Share

New Union and California Homecare Workers Fight Budget Cuts

by: Seth Sandronsky, t r u t h o u t | Report

photo
At a September 2008 rally in Los Angeles, Californians protest budget shortages for seniors, the disabled, community organizations, service workers and others. (Photo: Marty Omoto / California Disability Community Action Network)

    Several dozen homecare workers, some with their patients, gathered February 10 on the west steps of the state Capitol in Sacramento to protest Governor Schwarzenegger's proposal to cut state spending on the In-Home Supportive Services program for disabled and elderly people.

    The homecare workers, predominantly female and nonwhite, are current members of the Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers-West (SEIU-UHW) in Sacramento, 17,000 strong. They will be able to vote this spring for representation by the National Union of Healthcare Workers (NUHW), which organized the political rally.

    Elected leaders of SEIU-UHW formed the NUHW on January 28, a day after SEIU placed UHW and its 150,000 members into a trusteeship, a legal move to seize financial and political control of the California affiliate. The trusteeship also shifts 65,000 long-term (homecare and nursing home) UHW workers into a single local statewide under senior members of SEIU appointed by President Andy Stern.

    Dissident SEIU-UHW workers are opposing Stern's maneuver. For example, homecare workers in Fresno are moving forward in a bid for representation by the NUHW now. In Sacramento, homecare workers and their patients showed support, visually and rhetorically, for their patients and the NUHW.

    "IHSS [In-Home Supportive Services] patients are at-risk of being forced from living in their homes into entering more expensive nursing homes due to the proposed spending cuts," said Lola Young, who labors as a homecare worker in Sacramento County. "The $10,000 a year state funding budgeted per-person for IHSS is a solution, not the problem."

    According to SEIU, it placed UHW into a trusteeship in part to fight proposals like that of Schwarzenegger to reduce state-funded health care payrolls and services to balance the budget deficit, as the California constitution requires.

    "The governor is missing the boat in proposing cuts to the IHSS program," said Karen Sandidge, a homecare worker, who noted the thousands of her fellow union members unable to attend the rally due to their caring for patients 24/7. "Homecare workers save the state money by helping people stay in their homes and to remain functional citizens with dignity."

    There are over 400,000 IHSS recipients in California, whose homecare providers in the SEIU-UHW prepare their meals, make medical appointments and perform varied hygienic activities. According to the NUHW, Schwarzenegger's proposed cuts would end such services for 80,000 recipients of IHSS, and require 7,000 others to pay up to $5,000 in out-of-pocket costs to keep the services they receive now.

    "The governor's proposal to cut IHSS spending is not acceptable," said Sal Rosselli, the former president of SEIU-UHW and volunteer head of the NUHW, at the rally. He, along with dozens of other recently elected UHW officials, was ousted in the SEIU trusteeship. That action capping a protracted conflict of his and the SEIU-UHW rank-and-file with Stern over strategies and tactics for members' involvement to expand the union, the second largest in the US.

    The jobs crisis would worsen with IHSS spending cuts. Such a policy "would push more than 300,000 caregivers and their families closer to poverty and drive many out of the workforce entirely, leaving people without care," Rosselli said.

    The state is hard-hit by the current economic downturn, a result of the bursting of a multi-billion dollar bubble in real estate. There were 1.69 million Californians officially out of work last December, an unemployment rate of 9.3 percent versus a 5.9 percent rate in December 2007.

    With the demise of sales, property and utility tax revenues to state and local governments comes a rise in demand for publicly funded health care. Can Uncle Sam ride to the rescue? The House and Senate versions of President Obama's economic stimulus package provide funding to offset Schwarzenegger's proposal to slash IHSS spending, according to Rosselli.

    Asked what she and her fellow protesters planned to do after the rally to maintain current the state's IHSS funding and to support the NUHW, Valerie Carter, a Sacramento homecare worker and SEIU-UHW member, said they were going to speak with state legislators inside the Capitol Building. They have been trying to seal a budget deal to close a $42 billion deficit with a mixture of tax increases and spending decreases.

    --------

    Seth Sandronsky lives and writes in Sacramento. ssandronsky@yahoo.com

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

When you look at the most

When you look at the most vulnerable people in this country, and really know how these policies affect them, then you can have a big dose of exactly what this politicians are saying in the instance of these cuts to services. They give human beings a bad name.

Although the current focus

Although the current focus is on California, as a CNA (certified nursing assistant) myself, I can assure you that these problems exist throughout the country. The typical worker receives about $8 per hour and no benefits. Not even health or sick benefits. As a result, very few men are found doing this very needed and worthwhile work and most of the women who do it are minorities; the very people whotypically experience difficulty finding any work paying a living wage - a living wage will not be found here. Unionization is working to change this.

If you read the Sacramento

If you read the Sacramento Business Journal website story about this rally, http://www.bizjournals.com/sacramento/stories/2009/02/09/daily36.html, posted on February 10, the number of people at this rally was "about two dozen". The story on Indybay, http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2009/02/11/18569490.php?show_comments=1#comments, posted on February 11, said that "dozens" of people showed up. Now this version transforms that number into "several dozen". The photo on Indybay, though, clearly shows exactly 26 people. NUHW claims the petitions they have collected are for facilities employing tens of thousands of workers. They are not all working 24/7. If NUHW couldn't manage to turn out more than a couple of dozen people for something like this, what kind of clout are they likely to have during the bleep-storm that's a-comin'? Meanwhile, SEIU has already demonstrated its ability to enter into rapid, effective negotiations with the state to save the jobs of its members. Union democracy is a wonderful and important thing, but having a job is essential. Perhaps this is not the best time to be agitating workers to jump over the side of the SEIU ship into the shark-infested waters that they would have to swim in order to reach NUHW.

It is a shame and disgrace

It is a shame and disgrace that this country cannot take care of it's old people, the sick and the maimed without treating them as though they were nothing but a burden. What is seemingly forgotten and ignored is the fact that all will eventually become old, sick and helpless themselves, should they live long enough. When a Society considers a Home Care Aide not worthy of being paid a living wage, and the people that must have their care are left to die alone and uncared for..that Society does not deserve to exist. The purpose of government is to protect it's citizens from all enemies, both within our borders and without. It appears that we need to be protected from what poses as Our Government, and the heartless Politicians that are busily confiscating our wealth and giving it to the warmongers and stuffing the pockets of the members of Congress. Angry ? You bet !

This is a frightening time

This is a frightening time for everyone and an absolute nightmare for the elderly and disabled. Where are we suppose to go? The first thing to go will be our drug coverage... about the only thing bush ever did to help me personally. Being disabled I am truly afraid. Remember Oregon's fight for the Right to Death with Dignity? They are the only ones with any common sense. If all I am is a burden to my family and to society, maybe I shouldn't even be here. This IS the exact translation of what Schwarzenegger is saying. Yes, euthanasia or genocide of the elderly and infirmed must be what's coming next.

I need to get ahold of Sal

I need to get ahold of Sal Rosseli. I dont know what happened but one thing is for sure.Mr Stern has abandoned the usual labor protection and went for a corporate model at local 660 now 710 or something.