Share

December Job Losses at 673,000, Worse Than Thought

by:   |  Reuters

photo
Recession results in deep job cuts in trucking industry and just about every other sector of the economy. (Photo: Jay L. Clendenin / The Los Angeles Times)

    U.S. private-sector employers shed 693,000 jobs in December, a private employment service said Wednesday in a report that was far worse than expected and pointed to more ugly news from the government's jobs data due later this week.

    The drop, much bigger than the revised 476,000 private sector jobs lost in November, is consistent with about a 670,000 fall in December non-farm payrolls, said Joel Prakken, chairman of Macroeconomic Advisers, which jointly develops the private sector employment report with ADP Employer Services.

    "If we assume that governments added say 20-odd thousand jobs then this morning's number would correspond to a decline of about maybe 670,000 or so for total employment," Prakken told a teleconference of journalists.

    On Friday the government will release its non-farm payrolls report, considered the most authoritative gauge of the U.S. labor market.

    After the ADP report, U.S. Treasury bonds regained some lost ground, the dollar extended its losses against the euro and the yen and U.S. stock futures slid.

    The median of estimates from 20 economists surveyed by Reuters for the ADP Employer Services report was for a loss of 473,000 private-sector jobs in December.

    The report for December was the first month the data was issued using a new methodology, which ADP said was designed to more closely predict the outcome of the government's non-farm payrolls report.

    "It's obviously a terrible number, though everyone was expecting a terrible number," said Steven Butler, director of FX trading at Scotia Capital in Toronto.

    "The initial shock is a big one...and should keep the dollar under pressure for the rest of the session," he said.

    Another report, from outplacement company Challenger, Gray & Christmas, showed that planned layoffs at U.S. firms eased in December from the previous month's seven-year high but they were up an astounding 275 percent annually as the year-old recession cut a huge swathe of destruction through job market.

    The economic slump, which is likely to be the longest since the Great Depression of the 1930s, also produced the worst year of layoffs since 2003, outplacement company Challenger, the firm said Wednesday in its monthly report on U.S. job cuts.

    The report said heavy job-cutting could continue through at least the first half of 2009, and the outlook afterward hinges on President-elect Barack Obama's plans to stimulate the economy through increased government spending.

    "The economy could begin to mount a comeback in the second half of the year, if the new administration can achieve quick passage of its proposed economic and job-growth stimulus package," said John Challenger, chief executive officer of Challenger, Gray & Christmas.

    "The plan to rebuild the nation's crumbling infrastructure will benefit not only laborers on the front lines, but it will push up through the economy, creating jobs for manufacturing workers, engineers, architects, technology specialists, etc."

    Job cuts announced in December totaled 166,348, down 8.4 percent from November's 181,671, Challenger, Gray & Christmas said. Despite the monthly decline, layoffs were up from just 44,416 in the year-ago period.

    Overall, employers announced 1,223,993 job cuts in 2008, the largest annual total since 2003, when there were 1,236,426 job cuts.

    The year-end total was up 59 percent from the 768,264 layoffs announced in 2007. It was the largest total for any December since Challenger started tracking layoffs in 1993.

    Employers announced 460,903 job cuts in the fourth quarter alone, producing the largest one-quarter total since 478,905 job cuts were announced in the first three months of 2002.

    The financial sector was at the epicenter of the economic turmoil in 2008 and, not surprisingly, job cuts.

    The financial sector announced plans to shed 260,110 workers, the third largest annual industry total on record behind the 317,777 job cuts and 268,851 job cuts announced by the telecommunications sector in 2001 and 2002, respectively.

    The automotive industry was the second-biggest downsizing industry of the year, with 127,281 announced cuts followed by transportation at 82,859.

    The financial sector also topped the December layoffs with 39,604.

  

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

But it was all Clinton's

But it was all Clinton's fault, right? Is there any doubt as to why the Republicans are no longer regarded as reliable on the business side of things? At least Greenspan is somewhat accepting reality by saying that he was wrong about the markets being able to regulate themselves, but I don't hear very many other Republicans making similar admissions.

Republicans NEVER apologize

Republicans NEVER apologize for anything. Not Depression 1, the killing of an effective League of Nations and more recently Depression 2. -- The rest of us know, but Republican voters, who appear unwilling or unable to read and remember, never will. They still idolize Reagan, who had all the mental acuity of Mortimer Snerd and almost, ALMOST, makes W appear clever.

Don't you realize: the whole

Don't you realize: the whole downturn was caused because Obama was going to be elected. That's the story some are telling: Business was so traumatized. Republicans claim that the only thing government should do is cut capital gains taxes! So that the speculators who got us into this mess would face no taxes at all if they began to speculate even more wildly. I doubt there are many who would pay any capital gains taxes this year. Well, maybe, Republicans concede, Obama's tax cuts for the middle class are also acceptable--they're partly a sop to gain enough R votes so that there won't be a filibuster in the Senate. Conservatives are telling the story (pure fiction) that the depression was prolonged by the New Deal programs; it caused investor uncertainty, they claim. Actually, when FDR tried to balance the budget in 1937, the economy started to fall back, but that was because he wasn't spending enough to stimulate it. Unemployment disappeared with the run-up to WWII, because, finally, the US was running deficits large enough that the whole economy got rolling.