Share

The Audacity of Audacity

by: E.J. Dionne Jr.  |  The Washington Post

photo
President Obama faces a host of tough choices. (Photo: Lawrence Jackson / AP)

    President Obama faces three overlapping questions: When will middle-of-the-road voters start blaming him for the sick economy? When will he act decisively to deal with the mess that is our banking system? And can he keep managing his political two-step of appealing simultaneously to centrists and progressives?

    He has to confront all three at once. The economy will remain in crisis until there is a resolution to the problems facing the banks, and if things keep going bad, more and more voters in the middle will start blaming Obama for not fixing them.

    Meanwhile, the flood of bad news is empowering Obama critics who style themselves as moderates. They will continue saying that the president, in trying to keep his campaign promises on health care and energy, is "overreaching" and not focusing on economic recovery.

    It's hard for the fair-minded not to have some sympathy for Obama. He has been in office for less than two months, and no president since Franklin D. Roosevelt has inherited such an "unholy mess," as one of Obama's top advisers put it.

    Moreover, some of the criticisms are nonsense. Wall Street conservatives - well-represented on the financial cable shows and the Wall Street Journal's editorial page - are arguing that the stock market is collapsing because Obama wants to institute a relatively modest set of tax increases on the wealthy, starting in 2011.

    But these voices supported lower taxes on the rich when the economy was bad, when the economy was good and when the economy was so-so. They have no credibility. These same voices claim to worry about future budget deficits. Do they really believe we can fix the deficit without tax increases?

    As for criticisms from the moderates, it's balderdash to call Obama's policies "radical." They seem radical only in comparison with the right-wing approach the government has pursued in recent years. Particularly on health care, it would be irresponsible for Obama not to press the reforms he promised in his campaign. And what could be more "moderate" than the open, pragmatic approach Obama took during his White House health-care summit last week? No, the president is not "overreaching." His agenda is focused on a few big things.

    Unfortunately for Obama, such arguments matter far less right now than unemployment hitting 8.1 percent and the downward spiral of the stock market since he took office. All of the administration's critics are being emboldened by its hesitancy in dealing with the banking question and its apparent fear of temporary bank nationalization. On this issue, the president genuinely is trying to steer a moderate course - and moderation may be exactly the wrong recipe.

    There is something deeply disturbing about the drip, drip, drip of billions of dollars into the banking system with no apparent impact. There is no transparency about how financial institutions are using the money. And there has been little clarity as to how the administration's actions will eventually lead to a recovery. Obama and his speechwriters need to seek inspiration, again, from FDR's fireside chats - and explain what's happening to a petrified nation and world. His aides promise more of this, and they need to get moving.

    The administration also needs to mobilize the rest of the world's leaders. This is a global downturn. The economies of Central and Eastern Europe are a shambles. They could further drag down the rest of Europe, which in turn could make everything worse.

    Meanwhile, the top echelon of the Treasury Department is a wasteland of empty desks. More people seem to have been tossed out of competition for jobs under Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner than have been appointed. You have to ask: If it was okay for Obama to stick with Geithner despite the secretary's tax problems, why does everyone under him suddenly have to meet administration vetting standards that St. Francis of Assisi might find too exacting? Obama responded to this criticism early yesterday with three new Treasury nominees, but Treasury desperately needs more reinforcements.

    Obama's calm and deliberative style is one of his greatest strengths. He doesn't want precipitous action in the midst of an economic collapse to come back to haunt us all. But sometimes excessive caution can be as dangerous as impetuousness. The president has no choice but to be bold. If there is one thing he should fear, it is fear itself.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

I agree with Dionne, and I

I agree with Dionne, and I fear for Obama. Iwish he would seek advice from two of our economic NOBEL Laureates, Paul Krugman (who warned about the housing bubble at least 2 years ago) and Joseph Steglitz, who, like Obama, is pragmatic, not ideological. We need more bod plans for jobs and something sensible for banks--something the populace can understand. Thank you, Mr. Dionne.

When Republicans were

When Republicans were pushing the idea that Democrats were more concerned about democratic rules than protection from terrorists it said more about the speakers than the subjects: obviously Democrats care as much about their families as Republicans. Now the Republicans show they still have that attitude of 'you are with us or you are against us' and demonstrate that by showing that they would rather have the country fail than have Obama's policies succeed. In practice they are attempting to lessen the impact of Obama's policies by delaying bills; adding damaging amendments and most of all by degrading public confidence. These are not the actions of a party that John McCain said would always put 'country first'.

When will the Washington

When will the Washington Press realize that middle road voters will tire of the Republican and the media's failure to work with Obama long before they lose their patience with the President.

Why would anyone invest in

Why would anyone invest in the stock market until regulations are in place to prevent more of the unregulated insanity that led to this mess. People used to invest long term in companies they believed in. Companies used this invested money to expand and develop products. For the past 30 years, in has all been about short term payoffs. Businesses didn't look years ahead and build their strengths. It came down to quarterly profits and looking good on paper. Then we added the strange and business killing product called derivatives. Time to regulate against greed and get back to the business of producing good products.

Obama's a lot like a new

Obama's a lot like a new young doctor who's come to town to take over the practice of an old sawbones who hadn't learned much about procedures or medications since medical school. Finds an emaciated patient near death with combination of illnesses. He quickly consults with his peers, writes some prescriptions for up-to-date medication, initiates multiple lab tests, arranges for round-the-clock nursing care, the whole enchilada. And in a few short days, the patient's family--some of whom sort of liked the doddering old M. D. with whom they'd dealt before, despite his glaring faults--start demanding to know why poor Papa isn't suddenly up walking about like his old self.

