Share

Who Owns Colorado's Rainwater?

by: Nicholas Riccardi  |  The Los Angeles Times

photo
Tara Hui of San Francisco displays a barrel she uses to harvest rainwater at her home. Rainwater laws prevent Colorado residents from legally doing the same. (Photo: Jeff Chiu / AP)

    Environmentalists and others like to gather it in containers for use in drier times. But state law says it belongs to those who bought the rights to waterways.

    Denver - Every time it rains here, Kris Holstrom knowingly breaks the law.

    Holstrom's violation is the fancifully painted 55-gallon buckets underneath the gutters of her farmhouse on a mesa 15 miles from the resort town of Telluride. The barrels catch rain and snowmelt, which Holstrom uses to irrigate the small vegetable garden she and her husband maintain.

    But according to the state of Colorado, the rain that falls on Holstrom's property is not hers to keep. It should be allowed to fall to the ground and flow unimpeded into surrounding creeks and streams, the law states, to become the property of farmers, ranchers, developers and water agencies that have bought the rights to those waterways.

    What Holstrom does is called rainwater harvesting. It's a practice that dates back to the dawn of civilization, and is increasingly in vogue among environmentalists and others who pursue sustainable lifestyles. They collect varying amounts of water, depending on the rainfall and the vessels they collect it in. The only risk involved is losing it to evaporation. Or running afoul of Western states' water laws.

    Those laws, some of them more than a century old, have governed the development of the region since pioneer days.

    "If you try to collect rainwater, well, that water really belongs to someone else," said Doug Kemper, executive director of the Colorado Water Congress. "We get into a very detailed accounting on every little drop."

    Frank Jaeger of the Parker Water and Sanitation District, on the arid foothills south of Denver, sees water harvesting as an insidious attempt to take water from entities that have paid dearly for the resource.

    "Every drop of water that comes down keeps the ground wet and helps the flow of the river," Jaeger said. He scoffs at arguments that harvesters like Holstrom only take a few drops from rivers. "Everything always starts with one little bite at a time."

    Increasingly, however, states are trying to make the practice more welcome. Bills in Colorado and Utah, two states that have limited harvesting over the years, would adjust their laws to allow it in certain scenarios, over the protest of people like Jaeger.

    Organic farmers and urban dreamers aren't the only people pushing to legalize water harvesting. Developer Harold Smethills wants to build more than 10,000 homes southwest of Denver that would be supplied by giant cisterns that capture the rain that falls on the 3,200-acre subdivision. He supports the change in Colorado law.

    "We believe there is something to rainwater harvesting," Smethills said. "We believe it makes economic sense."

    Collected rainwater is generally considered "gray water," or water that is not reliably pure enough to drink but can be used to water yards, flush toilets and power heaters. In some states, developers try to include a network of cisterns and catchment pools in every subdivision, but in others, those who catch the rain tend to do so covertly.

    In Colorado, rights to bodies of water are held by entities who get preference based on the dates of their claims. Like many other Western states, Colorado has more claims than available water, and even those who hold rights dating back to the late 19th century sometimes find they do not get all of the water they should.

    "If I decide to [take rainwater] in 2009, somewhere, maybe 100 miles downstream, there's a water right that outdates me by 100 years" that's losing water, said Kevin Rein, assistant state engineer.

    State Sen. Chris Romer found out about this facet of state water policy when he built his ecological dream house in Denver, entirely powered by solar energy. He wanted to install a system to catch rainwater, but the state said it couldn't be permitted.

    "It was stunning to me that this common-sense thing couldn't be done," said Romer, a Democrat. He sponsored a bill last year to allow water harvesting, but it did not pass.

    "Welcome to water politics in Colorado," Romer said. "You don't touch my gun, you don't touch my whiskey, and you don't touch my water."

