Share

Obama Preparing Order to Close Guantanamo

by: Lara Jakes  |  The Associated Press

photo
An executive order closing Guantanamo could come early as next week. (Photo: AP)

    Washington - President-elect Barack Obama is preparing to issue an executive order his first week in office - and perhaps his first day - to close the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, according to two presidential transition team advisers.

    It's unlikely the detention facility at the Navy base in Cuba will be closed anytime soon. In an interview last weekend, Obama said it would be "a challenge" to close it even within the first 100 days of his administration.

    But the order, which one adviser said could be issued as early as Jan. 20, would start the process of deciding what to do with the estimated 250 al-Qaida and Taliban suspects and potential witnesses who are being held there. Most have not been charged with a crime.

    The Guantanamo directive would be one of a series of executive orders Obama is planning to issue shortly after he takes office next Tuesday, according to the two advisers. Also expected is an executive order about certain interrogation methods, but details were not immediately available Monday.

    The advisers spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the orders that have not yet been finalized.

    Obama transition team spokeswoman Brooke Anderson declined comment Monday.

    The American Civil Liberties Union called the order an important first step, but demanded details on how Guantanamo will be shuttered.

    "What we need are specifics about the timeline for the shuttering of the military commissions and the release or charging of detainees who have been indefinitely held for years," ACLU Executive Director Anthony Romero said in a statement. "An executive order lacking such detail, especially after the transition team has had months to develop a comprehensive plan on an issue this important, would be insufficient."

    The two advisers said the executive order will direct the new administration to look at each of the cases of the Guantanamo detainees to see whether they can be released or if they should still be held - and if so, where.

    Many of the Guantanamo detainees are cleared for release, and others could be sent back to their native countries and held there. But many nations have resisted Bush administration efforts to repatriate the prisoners back home. Both Obama advisers said it's hoped that nations that had initially resisted taking detainees will be more willing to do so after dealing with the new administration.

    What remains the thorniest issue for Obama, the advisers said, is what to do with the rest of the prisoners - including at least 15 so-called "high value detainees" considered among the most dangerous there.

    Detainees held on U.S. soil would have certain legal rights that they were not entitled to while imprisoned in Cuba. It's also not clear if they would face trial through the current military tribunal system, or in federal civilian courts, or though a to-be-developed legal system that would mark a hybrid of the two.

    Where to imprison the detainees also is a problem.

    Obama promised during the presidential campaign to shut Guantanamo, endearing him to constitutional law experts, civil libertarians and other critics who called the Bush administration detentions a violation of international law.

    But he acknowledged in an interview Sunday that the process of closing the prison would be harder and longer than initially thought.

    "That's a challenge," Obama said on ABC's "This Week." "I think it's going to take some time and our legal teams are working in consultation with our national security apparatus as we speak to help design exactly what we need to do.

    "But I don't want to be ambiguous about this," he said. "We are going to close Guantanamo and we are going to make sure that the procedures we set up are ones that abide by our constitution."

    President George W. Bush established military tribunals to prosecute detainees at Guantanamo. He also supports closing the prison, but strongly opposes bringing prisoners to the United States.

    Lawmakers have moved to block transfer of the detainees to at least two potential and frequently discussed military facilities: an Army prison at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., and a Navy brig in Charleston, S.C. A Marine Corps prison at Camp Pendleton in Southern California also is under consideration, a Pentagon official said.

    Sen. Sam Brownback, R-Kan., said Monday that "it's hard to show why terror suspects should be housed in Kansas."

    "If the holding facility at Guantanamo Bay is closed, a new facility should be built, designed specifically to handle detainees," Brownback said in a statement.

    A Pentagon team also has been looking at how to shut Guantanamo and move its detainees, but spokesman Bryan Whitman did not immediately know Monday whether it was completed.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

OK, let's build a special

OK, let's build a special prison that institutionalizes the holding of terror suspects that haven't been charged with crimes. That will send a strong message to future terrorists. But the message it will send, Senator Brownback, is that terrorists are the most important criminals we know of and deserve their own facility, an honor bestowed on no others. Isn't that what Gitmo is now?

