Dump the GOP
Friday 13 February 2009
by: William Rivers Pitt, t r u t h o u t | Columnist

(Photo: rutsig / Flickr)
Reader, suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were
a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.
- Mark Twain
Former GOP Congressman Joe Scarborough was doing his MSNBC morning yak-fest on Friday, and made a comment about how President Obama's newly-finalized stimulus package has "greatly offended Republicans." His guests all agreed with solemnly nodding heads, yeah, you're right, Joe, Obama offended the Republicans. Greatly and stuff.
This grim pronouncement came on the heels of GOP Sen. Judd Gregg's stunning announcement that he was withdrawing as Obama's nominee for commerce secretary. Citing irreconcilable differences between himself and the Obama administration on the stimulus bill as well as the upcoming census, Gregg said, "The bottom line is, this was simply a bridge too far for me."
Gregg's sudden announcement delivered a rather significant four-pronged screwing to the Obama administration. First, it stepped all over a news cycle that should have been dominated by a triumphant White House awaiting delivery of the finalized stimulus bill for signature. Second, Gregg's withdrawal let him vote on the final bill, a certain "no" vote. Third, it gave further voice to the preposterous Congressional GOP claims of being shut out of the process by the administration. Fourth, it adds another page to the ever-lengthening storyline of Obama's nomination troubles.
President Obama has not had a great deal of luck dealing with the minority GOP in Congress. From the beginning, GOP members lied outright about the contents of the stimulus package, squealed indignantly for the inclusion of every failed Bush fiscal policy one could name, and in the end, did a fantastic job of gumming up the works and muddying the waters in order to thwart the passage of this bill. That they failed is of little consequence; they made their presence known with far more vigor than their dwindled numbers would seem to allow, and all because President Obama wanted to work in a bi-partisan fashion.
In his inaugural address, he promised to reach out a hand to anyone willing to unclench their fist. The GOP responded not only with clenched fists, but with swinging clenched fists. It seems early to give up already, but facts are facts, and Obama needs to withdraw his hand and just wave these people off.
Consider the following recounting of the stimulus package process, related by Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY) in her diary on the website DailyKos.com:
As Chair of the House Rules Committee, I must clear up untruths regarding the economic recovery package. We've heard a lot of noise across the aisle about how partisan the development of the bill was - that Republicans were blocked from being involved. This is entirely false. In fact, this was one of the most open processes a bill this large has had in over a decade.
They are being disingenuous, or worse. These are the facts:
The bill, as it came to the Rules Committee, the last stop before the floor vote, already incorporated 12 Republican amendments. The Rules Committee then added the 11 amendments: 6 Democratic and 5 Republican, in addition to a complete Republican substitute, and a motion to recommit. They were unable to muster the votes necessary and lost on bipartisan votes. House Republicans may have come together to vote against the final bill, but they split on their own amendments with 40 to 60 Republicans voting with Democrats. Some Republicans even voted against their party's alternative bill, and it failed on the floor.
The Republican alternative didn't have a final price tag, consisted entirely of tax cuts, and would actually raise taxes for 26 million American families. In two years, the Democratic bill would create 3.6 million jobs. The Republican substitute: 1.2 million - a third as many as the Democratic bill that passed the House. President Obama even met with House Republicans more times in two weeks to discuss this legislation than President Bush did with House Democrats in two terms. The Republicans were certainly allowed in the process, but they wanted to obstruct.
Dan Froomkin, writing on Friday morning for the Washington Post's White House Watch blog, examined the Gregg/stimulus GOP crack-up thusly: "The voters sent President Obama to Washington with a mandate to change the way this town works. But yesterday's decision by GOP Sen. Judd Gregg to withdraw as the commerce secretary nominee is the latest sign that the Republican Party has no interest in going along."
"Obama, while aggressively pursuing a traditionally Democratic agenda," he continued, "has nevertheless said that in the long run he and Republicans can find a considerable amount of common ground around shared values and pragmatism. But Gregg's withdrawal is yet more evidence either that Obama underestimated the ideological gulf between the elected officials of the two parties, or that Republicans are getting more rather than less hostile towards efforts to reach out. Or both."
