Share

TARP II: Money for Banks, Not Homeowners

by: Dean Baker, t r u t h o u t | Perspective

photo
A woman waits in line to receive counseling regarding foreclosure on her home. (Photo: Getty Images)

    TARP II, the second helping of $350 billion that is supposed to restore the health of our financial system, will soon be dished out by the Obama administration. Ostensibly, much of this money will go to help homeowners stay in their homes. But, as is the case with many Washington policies, this money is also going to end up in the bankers' pockets.

    The basic deal is simple. More than ten million homeowners are underwater, owing more than the market value of their home. Millions of these homeowners have fallen behind on their mortgages and now face foreclosure.

    But, under TARP II, the Treasury rushes to the rescue, buying up the current mortgage at far more than the market value. It then issues a new mortgage that reflects the market value of the home, which allows the homeowner to stay in their home.

    Depending on the price decline of the house, the Treasury can easily be handing $30,000, $40,000, even $50,000 to the banks so that a homeowner can stay in a home in which he/she has little or no equity. This is a great deal for the banks, but it is not very helpful to homeowners, and just about the worst use of money that the Washington policy wonks ever produced.

    This is not to attack the idea of helping homeowners. Millions of people listened to the politicians, the policy wonks and even nonprofits, who told them that buying a home in a bubble-inflated market was a good way to build wealth. Almost all the wizards who gave this advice still have their high-paying jobs, but the people who took the advice are underwater in their mortgages and facing foreclosure.

    People should perhaps know better than to listen to the "experts," but unfortunately, most do not. It is fair to try to give a hand to those who got taken. There are simple, no-cost ways to do this, as I have pointed out in the past.

    The most obvious way to help these homeowners is to temporarily change the foreclosure process so that people would have the right to stay in their homes as renters for a substantial period of time, paying the market rent. This requires no taxpayer dollars, no new bureaucracy and it can take effect the day Congress passes it. In addition to giving former homeowners security in their home, it also gives bankers a real incentive to negotiate terms to allow homeowners to stay in their house as homeowners, since banks do not want to become landlords.

    Along the same lines, Congress can change the bankruptcy law to allow judges to alter the terms of mortgage debts as part of a bankruptcy, just as is done with other debts. While this will provide limited help to a limited number of homeowners, it is likely that Congress will at least pass this measure.

    But the method of "helping homeowners" that draws the most enthusiasm in Washington policy circles these days is handing tens of billions of dollars to banks for their bad mortgages. There should be no mistake that this is exactly what the TARP II plan is all about.

    Banks can already get market value for their mortgages under the Hope for Homeowners legislation approved by Congress last summer. But, there is no reason they should accept market value when the Democrats in Congress are prepared to hand them tens of billions of dollars above market value.

    If the point is to help homeowners, there is a really simple way to restructure the plan. When the government has worked out a deal with the bank, it can then offer to just give the homeowner the same amount. This means that if the government was prepared to give a bank $250,000 for a mortgage on a home that is currently appraised at $200,000, that it offers to hand the homeowner the $50,000 difference ($250,000 minus $200,000) before the deal goes through. This would mean that we give the homeowner the option of pocketing the $50,000 that we would otherwise be giving to banks.

    Is this fair? Well, people can debate how much help we think is appropriate to give to the homeowners who got nailed by the crash of the housing bubble, but it certainly makes more sense to help the homeowners than to help the banks who made bad mortgages.

    At this point, it seems that Congress is intent on handing tens of billions of taxpayers' dollars to the banks under the guise of helping homeowners. The public should insist that if the point is to help homeowners, then the homeowners should be the ones receiving the checks, not the banks.

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.

  

»


Dean Baker is a macroeconomist and co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington, DC. He previously worked as a senior economist at the Economic Policy Institute and an assistant professor at Bucknell University. He is a regular Truthout columnist and a member of Truthout's Board of Advisers.

Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.

the American dream has

the American dream has ended; this is the beginning of the end; EU will emerge as the top world economy; why?; because EU is the most flexible with its states adjusting individually to this crisis and the most proved idea will be implemented into most of their states as in US the Banksters will just keep robbing the tax-payers until there's nothing more to rob or better yet Martial Law is instituted; my advise: when your unemployment ends leave US as soon as you can

If you allow people to stay

If you allow people to stay in their homes as renters, who pays the taxes and who pays the inevitable maintainance that will be needed? This proposal doesn't seem to work.

