Share

In West Bank, There's Anger at Hamas as Well as at Israel

by: Shashank Bengali  |  McClatchy Newspapers

photo
Members of the Hamas Executive Force take away a Palestinian Fatah party member in Rafah, Gaza last May. (Photo: Mohammed Omer / Rafah Today)

    Ramallah, West Bank - Since the war in Gaza began two weeks ago, Rami Hamdan has oscillated between two emotions: sadness at the deaths of Palestinian civilians and anger, not only at Israel but also at its Palestinian foe, the militant Islamist group Hamas .

    "Of course I am unhappy about the killings," said Hamdan, a 30-year-old building inspector in Ramallah , the de facto capital of the West Bank . "But Hamas is also responsible. They breached the truce. Israel is an aggressive entity at the end of the day, and Hamas knew this could happen."

    Not many Palestinians will say that out loud in the West Bank these days. Most people voice outrage about Israel's offensive in the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip , which by Friday had killed nearly 800 people, two-fifths of them women and children.

    Below the surface, however, many in the West Bank are conflicted. A violent rift between Hamas and the secular Fatah party, which controls the West Bank , has left many unsure of their political future and fearful that their own territory could be engulfed in yet another round of battles with Israel .

    Since Hamas seized control of Gaza in June 2007 , the two Palestinian mini-states have been on very different tracks. While Israel and the United States have tried to isolate Gaza and bring Hamas to its knees, the Fatah-led Palestinian Authority , with U.S. backing, has consolidated its hold on the West Bank , building up its security forces and trying to make its administration more efficient.

    Despite the bitter political rivalry, most Palestinians appear to view the onslaught in Gaza as an attack on them all. Any real hope of peace negotiations with Israel has been forestalled by the division between Fatah and Hamas , however, leaving many feeling helpless.

    "This is the first face-off with the Israelis where we have not had a united front," said Sam Bahour , an Ohio-born Palestinian who returned to Ramallah 15 years ago and runs a leading consulting firm. "This is a bitter reality that we're facing, and it's affecting how people are mobilizing."

    Hamas leaders have called for a third Intifada, or uprising, against Israel, but there's little sign of that in Ramallah.

    This city saw fierce clashes with Israeli forces during the second Intifada, starting in 2000, including a grisly mob lynching of two Israeli soldiers whose bodies then were dragged through the town square. Up to Friday, however, when a well-organized rally drew thousands into the streets, anti-Israeli protests had been relatively small.

    Many said that was because Fatah leaders had deployed security forces to intimidate protesters and had banned displays of the Hamas flag. Several Hamas leaders continue to be held behind bars.

    Fatah leaders say they're trying to prevent the West Bank from slipping into chaos. Many people chafe at the security presence, however, and criticize Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas for remaining silent through much of the conflict.

    "Everybody feels a problem with the authority's response," said Ashraf Shahin , a 20-year-old working at a car wash. He said he was stunned when Palestinian riot police broke up a pro- Gaza demonstration at Birzeit University earlier this week, beating students with clubs and hauling away several protesters in police vans.

    "Instead of using weapons to fight Israeli occupation, they are using them to fight our own people. That never happened under Abu Ammar ," Shahin said, referring to Yasser Arafat , the longtime Palestinian president and Fatah founder, who died in 2004.

    There's no question that Palestinians are deeply disillusioned with Abbas, whose term as president officially expired Friday, although he shows no sign of stepping down. His critics say that Abbas has become little more than a client of Israel and the United States , undermining Hamas while pursuing peace negotiations that few think have any real chance of success.

    Instead, with little to show for years of often violent political struggle, many Palestinians have opted for a quieter response. In homes, offices and restaurants across Ramallah , people are glued to television coverage of Gaza and are organizing charity drives via social organizations and Web sites such as Facebook .

    "People are more analytical now," 24-year-old Nura Treish said. "If there was a viable peace process to cling to, it might be different. There is no such peace process. So this idea of a third intifada, people are thinking, well, really, what would we be fighting for?"

    Many in Ramallah remain hopeful that the onslaught in Gaza could help unite the Palestinian factions. At Friday's rally, however, Jamil El Abed , a 27-year-old carpenter, said he was disheartened to hear so many people voicing support for one faction or the other.

    For now, he said, the thought of Palestinian unity is farfetched.

    "I've lost hope in everybody: Fatah , Hamas and the authority," El Abed said. "Their division makes it easy for Israel to swallow us."

    -------

    (McClatchy special correspondent Khader Musleh contributed to this report from Ramallah.)