In other words, and to a large measure, this whole thing just is what it is, and the GOP obstructionists are how they are, and President Obama would do well to refrain from battering his head into this particular brick wall.
For the record, here are a few of the items in the stimulus package that left the GOP so greatly offended, per BusinessWeek.com:
$30 billion for a smart power grid, advanced battery technology, and energy efficiency measures.$20 billion in tax incentives for renewable energy and energy efficiency over the next 10 years. Tax credits for families that purchase plug-in hybrid vehicles of up to $7,500.
$5 billion to improve the energy efficiency of more than 1 million homes.
$6.3 billion for increasing energy efficiency in federally supported housing programs.
$3 billion for the National Science Foundation for basic research in fundamental science and engineering. $1.6 billion for the Energy Dept.'s Office of Science, which funds research in such areas as climate science, biofuels, high-energy physics, nuclear physics, and fusion energy sciences . $8.5 billion for the National Institutes of Health, including expanding good jobs in biomedical research to study diseases such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, cancer, and heart disease.
$7 billion for extending broadband services to underserved communities.
$87 billion over the next two years in additional federal matching funds to help states maintain Medicaid programs.
$53.6 billion for a State Fiscal Stabilization Fund-$40.6 billion to local school districts, which can be used for preventing cutbacks, preventing layoffs, school modernization, and other purposes; $5 billion as bonus grants for meeting key performance measures; and $8 billion for public safety and other services.
Higher education tax credit increased to a maximum of $2,500, and makes it available to nearly 4 million low-income students by making it partially refundable
Increases the maximum Pell Grant by $500, for a maximum of $5,350 in 2009 and $5,550 in 2010.
$200 million added to the College Work-Study Program.
$1.1 billion for Early Head Start.
$1 billion for Head Start.
$2 billion for the Child Care Development Block Grant to provide child care services to an additional 300,000 children in low-income families while their parents go to work.
$13 billion for Title I grants to help disadvantaged kids reach high academic standards.
$12.2 billion for special education grants.
$29 billion for modernizing roads and bridges. $18 billion for clean water, flood control, and environmental restoration investments.
$5 billion for improvements in Defense Dept. facilities.
Child tax credit expanded to allow families to begin qualifying for the child tax credit with every dollar earned over $3,000.
Earned Income Tax Credit expanded by providing tax relief to families with three or more children and increasing marriage penalty relief.
New, partially refundable $2,500 tax credit for families. Temporarily suspends taxation of some unemployment benefits. Tax credits for hiring recently discharged unemployed veterans and youth that have been out of work and out of school for the six months prior to hire. New bond-financing program for school construction, rehabilitation, and repair.
Increases unemployment benefits for 20 million jobless workers by $25 per week.
Increases food stamp benefits by 13%.
$100 million for Emergency Food & Shelter to help local community organizations provide food and shelter; $100 million for formula grants to states for elderly nutrition services including Meals on Wheels; and $150 million for the Emergency Food Assistance Program to purchase commodities for food banks to refill emptying shelves.
$4 billion for job training including formula grants for adult job training, dislocated worker job training, and youth services (including funding for summer jobs for young people).
$500 million for Vocational Rehabilitation State Grants to help persons with disabilities.
$500 million to match unemployed individuals to job openings.
$120 million to provide community service jobs to an additional 24,000 low-income older Americans.
Payment of $250 to Social Security beneficiaries, as well as veterans receiving disability compensation and pension benefits from the Veterans Affairs.
There are a few distinct reasons the GOP has decided to get in the way of everything proposed by the Obama administration and the Congressional Democratic majority. They need to appear to be relevant after back-to-back electoral pastings in 2006 and 2008. Because they are better at playing the media game than the Democrats, they can telegraph whatever remaining strengths they have far more effectively.
They need Obama to fail on all fronts if they are to have a prayer at recovering lost ground at the polls in 2010. Finally, they only have representation in states where Bush remains popular and the GOP cant on government remains holy writ, so if they want to keep those few remaining seats, they have to play in the hard-right part of the pool. This is not a group of people Obama should expect anything from beyond what has already been demonstrably in evidence. Hoping for something different is a foolish pipe dream.
