Share

Gray Wolves to Lose Endangered Status

by: Jim Tankersley  |  The Los Angeles Times

photo
The Interior Department has taken away federal protection for wolves in Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan, Idaho and Montana. (Photo: Sierra Club)

    The Bush administration will remove wolves in Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan, Idaho and Montana from the endangered species list. Environmentalists hope Obama will reverse the action, or they'll sue.

    Washington - Bush administration officials said Wednesday that they would remove gray wolves in the Midwest and the northern Rocky Mountains from the endangered species list - the latest, but probably not last, chapter in the wolf's on-again, off-again federal protection.

    The Interior Department decision would apply to wolves in Wisconsin, Minnesota, Michigan, Idaho and Montana. It would maintain protections for wolves in Wyoming, where the department says state officials haven't done enough to ensure the wolves' continued recovery.

    An Interior Department official told reporters that the decision represented a victory for conservation efforts.

    But the move, less than a week before President Bush leaves office, could be short-lived. Environmental groups hope President-elect Barack Obama will quickly reverse it after his inauguration. If he doesn't, the groups, which have blocked previous efforts to delist the wolf in court, say they'll sue again.

    Obama spokesman Nick Shapiro said Wednesday that the president-elect "will review all 11th-hour regulations and will address them once he is president." A Senate committee could shed more light on the issue today when it questions Obama's choice for Interior secretary, Sen. Ken Salazar (D-Colo.).

    The gray wolf, a symbol of the nation's wild heritage to some but the bane of ranchers and livestock, is fiercely debated in the West. The wolves once roamed most of the continental United States but had largely vanished before the Clinton administration began reintroducing them in the mid-1990s, starting in Yellowstone National Park.

    Populations grew quickly, and a decade after reintroduction, Bush officials tried several times to remove the wolf from the endangered species list but were thwarted by court rulings.

    "It's kind of the Guantanamo Bay of wildlife management," said Jonathan Lovvorn, chief counsel of the Humane Society of the United States. "These guys have tried over the last eight years to come up with a reason that it's legal, but they still can't do it."

    Environmentalists said Wednesday's decision wouldn't survive a challenge either. The wolf population in the northern Rockies isn't large enough to be considered "recovered," said Andrew Wetzler, director of the endangered species program for the Natural Resources Defense Council.

    And, he added, "as a legal boundary, they can't be not endangered in Idaho and Montana but endangered in Wyoming."

    The wolf is perhaps the highest-profile example of a continuing court battle between environmentalists and the Bush administration over endangered species.

    On Wednesday, the Center for Biological Diversity fired a final shot of sorts, suing or declaring its intent to sue over the handling of 19 species, including the San Bernardino kangaroo rat and the Colorado River cutthroat trout.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Author failed to note, as

Author failed to note, as many others fail to mention that these ranchers are grazing their livestock on public lands for pennies on the dollar for the cost of private range land. If the ranchers want to use public lands on the cheap than they need to live with the loss of a few sheep to wolves.

It is clear that whatever

It is clear that whatever the outcome of the wolf status controversy, all political appointees Bush made in the Interior Department are now endangered species.

First off, I am not a

First off, I am not a supporter of the Bush Administration and I distrust just about everything they do and stand for. I can't comment on other states, but I have followed the wolf recovery program here in Wisconsin since its inception and it has been, as Interior claims, a conservation success story -- when a critically endangered (in our case, extirpated) species such as the wolf can be brought back to its current population levels, it most certainly is a success. However, the population goals set by wildlife managers, based upon habitat considerations, have been far exceeded, and that is now becoming the problem. From my understanding, and I may be wrong, the only way the population can be controlled and brought back to safer, healthier levels in the state is if the wolf is removed first from the federal endangered species list. Then our Department of Natural Resources can better regulate and manage a viable, healthy population. And, yes, this may required allowing a regulated hunt (we have hunted deer here for many years and still had a million-plus deer in the state this fall -- plus our deer habitat is healthy, as well). We now have black bears throughout the state where 30 years ago they were not. This is, like with the wolf and elk in Wisconsin, really cool! But, we don't want their population, or that of the wolf, to reach points where, due to resulting scarce natural foods, it leads them to start doing things that are hazardous to humans, pets, or farm animals and lands. When that happens, we lose, and so do they. I know other states have situations Wisconsin does not (public grazing lands, etc.), but if Wisconsin was given control of its wolf population by removal from the endangered list, I believe it would manage the wolf for the benefit of its long-term survival.

There's a million sheep out

There's a million sheep out there, and a few dozen wolves. Let's get real about this. Wolves should be protected from being killed until it is absolutely positive that they won't be made permanently extinct.