Share

Investigative Reporter Seymour Hersh Describes "Executive Assassination Ring"

by: Eric Black  |  MinnPost.com

photo
Seymour Hersh. (Photo: Glenn Brown)

    At a "Great Conversations" event at the University of Minnesota last night, legendary investigative reporter Seymour Hersh may have made a little more news than he intended by talking about new alleged instances of domestic spying by the CIA, and about an ongoing covert military operation that he called an "executive assassination ring."

    Hersh spoke with great confidence about these findings from his current reporting, which he hasn't written about yet.

    In an email exchange afterward, Hersh said that his statements were "an honest response to a question" from the event's moderator, U of M Political Scientist Larry Jacobs and "not something I wanted to dwell about in public."

    Hersh didn't take back the statements, which he said arise from reporting he is doing for a book, but that it might be a year or two before he has what he needs on the topic to be "effective...that is, empirical, for even the most skeptical."

    The evening of great conversation, featuring Walter Mondale and Hersh, moderated by Jacobs and titled "America's Constitutional Crisis," looked to be a mostly historical review of events that have tested our Constitution, by a journalist and a high government officials who had experience with many of the crises.

    And it was mostly historical, and a great conversation, in which Hersh and Mondale talked about the patterns by which presidents seem to get intoxicated by executive power, frustrated by the limitations on that power from Congress and the public, drawn into improper covert actions that exceed their constitutional powers, in the belief that they can get results and will never be found out. Despite a few references to the Founding Fathers, the history was mostly recent, starting with the Viethnam War with much of it arising from the George W. Bush administration, which both men roundly denounced.

    At the end of one answer by Hersh about how these things tend to happen, Jacobs asked: "And do they continue to happen to this day?"

    Replied Hersh:

    "Yuh. After 9/11, I haven't written about this yet, but the Central Intelligence Agency was very deeply involved in domestic activities against people they thought to be enemies of the state. Without any legal authority for it. They haven't been called on it yet. That does happen.

    "Right now, today, there was a story in the New York Times that if you read it carefully mentioned something known as the Joint Special Operations Command -- JSOC it's called. It is a special wing of our special operations community that is set up independently. They do not report to anybody, except in the Bush-Cheney days, they reported directly to the Cheney office. They did not report to the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff or to Mr. [Robert] Gates, the secretary of defense. They reported directly to him. ...

    "Congress has no oversight of it. It's an executive assassination ring essentially, and it's been going on and on and on. Just today in the Times there was a story that its leaders, a three star admiral named [William H.] McRaven, ordered a stop to it because there were so many collateral deaths.

    "Under President Bush's authority, they've been going into countries, not talking to the ambassador or the CIA station chief, and finding people on a list and executing them and leaving. That's been going on, in the name of all of us.

    "It's complicated because the guys doing it are not murderers, and yet they are committing what we would normally call murder. It's a very complicated issue. Because they are young men that went into the Special Forces. The Delta Forces you've heard about. Navy Seal teams. Highly specialized.

    "In many cases, they were the best and the brightest. Really, no exaggerations. Really fine guys that went in to do the kind of necessary jobs that they think you need to do to protect America. And then they find themselves torturing people.

    "I've had people say to me -- five years ago, I had one say: 'What do you call it when you interrogate somebody and you leave them bleeding and they don't get any medical committee and two days later he dies. Is that murder? What happens if I get before a committee?'

    "But they're not gonna get before a committee."

    Hersh, the best-known investigative reporter of his generation, writes about these kinds of issues for The New Yorker. He has written often about JSOC, including, last July that:

    "Under the Bush Administration's interpretation of the law, clandestine military activities, unlike covert C.I.A. operations, do not need to be depicted in a Finding, because the President has a constitutional right to command combat forces in the field without congressional interference."

    ("Finding" refers to a special document that a president must issue, although not make public, to authorize covert CIA actions.)

    Here is a tape of the full Mondale-Hersh-Jacobs colloquy, a little over an hour, without the audience Q and A. If you want to look for the Hersh statement quoted above, it's about at the 7:30 mark.

