Share

Prosecute War Criminals and Their Lawyers

by: Marjorie Cohn, t r u t h o u t | Perspective

photo
President Barack Obama stands beside former President George W. Bush. (Photo: Reuters Pictures)

    Since he took office, President Obama has instituted many changes that break with the policies of the Bush administration. The new president has ordered that no government agency will be allowed to torture, that the U.S. prison at Guantánamo will be shuttered, and that the CIA's secret black sites will be closed down. But Obama is non-committal when asked whether he will seek investigation and prosecution of Bush officials who broke the law. "My view is also that nobody's above the law and, if there are clear instances of wrongdoing, that people should be prosecuted just like any ordinary citizen," Obama said. "But," he added, "generally speaking, I'm more interested in looking forward than I am in looking backwards." Obama fears that holding Team Bush to account will risk alienating Republicans whom he still seeks to win over.

    Obama may be off the hook, at least with respect to investigating the lawyers who advised the White House on how to torture and get away with it. The Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR) has written a draft report that apparently excoriates former Justice Department lawyers John Yoo and Jay Bybee, authors of the infamous torture memos, according to Newsweek's Michael Isikoff. OPR can report these lawyers to their state bar associations for possible discipline, or even refer them for criminal investigation. Obama doesn't have to initiate investigations; the OPR has already launched them, on Bush's watch.

    The smoking gun that may incriminate George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, et al., is the email traffic that passed between the lawyers and the White House. Isikoff revealed the existence of these emails on The Rachel Maddow Show. Some maintain that Bush officials are innocent because they relied in good faith on legal advice from their lawyers. But if the president and vice president told the lawyers to manipulate the law to allow them to commit torture, then that defense won't fly.

    A bipartisan report of the Senate Armed Services Committee found that "senior officials in the United States government solicited information on how to use aggressive techniques, redefined the law to create the appearance of their legality, and authorized their use against detainees."

    Cheney recently admitted to authorizing waterboarding, which has long been considered torture under U.S. law. Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleezza Rice, George Tenet, Colin Powell, and John Ashcroft met with Cheney in the White House basement and authorized harsh interrogation techniques, including waterboarding, according to an ABC News report. When asked, Bush said he knew about it and approved.

    John Yoo wrote in a Wall Street Journal oped that Bush "could even authorize waterboarding, which he did three times in the years after 9/11."

    A representative of the Justice Department promised that OPR's report would be released sometime last November. But Bush's attorney general Michael Mukasey objected to the draft. A final version will be presented to Attorney General Eric Holder. The administration will then have to decide whether to make it, and the emails, public and then how to proceed.

    When the United States ratified the Convention Against Torture, we promised to extradite or prosecute those who commit, or are complicit in the commission, of torture. We have two federal criminal statutes for torture prosecutions – the Torture Statute and the War Crimes Act (torture is considered a war crime under U.S. law). The Torture Convention is unequivocal: nothing, including a state of war, can be invoked as a justification for torture.

    Yoo redefined torture much more narrowly than U.S. law provides, and counseled the White House that it could evade prosecution under the War Crimes Act by claiming self-defense or necessity. Yoo knew or should have known of the Torture Convention's absolute prohibition of torture.

    There is precedent for holding lawyers criminally liable for giving legally erroneous advice that resulted in great physical or mental harm or death. In U.S. v. Altstoetter, Nazi lawyers were convicted of war crimes and crimes against humanity for advising Hitler on how to "legally" disappear political suspects to special detention camps.

    Almost two-thirds of respondents to a USA Today/Gallup Poll favor investigations of the Bush team for torture and warrantless wiretapping. Nearly four in 10 favor criminal investigations. Cong. John Conyers has introduced legislation to establish a National Commission on Presidential War Powers and Civil Liberties. Sen. Patrick Leahy advocates for a Truth and Reconciliation Commission; but this is insufficient. TRC's are used for nascent democracies in transition. By giving immunity to those who testify before them, it would ensure that those responsible for torture, abuse and illegal spying will never be brought to justice.

