Share

Obama's Black Widow

by: Nat Hentoff  |  The Village Voice

photo
Obama voted for FISA in July. (Photo: Getty Images)

Thanks to Bush and Obama, the National Security Agency now knows more about you.

    Barack Obama will be in charge of the biggest domestic and international spying operation in history. Its prime engine is the National Security Agency (NSA)-located and guarded at Fort Meade, Maryland, about 10 miles northeast of Washington, D.C. A brief glimpse of its ever-expanding capacity was provided on October 26 by The Baltimore Sun's national security correspondent, David Wood: "The NSA's colossal Cray supercomputer, code-named the 'Black Widow,' scans millions of domestic and international phone calls and e-mails every hour.... The Black Widow, performing hundreds of trillions of calculations per second, searches through and reassembles key words and patterns, across many languages."

    In July, George W. Bush signed into law the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, which gives the NSA even more power to look for patterns that suggest terrorism links in Americans' telephone and Internet communications.

    The ACLU immediately filed a lawsuit on free speech and privacy grounds. The new Bush law provides farcical judicial supervision over the NSA and other government trackers and databasers. Although Senator Barack Obama voted for this law, dig this from the ACLU: "The government [is now permitted] to conduct intrusive surveillance without ever telling a court who it intends to spy on, what phone lines and e-mail addresses it intends to monitor, where its surveillance targets are located, why it's conducting the surveillance or whether it suspects any party to the communication of wrongdoing."

    This gives the word "dragnet" an especially chilling new meaning.

    The ACLU's Jameel Jaffer, director of its National Security Project, adds that the new statute, warming the cold hearts of the NSA, "implicates all kinds of communications that have nothing to do with terrorism or criminal activity of any kind."

    Why did Obama vote for this eye-that-never-blinks? He's a bright, informed guy, but he wasn't yet the President-Elect. The cool pragmatist wanted to indicate he wasn't radically unmindful of national security-and that his previous vow to filibuster such a bill may have been a lapse in judgment. It was.

    What particularly outraged civil libertarians across the political divide was that the FISA Amendments Act gave immunity to the telecommunications corporations-which, for seven years, have been a vital part of the Bush administration's secret wiretapping program-thereby dismissing the many court cases brought by citizens suing those companies for violating their individual constitutional liberties. This gives AT&T, Verizon, and the rest a hearty signal to go on pimping for the government.

    That's OK with the Obama administration? Please tell us, Mr. President.

    Some of us began to see how deeply and intricately the telecoms were involved in the NSA's spying when-as part of an Electronic Frontier Foundation lawsuit-it was revealed by a former AT&T technician, Mark Klein, that he had found a secret AT&T room in which the NSA was tapping into the telecom giant's fiber-optic cables. On National Public Radio on November 7, 2007, he disclosed: "It's not just AT&T's traffic going through these cables, because these cables connected AT&T's network with other networks like Sprint, Qwest [the one firm that refused to play ball with the government], Global Crossing, UUNet, etc."

    What you should know is that these fruitful cables go through "a splitter" that, as Klein describes, "just copies the entire data without any selection going on. So it's a complete copy of the data stream."

    Under the new FISA Amendments Act, there are no limits on where this stream of data can be disseminated. As in the past, but now with "legal" protection under the 2008 statute, your suspicious "patterns" can go to the FBI, Homeland Security, the CIA, and state and local police that are also involved in "fusion centers" with the FBI.

    Consider the enormous and bottomless databases that the government-and its NSA-can have a ball with. In James Bamford's The Shadow Factory (Doubleday)-a new book that leads you as far as anyone has gone into the bowels of the NSA-he notes: "For decades, AT&T and much of the rest of the telecommunications industry have had a very secret, very cozy relationship with the NSA." In AT&T's case, he points out, "its international voice service carried more than 18 billion minutes per year, reaching 240 countries, linking 400 carriers, and offering remote access via 19,500 points of presence in 149 countries around the globe."

    Voilá! Also, he notes: "Much of those communications passed through that secret AT&T room that Klein found on Folsom Street in downtown San Francisco."

    There's a lot more to come that we don't know about. Yet. In The Shadow Factory, James Bamford quotes Bush's Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell as saying that this wiretapping program was and is "only one program of many highly secret programs approved by Bush following the attacks on 9/11" (emphasis added). McConnell also said of the NSA's nonstop wiretapping: "This is the only aspect of those various activities whose existence has officially been acknowledged."

    Come on, Mike. Bush acknowledged the NSA's flagrant contempt of the First and Fourth amendments only after The New York Times broke the story in December 2005. When the Times executive editor, Bill Keller, first decided to hold the explosive story for a year, General Michael Hayden-the former head of the NSA who is currently running the CIA-was relieved because he didn't want the news to get out that "most international communications pass through [these telecommunications] 'switching,'" Bamford reports. It would blow the cover off those corporate communicators. Now, AT&T, Verizon, et al., don't have to worry, thanks to the new law.

    There are increasing calls, inside and outside of Congress, for President Obama to urge investigations by an independently bipartisan commission-akin to the 9/11 Commission-to get deeply into the many American and international laws so regally broken by Bush and his strutting team.