Download MP3

    The rest of the evening was, as expected, full of worry and wisdom and quite a bit of Bush-bashing.

    Jacobs walked the two elder statesmen through their experiences of:

  • The My Lai massacre, which Hersh first revealed publicly and which he last night called "the end of innocence about us and war."
  • The Pentagon Papers case, which Mondale called the best example of the "government's potential for vast public deception."
  • Henry Kissinger's secret dealings, mostly relating to the Vietnam War. (Hersh, who has written volumes about Kissinger, said that he will always believe that whereas ordinary people count sheep to fall asleep, Kissinger "has to count burned and maimed Cambodian babies.")
  • The Church Committee investigation of CIA and FBI abuses, in which Mondale played a major role. (He talked about the fact that FBI director J. Edgar Hoover, not only spied on Martin Luther King but literally tried to drive him to suicide.)
  • The Iran Contra scandal. (Hersh said the Reagan administration came to office with a clear goal of finding a way to finance covert actions, such as the funding of the Nicaraguan Contras, without appropriations so that Congress wouldn't know about them. Mondale noted that Reagan had signed a law barring further aid to the Contras, then participated in a scheme to keep the aid flowing. Hersh said that two key veterans of Iran-Contra, Dick Cheney and national security official Elliot Abrams, were reunited in the George W. Bush White House and decided that the key lesson from Iran-Contra was that too many people in the administration knew about it.)
  • And the Bush-Cheney years. (Said Hersh: "The contempt for Congress in the Bush-Cheney White House was extaordinary." Said Mondale of his successor, Cheney and his inner circle: "they ran a government within the government." Hersh added: "Eight or nine neoconservatives took over our country." Mondale said that the precedents of abuse of vice presidential power by Cheney would remain "like a loaded pistol that you leave on the dining room table.")
  •     Jacobs pressed both men on the question of whether the frequent abuses of power show that the Constitution fails, because these things keep happening, or whether it works, because these things keep coming to light.

        Mondale stuck with the happy answer. "The system has come through again and again," he said. Presidents always think they will get away with it, but eventually reporters like Hersh bring things to light, the public "starts smelling this stuff," the courts and the Congress get involved. Presidents "always, in the long run, find out that the system is stronger than they are."

        Hersh seemed more troubled by the repetitions of the pattern. The "beautiful thing about our system" is that eventually we get new leaders, he said. "The evil twosome, Cheney and Bush, left," Hersh said. But he also said "it's really amazing to me that we manage to get such bad leadership, so consistently."

        And he added that both the press and the public let down their guard in the aftermath of 9/11.

        "The major newspapers joined the [Bush] team," Hersh said. Top editors passed the message to investigative reporters not to "pick holes" in what Bush was doing. Violations of the Bill of Rights happened in the plain sight of the public. It it was not only tolerated, but Bush was re-elected.

        And even Mondale admitted that one of his greatest successes, laws reforming the FBI and CIA in the aftermath of the Church Committee, were supposed to fix the problem so that "we would never have these problems again in the lifetime of anyone alive at the time, but of course we did."

      

    »


    Comments

    This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

    Could it get any worse? How

    Could it get any worse? How did we become a nation of death squads? When will the media be held accountable for being complicit? Are we going to stand up against this? Prosecute the Bush administration now. They didn't represent me.

    Whoa. Hersch himself said

    Whoa. Hersch himself said it would take two years for him to get the facts needed to back up his assertion. Which means it's not a proven fact yet, just a theory. Yet comments from readers take is as fact.

    Did they kill Wellstone?

    Did they kill Wellstone?

    Radline9 is quite right,

    Radline9 is quite right, they didn't represent him. They represented their wealthy masters, and continue to do so. It is class warfare, and the middle and lower classes will always lose. All you need for proof of this is the recent morphing of "health care reform" from a "single payer" system that would cut out the insurance companies and their massive profits into just more smoke and mirrors that will actually serve to increase those same profits. Money speaks, nothing else does. And when money and government merge, as they have in the United States, the term for this joint effort against the rest of us is an ugly word: FASCISM. Enforced and held in place by murder, as Mr Hersh points out.