    Attorney General Eric Holder should appoint a Special Prosecutor to investigate and prosecute high Bush officials including lawyers like John Yoo who gave them "legal" cover. Obama is correct when he said that no one is above the law. Accountability is critical to ensuring that our leaders never again torture and abuse people.

  

»


Marjorie Cohn is president of the National Lawyers Guild and a professor at Thomas Jefferson School of Law. She is the author of "Cowboy Republic: Six Ways the Bush Gang Has Defied the Law" and co-author of "Rules of Disengagement: The Politics and Honor of Military Dissent." Her anthology, "The United States of Torture: America's Past and Present Policy of Interrogation and Abuse," will be published next year by NYU Press. See www.marjoriecohn.com.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

I agree with president Obama

I agree with president Obama that we must look forward and not back, but that doesn't mean that the Bush administration shouldn't be held accountable for their acts. The American people should pursue this matter vigorously and not allow it to be swept under the carpet. Otherwise we risk setting a precedent that will allow for future administrations to get away with even more.

Thank you Marjorie! We

Thank you Marjorie! We already know from experience what giving criminals a pass gets us: more criminals committing more extreme crimes! Nixon got a pass and so did Reagan. Bush was the logical result. In each case the crime became more heinous and the response to that crime more flaccid. Nixon made a burglary for political gain, Reagan traded arms to Iran to support US terrorists in Nicaragua, and Bush has committed the Supreme crimes of Crimes Against the Peace, Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes. And the Peoples response was that Nixon resigned under threat of impeachment and was pardoned, Reagan got a show trial followed by a free pass, and the extreme crimes of the Bush administration barely provoked the merest attempt at restraint or punishment! It is way past time to attach some consequences to these crimes.

How about President Obama

How about President Obama alienating the Democrats with his idea of moving forward and forgetting the heinous acts committed by the Cheney-Bush Administration? He must remember who supported him with many donations. It was not the Republican voter.

It must be done as a gesture

It must be done as a gesture of good faith to the rest of the world.

Do we the present - and

Do we the present - and future - future fettered with the ball and chain of the Patriot Act? Homeland Security? Warrantless wiretapping and Sneak and Peek searches? National Security letters? With the perception that boxcutters dropped WTC at free-fall demolition speed? Believing that we, as a nation, or people as slaves must embrace invasion, incarceration, genocide, oppression and exploitation as a foreign (if not domestic) policy? Not, as citizens, even having access to our "own" National Energy Policy? Must we remain in the clutches of the departed naked emperor's toady court?

Make Obama do it! I think

Make Obama do it! I think Obama can only prosecute our bumper crop of war criminals if we demand he does. On his own he would just create problems for his administration, but if the American people demand it as Osvaldo Lucca wrote, Obama wouldn't be wasting "political capital."

Although I supported Obama,

Although I supported Obama, so far I agree with him on little. The way out of a deep depression was shown by FDR. The money goes to job programs, not to the same people who have blown it since John Davison Rockefeller drew the first oil out of the ground. They will blow it again. Bankruptcy works just fine, let them into it and be replaced with young Turks who know what to do, not to old horse thieves. If President Obama does not prosecute then we may as well let all of the inmates out of all of the prisons in America. He is showing Jesus as wrong and privilege by wealth is right. Killing one person gets you death or life, killing 1 million gets you... millions through Carlyle Group war profiteering Obama is showing that he is no Progressive, and that there is to be no change. It is business as usual except sans the "rounding up of the usual suspects."

The apparent inability of

The apparent inability of people in the U.S. to hold high officials responsible for their crimes undermines the rule of law everywhere. In this respect, the U.S. cannot move forward as a society, just like a house being eaten away by termites... or should I say like banks nobody trusts anymore? There will be accountability, make no mistake about it. Whether it is imposed by other countries or shouldered responsibly by U.S. citizens remains to be seen. We have a choice, but if the choice is to continue to allow such crimes to occur unchecked by the people wielding power, then dark times are indeed descending for people in the U.S.

