Share

The Union Way Up

by: Robert B. Reich  |  The Los Angeles Times

photo
Mechanic Paul Cook works on a Ford at a dealership in Warren, Michigan. (Photo: Reuters)

    America and its faltering economy need unions to restore prosperity to the middle class.

    Why is this recession so deep, and what can be done to reverse it?

    Hint: Go back about 50 years, when America's middle class was expanding and the economy was soaring. Paychecks were big enough to allow us to buy all the goods and services we produced. It was a virtuous circle. Good pay meant more purchases, and more purchases meant more jobs.

    At the center of this virtuous circle were unions. In 1955, more than a third of working Americans belonged to one. Unions gave them the bargaining leverage they needed to get the paychecks that kept the economy going. So many Americans were unionized that wage agreements spilled over to nonunionized workplaces as well. Employers knew they had to match union wages to compete for workers and to recruit the best ones.

    Fast forward to a new century. Now, fewer than 8% of private-sector workers are unionized. Corporate opponents argue that Americans no longer want unions. But public opinion surveys, such as a comprehensive poll that Peter D. Hart Research Associates conducted in 2006, suggest that a majority of workers would like to have a union to bargain for better wages, benefits and working conditions. So there must be some other reason for this dramatic decline.

    But put that question aside for a moment. One point is clear: Smaller numbers of unionized workers mean less bargaining power, and less bargaining power results in lower wages.

    It's no wonder middle-class incomes were dropping even before the recession. As our economy grew between 2001 and the start of 2007, most Americans didn't share in the prosperity. By the time the recession began last year, according to an Economic Policy Institute study, the median income of households headed by those under age 65 was below what it was in 2000.

    Typical families kept buying only by going into debt. This was possible as long as the housing bubble expanded. Home-equity loans and refinancing made up for declining paychecks. But that's over. American families no longer have the purchasing power to keep the economy going. Lower paychecks, or no paychecks at all, mean fewer purchases, and fewer purchases mean fewer jobs.

    The way to get the economy back on track is to boost the purchasing power of the middle class. One major way to do this is to expand the percentage of working Americans in unions.

    Tax rebates won't work because they don't permanently raise wages. Most families used the rebate last year to pay off debt - not a bad thing, but it doesn't keep the virtuous circle running.

    Bank bailouts won't work either. Businesses won't borrow to expand without consumers to buy their goods and services. And Americans themselves can't borrow when they're losing their jobs and their incomes are dropping.

    Tax cuts for working families, as President Obama intends, can do more to help because they extend over time. But only higher wages and benefits for the middle class will have a lasting effect.

    Unions matter in this equation. According to the Department of Labor, workers in unions earn 30% higher wages - taking home $863 a week, compared with $663 for the typical nonunion worker - and are 59% more likely to have employer-provided health insurance than their nonunion counterparts.

    Examples abound. In 2007, nearly 12,000 janitors in Providence, R.I., New Hampshire and Boston, represented by the Service Employees International Union, won a contract that raised their wages to $16 an hour, guaranteed more work hours and provided family health insurance. In an industry typically staffed by part-time workers with a high turnover rate, a union contract provided janitors with full-time, sustainable jobs that they could count on to raise their families' - and their communities' - standard of living.

    In August, 65,000 Verizon workers, represented by the Communications Workers of America, won wage increases totaling nearly 11% and converted temporary jobs to full-time status. Not only did the settlement preserve fully paid healthcare premiums for all active and retired unionized employees, but Verizon also agreed to provide $2 million a year to fund a collaborative campaign with its unions to achieve meaningful national healthcare reform.

    Although America and its economy need unions, it's become nearly impossible for employees to form one. The Hart poll I cited tells us that 57 million workers would want to be in a union if they could have one. But those who try to form a union, according to researchers at MIT, have only about a 1 in 5 chance of successfully doing so.

    The reason? Most of the time, employees who want to form a union are threatened and intimidated by their employers. And all too often, if they don't heed the warnings, they're fired, even though that's illegal. I saw this when I was secretary of Labor over a decade ago. We tried to penalize employers that broke the law, but the fines are minuscule. Too many employers consider them a cost of doing business.

    This isn't right. The most important feature of the Employee Free Choice Act, which will be considered by the just-seated 111th Congress, toughens penalties against companies that violate their workers' rights. The sooner it's enacted, the better - for U.S. workers and for the U.S. economy.

    The American middle class isn't looking for a bailout or a handout. Most people just want a chance to share in the success of the companies they help to prosper. Making it easier for all Americans to form unions would give the middle class the bargaining power it needs for better wages and benefits. And a strong and prosperous middle class is necessary if our economy is to succeed.

    --------

    Robert B. Reich, former U.S. secretary of Labor, is professor of public policy at UC Berkeley and the author, most recently, of "Supercapitalism."

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Reich is right. We won't

Reich is right. We won't restore the middle class until we restore the strength of labor unions. We also need to strengthen consumer cooperatives, including housing co-ops, food co-ops and credit unions. We have suffered anti-middle class war for a couple of decades. It is time we defended ourselves against the overpaid corporate executives.

Will wonders never cease?!

Will wonders never cease?! Someone actually acknowledging that unions are needed if this capitalist system is going to work for more than just the uber wealthy! Now if we can just get Congress to recognize it too.