    The national media clearly

    The national media clearly became an arm of the government during World War II. Having established the hot line between the White House and the editorial offices of the major news media, what was waiting its opportunity was for that cozy relationship [with what is now "the corporate media"] to be exploited by fascists. Scott Horton in HARPER'S says that from late 2001 to January 2009 "the United States was a dictatorship." Maybe this explains why so many have felt so sick for so long. It hurts to live in a dictatorship. What an irony! Just when the US capitalist system wins the Cold War it sews the seeds of its destruction of democracy and itself through sheer hubris. Cheney especially believes that "the people" are ripe for dictatorship. When Tim Russet would ask a tough question to Cheney on "Meet the Press," you could see the contempt in Cheney's facial expression as if to say, "YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO QUESTION ME!" Such an attitude is a clear conclusion from the basic corporate philosophy which is that since life itself for "the people" depends on corporate livelihoods then who else should run the government but businessmen and women? How many times have I heard that "every nickel that goes through the government in taxes is a nickel wasted"? All this is also a clear result of Milton Friedman's continuous assertion that corporations have no social responsibility. The last exemplar of a George W. Bush would be, ah, King John. How about a new Magna Carta.

    The CIA has been involved in

    The CIA has been involved in running America's publishing industry for decades subsidizing it to publish books for psychological warfare purposes. Because the publishefs didn't want to lose the money, they allowed the CIA to stop the publication of books that they deemed harmful. In 2003, the New York Post reported that the CIA stopped the publication of books on Ethiopia for national security reasons. Yet they would not or could not stop the publication of "The Emperor" by Polish journalist, Ryszard Kapuscinski. it got the reviewers to say it was not about Ethiopia but was a"parable" about Poland. This stuff is still going on. They gave a ton of money to Scholarstic to produce children's books in Arabic to win "hearts and mind." The first one they did was an illustrated book abougt a dog. The Jordanians returned all the copies, explaining that Arabs hated dogs, which they regarded as dirty. America was a police state until the election of Obama. Ho much he can do remains unclear, since there have always been intelligence oprations that even the president knows nothing about.

    Agreed! The Bush

    Agreed! The Bush Administration represented only their own interests and not those of the American people. Holder needs to appoint an independent prosecutor NOW. We need the light of day on this. We can "move forward" at the same time that the truth is being revealed and people are being held accountable. Our future is rooted in our past.

    I remember, during the

    I remember, during the Reagan years, reading a newspaper story about Reagan's "Secret Government" with the Government. I told someone about the article and went back to the library to find it. It was gone! And, any footprints of it seem to be missing. But then, that could have been how Cheney started his construct of secret government. The media now belongs to Rupert Murdock, who just bought another newspaper. The public is not going to get, without searching for it, anything but neo-con propaganda. Why isn't anyone talking about the secret prisons that are now in full operation within and all over the US? They have been there since Reagan, at least. They are like a black hole ... once you in, you're gone. And, so it goes.

    Great Conversations is an

    Great Conversations is an extraordinarily valuable event! Thanks to Larry Jacobs, Walter Mondale and Seymour Hersh for their candid conversation concerning some of the people with whom we have given our trust to represent us. To maintain our democracy we will need a vigilant citizenry and events like this will provide us with the tools to maintain that vigilance. Uncovering and making known these kinds of abuses by politicians and their allies gives the public the ability to maintain and improve our "for and of the people" democracy. These three men are an inspiration to us all!

    Surprised, but briefly.

    Surprised, but briefly. This article is very comprehensive. First comments (no doubt more later): How much will Pres. Obama refrain from use of the Bush expansion of executive power? On DemocracyNow headlines today, Pres. O. signed his first "signing statement" disagreeing with a bill passed by Congress. Will he ignore parts of the law with which he disagrees? On private killing squad from the executive branch (in this case VicePres. Cheney's office) that Mr. Hersh mentions: Chalmers Johnson has alleged in his trilogy, particularly in the middle book, "Sorrows of Empire" that the Pres. has a PRIVATE ARMY, the CIA, at his disposal. That's why my initial surprise at Hersh's statement evaporated. It is somewhat peculiar to read Hersh say of the special squad, "these ...are not murderers" but "they thought they were" serving their country. Um, murderers come in suits, some are heads of state. Carrying out illegal, in some other country murder, is still murder. I think the Nuremberg Trials covered all aspects of illegal orders. Even if extrajudicial killings are of alleged "bad" people, it's still murder. Big Question:who will be held accountable?