    But there is so much still to find out about the NSA's "many highly secret programs" that a separate commission is sorely needed to probe exclusively into the past and ongoing actions of the Black Widow and other NSA lawless intrusions into our privacy and ideas.

    President Obama could atone for his vote that supported the FISA Amendments Act of 2008 by appointing such a bipartisan commission composed of technology experts who are also familiar with the Constitution.

    Bamford says that the insatiable NSA is "developing an artificial intelligence system designed to know what people are thinking." Here come the thought police!

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

I would already be in "tried

I would already be in "tried and fried" by this administration if they could read my thoughts.

News Flash, Mr. Hentoff.

News Flash, Mr. Hentoff. Michael Connell has already died in a fiery plane crash, due to running out of fuel (sic), and though the plane exploded, an unknown state trooper made an ID on the body. Yeah, right. He was a star witness in an Ohio lawsuit against Karl Rove, et al, concerning the electronic theft of the 2004 election, and he claimed that he had been threatened by Rove if he didn't take the fall. So, you might want to stop addressing him in print as though he were still alive. Goes to show how quickly they buried the story...

I was a passionate supporter

I was a passionate supporter of Obama for many years ... until he voted to give the Bu(ll)shites a free pass on illegal "Big Brother" spying on us. I wrote to his official website and told him he lost my vote over his vote on this. This, arguably the most important vote of his career to that date (his push for the bailout rivals its importance, and suggests a trend in his policy that deeply disturbs me), was a huge betrayal to the progressives in his party, the so-called Left. I'll be watching him closely to see if he atones in any way on this watershed issue that made me, and many others, feel like it's time to dump the whole lot of both parties in Washington into the Boston Harbor! Is he a true progressive Democrat? Or another Illuminati hack in progressive clothing? How he addresses (or doesn't address) this issue will answer much of that question.

When conservatives start

When conservatives start whining about the mythical 'liberal media,' remember to point out this sordid story. The NYT knew that the illegitimate 'administration' was, as usual, wiping its virtual butt with the Constitution (O lost!) by indiscriminately spying on Americans with the help of the phone companies. Mind you, they knew this before the 2004 election, but they held the story for over a year. Would any responsible news organization have done this, never mind a 'liberal' one? Would the Pentagon Papers get printed today? Hell, no. For eight years we didn't see a fraction of the zeal in covering spying, war crimes and the like that we saw in the examination of Clinton's sex life and now the piling on of Obama. Liberal media my eye.

Thought police =

Thought police = inquisition. The last witchcraft trial was in 1952. The implements of torture and the implementers of torture are warmed up and ready. This same reckless system, for example, labeled an anti war group as a white supremest group. We all know we are on the brink of a dark age, the fall of Troy, the anguish of Europe, etc. Let us be up and doing... and mind our own business. That surely is challenge enough.

We all urgently need to

We all urgently need to think outside the box. Privacy is gone forever. That is, except for the government's privacy. A society cannot be free if its rulers can see all, but all can't see the rulers. The best that can be done is to make our government abandon its own privacy, too, so that the citizenry can see what's going on in government, just as government can see what's going on with citizens. Freedom is not secrecy, and privacy is not essential to freedom. We can be free and at the same time not private (although some of us may have to gain some courage in order to experience freedom in this way). But transparency *is* essential to freedom. Do you love freedom enough to demand government transparency, and to live with personal transparency? I do.

Who is paying this Steve

Who is paying this Steve Newcomb commenter? Freedom ≠ lack of privacy. Especially when lack of privacy means the gov't charges you for a crime it thinks you may have been planning on committing (conspiracy)... how many times have you said something which could easily convince a jury you are a criminal-minded or even terrorist-minded person? Gov't transparency would be great, but wouldn't cancel out our right to privacy. Why? Because the gov't can "disappear" people, but people can't "disappear" the gov't.

George Orwell was right,

George Orwell was right, just 20 years early on the date.

Domestic spying throughout

Domestic spying throughout history has served the needs of the state to keep control over the populace. It is no different today in the USA where freedom is becoming a memory with the exception of still being free to leave the insanity and the country behind before one hears the boots of the Cossacks at the door.

Much of this has been in he

Much of this has been in he papers before, but only now with Obama do I feel a sense of hope that we can bring this back to our American constitutional standards of citizen protection. Obama, we count on you to address and correct this.

Excellent article. This is

Excellent article. This is one of the key open questions for the Obama administration ... there's a lot he could do by executive action to end the worse abuses immediately, and over the course of course of 2009 he could have a lot of influence on telecom immunity and the PATRIOT Act sunset/repeal. If you'd like to help with the fight for restoring the Constitution, please consider voting for the idea "Get FISA Right, repeal the PATRIOT Act, and restore our civil liberties" in the change.org competition at http://www.change.org/ideas/view/get_fisa_right_repeal_the_patriot_act_and_restore_our_civil_liberties Thanks! jon

go ahead, government, read

go ahead, government, read my emails, listen to my phone calls. satisfy your bottomless voyeurism and find out how boring my life really is. don't stop there, though! how about some hidden cameras? one over my bed, maybe one in the bathroom? naughty, naughty dirty birds with nothing better to do!

another peasant, you seem to

another peasant, you seem to have confused Mike Connell with Michael McConnell, the Director of National Intelligence, who is most definitely not dead, unlike Mike Connell, who unfortunately is.