Share

US Drops "Enemy Combatant" as Basis for Detention

by: Randall Mikkelsen  |  Reuters

photo
A razor-wire fence at Guantanamo detention center. The Obama administration has dropped the classification "enemy combatant," and will use international law to determine if someone can be detained. (Photo: Getty Images)

    Washington - The Obama administration dropped the term "enemy combatant" and incorporated international law on Friday as its basis for holding terrorism suspects at prison while it works to close the facility.

    The U.S. Justice Department said it had filed court papers outlining its break from Bush administration detention standards, and said only those who provided "substantial" support to al Qaeda or the Taliban would be considered detainable.

    "As we work towards developing a new policy to govern detainees, it is essential that we operate in a manner that strengthens our national security, is consistent with our values, and is governed by law," U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder said in a statement.

    "The change we've made today meets each of those standards and will make our nation stronger."

    Unlike under former President George W. Bush, who greatly sought to expand presidential powers during his term, the new detention policy does not rely on the president's powers as military commander in chief to hold terrorism suspects at Guantanamo.

    That policy has been subject to numerous legal battles and Supreme Court rulings that rebuked the Bush administration.

    Instead, the Justice Department said, "It draws on the international laws of war to inform the statutory authority conferred by Congress.

    "It provides that individuals who supported al Qaeda or the Taliban are detainable only if the support was substantial. And it does not employ the phrase 'enemy combatant.'"

    It said it had told the court that the Obama administration was reviewing its entire detention policy - as part of its plan to close the prison at the U.S. naval base on Guantanamo Bay, Cuba - and further refinements of the policies were possible.

--------    

    Additional reporting by Jim Vicini, editing by Jackie Frank.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

This changes nothing we

This changes nothing we still have prison camps in Afghanistan and Iraq and we're still imprisoning over 50,000 civilians..We're still occupying countries that don't want us there..and will continue to do so for who knows how many decades

When are we going to give

When are we going to give the name "war criminals" to the Bush administration?

The words make innumerous

The words make innumerous the ways our language allows for the most barbaric of practices to be innocuous. How the language glosses over the rude. That which we ought not be discussing, apparently, is the fact that this glorious United States of America, this fantastic system of ours, engaged in such truly ugly, abhorrent behavior to begin with. This is learned behavior. That, the editors won't talk about. It is no longer a question of IF they can suspend supposedly human rights, is it? No wonder the US won't sign the UN's Universal Declaration, or obey the World Court. The US' client states enjoy similar privileged excesses. A rouge state needs no permission. "Badges? We don't need no stinking badges!" What designation will be our next "Basis for Detention"?

You folks make some

You folks make some significant points, but this is an important step. Recognizing the rule of actual law...not some rules made on the spur of the moment, is a necessary step in putting an end to all of this.

I agree with radline9. I

I agree with radline9. I think limpball, glen beck, mann coulter and oh'really are good examples of enemy combatants. Ever notice that p.o.w.s became "enemy combatants" around the same time that rebels became "insurgents"? In an intellectual fiefdom such as ours it's very important that we only think and communicate within the parameters clearly defined by our betters.

HELLO! It draws on the

HELLO! It draws on the "international laws" ? REALLY We are following International Law, does that sound strange to anyone? Sounds like the United States is officially part of the 'One World Order' and Obama just signed away another big pot of money to the UN. All so wrapped up. We should all be so happy now.

I'm proud of my president

I'm proud of my president again.

Really disappointing if this

Really disappointing if this is all the "change " we're going to get on Gitmo. Isn't Obama going back on his word to close down the place?