President Obama can work with the Democratic Congressional majorities to pass future legislation, perhaps making sure to get one GOP vote in the Senate to thwart a filibuster. If no such vote is forthcoming, he can dump any quixotic quest for one or any GOP votes and dare the GOP to filibuster widely popular bills. He's not going to get GOP support for anything, so why bother trying? Let them keep it up and lose every time, and let them try to stand on that record for the 2010 midterms.
President Obama needs to do the work the people overwhelmingly elected him to do, and if the GOP does not want to be a part of that work, so be it. In the long run, a string of Democrat-only legislative victories will have a dynamic effect on the obstructionist tendencies of the GOP. Sooner or later, they'll come running in whole or in part to Obama's side of the aisle, if only to save themselves. Until then, dump them.



Comments
This is a moderated forum. Â It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.
I never had the urge that
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 19:43 — Anonymous (not verified)Congratulations, Mr. Pitt.
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 19:54 — George Powell (not verified)The GOP is now acting like a
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 19:54 — radline9 (not verified)Grumpy Oligarchical
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 19:55 — RoughAcres (not verified)A bridge TOO FAR for a
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 19:55 — Anonymous (not verified)It is beyond time to "Dump
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 20:03 — Craig Allen Jones (not verified)Never bargain with
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 20:12 — Anonymous (not verified)The Republicans leverage
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 20:13 — E Pluribus Unum (not verified)The GOP be DAMNED! directly
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 20:23 — Anonymous (not verified)Well-said. The Repugnicans
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 20:25 — Anonymous (not verified)Dear Mr. President: Doing
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 20:31 — Anonymous (not verified)General OBSTRUCTIONIST
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 20:38 — LizzardAnn (not verified)Why would anyone pay
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 20:41 — Anonymous (not verified)Out here in New Mexico,
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 20:46 — Robert B. (not verified)“Never try to teach a pig
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 20:50 — DCDarling (not verified)Years ago H. L. Mencken
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 20:51 — Anonymous (not verified)I'm still looking for the
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 20:52 — Anonymous (not verified)Hell yes. Eff the GOP. Eff
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 20:52 — edmi0002 (not verified)I think that Obama's idea of
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 20:53 — Reidar Hansen (not verified)Mr. President, as Mr. Pitt
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 21:02 — Devon Noll, MPA (not verified)Everything the Republicans
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 21:03 — ted tun (not verified)I think the reason Gregg
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 21:04 — JoshuasGrandma (not verified)Yes, Obama has reached out
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 21:05 — Anonymous (not verified)Obama should take the
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 21:06 — David Spaethica (not verified)The DNC should buy space in
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 21:06 — granny (not verified)If the Republicans don't
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 21:08 — Anonymous (not verified)With American socialism
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 21:11 — Bruce (not verified)who do those GOPs think they
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 21:16 — Bob, Atlanta (not verified)Altogether now! Dump the
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 21:20 — Afrothetics (not verified)The lies and deceits of the
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 21:22 — Jefferson Nation (not verified)The Repugs only want Obama
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 21:28 — Anonymous (not verified)The GOP is on self-destruct
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 21:40 — Polpuffin (not verified)This tactic just proves what
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 21:43 — Anonymous (not verified)Mr. President, you tried.
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 21:54 — Steve Newcomb (not verified)The Media, a wholly owned
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 21:57 — Jenna (not verified)Any journalism that centers
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 22:41 — Anonymous (not verified)Time to recognize that you
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 23:04 — Rowland (not verified)If and when the stimulus
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 23:33 — Anonymous (not verified)Let them show themselves to
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 23:38 — Anonymous (not verified)The Twain quote was an
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 23:47 — e&co. (not verified)Maybe, just maybe, Obama is
Fri, 02/13/2009 - 23:54 — SlidingHomeInOregon (not verified)President Obama should
Sat, 02/14/2009 - 00:17 — Anonymous (not verified)Right. The petulant GOP is
Sat, 02/14/2009 - 00:19 — Tom Camfield (not verified)Offended? Republicans are
Sat, 02/14/2009 - 00:23 — NorthOf49 (not verified)President Obama should not
Sat, 02/14/2009 - 00:24 — Anonymous (not verified)Don't be dumb. Just because
Sat, 02/14/2009 - 00:25 — Anonymous (not verified)NOT Republican.