    The truth must come out now.

    The truth must come out now. The media must also be held accountable for "looking the other way" and fox must be prosecuted for spreading propaganda.

    The collapse of America's

    The collapse of America's economy got everyone's attention, even more effectively than did 9/11. That may be why Obama was able (allowed?) to win. The thought of going hungry was probably more frightening to more Americans than were the so-called "terrorists", or the incremental death of our Constitution.

    If Hersch's assertions prove

    If Hersch's assertions prove to be true - it is either prosecute Bush and Cheney or kiss our constitution, our country and our ideals goodbye forever. It is do or die for our country. The truth MUST be known and ACTED UPON !!!

    the american system does not

    the american system does not work....bush and especially cheney should be in prison for life for their crimes. They are not. Your system, america, doesnt work...shining a light on an issue isnt enough.....prosecuting criminals for their crimes...putting them in prison is a system working....bush and cheney are free....your system protects these criminals and you erudite men who speak so eloquently about these criminal abuses of power get paid handsomely for your writing....writings which only remind us again and again how the powerful go scot free again and again and again and again.....oh and what about an ould pardon there please me president????

    We live in what is supposed

    We live in what is supposed to be a nation of laws, and yet we cannoy elect leaders who will obey the law, or enforce it against the rich and powerful. Currently there are thousands of allegations of criminal activity by Bush, Cheney, et al. There is credible evidence to suggest crimes of high treason, fraud, mass murder, and the list goes on. Why do we ignore the public outcry for justice, and the tens of millions of signatures on petitions calling for investigation and prosecution of these people? How do we justify NOT investigating these alleged crimes? We routinely imprison criminals for much lesser offenses in the name of justice and the law. If we do nothing, do we not invite the criminal acts to continue, or is that the point no one wishes to address. Our country has never seen a more devastating or disgraceful time! Where are the Special Prosecutors, Mr. Obama?

    well ,i guess we now know

    well ,i guess we now know what a decider really is.

    Bush hinted at something

    Bush hinted at something like these "killing squads" in one of his speeches:" let's put it this way: they are no longer a threat to the US" or similar words. Many of the Latin American death squads were apparently trained by the CIA or US "military". Another point: the US MUST disband these "special forces"; they've become a training ground for killers, in some cases psychopathic. Some of their members also become mercenaries when they leave the military (look at Blackwater: founded by ex-Navy SEALS). This harms the rest of the military besides. You don't need this crap to actually defend the US in an emergency.

    Never forget Acton: POWER

    Never forget Acton: POWER CORRUPTS; ABSOLUTE POWER CORRUPTS ABSOLUTELY

    I agree with both men. The

    I agree with both men. The system does eventually work but there are problems with recurring issues. My thoughts on investigations that produce no prosecutions are that if no one is prosecuted in very high levels of government it gets easier for the next “leaders” to try again. At the same time I believe someone must investigate at least to try to write legislation that will prevent such power grabs again. And as with all legislation the new laws will have to be revisited as people in power find new ways around them. (Thus is the nature of many.) Yet, I am sick when I read the statements of the person involved in a covert act about their fear of getting called before a committee. The puzzle is when can a soldier say no. As we saw in previous torture cases, Abu Ghraib for instance, few “top leaders” were punished. How does one decide if or when a soldier follows orders he or she feels are wrong should be punished or if the soldier who says no should be punished for not following orders. But more than that for the person who follows the orders he should do so with the knowledge that those above him are going to be held to account for their decisions no matter how high it goes.

    I think most Americans

    I think most Americans suspect this kind of black activity happens. Regarding the public letting down their guard, I'm not convinced. I couldn't have written more letters demanding investigations beginning with the lies Rice told Congress after 9/11. But it seems there is a real question of whether there is such a thing as reliable news in America. I don't envy more remote locations a bit, their options are limited, which is why we have to support media ownership limits BELOW the current limit, which is at 39% of a market. And internet neutrality, we must support it if more remote locations are going to have access to more accurate reports. I'm convinced this is a primary reason many are in the dark about their government.