The place on this planet now

The place on this planet now most famous for reconciliation is South Africa. We need to know the stories of these detainees. It probably cannot happen in the U.S. I will not enumerate the reasons here. People who read truthout will have plenty of their own. What went on in South Africa was a human step way beyond the trials after WWII. It is the deep practice of reconciliation that is needed now. I cannot think of anywhere more experienced with that than South Africa. South Africa now has cultural diversity among all the world's major religions, who could all learn and participate in a search for truth and reconciliation, bringing needed material resources to a place with a challenging refugee situation right now. If we are to learn from our horrific recent history, we must find a place where truth can be exposed from many different perspectives and where the goal of getting beyond incoherence and anger can happen. Developing an ability to wrangle in words can be held constantly as important in the process if this happens in a place with experience in this immensely difficult process. Switzerland used to be held as a place of neutrality. We are in a new era where we need to get beyond neutrality and to a place where the betterment of the entire planet can be held in mind as negotiations go on. South Africa's struggles should not have been in vain. The skills developed there are valuable to the human race, though I recognize that calling humans a race is a bit of a stretch. When I have to fill out a form, I still put human in the blank, even though I realize that is not the answer governments want.

Do we really want to build

Do we really want to build Dachau on the Missouri?

The last great hope we have

The last great hope we have for all major news headlines: GUILTY! TODAY MARKS A GREAT MOMENT IN HISTORY AS BUSH AND CHENEY AND THEIR CO-CONSPIRATORS WERE FOUND GUILTY OF WAR CRIMES AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY IN A UNANIMOUS DECISION OF JUDGES IN THE INTERNATIONAL COURT AT THE HAGUE. UNPRECEDENTED NUMBERS OF PEOPLE GATHERED IN ALL THE MAJOR CITIES AND TOWNS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD TO CELEBRATE THE VICTORY OF JUSTICE AND TO SEND THE MESSAGE THAT ALL TYRANTS THAT COMMIT WAR CRIMES AND CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY WILL BE BROUGHT TO JUSTICE, AND AS IN THIS CASE AGAINST THE MOST POWERFUL POLITICIANS, NO ONE WILL BE EXEMPT FROM THE LAW! OK...the chances for these headlines to show up are unlikely to say the least...but I found the fantasy quite therapeutic nonetheless!

Guantanomo serves an

Guantanomo serves an extremely important service to this country and shouldn't be closed just for the sake of a few liberal voices. The prisoners lodged there are safe,well fed,allowed religious freedom among others and should appreciate the fact that they are not dead and fulfilling the alleged role of a martyr. This is a war like no other,no uniforms,no borders,no full cooperation,war in the name or guise of religion,no ethics and besides, where are you going to put the masterminds of this major terrorist plot if and when they are captured alive. I personally hope that they are not captured alive since I don't want to see or have my friends and relatives see the hoard of liberal voices emerge to see that these culprits get rights that they are not entitled to considering the unhumane acts they have commited.

To Walt Rosendale: If you

To Walt Rosendale: If you would stop identifying with the corporate-run United States and recognize that we could conduct ourselves in a much more intelligent way internationally there could be a lot fewer people who hate us and want to do us harm. The people of the US are not synonymous with Haliburton or Exxon/Mobil; our "national interest" is not to make the world safe for them to rip off the nations with oil. Our interest is to use our minds to create alternatives to oil. We've got to get out of this "zero-sum game" mentality. We do not know if those still detained at Gitmo are even guilty of anything but being picked up on an Arab street and sent into rendition. All we have is Bush's and Cheney's word for it. Isn't it clear that they are the ones not to be trusted? Isn't it clear that the economy has gone to hell not because of the US citizens but because certain businessmen got Phil Gramm to change the laws so they could speculate the country and the world into an economic disaster?

What about the 17 prison

What about the 17 prison ships? When will they be closed? http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/jun/02/usa.humanrights