Should the crimes, by the

Should the crimes, by the Bush/Chaney Administration, be overlooked, then these crimes of high treason will be repeated in future administrations. The Allies conducted the Nürenberg Trials (in 1945 to 1949) for several reasons: A) To make aware that these crimes were actually committed, B) To examine HOW these crimes were able to be committed, C) Who committed these crimes and D) To punish the criminals. Should the guilty not be punished, then, their Criminal Acts would be absolved and could easily be repeated. There would not be any justice. “The true administration of justice is the firmest pillar of good government.” Should the Bush/Chaney Administration (alleged) criminals not be prosecuted, not be brought to trial and not found guilty, then, like the Ronald Reagan Republican group, they will be glorified, deified and praised. With ALL the evidence available: Eyewitnesses, Documents, Dead Bodies, Remnants of Death Camps, Newsreel clips, piles of clothes, piles of shoes, piles of hair, piles of eyeglasses, piles of gold teeth –COLD HARD EVIDENCE-, there are Holocaust Deniers being celebrated, glorified and believed. So, too, these (alleged) criminals will be praised and glorified for future generations. We will have not have learned from history –and the American society will repeat this debacle.

Holding these war criminals

Holding these war criminals to account will alienate Republicans? Gee, that's too bad---they've certainly alienated most Americans with their utter contempt for human life and the rule of law. Funny how all that 'law and order' and 'get tough on criminals' rhetoric evaporates when it's rich white guys committing heinous crimes. There is something seriously wrong when lying about a one-night stand is an impeachable offense, but lying to justify torture and mass murder barely rates a shrug. Or should I say shrub?

Thank you Ms. Cohn for your

Thank you Ms. Cohn for your astute perspective. I want to acknowledge it's absence of politics, focusing as it does on the only thing that matters, which is the rule of law. It's the foundation of our nation, and must continue uncrippled. Thus a truth and reconciliation commission is not enough. I also agree with Obama that we should look forward, to the day our Constitution has been restored. Bush's "reign" must be exposed for the criminal sham it was. Republicans will always attempt to foil investigations directed at their "team". For them it was a confidence game, resembling the Bernie Madoff con game of winning the trust of the people and then running roughshod over them, their laws, their dreams. Bush and his co-conspirators must be investigated and brought to justice before the world. Republicans would do the same, in a heartbeat, if the situation were reversed, and everyone knows it.

Corrections: Do we the

Corrections: Do we the fetter the ourselves and our world present - and future - with the ball and chain of the Patriot Act? Homeland Security? Warrantless wiretapping and Sneak and Peek searches? National Security letters? With the perception that boxcutters dropped WTC at free-fall demolition speed? Believing that we, as a nation, or people as slaves must embrace invasion, incarceration, genocide, oppression and exploitation as a foreign (if not domestic) policy? Not, as citizens, even having access to our "own" National Energy Policy? Must we remain in the clutches of the departed naked emperor's toady court?

Marjorie, you say "Obama

Marjorie, you say "Obama fears that holding Team Bush to account will risk alienating Republicans whom he still seeks to win over." Is that fact or your opinion? If it is a fact, then what are we to deduce? That as long as it is politically expedient, justice will be ignored, as it has been so often in our past? High officials of the previous regime admitted their felonious crimes, yet there is still no accountability. You say "The smoking gun that may incriminate George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, et al., is the email traffic that passed between the lawyers and the White House." Isn't the smoking gun the fact that they already (proudly) admitted their crimes? Is a gun that smokes more than that needed? The self-proclaimed "law and order" Repubs show their hypocrisy daily, while the spineless Democrats and the House Speaker put impeachment then and prosecution now off the table. Congress won't pursue these criminals, and both parties continue to ignore this travesty of justice. You say, in your last paragraph, "Obama is correct when he said that no one is above the law." We have heard that lie many times before over the years. Isn't it about time to take such a pronouncement out of the realm of rhetoric, and make it a reality?

We are a Nation of Laws and

We are a Nation of Laws and NOT of Men... Aren't WE..? Why can't Obama see that it all begins and ends with that concept...? The BuSh Administration is over. And now, after the 8 long, dark years, they have now done all they have done by way of whatever motivations moved them to pursue the course and take the actions they took. Now... Its time to see if they broke LAWS, and if so, they will have to be prosecuted. We will do this because we claim to be who we claim to be in the world to all the world just as if We are here to set the standards of how People and Governments of the world should act... Now, all the world is watching..., and either we are who think we are--- OR... WE ARE NOT WHO WE LIKE TO THINK WE ARE. Who do you think WE are Mr Obama..?

