Opinion

Facebook DIGG

Banks on a Wire

by:   |  Visit article original @ Le Monde | Editorial

photo
Le Monde's editorialist points out that Europe's bank rescue plans are intended to rescue the banks, not the bankers. (Photo: Fear of Heights Treatment Project)

    Gordon Brown is not happy. His rescue plan for British banks, which everyone - including foreigners - admired when he presented it in October 2008, is not producing the hoped-for results. In the absence of credit, shops are closing and real estate is collapsing. Hence, his finance minister, Alistair Darling, evokes a new plan that could also involve recapitalizations.

    Why this failure? Because the banks have not played the game. A number of them have found the Brown plan too restrictive, notably because it requires that they cease paying dividends to their shareholders. In a speech he gave at the end of October, Bank of England Governor Mervyn King had warned bankers: "The actions undertaken are not intended to save the banks as such, but to protect the rest of the economy from the banks," he explained to management. Logically, the City hangs back, and today we witness a duel with buttoned foils between the government and the financial sector, praised to the skies yesterday for its key role in the dynamism of the British economy, criticized today for its cowardice and incompetence.

    The debate is not confined to Britain. In Germany also, voices - bankers' voices - are raised to denounce the limitations on the remuneration of financiers who demand the benefit of public assistance. The two European countries that have required the most rigorous compensation for assistance to the banking sector are both in a pre-electoral period. In France, where elections are further off, the government has been more clement. Do the banks therefore distribute more loans? There is no evidence for that assertion. French banks are also seeking to reconstitute their margins and limit their risks.

    Bank rescue plans are in the process of showing their effectiveness - there's been no Lehman Brothers' failure in Europe - but also their limitations, since demand is not picking up again. With no obvious impact from public assistance, it's normal for public opinion and governments to require quida pro quo. At issue is saving the banks. Not the bankers.

    --------

    Translation: Truthout French language editor Leslie Thatcher.


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. TRUTHOUT HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR IS TRUTHOUT ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON TO MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

To me it is amazing that the

To me it is amazing that the US has given the banks all this money without so much a disclosing a single page of their accounts. Wouldn't it make some sense to examine the banks accounts before just giving them money? If I try to get $10 from a bank I am put through hell and back with scrutiny. Something is very wrong in this picture.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.