Share

President Obama Seeks Russia Deal to Slash Nuclear Weapons

by: Tim Reid  |  The Times UK

photo
A spokesman has stated that President Barack Obama will seek an agreement with Russia to significantly reduce the two countries' nuclear weapons stockpiles. (Photo: Senior Airman Javier Cruz Jr. / af.mil)

    The radical new treaty would reduce the number of nuclear warheads to 1,000 each.

    Washington - President Obama will convene the most ambitious arms reduction talks with Russia for a generation, aiming to slash each country's stockpile of nuclear weapons by 80 per cent.

    The radical treaty would cut the number of nuclear warheads to 1,000 each, The Times has learnt. Key to the initiative is a review of the Bush Administration's plan for a US missile defence shield in Eastern Europe, a project fiercely opposed by Moscow.

    Mr Obama is to establish a non-proliferation office at the White House to oversee the talks, expected to be headed by Gary Samore, a non-proliferation negotiator in the Clinton Administration. The talks will be driven by Hillary Clinton's State Department.

    No final decision on the defence shield has been taken by Mr Obama. Yet merely delaying the placement of US missiles in Poland and a radar station in the Czech Republic - which if deployed would cost the US $4 billion annually - removes what has been a major impediment to Russian co-operation on arms reduction.

    Any agreement would put pressure on Britain, which has 160 nuclear warheads, and other nuclear powers to reduce their stockpiles.

    Mr Obama has pledged to put nuclear weapons reduction at the heart of his presidency and his first move will be to reopen talks with Moscow to replace the 1991 US-Soviet Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (Start), which expires in December. Under that pact, the two countries have cut their respective stockpiles from roughly 10,000 to 5,000.

    "We are going to re-engage Russia in a more traditional, legally binding arms reduction process," an official from the Administration said. "We are prepared to engage in a broader dialogue with the Russians over issues of concern to them. Nobody would be surprised if the number reduced to the 1,000 mark for the post-Start treaty."

    Efforts to revive the Start talks were fitful under Mr Bush and complicated by his insistence on building a missile defence shield. "If Obama proceeds down this route, this will be a major departure," one Republican said. "But there will be trouble in Congress."

    The plan is also complicated by the nuclear ambitions of Iran, which launched its first satellite into space yesterday, and North Korea, which is preparing to test a long-range ballistic missile capable of striking the US.

    Mr Obama views the reduction of arms by the US and Russia as critical to efforts to persuade countries such as Iran not to develop the Bomb.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Finally, we have a grown up

Finally, we have a grown up in the White House.

Right On!

Right On!

Awesome. So now USA will

Awesome. So now USA will have 1,000 nuclear warheads, and Russia will still have 6,000. Brilliant.

Read the small print--does

Read the small print--does the deal involve concessions that will further encircle and marginalize Russia. To Russia, these are deal breakers and when Americans make such deals they are merely posturizing. Twas ever thus with American so-called deals from the Baruch Plan onward.

I think reducing the arms of

I think reducing the arms of Israel should be part of the pact too!

This President has done more

This President has done more to restore sanity and honor to this country in one month's time than the White House squatters of the last regime did in eight years. Well done, Mr President! There is much more work yet to be done, but you are off to a very good start. Please keep up the good work. Lovers of peace the world over thank you.

This may be the quid pro quo

This may be the quid pro quo for Russia providing an alternative supply route into Afghanistan. And yes, the reductions will leave more than enough warheads to destroy the world (fill in the blank) times over.

If 1,000 nuclear warheads

If 1,000 nuclear warheads were detonated the world would possibly be uninhabitable. 2,000 would certainly obliterate every power on Earth. (Anybody seen "From Here to Eternity"?) To the complete stupidity of having 10,000 nuclear warheads the fact that our "missile defense shield" has not been shown to be effective (i.e, it can't differentiate between the real thing and a decoy), this is the best news I've heard since the Cuban missile crisis. Every time I saw Bush with that "football" I cringed. At last, a President with some intelligence!

Study the structural damage

Study the structural damage one nuclear warhead could impose. a nation with today's sophisticated warheads would probably only need a maximum 0f 3-4 to wipe a nation (like the United States) off the face of the earth. Obama good sense but I think the idiots ruling the rest of the world should really focus on de-denuclearizing, what's the point of thousands of warheads when three could be sent on over and destroy any possibility of a nation sending theirs over? A thousand could be a good limit though if were were extremely conservative and had the far out fear that every nation would want to destroy us, then we'd probably just want to reserve 3 per nation in the world.. but the logic of that is just ludicrous.

Sanity returns to white

Sanity returns to white house.

The Fate of the Earth by

The Fate of the Earth by Jonathan Schell (1982 Knopf, New York) is still probably the best book written to describe the terrible threat of nuclear policies still active in the United States to this day. Culturally and individually we simply do not have a grasp of what these weapons mean. "human extinction assumes awesome, inapprehensible proportions," Schelle writes. With the exception of the books by Dr. Helen Caldicott, this is arguably the most important book to be written on the terms and consequence of the nuclear weapons polices we are subject to. It corrects decades of secrecy and immense state propaganda that democratic elements of our society have had virtually no hand in shaping. This extremely important book should be a part of the literacy and conscience of every thinking person.

Sanity, Sweet Sanity! Obama

Sanity, Sweet Sanity! Obama keeps pulling these surprises out of his box; like I never heard him mention black site prisons on the campaign trail...so kudos for that also. Now to Israel: by all means cleanup the Nigev desert & eliminate ALL nukes. Either that, or lose all foreign & military aid from the US. If any country in the world has proven time and again that they do not want peace, it is Israel. Their recent actions shooting the fish in the barrel in Gaza is proof enough that they cannot be trusted with any weapons, let alone nukes. It's time the US woke up to what a liability it is to support Israel. If they're God's chosen, then surely He gave them the wits to be self-supporting and to defend themselves.

Thank you for actually

Thank you for actually thinking Prez.

President Obama has the

President Obama has the beginning of the right idea. What is needed however is world wide nonproliferation ans then removal of all nuclear weapons. Nuclear bombs regardless where and when used are the beginning of the end of life on this planet. There will always be some madman like Hitler or Bush to pursue their evil schemes.