    If you think JSOC

    If you think JSOC assassinations/tortures are (now) under" the CIA, you missed what Hersch was saying. US Presidents since at least Kennedy have had direct access to such teams. John Perkins called them the Jackals, in the period when it was still allowed to murder top national leaders, not just particular individuals. When such access is ignored and/or delegated (Kennedy and Bush) the consequences are disasterous beyond simple murder/torture. Hersch is elliptical here because he does not want his voice to be destroyed with his truth, as was Gary Webb, until his "empirical" proof is so multiply supported, so overwhelmingly quantitative, so free of even minor errors, that the corporately-controlled "media of record" cannot ignore or destroy him -- they will have to take on the reporting themselves or become even more irrelevant, as with the torture at Abu Graib.

    The last four paragraphs are

    The last four paragraphs are the only argument you need to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the Bush crime syndicate. Want another Church Committee? That was intended to end the criminal behavior and abuse of power? That's exactly what you'll get with a "Truth Commission--" some more "truth" to add to what we already know at best, and a cover up at worst. We have enough "truth" already to convict. Let's put an end to the behavior once and for all by finally holding the criminals accountable.

    Not much new here, when you

    Not much new here, when you read the book "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man" John Perkins pretty well spells that out. Private Corporations hiring Hit men for the CIA and doing the work for our Government in all covert operations. This has been embedded in our government for so long now, it will never be brought to the public, or the guilty ones will go about their lives and no one will know whats going on. We will never have peace in the world, as long as there are controlling elite pushing the buttons in secret. Money buys anything, and as long as we have people desperate enough to take on these jobs, it will continue. Tonight Washington state is going to execute a man for raping and killing a woman. Unless there is a last minute stay, and yet these government assassination experts will never have to face a trail for their actions. So go ahead Seymour Hersh and write your book and make your fortune, Just watch your backside, cause someone may be appointed to remove you before you get it all written down and documented. Good luck, and thanks for your journalism.

    Luke 12:4 ... and so now the

    Luke 12:4 ... and so now the larger truth is out.

    Wellstone? Maybe. The best

    Wellstone? Maybe. The best argument against the existence of a domestic assassination team is that they have not offed Sy Hersch, probably their most potent enemy. For which we should all be eternally grateful. ps. I am sure they have thought about it.

    Reply to "Whoa" -- Hersch

    Reply to "Whoa" -- Hersch would never have spoken about it in public if he didn't have sufficient facts to know that it happened. What he meant by "not proven yet" is that he hasn't interviewed enough people to build an airtight case. Remember, every bad thing that has been rumored about George II's "administration" has been eventually found to be true, and even worse than the first rumors indicated. The Bushie-Cheneys had absolutely no moral bounds because they believed (and continue to believe - e.g., Fleischer yesterday on HardBall) that any acts they undertook were justified by their vision of how to do things. These people have moral compasses that "failed to form" because of the intense anti-communist, anti-socialist propaganda of the fifties led them to believe their ends justified any means necessary. What is shown by both the deep corruption of government and the extraordinarily unethical corporate behavior that led to the financial crash is that the Religious Right is right about one thing -- morality in the US (financial and political morality) has completely vanished.

    I'm sorry to say the system

    I'm sorry to say the system is really failing, and the major media is very involved with it when it only reports on a small part of what's gone wrong and no one goes to jail. For example, why wasn't Reagan and his gang tried for the treasonous act of a private citizen conducting foreign policy when he negotiated with the Iranians to hold the hostages till after the election so that he could beat Carter? Why did an ex head of the CIA say that anyone who is anyone in the major media is owned by the CIA? Why did the media bury the story that James Earl Ray was found innocent of the murder of ML King? that the real murderer was a hit-man backed up by US military sharpshooters? (see Pepper's An Act of State), and 9/11: Why is everyone afraid to really look at the facts about what really happened? Go to ae911truth.org, watch the collapse of building 7 - a classic demolition - and read what architects and engineers, experts in steel structure buildings, have to say - the evidence is overwhelming against the Bush administrations explanation. When the Bush administration has obviously lied about so many things, why are we trusting them with their myth of 19 arab hijackers? Where is honest investigative reporting? Where are prosecutions? These are only a few examples of the failure of our system. And Bush was not re-elected. There was overwhelming evidence of the 2004 election being stolen. For two examples, see Witness to a Crime by Phillips and Loser Take All by Miller.