I look "forward" to the Bush

I look "forward" to the Bush administration in court for war crimes.

Special Prosecutors are

Special Prosecutors are needed to protect the rule of law and the honor of the leadership of this country in the future. Politicians have the distrust of Americans for not honoring their campaign pledges -- that has generally been the most common reaction. But lately, they have been caught repeatedly violating the laws. For some reason not understood by me, however, the leaders of our country now seem VERY reluctant to even investigate the potentially illegal behavior of the most rich and powerful duo - Bush and Cheney. Is bush entitled to an annual retirement payment of $196,700 if he should be in jail? If people died under torture, international law provides for a death penalty and it is known that 9 people died under his torture policy. Should he simply be allowed to collect his "hard earned" retirement with no consequences??? Is that fair to all Americans? Is this right with the World? NO. Most assuredly, NO.

Obama is really blowing it.

Obama is really blowing it. When banks are in trouble you don't save the bankers, you take their banks away from them. When government officials break the law you prosecute them, you don't consider "Truth Commissions" to look into it. When drug laws don't work and cause tremendous harm, you think up new ways of looking at the problem, like taking the profit motive out. America needs a leader now and not another politician. And finally let's not forget that steel frame buildings can not collapse at free fall speed into their own footprints (THE PATH OF MOST RESISTENCE), because that's impossible!

YES!! now this is something

YES!! now this is something i can get behind! its time this country woke up and started practicing what it preaches. bad enough we have ALL let things get so wrong, but if we choose to not do the hard and unsavory job of putting our house in order, then we all truly do become JUST as guilty as those who by hook or by crook lead us into committing these VERY UN-American and shameful acts. we owe it to our forefathers, our children and to ourselves to know the REAL truth and hold those guilty parties accountable under the laws of the land. anything less is unacceptable in the extreme.

Why are some people

Why are some people addressing comment to "Marjorie"? This article by Marjorie Cohn Esq. is clear, simple and to the point(s). I really appreciate legal matters translated into easy language for me, a lay person. I can't find anything with which to disagree, in this article. I would only add this:Phillipe Sands has made the point (find transcript on www.democracynow.org) that if the U.S. does not have investigations and trials, as charges are found/prosecuted, then other countries with universal jurisdiction will. He was told this by a prosecutor in Europe, while investigating the torture memos. I hope the US will take care of its own law breakers, but if not, others will investigate and prosecute.

Nation of Laws. Is that not

Nation of Laws. Is that not what the United States of America is? Do we teach are children that concept every day? Isn't that what the founders wanted, a nation that writes,respects, and challenges law? This country is pure shit if we do not respect and challenge the fact that everything that is done by our hands is tied to the law. If the law is wrong, make it right; if the law has been broken, challenge it; if there is no law, make a law. The future of this country literally depends on what we as Americans do with our laws presently. I think it is going horribly wrong and this nation will not survive. I'm sorry for the pessimism and I'm sorry to the past leaders, founders, and soldiers who fought for the law and the right for us to exist today. We have failed you.

Will will be a nation of

Will will be a nation of laws or a nation of men subject to the whims of tyrants? The founders of our republic knew full well what it was to be subject to a distant ruler that was above the law and they carefully crafted safeguards in the the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights. If rulers, whether they are in Kosvo, Argentina, Chile, Panama, Iraq, Nigeria, Burma, or the USA, break the law and commit crimes against their people and against humanity, they and their helpers should be prosecuted. The actions both public and private of Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Brennan, Wolfowitz, Rice, Tenant, Gonzales, and Rove, should be thoroughly investigated and disclosed to the American people as a bare minimum price to pay for the support of the present administration and the current members of Congress of either party. And this needs to be started immediately so that the results are made public before November of 2010 so the public can decide which representatives and which senators should be reelected to office.

