Share

Sources: Obama Cuts Funds for Nevada Nuclear Dump

by: H. Josef Hebert  |  The Associated Press

photo
President Barack Obama's budget will slash funding for Nevada's nuclear waste dump at Yucca Mountain. (Photo: Dan Lamont / Corbis)

    Washington - President Barack Obama is taking the first step toward blocking a nuclear waste dump at Nevada's Yucca Mountain by slashing money for the program in his first budget, according to congressional sources.

    Obama's budget to be announced Thursday will eliminate virtually all funding for the Yucca project with the exception of money needed for license applications submitted last year to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

    "The Yucca Mountain program will be scaled back to those costs necessary to answer inquiries from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission while the administration devises a new strategy toward nuclear-waste disposal," the Energy Department will say as part of the budget document, said the sources, who asked not to be identified because the document had not been made public.

    Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, who has fought the Yucca dump for years, said Obama's decision to cut funding "represents our most significant victory to date in our battle to protect Nevada from becoming the country's toxic wasteland."

    The site at Yucca Mountain, 90 miles northwest of Las Vegas, has been under consideration for a quarter-century, although Nevada officials have argued that the volcanic ridge line is not the most suitable place to store 70,000 tons of reactor waste from commercial power plants.

    Obama during his presidential campaign said Yucca Mountain has not been shown to be the best site based on the science, and he promised to review the project.

    Earlier this week, House and Senate Democrats cut Yucca Mountain funding for the remainder of this fiscal year to $288 million, the lowest in recent years. Obama is not expected to provide a specific funding level in his budget, which instead will provide a general outline of spending for the 2010 fiscal year beginning in October.

    By cutting the waste program, said Reid in a statement, Obama has taken "a critical first step toward fulfilling his promise to end the Yucca Mountain project ... President Obama recognizes that the proposed dump threatens the health and safety of Nevadans and millions of Americans."

    Obama is expected to establish a commission to examine alternatives to Yucca Mountain, even as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission continues to consider the license application for the waste repository that was submitted by the Bush administration last year.

    Energy Secretary Steven Chu has said he has no plans to withdraw the license application, a move that could draw lawsuits from the nuclear industry.

    The NRC has up to four years to review the application. The Bush administration had hoped to have the Yucca dump available for waste shipments in 2020.

    In a report to Congress in December, the Bush administration dismissed suggestions that reactor waste be kept at temporary storage sites at government facilities, an option that Obama has suggested. To keep waste in temporary storage Congress would have to change the 1982 nuclear-waste law that cited Yucca Mountain as the only future waste repository.

    Reactor spent fuel is kept in pools and in concrete enclosures at reactor sites.

    The government has estimated the Yucca Mountain project's total costs at $96.2 billion. About $13.5 billion already has been spent.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

The DOE let the nose of the

The DOE let the nose of the camel into the tent and it has cost the taxpayers plenty. The DOE estimated in 1982 that the cost for the site would be $80 million. Already billions of dollars have been spent-wasted. In 2001 the cost was estimate was raised nearly 500 fold to 57.5 billion dollars and the last estimate of the DOE was that the dump would cost over 96 billion dollars and that did not include the cost to actually operate the facility, or the 4 billion dollar railroad that needed to be built (at a time when Amtrak's funding was being slashed and service to move people was being dramatically slashed). Hopefully this will also put the breaks on future insane efforts to provide federal (taxpayer) guarantees for funding and insurance for new nuclear plants. When the private sector will not even provide funding with free insurance courtesy of the American taxpayer it should be obvious that nuclear power is not a cost effective source of energy when ALL the costs are totaled.

They have to find SOMEWHERE

They have to find SOMEWHERE to store the nuclear waste they've created for the next 40,000 years when it finally becomes safe enough to come in contact with any lifeform. What about Utah? Don't they already have a dump site in Utah? Isn't Utah the most republican state in the union? Let's make Utah a deal: If they take all of our nuclear waste we'll give their stimulus package money to a blue state where it will be appreciated. Just a thought.

If nuclear power "is not a

If nuclear power "is not a cost effective source of energy" how come it works in Europe?

It works in Europe because

It works in Europe because they are storing a disaster waiting to happen and millions will die. I guess you figure cheap is good until a disaster, then "help me!"

A few things about nuclear

A few things about nuclear power. No state is going to allow the waste storage facility in their backyard. No bank is going to underwrite a nuclear reactor because banks have deemed them too risky. The government is the only entity that could afford to build nuclear power plants and the verdict is in, it's too risky, especially when you have nowhere to store the waste. Chernobyl helped bring about the dissolution of the Soviet Union. Essentially, nuclear waste is a dirty bomb waiting to happen. Yucca Mountain is in a volcanic range and if it blew, most of the US would become uninhabitable, as would Europe, if they had a second Chernobyl, say in the middle of France. Obama is headed on the correct path which is no more nuclear power. George Harrison had it right with this song line: "Nuclear power will cost you more than you ever thought it could before." The cost per KWH of nuclear power is just a little bit higher than windpower and if you count in radiological cleanups, windpower becomes way cheaper.