    JFK November 22, 1963.

    JFK November 22, 1963. Anyone remember that? RFK. MLK. Senator Wellstone. Mel Carnahan. Probably lots of others who were less known. Kennedy vowed to scatter the CIA into a thousand pieces and the CIA scattered Kennedy into a thousand pieces. I have zero faith that Obama will change any of this. Wall Street wanted him instead of McCain, they need a "good cop" for this chapter of the story.

    Yeah, put Bush and Cheney on

    Yeah, put Bush and Cheney on trial. And what to do about Obama's war crimes against innocent Afghanis he has already began bombing from the sky? Children, women, it don't matter - they must ALL be terrorists. One needs read no further than the preamble to understand the constitution was burned the day it was written. ALL humans have inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? Ha! Tell that to the mexicans living in this country. Tell that to your hungry and your poor.

    Okay, so where is the Honor

    Okay, so where is the Honor in this new Presidency -- where is Obama standing up and saying, "These illegal acts were wrong. Here is what they were, and here is what our country should do. We WILL hold people accountable." --- or is this leadership same old, same old and does Congress stick its head in the sand and pretend that none of this ever happened. --- When will our "leadership" actually SHOW some leadership and some honesty, or do they just believe that nobody believes this stuff? "Death Squads, the New American System for restoring Democracy and Freedom" in this world and others. Honesty, openness and transparency, please. And punishment for the evildoers of all stripes.

    Too Late for USA. It is too

    Too Late for USA. It is too late for public interest in these matters. Americans do not wish to be informed - they demand entertainment, and the corporate-controlled media provides this entertainment while simultaneously concealing the truth. The Constitution has no relevance anymore, except as a historical document. Now excuseme while I go watch "American Idol..."

    Salubrious! For those of us

    Salubrious! For those of us who have studied these issues in horror during our lifetime, the surprise is that it is being discussed at all. This is salubrious for the Nation. The thing to know, as background, is that there is a huge engine that supports the War Machine. As the saying goes, this is not about “Who killed Kennedy?” it is, rather, about “Who continues to kill him”. The war machine generates a false economy. It is parasitic. Cheney represents this national sickness that has festered and weakened the Nation since the time of President Eisenhower’s famous Military Industrial Complex speech. The most important thing is that this information is used to inflame our demand for Rule of Law rather than collapse into cynicism. The anti-constitutional Right and the cynical Left will say the Constitution has always failed. Yet, the structure for political health is in place within the Constitution to bring forth the necessary correctives if Citizens cite it and demand it’s checks and balances to be fully enabled. This is the moral high ground that builds allies and strengthens the democratic health of the Nation. It is essential to understand that the principle issue is not about Left versus Right or Democrats versus Republicans. The crucial issue to cite for all people of good will is whether Constitutional or anti-Constitutional forces prevail. We were really at the brink with Cheney’s cabal. Though they are still at large, there is now a chance to set things right. Let’s get busy.

    Send letters to your

    Send letters to your representatives telling them that these "possible" crimes need to be investigated and pass this information on to all those with whom you are acquainted so we are a real "mass" of citizens who understand that we can't let these terrible crimes happen again. We just can't. We can't. And we won't!

    Did they kill Ken Lay so he

    Did they kill Ken Lay so he wouldn't implicate Bush &co.?

    I worked hard to elect Obama

    I worked hard to elect Obama and am glad he got elected. But I urge all progressives to get involved in local Obama groups to try to inject some objectivity . It is pretty spooky when a "minder" shows up to every discussion and insists that we have to support the"Obama agenda" no matter what, even when the agenda is extremely vague. Being realistic is one thing, but being a sheep is not my style and should not be. Obama is a huge improvement, but bears watching and needs to be pressured about all those people we are holding and presumeably abusing in places other than Guantanamo. Check with Amnesty Internationl for details and for a list of what needs to be done.