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

It would be nice if just one

It would be nice if just one article would avoid the zionist spin and hold the Israelis responsible for their crimes against humanity. Why must you parrot Israeli lies and misinformation: ""But Hamas is also responsible. They breached the truce." No. Israel "breached" the truce on November 4th. Israel also never opened their siege, you know, the starvation siege that doesn't allow food, medicines, fuel or anything else into Gaza? No, you probably don't know, seeing how like the rogue state of Israel, you seek to blame the Palestinians for their own Genocide. The United States Promotes Israeli Genocide Against the Palestinians Prof. Francis A. Boyle

It's a pity that even the

It's a pity that even the "spin" affects the West Bank. Multiple sources including Jimmy Carter have indicated that a truce was possible but ultimately rejected by Israel. At the end of the day, Israel wants war and with it territory. If they wanted a peaceful settlement, it was possible in 1982. Do Palestinian leaders have their problems? To be sure, they are repeating exactly the kinds of disruptive policies that let East African colonials divide and conquer. Hamas' sin has been refusal to surrender.

Expect more articles like

Expect more articles like this to appear at movement websites, as progressives are reined in to the "center" so as not to make too much trouble for the incoming Great One.

Why do you insist on calling

Why do you insist on calling it WAR instead of its proper name MASSACRE ???

Living in Europe one is more

Living in Europe one is more disgusted by the pro-palestinian spin which is everywhere. The EU is the biggest contributor to Palestine (or so they say). Which means some of my taxes not only pay for schools & hospitals but probably in some way for arms that Hamas uses. And will pay for reconstruction... again... Well in the US you're paying for Israel... I think that there are a certain amount of politically incorrect answers to the current problems. Israel is the way it is, perhaps sometimes/always overly zealous, but they are fighting for survival. That means that they will always be on the excessive side, not having the luxury on sitting back to think too much. That said it is a democracy and does want peace. Therefore the Palestinians must take their own future into their hands. Whatever Israel does to hamper them is compensated by the millions in European aid. The Palestinians must show that they are building something, they must restrain their population growth (the current impression is that they are multiplying as much as possible and don't hesitate to use children as civilian shields. Of course orthodox jews also multiply as much as they can but Palestinians are winning in the demographic war). The Palestinians must build a society with several democratic parties, reject extreme islamism and accept Israel. My feeling is that they must break the vicious circle, and therefore really force Israel to make peace. The problem with one acceptable party (Fatah) is that people get sick of it (I would) and finally vote for the only opposition which happens to be Hamas. Even non-extremists will do that if there is no other option. The West Bank should not only have Fatah, but the opposition should not be radical islamists. The problem of Territory and the Refugee problem are huge enough that we not have extremists in the way. Egypt is a problem also. Were I a poor Egyptian I'd probably be tempted by the muslim brotherhood, because there is probably no real opposition. It's a mess.

yes, another liberal, do

yes, another liberal, do nothing happening in the west bank. public ignorance is not limited to the usa! a more realistic article might have talked about the dumbing down of the west bank people. it might have talked about the fear of the people who are probably still reverberating from the isreali assault on ramallah not so long ago. it might have talked about the idea of a 3rd intifada as part of the strategy to bring isreali to heel and force a real peace initiative. there are lots of things that could have been discussed. but no, this article finds a palestinian who has been dumbed down to think hamas breached the truce, not knowing that isreal spent 6 months planning this assault and its november bombings in gaza were designed to cause reaction by hamas as the excuse for the planned major military assault. and then it goes on to talk about the thoughtfulness of the west bank palestinians who try to organize aid on the internet, noting how beaten their hope is. abbas' term is up and it seems there isn't even any hope for an election to get rid of him! this article is useless in dealing with the situation except to direct others into the same do nothing state.

Thanks @ john doraemi for

Thanks @ john doraemi for pointing out one of all too many pro-Israel and anti-Hamas spins. Another in this article is “Hamas seized control of Gaza in June 2007”. In fact, after Hamas won elections in Gaza that were internationally judged as free and fair, the US and Little Brother cut off all aid to Gaza and urged Fatah to use force to replace Hamas’ security forces with their own. Fatah tried but were routed by Hamas. Since when is a democratically elected government defending itself against a violent coup attempt by its defeated electoral rival a case of “seizing control”, or, as elsewhere, a coup? This is not so say Hamas is perfect, although they are the only organization that has long provided Gazans with food, water, electricity, and education. Not only is the invasion of Gaza a case of asymmetric warfare it is also a case of wildly asymmetric blame. I urge everyone to read Steve Niva’s excellent and careful account of the events leading up to the invasion, “War of Choice” originally in “Foreign Affairs in Focus”, available at commondreams.org for 8 Jan. It is the best antidote to the pro-Israeli poison being spread almost everywhere else. Once you’ve read it, you know that El Abed’s well-founded despair at the end of this article is just what Israel and the US have been aiming for.

I guess that if the "bad

I guess that if the "bad guys" win an election it is called " seizing control". And therefore we are justified in all and any kind of actions to balance the democratic outcome. Seems to me that we have a long record in this kind of behaviour would it only be in Chile or Argentina or Viet-Nam or any other dozens of countries that "played the democratic game" but not to our liking. We are just the biggest bullies on the block ... for now.