Share

Congress Sends $787 Billion Stimulus to Obama

by: Richard Cowan and Jeremy Pelofsky  |  Reuters

photo
President Barack Obama will sign stimulus legislation on Monday. (Photo: Saul Loeb / AFP)

    Washington - The U.S. Congress, handing President Barack Obama a major legislative victory, approved on Friday a $787 billion stimulus bill that aims to rush emergency government spending and tax cuts to a nation in the grip of a severe recession.

    The Senate cast the final vote, 60-38, hours after the House of Representatives passed an identical bill, 246-183. The action capped weeks of arguing over how Congress could best stimulate an economy suffering a rising jobless rate of 7.6 percent and a banking crisis that has nearly frozen lending.

    "It will not fix our problems overnight," Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Daniel Inouye, a Hawaii Democrat, said shortly before the final vote began on the measure, closely watched by financial markets and governments around the world.

    But Inouye added, "It will begin the process ... it will give America confidence that we can overcome this crisis."

    The Senate voting was held open for several hours to await Ohio Democratic Senator Sherrod Brown's arrival in Washington to cast the 60th vote needed for passage. The White House arranged for a government plane to fly him back from services for his late mother in Ohio.

    Obama is expected to sign the bill into law soon, fulfilling a pledge to try to reverse the economic slide with a recipe that includes middle-class tax cuts, money for construction projects, help for the poor and unemployed and new investments in alternative energy.

    Democrats hope to save or create 3.5 million jobs.

    But the Democratic president, in office only since January 20, failed in his efforts to win over Republicans, who are a minority in Congress. Not a single House Republican voted for one of the biggest single spending bills in the nation's history and only three Republican senators backed it.

    "I think we need to appreciate that the bill is the largest change in domestic policy since the 1930s" said House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Obey, referring to heavy government investments.

    Republicans argued unsuccessfully for less government spending and more tax cuts.

    The final plan is split into 36 percent for tax cuts and 64 percent in spending and other provisions. That was close to the 40/60 split Obama had sought in his effort to jolt the economy, which he has warned could become a "catastrophe" without rapid government intervention.

    Spending Spree?

    Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell complained the bill "is unlikely to have much stimulative effect." He said it could be just the beginning of a Democratic spending spree in which Obama might seek $50 billion to help avert some home mortgage foreclosures and possibly hundreds of billions of dollars more to dig the financial sector from its crisis.

    House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer chastised Republicans, saying they were sticking to the same economic precepts that proved a failure during the eight-year tenure of Republican President George W. Bush.

    The massive new government spending will add significantly to federal budget deficits already shattering records. According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, the stimulus bill will increase next year's deficit alone by nearly $400 billion.

    But Democrats have argued that without the stimulus spending, the economy will decline further, leading to even slower revenues that contribute to higher budget deficits.

    The White House said it would take about a month for the money to start flowing. A primary concern for economists is that the stimulus will come too late to do much good in 2009, when many forecasters think full-year output will contract.

    "Unfortunately, the downward momentum in the economy is so steep that it is hard to see how the package can kick in quickly enough to make much difference to 2009," said Nigel Gault, chief U.S. economist at IHS Global Insight.

    The Democrats' quest for a new economic stimulus bill -- on top of the $162 billion one enacted a year ago -- actually began last July, when House leaders started crafting a much smaller measure of around $60 billion.

    Then-President George W. Bush and his fellow Republicans in Congress blocked that bill, saying it was not needed yet.

    As the economy got markedly worse, Democrats pushed for larger stimulus measures. At one point, Congress was considering a $937 billion bill.

    To win final passage, a group of Senate moderates crafted a compromise that shaved some of the tax-cut and spending provisions, finally arriving at the $787 billion bill, with most of the spending this year and next. The tax breaks are temporary.

    The final package includes about $500 billion in spending and money for social programs like the Medicaid health insurance program for the poor. It has about $287 billion in tax cuts that include small tax incentives to spur home and automobile sales as well as business tax deductions.

    Individuals would get a refundable tax credit championed by Obama of up to $400 per individual and $800 for couples in 2009 and 2010. It is phased out for individuals with adjusted incomes of over $75,000 and couples with incomes over $150,000.

    The measure includes almost $54 billion to help states with their budget deficits and to modernize schools, $27.5 billion for highway projects, $8.4 billion for public transportation and $9.3 billion for Amtrak and high-speed rail service.

    The final agreement also included limits on compensation for senior executives of companies receiving government aid from a $700 billion financial bailout, including restrictions on bonuses.

    ---------

    (Additional reporting by Caren Bohan, Susan Cornwell, Emily Kaiser and Donna Smith; Editing by Peter Cooney)

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

The stimulus package is very

The stimulus package is very good, I will give it an A. I would have given it an A+, if the Republican'ts had not watered it down. I am not referring to the Republic ants which are a real species of ant, I would not want to give them a bad name. I am referring to all the Republicans who can't do anything meaningful or good or put the country first.

