News

Facebook DIGG

Budget Deficit to Hit $1.2 Trillion in Fiscal 2009

by: Richard Cowan and Jeremy Pelofsky  |  Visit article original @ Reuters

photo
With the budget deficit projected to hit $1.2 trillion this year, President-elect Obama, shown above meeting with his economic team, may have to alter his stimulus package. (Photo: Doug Mills / The New York Times)

    Washington - The U.S. budget deficit will swell to a record $1.186 trillion in fiscal 2009, congressional forecasters said on Wednesday, the result of an economic recession that has cut tax receipts and caused massive government bailouts of banks and automakers.

    The out-of-control deficit picture by the Congressional Budget Office illustrates the daunting economic challenges President-elect Barack Obama faces when he takes office on January 20.

    But on Thursday, Obama will deliver a speech on the economy in which he will lay out his case for even more short-term deficit spending, possibly $775 billion or more over two years, to help heal the sick economy.

    CBO also said the budget deficit could fall to $703 billion in the 2010 fiscal year which begins October 1, 2009, as the U.S. recession begins easing.

    The actual budget gaps for both years may be significantly greater as Washington prepares to pass the gigantic economic stimulus bill by mid-February.

    The CBO report shattered President George W. Bush's pledge that the government would balance its budget by 2012. Instead, CBO sees significant deficits at least through 2019.

    The recession, which began in December 2007, has brought major job losses and slashed consumer spending and tax revenues. Unhappy and anxious voters elected Obama to the White House and gave Democrats larger majorities in Congress.

    "This isn't your run-of-the-mill recession," CBO Acting Director Robert Sunshine told reporters. He said it might be the longest downturn since World War II.

    CBO projected the U.S. economy will shrink 2.2 percent in 2009, the deepest for any calendar year since an 11 percent decline in 1946, before growing a modest 1.5 percent in 2010.

    Unemployment was forecast to rise to an average of 8.3 percent this year and 9 percent in 2010. But Sunshine said there was unusual uncertainty with the forecasts.

    Obama has said he expects deficits around $1 trillion for years, forcing tough budget choices. But on Wednesday he said his stimulus plan would not be as big as some have projected.

    "Grim Epitaph"

    While trying to revive the economy, Obama also faces a longer-term problem of trying to control the rapid growth in the cost of federal retiree and health benefits for an aging population. Politicians have been putting off these tough decisions for years.

    Obama said he was mindful that the stimulus package would add to the near-term deficits but said it was needed because of the "dire" condition of the economy.

    Signaling that he intends to stress fiscal responsibility, Obama on Wednesday named former Treasury official Nancy Killefer to scour the budget for wasteful spending items.

    Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin, the senior Republican on the House Budget Committee, warned that if the stimulus measure establishes permanent new spending programs, trillion dollar deficits would never go away.

    The projected deficits dwarf last year's $455 billion -- the current record.

    House Budget Committee Chairman John Spratt, a South Carolina Democrat, said the new CBO deficit forecast represented "a grim epitaph for the Bush administration," which inherited a surplus in 2001.

    In coming months, Congress will be asked to approve tens of billions of dollars for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan which have so far cost $857 billion, further adding to the deficit.

    This year's deficit also swelled in part because of a $240 billion rescue of mortgaging financing companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and a tax rebate, part of a 2008 stimulus package which will cost $168 billion over two years.

    The Bush administration has loaned hundreds of billions of dollars to rescue financial institutions from risky real estate investments that went sour. Domestic automakers also are getting assistance from Washington.

    The bailouts could cost the government $184 billion this year and $5 billion next year, the CBO projected. So far, the Treasury Department has spent about half of the $700 billion authorized by Congress.

    CBO also estimated deficits over the next five years will total $1.972 trillion.

    When Bush took office, total U.S. debt was $5.7 trillion. It now stands at more than $10.6 trillion because of increased government spending, tax cuts and the recession.

    ----------

    Additional reporting by Caren Bohan, editing by David Wiessler and Alan Elsner.

»


IN ACCORDANCE WITH TITLE 17 U.S.C. SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. TRUTHOUT HAS NO AFFILIATION WHATSOEVER WITH THE ORIGINATOR OF THIS ARTICLE NOR IS TRUTHOUT ENDORSED OR SPONSORED BY THE ORIGINATOR.

"VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS ARE PROVIDED AS A CONVENIENCE TO OUR READERS AND ALLOW FOR VERIFICATION OF AUTHENTICITY. HOWEVER, AS ORIGINATING PAGES ARE OFTEN UPDATED BY THEIR ORIGINATING HOST SITES, THE VERSIONS POSTED ON TO MAY NOT MATCH THE VERSIONS OUR READERS VIEW WHEN CLICKING THE "VIEW SOURCE ARTICLE" LINKS.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Our economy was sabotaged by

Our economy was sabotaged by traitors. When they knew they weren't going to win the presidency, they doled out the rest of the treasury to their buddies, and the economy is still tanking. Is anyone ever going to wake up to the fact that giving all the money to the megalomaniacs is a bad idea?

That $1.2 trillion deficit,

That $1.2 trillion deficit, I find in other sources, does not include the $700 billion for the banks nor the low ball $70 billion for our splendid little off the books wars, so it looks like a more inclusive figure for the deficit is a cool $2 trillion. Does that number sound familiar? It should: this year’s last of the Bushie budgets admits to spending a bit over $2 trillion. ‘Course the budget was low, partly by intent partly by circumstances. Anyhoo, to cover last year’s “shortfall” we gotta borrow the same amount of money we sort of mean to spend this year. And we’ll have to borrow even more next year. Borrowing the money of course means our kids, and grandkids, and great-grandkids will have to pay it back, with compound interest of course. If any person or business were in these circumstances, even if the bidness were in the hallowed “too big to fail” class, the only recourse would be bankruptcy, lousy as it is these days. How could this have happened when the party of bidness and fiscal responsibility has been in charge, sometimes sole charge, for 8 (or 30) years? Hmm, it strikes me that if you know how to build something, you also know how to destroy it. Grover dear, I’m afraid you’ve waterboarded the subject a bit too, er, enthusiastically. It’s dead.

How come nobody talks about

How come nobody talks about the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 which is the real root cause of this phenomenal and upayable debt? The Federal Reserve Act is the unconstitutional piece of legislation that created our currently operating money cartel by restricting the issuing of money to the FED which despite it's name, is a PRIVATE BANK. This means that our government must BORROW the money supply needed for commerce from the FED and pay interest on it. The FED creates the money from thin air by adding some digits (with lots of zeros) to the US Govt's account. The US gov’t COULD reassert it’s the sovereign right to issue the nation’s money by trial of the law in court, or by abolishing fractional reserve banking (part 2 of the banking scam) but ... the bankers like it this way, and politicians on both sides are bought by bankers, so they look the other way. Another interesting thing is that the principal on the federal debt owed to the FED Reserve Bank NEVER GETS PAID BACK. Ever increasing taxes pay for an ever increasing interest on an ever-increasing debt which, of course, cannot keep up forever. The inevitable result is financial melt-down when the creditors have everybody’s money and the debtors cannot pay. Anybody out there still surprised at how things are turning out? An excellent reference on the subject is the book THE WEB OF DEBT, by Ellen Brown, J.D. Read, learn, get mad, and demand gov’t action. The remedy for our current financial pickle is not as complex as you’d think.

And I forgot to mention that

And I forgot to mention that because the US has to borrow the money from the FED, private bankers are in control of the credit in this country. And they don't feel like lending right now. (..No doubt too cross-eyed with bliss from their $700 bn freebie and floating down with their golden parachutes.) Lack of available credit to conduct business is what is causing our country to grind to a screeching halt right now. If the US resumed issuing it's own money, credit could be made available, instantly, without any increase in Federal Debt.

I forget - how big was the

I forget - how big was the surplus in 1999? That no-good Clinton!

Gee - maybe Congress should

Gee - maybe Congress should start by cutting THEIR salaries. Call it "solidarity with the American People" - sure it's cosmetic, but in Amerika what isn't?

let's admit it everybody; we

let's admit it everybody; we americans are so spoiled and stupefied that we just don't care about those banksters; we can afford to pay them to print our money for us hehehe; how about a beer and a ballgame? anybody with me? that idiot box sure is pretty, loud and convenient; books, blogs and showers are overrated

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.