelated to human activity. Of course climate changes without humans, but does that prove that humans can’t influence the climate? Absolutely not! The wind blows without humans, but we can make it blow with a fan, and we can block the wind with a wall. The story of Greenland only proves that climate changes can wipe out human communities. It is an established scientific fact that increasing greenhouse gases will raise the global temperature and that a small rise in global temperature can have a dramatic effect on the climate. It is an established fact that burning fossil fuels releases greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. We know how much we have been releasing, and we know how much that has changed global temperatures. All reputable scientists agree that humans caused the recent rise in global temperature. We should try to stop great threats to the human race whether we caused them or not. But the fact that we are causing global warming means we know exactly how to reverse it. That is why we should not be confused. Time is quickly running out. Once we push the climate too far, feedback will take over, and we will no longer be able to stop it. James Hansen is a hero to the entire world. We should listen to him and demand that our leaders follow his advice, NOW!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.