    You're wrong about Bush; he

    You're wrong about Bush; he had no interest in governing the country. He just wanted to play president. Everyone else was free to do as he chose. That's how he left things in such a chaotic state; no one had any real responsibility to anyone but themselves.

    i am not surprised.

    i am not surprised.

    Indeed, Perkins' book spells

    Indeed, Perkins' book spells out how murder has been done in the name of the American people (but without their direct knowledge) for decades. I do not expect any members of the D.C. Establishment to react with much more than a shrug to Perkins' story or Hersh's statments. Perkins even earned himself a page on the DoS site in 2008 about disinformation, so you know he's on to something. Archive.org captured this copy while it was live: http://web.archive.org/web/20070323141606/usinfo.state.gov/media/Archive/2006/Feb/02-767147.html

    Conspiracy theories aside,

    Conspiracy theories aside, it not only can get worse, but unless Bush, Cheney et al are brought to justice for their crimes, it will get worse. The Republic is dead, died on Dec 12, 2000, when the Supreme Court violated the Constitution of the State of Florida and the Constitution of the United States of America by appointing George Walker Bush, may his name live in infamy, to the office of President of the United States. That cities did not burn as a result of this, shows that Americans in general were weak and servile before September 11th, 2001. For eight years we got the government we deserved. We can change the course of history by demanding the arrest and trial of Mr. Bush and his administration. Upon conviction, he and Mr. Cheney should be turned over to the Haig to be tried for War Crimes and hung if convicted. Are you listening, Mr. Yoo?

    I do believe, generally

    I do believe, generally speaking, the populous does not care. Perhaps, this is true world wide I do not know. Most care about their own daily lives, working, eating and they care about providing for the family. Beyond that those who really care about the minutiae of government, civil liberties and real principles are few. It is unfortunate because yes, bad govvernment keeps happening over and over and over again. The illegalities committed in our name by our government have consequences about which the average citizen does not understand nor does he want to. 9/11's come as a total shock as the average person wonders what the hell did I do to deserve that. Does anyone know about Mosadeq of Iran, does anyone care about it? The answer, of course, is a resounding NO but it surely did have an impact on the overthrow of the Shah of Iran to institute an Islamic state. I believe we can only hope that our press, the fourth estate, shows the light. It is a cruel world out there. Sometimes I do wonder if the US had committed no egregious foreign policy errors would we still have enemies. I think the answer is YES. We must be well defended but use our power wisely. No one should ever think the US weak but our power needs to be presciently used and when possible NOT used. A fine line has to be walked and we need to elect leaders who have the cerebral capabilities to walk it.

    Bush and Cheney go free and

    Bush and Cheney go free and Martha Stewart goes to jail. Perkins describes the many ways the death squads can remove an obstacle. Did they remove Tim Russert?

    Wouldn't those notes from

    Wouldn't those notes from the energy meeting convened by Cheney in early 2001 be enlightening? Manipulation of a scenario that would offer unquestioned control of the government would have been so tempting and using the numerical reference for an emergency would have been so cynical and diabolically "clever."

    Is this something different

    Is this something different from "Economic Hit Men" as covered in New York Times best-seller a few years back?

    well, how did we get

    well, how did we get there? That is the question behind Senator Patrick Leahy's call for a Truth /Reconcilliation Commission. The question of how we got there is perhaps more important than doing prosecutions at this point. As for Money and Gov't merging, like Billydoc and Radline9 are mentioning, that did happen before- it was the'corporate state', Italy under Mussolini

    Bush employed assassins?

    Bush employed assassins? Over one million killed by the U.S. in Iraq. Ten times that number are disfigured and disabled for life. Ten times that number are displaced and without income for their families. War crimes. Rendition. Torture. Arbitrary law? War crimes. AND our Nation is undefended. Who profits from this?

    I never believe any negative

    I never believe any negative stories about our govn't until it is officially denied.