The Republic stands at a

The Republic stands at a crossroad here and the stakes could not be higher. The way forward is fraught with danger and there are no easy solutions. The American Revolution began in such a tormented time and many anguished decisions had to be made to press forward in the rejection of tyranny and a belief in the ultimate majesty of the law. We have been at crossroads before in the history of this nation. Our American revolution in the struggle for liberty and in the need for a common security is a continuing process of progress toward or a falling away from our founding principles and ideals. There is tremendous fear among many about how to go forward and a measuring of the risks on all fronts, economic, political and civil for the right course of action. I believe we need to move toward and not away from our founding principles and ideals, as difficult as that is likely to be. As citizens, those of us who believe it is important to pause and reckon with these issues, we must be prepared to lend our support to any of the people's representatives who are willing to shoulder these risks and burdens -which are the very risks and burdens of liberty- and help to see it through. We will arrive stronger and more capable of handling our national and civil responsibilities if we draw a clear line in this instance , embracing law over lawlessness and stand united with Justice, a Justice for all, without regard to class, or station, or wealth, or office.

"Obama fears that holding

"Obama fears that holding Team Bush to account will risk alienating Republicans whom he still seeks to win over." Ah, too bad. Criminals are criminals, be they Republican, Democrat, gov't official, ordinary citizen. He may win the support of the Republicans for not pursuing these war criminals and thieves, but he will lose the support of the American people and the rest of the world. Are the Republicans that important?

To the extent that torture

To the extent that torture has been sold to the gullible, it has been done with grotesque distortions of language. It is repellent and infuriating to see the worst of crimes couched in planted phrases aimed at distorting and soft-selling torture. “Water boarding”? Does this mean, “Surf's up”? “Enhanced interrogation techniques” seems only a “harsh technique” because it is “Simulated drowning”? Upon consideration, we can know that forced drowning doesn't “simulate” anything. It is infuriating sophistry to say so. “Water-board torture” is attempted murder, repeated, with the aim of keeping the victim alive. How can anyone begin to really understand this extreme violation of a person? Thanks to Professor Cohn for her conscience and clarity.

I am sick and tired of

I am sick and tired of excuses used not to prosecute these criminals..Who cares if it alienates Republicans better to alienate them than the masses who will see Obama as just another shill who talks the good talk but never walks the good walk! No, excuses..Prosecute! Does anyone ever consider such things when they seek to prosecute the rest of the citizens in this country? I thought Obama was supposed to be for justice and to stop the division of the classes??? If he does nothing about these crimes then he is just another pawn in the game to keep the elite crimes covered while sending the middle class and poor to jails for profits! The division game will continue where the elite have one law and the rest have another!!

vertically=EVERY1 in our

vertically=EVERY1 in our society must be held accountable.Period.Fini.To not take action on these past 8 years GUARANTEES REPEATS. PresObama has probably been told by Republicans allowing any action against these miscreants will erase any possibility of 'bipartisan' support from the Reps, but we can see bipartisan talk is talk only and never realizes itself against their ideology/principles being' so strong'.

We can look forward...to a

We can look forward...to a time when U.S. war criminals have to account for their crimes in courts of law. We can look forward... to a time when the few people at the top who led this country into a war that caused the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraqis, and thousands of Americans, have to account for their crimes in a court of law. We can look forward... to a time when no U.S. president can even think about declaring preemptive war, or torturing people, or wiretap our citizens without warrants. President Obama, we can look forward and prosecute criminals at the same time. President Obama, the change we need in Washington is not to bow to Republican demands, but to have a Government under the law.

The problem behind going

The problem behind going after Bush is the same one they faced with actively pursuing the Iran/Contra fiasco it`s called RICO ACT where-in one goes down ALL FALL from the lowly mailroom clerk right up to the President,Congress and Supreme Court as well as every company that ever did business with any of them, basically it has come down to destroying everything and everyone that has become the America we are today vs the closed door out of main sight compromises that are neither just or fair but in their minds the only way in which the democratic republic social caste system can survive

Seems like there is a

Seems like there is a consensus on this, here in internetland. Now lets get out there and hold our elected representative's feet to the fire, until they do what is needed.