Sheila Bair of the FDIC has

Sheila Bair of the FDIC has been doing an outstanding job with the problems at IndyMac. The government should follow her lead.

Back in December, Jonathan

Back in December, Jonathan Laing of Barron’s proposed refinancing all existing homeowner’s mortgages at a 4.5% flat rate, which would have the advantages of boosting disposable income by reducing monthly payments and cushioning the decline in housing prices for all homeowners. This is much fairer than limiting assistance to those who are delinquent or in foreclosure, many of whom bear at least some responsibility for their predicament; those homeowners who have continued to make timely mortgage payments in the midst of the recession are also those who will be paying most of the cost of any bailout package.

America is giving money to

America is giving money to rich bankers rather than the deserving poor? Hard to believe! My only hope is that these idle rich will become the idle poor real soon. And I have a new idea: limit profits to the inflation rate plus 2%. This way people who invest in the likes of Madoff and other hedge fund geniuses, rather than collect their 20 % interest over a 30 year period will have to get by with a mere pittance. This will be the end of the bubbles that plague capitalism and give the working stiff an even break.

I am all for helping people

I am all for helping people stay in their homes but not for the people thinking they would get rich quick by slipping houses which is one of the reason we are in the mess we are in.

What happens to those of us

What happens to those of us who have NOT been irresponsible with investing, or with home flipping, or buying into idiotic lending schemes, those of us who did everything right? Those of us who have been paying mortgages that we will soon be having difficulty managing because of the trashed economy that the others wrecked? What happens to us? My wife and I have a 30 year mortgage at 6+% that we have been faithfully paying on since 1996. I have taken second jobs, sacrificed vacations, bought used cars, whatever I had to do to make those payments on time, and without a gap. I am an artist, and right now, through no fault of mine, no one feels like buying paintings. My wife is working part time because her company scaled back. She is looking for another full time, but so are MILLIONS of others. I hear a lot of help promised for those who fell for predatory lending nonsense to stay in their homes, but what about those of us who may be forced out because we cannot continue to pay because of the loss of income? We may be just as homeless, or maybe even more so...

Please read the column in

Please read the column in the New York Times today (1/19/'09) by the Nobel prize winner in economics, Paul Krugman. He has it all figured out!

Space-age mud and wattle is

Space-age mud and wattle is so low cost that shelter can be built for 1/3 the delivered cost of a Red Cross tent, per unit of area. Shelter is as much a human right as the freedom to enjoy a healthy and clean planet teaming with wildlife. Forget those huge loans. Don't worry about the democrats giving another 350 billion digital dollars to immortal corporations. Learn to cooperate and get synchronized with people power. Corporate consumerism is reaching a dead end, trillions of newly minted digital dollars will keep politicians busy but they can't see the new economy because sustainability can only arrive via slowly shrinking population and economic output.

Mr Baker, with all due

Mr Baker, with all due respect, the plan is and never was to "help out the homeowners." "The country is governed for the richest, for the corporation, the bankers, the land speculators, and for the exploiters." Helen Keller

i'm sure mr. baker is well

i'm sure mr. baker is well aware that this country is not run for the regular folks, but he said that there's no point in questioning motives, calling people liars or thieves. he just prefers to call them stupid, which indeed will elicit friendlier reactions than 'you're a lying thief!'

I am all for helping people

I am all for helping people stay in their homes but not for the people thinking they would get rich quick by slipping houses which is one of the reason we are in the mess we are in. xrapidser

as the last person stated i

as the last person stated i believe Marshall law is the whole intent on this mess. yes i am a bit of a conspiracy theorist! mandating banks either fix the ARM rates or capping the possible ability to raise them is the way to go. WHEN congress past this bill and the banks took this money it should have been under the stipulation ALL ARMS would either be re evaluated or fixed..... ALL OF THEM. we gave the banks money for nothing and the chicks for free the way i see it now. they have the loot and just buried it somewhere without an "X: so when congress asks where they can shrug their shoulders. the best and MOST financially intelligent route is the refi everyone to fixed affordable rates. this will keep the foreclosure market down, more expendable money within the household to spur the economy and keep more individuals off assistance. people can say "hey these borrowers knew what they were getting into" but sadly not a lot of them did. and when you tell people their whole life "no reward without risk" and then hand them a drowsy dream they will sure enough be easily convinced its divine intervention.