Share

Bad Ballots in Florida Doubled in 2008

by:   |  United Press International

photo
Florida election officials say more ballots were rejected as invalid in 2008 than in 2004. (Photo: tampabay.com)

    Tallahassee, Florida - Election officials in Florida say they found twice as many ballots were rejected as invalid in 2008 as in 2004.

    After switching nearly all voting to paper ballots and optical scanners for the 2008 election, officials said the rejection rate of 0.75 percent was considerably lower than in 2000, when it was 2.9 percent, The New York Times reported Thursday.

    However, a study found that twice as many ballots were rejected as invalid in 2008 as in 2004.

    Ballots are considered to have "no valid vote" if a voter recorded no choice for a specific office, selected more than one candidate or listed an incorrect write-in candidate, the Times said.

    Florida Secretary of State Kurt Browning said he wasn't surprised by the increase in invalid ballots in 2008, saying the main reason was that Florida forced 15 counties to switch from touch-screen machines to optical scan machines, the Times reported. Touch-screen machines do not permit voters to choose more than one candidate.

    "Obviously there's a trade-off when changing voting machinery," Browning said. "You are not going to find a voting system that protects voters from themselves."

    Florida Gov. Charlie Crist sought to eliminate touch-screen machines after a tight 2006 congressional election in which thousands of voters in Sarasota County did not cast a ballot. It was the second time since the 2000 election, which went before the U.S. Supreme Court to be resolved, that Florida had overhauled its voting systems.

  

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Time for the Justice

Time for the Justice Department to investigate and bring criminal charges of election fraud against the Republican officials perpetrating these crimes again and again. I would expect the trail will lead back to Karl Rove just as it did in Ohio. It is important not to let the suspicious, and for Karl Rove most fortunate, death of Michel Connell, the Republican IT expert who was to testify against his former boss regarding election fraud in Ohio. The laws are already on the books to prosecute these crimes - we only need a Justice Department willing and able and unobstructed by the White House to aggressively pursue the culprits.

Our County in Iowa has been

Our County in Iowa has been using ink pen marked paper ballots with optical scanners at every precinct for about 20 years. I was party to a manual recount in 1996 and again in 2000. I found a total error of 0.08 percent, some of which was compensating, with an actual change in final count of about 0.05 percent. A ballot with no choice on one office was voter choice, not a ballot error. Optical scanners can be programmed to reject a ballot with multiple votes for any office.

This country, and the entire

This country, and the entire world, may never fully recover from the destruction brought on by illegal election of George Bush via Florida in 2000 and via Ohio in 2004.

My question is... in what

My question is... in what counties are the majority of invalid paper ballots? Are the invalid ballots mostly in democratic counties? What is different about invalid ballots in those counties compared to counties with the least invalid ballots? Lots of questions about those invalid/multiple voted ballots still to be answered I think. My county (Platte County) has never had that percentage of invalid ballots. They are pretty easy to use. Smells fishy to me. And yes, it's true Optical Scan Voting Machines can be hacked and programmed to print out whatever is wanted. The good thing is that the Optical Scan printout can be compared to actual, real physical paper, ballots, unlike Touch-Screen computer code that can be hacked and left with no trace of the hacking. We should have a national law in this country that removes all touch-screen machines and allows only paper ballots (whether they are read by optical scanners or not), because paper can be looked at and counted and recounted. Just look at what's happening in Minnesota. At least they have paper ballots that can be looked at.