Are Republicans aligned with

Are Republicans aligned with the Constitution? If not, what are they aligned with? If not, what should people who believe in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights do?

More Corrections: Do we

More Corrections: Do we fetter ourselves, our world present - and future - with the ball and chain of the Patriot Act? Homeland Security? Warrantless wiretapping and Sneak and Peek searches? National Security Letters? With the perception that boxcutters dropped WTC at free-fall demolition speed? Believing that we, as a nation, or people as slaves must embrace invasion, incarceration, genocide, oppression and exploitation as a foreign (if not domestic) policy? Not, as citizens, even having access to our "own" National Energy Policy? Must we remain in the clutches of the departed naked emperor's toady court?

Obama's not Bush, but let's

Obama's not Bush, but let's get real. It's obvious at least to me that Obama wouldn't be president if he hadn't been thoroughly vetted by the real powers that be. Do you really think they would have let him live to see his first day in office if they weren't confident that his administration would never pursue investigations into 911 and crimes that the attacks were used to justify? Consider the Chenguin coming out in the last few days of his administration openly admitting to approving torture. This tells us that he KNOWS he's safe. We have to admit that this country hasn't lived up to the propaganda that we were raised on. We're not and never really have been a nation of laws. If we really are living by the constitution, then why are we paying income tax? Why was Bush in the white house at all?

As with any procedural legal

As with any procedural legal case facts must first be dug up and corroborated. A solid argument is - and MUST - be built;the stronger the better. Mr Obama I expect is doing just that : building a bullet proof case so that when he indicts he is sure, as possible, to get a conviction. Plain legal 101 tactics. I am glad that he is taking his time and not bowing to the easy immediate knee-jerk pressure and going off half cocked just to satisfy the more emotional elements of his constituency.These guys need to be put away solidly, legally and in full view and knowledge of the world! Only by going after and obtaining a conviction will the U.S. legal and constitutional systems be validated and cleansed of the ignoble blight the last 8 years has soiled them with!

Unless we the people

Unless we the people constitute some sort of threat (yes, my friends, threat) to the powers that be which has taken over the country and run roughshod over the world, then no amount of words here or elsewhere will stop them or cause them to change course. In fact, until they are removed from power and replace by we the people, our will can not be done. In other words, do we really expect these bought and paid for representatives of the ruling class to say one day, "Aw shucks, ya finally convinced us. We got together and decided to act on behalf of you all, the people, and give a big finger to the real powers behind the power in the country". I encourage people to watch "V for Vendetta" again (or for the first time).

Drowning is the act of

Drowning is the act of repeatedly taking water into your lungs, in a panicked effort to breathe. Drowned is what you are when they're full. Waterboarding puts you through the drowning process, with nothing simulated about the H2O entering your lungs. They drown you to the brink of being drowned. As a young, U.S. Navy Pilot I was subjected to waterboarding at SERE school, which familiarized us with enemy torture techniques and resistance to them. But I knew those guys in black pajamas wouldn't actually drown me, afterall they were, at the end of the day, still on my side. Real POW's have no such luxury, and things quickly, and sadistically turn tortuous, even murderous.

Why are we focused only on

Why are we focused only on torture when the most successful prosecutor of our time (Vince Bugliosi) has clear evidence that Bush & his cabinet defrauded our entire country, congress, public, etc. into an unnecessary war that killed thousands of U.S. troops and tens if not hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqis? Bugliosi's book, "The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder", lays out a clear and credible process for D.A.'s across the country to prosecute Bush for the murder of our troops using the same "innocent agent" method he used to convict Charles Manson. Manson never touched the murder weapons either, but he still was convicted for the murders committed by the "innocent agents". In this instance, the innocent agents were the Iraqis who were merely defending themselves from a foreign intruder. Indict and prosecute,already!!! Geez!

It's mildly heartening to

It's mildly heartening to see mention of the as yet unexamined (by the MSM anyway), events of 9/11 allowed on the comments @truthout.org. Progress, even at a snail's pace is still progress.