Sat, 02/14/2009 - 00:37 — Anonymous (not verified)Joe Scarbrough's guests
Sat, 02/14/2009 - 00:40 — Anonymous (not verified)Obama is on the right
Sat, 02/14/2009 - 01:08 — Jim Moffat (not verified)Where are the indictments?
Sat, 02/14/2009 - 01:46 — nightwriter (not verified)The voters spoke loudly and
Sat, 02/14/2009 - 01:57 — JD (not verified)When a “Republican”
Sat, 02/14/2009 - 02:31 — Anonymous (not verified)Ha Ha! Mr. Obama is compared
Sat, 02/14/2009 - 04:19 — Anonymous (not verified)"Works and plays well with
Sat, 02/14/2009 - 04:22 — Anonymous (not verified)"Never bargain with
Sat, 02/14/2009 - 04:59 — Anonymous (not verified)Some of these comments
Sat, 02/14/2009 - 10:58 — Anonymous (not verified)What a lot or people didn't
Sat, 02/14/2009 - 14:35 — Anonymous (not verified)Obama is an attorney.
Sat, 02/14/2009 - 15:11 — KSLiberal (not verified)I've really had it with
Sat, 02/14/2009 - 15:54 — L.D. Freitas (not verified)The ONLY Reason Republicans
Sat, 02/14/2009 - 16:35 — Anonymous (not verified)Obama needs to pull a
Sat, 02/14/2009 - 17:26 — Jerry (not verified)The GOP sucks but the
Sat, 02/14/2009 - 18:19 — Anonymous (not verified)It is time that the true
Sat, 02/14/2009 - 18:25 — Natasha (not verified)Has the fact that this is
Sat, 02/14/2009 - 18:34 — Ayleen (not verified)So you're all advocating a
Sat, 02/14/2009 - 18:38 — Anonymous (not verified)Two short and simple points
Sat, 02/14/2009 - 19:33 — Anonymous (not verified)I'm fairly shocked at not
Sat, 02/14/2009 - 19:58 — Seeker of liberty (not verified)One-party government? No
Sat, 02/14/2009 - 21:19 — Anonymous (not verified)You know, the real problem
Sun, 02/15/2009 - 02:04 — Steve (not verified)I am a Democrat. But I do
Sun, 02/15/2009 - 06:35 — Job (not verified)He needs to do more than
Sun, 02/15/2009 - 09:41 — Anonymous (not verified)To those posting here,
Sun, 02/15/2009 - 15:39 — L.D. Freitas (not verified)Wisdom says.....'do not
Sun, 02/15/2009 - 17:06 — The botanist (not verified)The GOP has the mentality
Sun, 02/15/2009 - 17:33 — Anonymous (not verified)The author and the
Sun, 02/15/2009 - 18:50 — FreedomForever (not verified)Hey L.D. Freitas.....Greens
Sun, 02/15/2009 - 20:21 — Yossarian_22 (not verified)Pitt, and the many excellent
Sun, 02/15/2009 - 20:36 — tomo (not verified)DUMP the GOP! ...makes a
Mon, 02/16/2009 - 15:21 — Anonymous (not verified)The GOP has gone back to its
Mon, 02/16/2009 - 19:25 — Anonymous (not verified)Complicity by the corporate
Mon, 02/16/2009 - 21:47 — Jruss (not verified)Jruss has it right. It's
Tue, 02/17/2009 - 12:26 — Anonymous (not verified)Its true that the GOP is
Tue, 02/17/2009 - 19:22 — classicalliberal (not verified)Maybe we should substitute
Tue, 02/17/2009 - 21:41 — nikto (not verified)I cannot write what I would
Tue, 02/17/2009 - 23:36 — Allan J Krueger (not verified)Since republicans have
Thu, 02/19/2009 - 19:33 — elmer fudd (not verified)