Share

Agriculture Nominee Vilsack Splits the Organic Community

by:   |  Environmental News Service

photo
Small organic farmers and opponents of genetically engineered crops have concerns about Agriculture Department nominee Tom Vilsack. (Photo: Christine Baker / The Patriot-News)

    Washington, DC - Agriculture Secretary nominee Tom Vilsack had no problem winning over both Democrat and Republican members of the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee during his confirmation hearing today, but he has not done as well with the growers and consumers of organic foods.

    A trial lawyer and two-term Iowa governor from 1999 to 2007, Vilsack owns a 590-acre Iowa farm, about half of which is planted to crops. He told the committee he supports federal programs that assist organic agriculture, but he has not managed to persuade the consumers of organic foods that he can be trusted to safeguard their interests.

    In the past, Vilsack has supported the genetic engineering of crops, which is viewed as a threat by organic farmers who cannot get organic certification for their produce if it is contaminated by pollen drift from transgenic crops. Official policy of the Agriculture Department is that genetically engineered crops need not be regulated or labeled.

    Some in the organic community also see Vilsack as a friend of corporate agribusiness interests, and they have mounted a petition drive to express their opposition to his nomination.

    The Organic Consumers Association says it is "disappointed in this controversial appointment" of Vilsack and has gathered over 100,000 emails and petition signatures from organic consumers and farmers objecting to the appointment of the man they call a "biotech and biofuels booster."

    This association has been drumming up support for a request to President-elect Barack Obama to "move beyond agribusiness as usual" by drafting Jim Riddle to head the USDA Agricultural Marketing Service, the department that oversees organic food, farming, and standards.

    Riddle is an organic farmer from Minnesota, former chair of the National Organic Standards Board, and a longtime advocate for sustainable and organic farming.

    "With Riddle heading up the AMS, farmers markets, community supported agriculture, transition to organic programs, and the National Organic Program will finally receive the attention, technical assistance, and funding they deserve," said the Organic Consumers Association in a statement.

    In response, a group of the organic industry's corporate executives has launched its own petition drive in support of Vilsack.

    Officers of some of the largest corporate entities like Whole Foods, Stonyfield and United Natural Foods Inc., have signed on in support. Their petition, with about 500 signatories, includes many Iowa residents familiar with Vilsack when he was governor.

    In a letter to the Obama transition team, The Cornucopia Institute, an advocacy group for family farmers, described the USDA's National Organic Program, NOP, as "dysfunctional" and asked for the Obama administration to make its rehabilitation a priority.

    The letter described the NOPs long-standing adversarial relationship with the majority of organic farmers and consumers and the groups that represent them. It said, "Senior management, with oversight of the NOP, has treated industry stakeholders arrogantly and disrespectfully and has overridden NOP career staff when their findings might have been unfavorable to corporations with interests in the organic industry."

    "We were and still are optimistic that when Mr. Obama talked about 'change' during his campaign, that he included a shift away from corporate agribusiness domination at the USDA," said Mark Kastel, a farm policy analyst at The Cornucopia Institute.

    Organic farmers and consumers have many environmental concerns, among them genetic crop engineering, pest control, clean and sufficient water supplies, hormones in milk, manure management, the decline of pollinators such as honeybees, labeling of organic products, land use for biofuels, and a warming climate.

    In his introductory remarks, committee chairman Senator Tom Harkin of Iowa raised the issue of organic foods, pointing out that "the demand for locally-grown and organic foods continues to grow - the fastest growing part of the food chain - providing new and expanding opportunities in rural communities."

    Vilsack told the committee that if he becomes the next U.S. Secretary of Agriculture, he will promote renewable energy as a way to boost the rural economy.

    The nominee mentioned "global climate change," a reduction in U.S. forest lands and the health care crisis as issues he intends to tackle.

    "All of these serious challenges require a compelling new vision for the department, with the attention, dedication and leadership to make it happen," Vilsack said. "The president-elect has called on each of us to meet these challenges."

    Iowa Senator Chuck Grassley, a Republican member of the Senate Agriculture Committee, predicted Vilsack's confirmation would be "swift and speedy."

  

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

The appointment of this

The appointment of this corporate hack to such a crucial environmental position registers as a black mark on the soul of this country and its need for urgent change in the field of agricultural practices. When it comes to knowledge about sustainable agriculture, Obama clearly is a buffoon, "consciously" choosing the continued use of pesticides, herbicides and insecticides over organic farming methods. Can you believe this ignorance?

"Vilsack has supported the

"Vilsack has supported the genetic engineering of crops, which is viewed as a threat..." So now he's a threat, too. And so is BO, if he keeps picking losers.

That Vilsack may support

That Vilsack may support corporate agriculture over sustainable agriculture and more importantly, consumers, is a valid point to argue about. This is something that does have an effect on real people and real situations. The bit about GM crops is not, however, a valid objection. It is more a religious objection similar to the creationists twisting themselves into logical pretzels trying to disprove evolution. Remember that several generations ago grafting fruit trees was also an abomination that was contra God's established order as well. I'm reminded of Shelley's Frankenstein where Dr. Frankenstein created a living being that had the potential to be a boon to the peasantry, but because of their ignorance and intolerance, they elected to continue living miserable existences and drove the critter away.

It doesn't 'split' the

It doesn't 'split' the organic community. Agribusiness in disguise as Whole Foods has never been a real part of the organic community nor the Union community. The organic community has labored tirelessly to protect standards, educate about true sustainability by growing locally and organically. See this one woman take on the giants. I have simply have enough!

Anyone who believes GM food

Anyone who believes GM food is safe to eat should take an Intoduction to Biology course.

The voice of the people is

The voice of the people is truly an organic one and by the time it gets to senators and representatives of the state, a certain pollution has occurred and we scratch our heads wondering how that could have happened. The theme I see happening here is getting the fox to watch over the chicken coup. He seems like he's strong and capable and very eager to take on the job. Grey issues "should" first be resolved to clear issues before "positions" are filled. Vilsec is clearly a fox, or a wolf in sheeps clothing.