It's unfortunate that Obama

It's unfortunate that Obama would have come unto a cesspool of situations that were bound to have happened, Either way he will be blamed for not trying hard enough to stop the downward spiral of this country,and the greed that has consumed a once mighty nation. Babel is falling.

Hurray for E.J. Obama must

Hurray for E.J. Obama must be bolder, even to the point of nationalizing the big banks (little banks seem to be doing better on their own). Another way our President can be bolder is to listening more to the left wing of his supporters when it comes to health care. Has anyone noticed that the recent White House conference on health care was attended by many who like the basis outlines of our present system, but not ONE spokesperson for a single-payer health system!!!

Obama's biggest challenge is

Obama's biggest challenge is putting up with these media types who have to keep stirring the pot to justify their own existence. He's barely six week in office and they are already predicting his downfall because he hasn't yet solved the financial crisis. This is colossal BS, and it just plays into the hands of the Party of naysayers.

After eight years of

After eight years of disaster, both national and international, let Obamas critics shut up and help dig us out of these problems. Obama did not get us into the current mess, the last administration did. Let's quit playing politics and get to work.

If he had 60 votes in the

If he had 60 votes in the Senate, he could take bolder action. How could anyone possibly blame him for the mess we are in? Are you serious? Call me naive, but, I believe he is playing the best hand that he can, using the cards he was dealt.

The axis of drivel

The axis of drivel Republican pundits started blaming Obama for the bad economy 6 weeks before he was elected. The Democrats didn't play partisan politics after 911. It's time to get behind Obama and give him a chance to see what he can do. I predict it will take 2 years to get this economy straightened out. The Republicans need to put up or shut up. The mainstream tv media is hyper-focused on letting the Republicans challenge Obama on every step because it get's great ratings. TV should not be driving our politics. The networks and cable need to get behind Obama as well. Or we can watch the economy die.

The author forgot to mention

The author forgot to mention another big elephant in the room - the Military Budget and the Wars in Iraq an Afghanistan - millstones around our necks that are complete folly. The military approach is a big lie. We can achieve peace in this troubled world by dismantling the military industrial complex, correct our injustices to foreign nations, and achieving energy independence at home.

If we really cared about

If we really cared about wars and economy, we would have elected Kucinich. But we didn't, and now we have to somehow educate Obama or hope he's deceiving us. The war in Afghanistan along with Geithner and Summers are very scary signs that the president has his faith in the wrong corner. If he does ANYTHING that Bush wouldn't have done, the conservatives will scream bloody murder. Maybe he knows what he's doing. Creating an illusion that he supports the status quo of imperialism, capitalism, and militarism - while shifting things slowly but surely away from the path of destruction. My concern is that, even if he does radically improve things, politics after will slowly return to corruption as usual... and societies can't afford this plague anymore. Obama needs to overhaul the political system. This two party system keeps noone honest. It's a joke.

THE AUDACITY OF INSOLVENCY.

THE AUDACITY OF INSOLVENCY. " There is something deeply disturbing about the drip, drip, drip of billions of dollars into the banking system with no apparent impact. There is no transparency about how financial institutions are using the money." The value of the highly leveraged financial "products" that reside in the file cabinets at AIG and its ilk cannot be allowed to see the light of day since their values are many times the value of all the money we could pour into them. If they are subject to transparency, it will be obvious to all that the world financial system is insolvent and must collapse. One must wonder whether the creators of this counterparty nuclear weapon devised it on purpose to wreck the world monetary systems to make way for a new currency of their own. I know, I know -- it sounds like the plot from some old Bond flick! But think about it -- surely they could see what would happen in the end. Well, soon the G-20 will meet to discuss the possibility of adopting a new world reserve currency. There's a coincidence for you.

We need jobs. First,

We need jobs. First, foremost, and urgently fix America's income problems. I keep wondering, with adult children on unemployment, what do they do for money when that runs out? For God's sake, Obama should be introducing an additional stimulus directly devoted to putting people back to work. The present stimulus just doesn't focus enough on that.

How about a debate on the

How about a debate on the filibuster -- it's not in the Constitution. When we had occasional two-party cooperation(1956-1980) it made a little more sense, but it slowed integration in deference to Dixie. But now when Big action is needed, why should a large majority of the country be held hostage by a just-say-no minority that has lost two elections big-time?

How come even these good

How come even these good articles are written without once saying "Bush", "Cheney", or "Rove"? I see this vacuum of guilty, guilty names everywhere and am bewildered.

So far the accomplishments

So far the accomplishments of the last 2 months are very good. The stimulus bill puts a floor under economic hardship and provides money in tax cuts and for investments. The details of the housing bill are very promising, in combination with a cramp down provision in the bankruptcy code (for the most difficult cases) this should provide relieve for the housing market. The science initiative is very promising. So far everything goes in the right direction.Now give it some time to work. The stock market will most likely find a floor within the next 1-2 months. What is left and desperately needed is a MEGA PROJECT for the nation to identify with. Like a new water/canal/dam system to connect the Mississippi/Big Lakes with the Colorado. For further development of the West the flood waters of the East are essential. More water in the West will decrease pressure on food prices and will ensure further growth. A mega wind mill project in North/South Dakota is also a very good idea. A national pride project everybody can identify with. Future inflation will mostly be an energy and water problem. Both will most likely only be sufficiently available if their prices are higher. This will increase the general price level. But that's the price of growth and needs to be accepted. It will be an increase we can live with!