I have long said that the

I have long said that the Bush administration's goal, and apparently that of the "low-wage, tax-cut republicans was to bankrupt the country so that we would become a debtor nation eligible and requiring the kind of austerity measures and "structural" adjustments - e.g. privatize all the nation's natural assets and eliminate all social and environmental programs, leaving funding only for police, the military and support for very large corporate interests - as the World Bank and IMF have done to countless developing countries. Well, they've succeeded in triggering the first half of the plan and are now trying to make sure that we don't recover enough to prevent the second half. These are the same people who say that growth pays for itself - which all evidence is to the contrary or we would be in great shape locally and nationally - and that tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations trickle down to make a rising tide that lifts us all. Which has worked so well, we see now. This is the party of greed and self-service and while this may not be the beliefs or sentiments of many people who belong to the party, it is clearly the belief and bases on which the party leaders act, while cloaking this in religious and patriotic cloth. The democrats are mainly different in not believing that corporations are good and government bad - the real Reagan legacy which enabled the Bush administration to gut and corrupt every regulatory and advisory agency or body of the federal government with a corporatist state goal underlying their actions. We have what they wanted and they aren't likely to let go any time soon.

Good, Republicans are going

Good, Republicans are going to pay a steep price for their vote. The tax cuts and deregulation got us into this mess and more of the same will not get us out. The deregulation and distruction of the regulatory authorities has gone so far that they now feed us and our children contaminated peanuts while giving money to their rich patrons.

Let us think. What got us

Let us think. What got us into this crisis? We took this continent from the natives, and never thought to ask them for any advice on how to live on the land without destroying it. We took advantage of every new group of people that came here to make ourselves richer and lazier. We only care about comfort and ease and stuffing ourselves with rich food. And crying that we need more health care. What we really need is more professional entertainment to watch on our big screens.

Okay, last fall was $700

Okay, last fall was $700 billion to bankers and wealthy, following a near decade of tax breaks for the rich and bankers, and almost half of this one is STILL "tax breaks", this time for the middle class, and it's "pork" if ANY of the money actually goes to building things and creating jobs, at least in the eyes of the Republicans. Adding $10 trillion in debt for Republican policies was good, but another 3/4 T is the only problem. right.

I grew up in the D.C. area,

I grew up in the D.C. area, and I can tell you that corruption in D.C. did not begin with Reagan. Corruption is the nature of the beast. To think you are protected by government agencies puts you at grave risk in your daily life and in the way you make purchases. Even if you lived in Europe, where they have discovered the suicide risk of some medications before us, still there are areas there where national health insurance will give you a pill rather than helping you deal with environmental and other issues that may be grieving you. A cascade of dollars to the already-rich will not change our true challenges much. Those in D.C. seem not to understand that funding their friends and acquaintances at high levels does not lift enough boats where needs are greatest. Oklahoma appears now to have the most advanced sovereignty legislation advanced so far. Federal agencies with the worst records of bullying the states may be at some risk. Meanwhile, truth-and-reconciliation would be the best way to try to figure out how the spoiled boys created such a mess. Bush may be safe in TX, but I don't know about Cheney. He has fouled every nesting place he's landed in, as far as I can tell. Maybe he will have an epiphany and want to explain his behaviors. It's obvious we can't put him on a chain gang, unless it's a keyboard chain gang.

Obama is a deep thinker with

Obama is a deep thinker with the good of the people tantamount in his heart, soul and mind! We created him, now let's help him with our own individual purpose for unity, freedom and transformations so that together we can uplift this wonderful country to its true destny! We all deserve it!

I'm already planning on how

I'm already planning on how the stimulus package will affect my life. The first thing I'm going to do is insulate my home better in order to cut my heating and AC bills. Public school teachers are being laid off in SC and I'm hoping that the stimulus package will allow them to keep their jobs. South Carolina, with the third highest unemployment rate in the country, has run out of money to pay unemployment claims, so I hope the stimulus can help there, also. This stimulus is very much needed and, I believe, will be well spent..

Although this stimulus bill

Although this stimulus bill is better than we could have expected under the republicans, the democrats watered it down unnecessarily. First Obama went to the House and made a deal with republicans under the guise of non-partisanship, which is a fool’s folly to begin with, when dealing with extremist republicans. Obama agreed to cut out necessary spending and replace it with tax cuts and didn't get one House republican vote (didn't need any republican votes to pass). Yet the democrats kept the powerless republican wish list in the House Bill. Next, the Senate, same BS, more cuts in necessary spending to appease two or three republicans. This time the democrats headed by Majority leader Harry Reid used their 60-vote filibuster farce that they have been using since becoming the majority in '07 to capitulate to Bush and Senate republicans. A real filibuster requires Senators to speak on the Senate floor until they win or give up. Now, all the republicans have to do is vote to filibuster and Reid says they won, how convenient. Reid also used the filibuster scam when democrats were the Senate minority. In that case under Reid's leadership the democrats never would filibuster, no matter how atrocious the bill. His excuse was, the republicans threatened to Nuke (vote to get rid of) filibusters. Why doesn’t he do the same? The best Senate strategy for the democrats would have been to force the republicans to delay the badly needed stimulus bill with a real filibuster instead of agreeing to unnecessary cuts. The republican political posturing would have outraged the public and the democrats could have gotten a much better stimulus bill passed with 50 plus votes. Makes you wonder who the democratic leadership really represents.

I heard on a news broadcast

I heard on a news broadcast that people on Social Security will each get $250. Working people will realize $12 weekly in tax savings, and that equals about $600 annually. Is that fair? Senior citizens, most of whom live on the smallest income, again get stiffed. The Bush stimulus gave us $300 each --- while every other man, woman AND CHILD got $600 each, so that some households got thousands, while a Senior's household (with the same upkeep) got only $300. Was that fair?