Someone(s) in the last

Someone(s) in the last thirty years or so did a number on the American public, psychologically speaking. So many younger people thought (and maybe still think) that unions are for chumps -- that anyone who's worth anything doesn't need a union to stand up for him/her. They didn't and don't understand what unions contributed in the past. That said, union leaders have been awful and we need a working people's union instead of all these ineffectual ones who have rolled over and play dead. We need unions in the style of Europe -- unafraid to go en masse into the streets and make life inconvenient for the few who aren't unionized.

You need global unions, or

You need global unions, or you need repeal of NAFTA. Otherwise, the tax code, etc., will continue to support corporations moving much manufacturing & other work outside the US, continuing the notorious, "race to the bottom." Employee Free Choice Act would help in this area, as will chaning the NLRB back from Bush's hate the worker mode to a fairer agency/board, in addition to once again enforcing work rules (OSHA) something else Bush decided wasn't necessary (that's why so many miners died during his administration).

I don't know if unions are

I don't know if unions are the answer, but I agree with the earning, spending cycle you speak of and the fact that middle income (now actually low income) workers are at the heart of the answer and that middle class Americans are NOT looking for a handout. If your looking for answers, as everybody is, here are just two easy solutions that would solve many problems: Share the work- Establish the 30 hr workweek across the nation, with all overtime as double time. That will solve the unemployment problem by making a 25% increased demand for man-hours. That demand will drive wages up slightly and make up for individuals lost income. At the same time the improved productivity of having 25% more people sharing the same workload, and increased motivation and attitudes of employees, will offset the costs to employers and create a more level playing field. Make the tax base fair- At todays cost of living, an individual supporting his or herself making under 25,000 a year, or a couple making under 35,000 combined, or a family of 4 making under 45,000 combined should not pay any taxes at all or even have to file. Anybody who thinks that’s not fair does not remember what it’s like to start out or to actually earn your living the hard and honorable way. In simple terms, just start making laws that are fair, quit bleeding the low income working class so they can actually afford a place to live, level the playing field, period.

In this hard economic time

In this hard economic time and with a renewed emphasis on service, unions must do more than just 'stand in the schoolhouse door' protecting existing jobs. Why not engage and encourage them to pair with post-secondary institutions and get more involved with training, retraining, apprenticeships, mentoring: all those positive activities that create new jobs, particularly in the trades - jobs that can't be exported - I mean, look how hard it is to find a good carpenter, mason, electrician, plumber... And look what those jobs are paying!

Anon@02:44 nails it:

Anon@02:44 nails it: "Someone(s) in the last thirty years or so did a number on the American public, psychologically speaking." It wasn't as crude as the Bloom County Sunday strip where Thornhump showed us a chart identifying unions as the cause of Communism, Khadafy, sin and hemmorhoids, but the basic message was the same, and it's become one of the default assumptions of our national conversation. The only thing wrong with Reich's essay is that he puts aside the question of when, how and by whom this was done.

And we have to STOP sending

And we have to STOP sending jobs to slave nations like China.

While American unions may

While American unions may have worked in the past, they have failed to change with the evolving market of doing international business. NAFTA permits the free flow of business and capital NOT people. If unions are to be effective, they must grow beyond national borders as business has to maintain leverage. "Free Trade Agreements" are nothing short of union busting and we all know who voted for that!

I grew up during the Great

I grew up during the Great Depression, and entered the business world in the early 1950's. I was actually THERE, and have been saying for the past ten years that Americans had the best of all possible worlds at that time. Unions were strong, the average worker was paid a living wage - sufficient to support a family, unless the wife WANTED to work. Most people could hope, with a little forethought, to own their own homes and send their kids to college. It seemed altogether a time of prosperity and hope. Of course, that applied mainly to White America - it's true civil rights have made great strides since then. But who can say that progress would not have happened even faster without the machinations of "big business", and the defeat of the workingman?

"NAFTA permits the free flow

"NAFTA permits the free flow of business and capital NOT people..." Exactly the reason that NAFTA and the rest of the Neo-Liberal "free trade" nonsense must DIE! Free trade is only "free" for multinationals; the Working Class pays dearly. The first step to revitalize this nation's working class is to restore the tariffs and trade policies that served us so well from Washington to Carter. Every speck of Reganomics must be scrubbed out of our economic policy.

Apples and oranges? Is Mr.

Apples and oranges? Is Mr. Reich correct in extrapolating from the 1950s US economy to the US economy in 2009? I don't think so and I doubt that we can chalk up our deep recession to the declines of the labor unions. We've been clinging to the notion that we can run our economy based on the principles that were used in 1950, but that is not reality. Reich is right that we have to strengthen labor's voice, but it won't bring back the glory days of our post-WWII boom economy, nor the classic function of labor unions to protect the workers' rights. Today, unions want to cling to the antiquated notion of the American worker circa 1950. This mentality has to change before we can move forward.

The Verizon comment is

The Verizon comment is misleading. Only a portion of the Verizon employees are represented by a union. Verizon has an internal campaign to keep the rest of its employees from joining a union. This extends to the point of separating union and non-union employees. Verizon is heavily involved in outsourcing jobs to Asia and South America.