    Dick Cheney, et al.

    Dick Cheney, et al. Treason. Murder. Death penalty.

    Bush an Cheney are indeed

    Bush an Cheney are indeed culprits at large. But far worse is the corporate enablers behind them. Corporations are people too? Baloney! They don't even have a soul. And whatever spirit they have is nothing but a dark collection of tentacles. The whole of America should be prosecuted by the whole world! I would love to see Interpol come and collect these pro convicts. I have no faith in the truth coming out here in America. I love what Obama stands for, but I wonder if he isn't a puppet of a different string?

    would they kill to keep

    would they kill to keep power?lets ask bill casey,oop sorry not available .

    When both Bush and Cheney do

    When both Bush and Cheney do not hesitate to publicly say that they encouraged and authorized the use of torture, and knowing how the CIA has supported paramilitary operations that have been actively disappearing people in Venezuela, Bolivia, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Haiti, Columbia, Honduras, and Guatamala it takes very little effort to believe that these two men would find it too hard to resist the use of outright assassination as a tool of government to achieve their desired ends or the oil, gas, and mining companies that they actively support. The Bush administration has repeatedly demonstrated its beliefs that the ends always justify the means.

    ONE ACT in each of us

    ONE ACT in each of us collectively becomes a tide to push back the madness of the Cheney/Bush years. One gesture begins to subdue the war within us and outside us begins to shift the balance. Consider this and then do one thing to make a difference: “…resistance, at root, must mean more than resistance against war. It is resistance against all kinds of things that are like war…so perhaps, resistance means opposition to being invaded, occupied, assaulted and destroyed by the system. The purpose of resistance, here is to seek the healing of yourself in order to be able to see clearly…I think that communities of resistance should be places where people can return to themselves more easily, where the conditions are such that they can heal themselves and recover their wholeness.” ~Zen Master, Thich Nhat Hanh

    Deborah Jeane Palfrey case

    Deborah Jeane Palfrey case was so unbelievable

    Obama is requesting $130

    Obama is requesting $130 billion for wars in Iraq and Afghanistan during 2010 plus a $75 billion supplemental request for the wars during 2009. This $205 billion is on top of $534 billion for the Pentagon in 2010, for total military spending of $739 billion. The Chinese government’s budget shows China’s military spending at $59 billion in 2008. (The Pentagon claims Chinese military spending is between $97 billion and $139 billion.) Russia’s military spending in 2009 is projected to be about $50 billion. In the midst of the greatest economic crisis in US history when trillions of dollars are being added to US national debt, Obama’s budget spends more on two pointless wars than the total military spending of China and Russia combined. Obama’s wars serve only the profits of the military/security complex and the promotion rate of military officers. The longer the wars continue, the larger the number of officers who can retire at higher ranks, thus further swelling future annual deficits and the national debt.

    Re: Did they kill Ken Lay?

    Re: Did they kill Ken Lay? Why is everyone so certain that Ken Lay is dead? With Lay's ill-gotten billions he could have found some poor bastard who looked enough like him to pass in the coffin, killed him and staged his own death with the corpse. Does anyone think that Lay's "conscience" would prevent him from killing someone to retain "his" money? A little plastic surgery and voila, he's living incognito in the south of France in a megabucks villa. There is no end to the evil that the wealthy will do to get, keep and augment "their" wealth. The greed of the wealthy is infinite. It can never be satisfied. They are as unsatisfied with their billions as if they had only $1.50 in their pockets and were wondering where they would get their next meal. If someone can't stop washing his hands, we call him sick and get him psychological or psychiatric help. If some cannot stop heating, we know he's sick and we get him help. If someone can't stop acquiring wealth, we call it "ambition" and reward and admire it. Go figger. WRT Ken Lay, I say start looking in the south of France.

    The system failed, and keeps

    The system failed, and keeps failing. I don't see these guys put into trial. Kissinger is a respected figure. If the system worked, he'd be rotting in prison, like all the war criminals the Allies tried after WWII. This is a disgusting double standard: the price of the lives of hundreds and thousands is only the office these people hold. If we're lucky. These are the worst kind of murderers.