    Romer and Republican state Rep. Marsha Looper introduced bills this year to allow harvesting in certain circumstances. Armed with a study that shows that 97% of rainwater that falls on the soil never makes it to streams, they propose to allow harvesting in 11 pilot projects in urban areas, and for rural users like Kris Holstrom whose wells are depleted by drought.

    In contrast to the high-stakes maneuvering in the capital, Holstrom looks upon the state's regulation of rainwater with exasperated amusement.

    Holstrom, director of sustainability for Telluride, and her husband, John, have lived on their farm since 1988. During the severe drought at the start of this decade, their well began drying up. Placing rain barrels under the gutters was the natural thing to do, said Holstrom, 51.

    "Rain out here comes occasionally, and can come really hard," she said. "To be able to store it for when you need it is really great."

    Holstrom had a vague awareness of state regulations. She decided to test it last summer when she was teaching a class on water harvesting. She called the state water department, which told her it was technically illegal, though it was unlikely that she would be cited.

    Holstrom is known in southwestern Colorado for a lifestyle and causes that many deem quixotic. The land she and her husband own holds a yurt and tepees to house "interns" who help on their organic farm in the summers. It boasts a greenhouse, which even on a recent snowy day held an oasis of rosemary, artichokes, salad greens and a fig tree.

    She plucked a bit of greens from one plant and munched on it as goldfish swam in a small, algae-filled pond that helps heat the enclosure. "This has been my passion for a long time - trying to live the best way I know how," she said.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Pathetic to claim the

Pathetic to claim the rainwater belongs to someone and only that someone can use it. Next thing to come would be taxing the AIR for each breath we do. They have a similar law in Germany that charges a Rain tax for all square meters covered by buildings and pathways on your own land. But I guess with that payment you are at least free to collect whatever rains down.

In a lot of places,

In a lot of places, rainwater collecting is considered beneficial, or at least it's beneficial when the rain falls on a hard surface, such as a roof, a driveway, a street, etc. That's because the runoff from hard surfaces tends to result in flooding, because it reaches streams suddenly, rather than in a trickle like it would if the rain fell on soil or vegetation.

Rainwater is pure water.

Rainwater is pure water. There are struggles developing where corporatists will insist upon ownership of anything and everything lobbyists can donate enough campaign funds to have their favorite laws written about, anyone who thinks can see that is the way things work in all political centers. This article is interesting in many ways but is totally false to claim, "Collected rainwater is generally considered 'gray water,' or water that is not reliably pure enough to drink but can be used to water yards, flush toilets and power heaters. This statement is wrong and misleading, there is no general consensus to this false claim anywhere on planet earth.

I cannot believe that any

I cannot believe that any court could rule that the rain that falls on my roof dose not belong to me.

I remember what a bargaining

I remember what a bargaining power water rights were as I was growing up in Colorado. We could sell shares if we needed some extra money; we had a large fallow farm. But not allowing us to collect rainwater? Who knew? And just try to stop us!! We've got to grow gardens these days and not just because our commercially grown food is toxic. We can't afford to pay for the inedible, tasteless, and vitamin free stuff.

Colorado's water laws are

Colorado's water laws are outrageous. According to them, digging a pond would be illegal. Collecting rainwater is a natural right, and I'm surprised that the people of Colorado have sat silent and allowed their lawmakers to pass such a stupid law. What's next--making us pay for the air we breathe?The sad fact is that the corporations who sell water just want more water in the rivers so they can pipe it to California, etc., and sell it and make mega bucks. It's just more bought and paid for government and greedy corporations. It's time to break the shackles of corporate serfdom.

No one owns a rain cloud,

No one owns a rain cloud, nor the rain in it, nor the rain that falls on a roof and flows out a canale into a garden and makes a puddle. No one.

These water-ownership laws

These water-ownership laws are atrocious and I pray that such travesties never enter Canada. But listen: those who collect rainwater for gardens, flushing toilets, doing the wash, etc., are ALL putting this water back into the ground. So the "owners" of the downstream rights surely are getting it back eventually...what's the problem? The water is never "consumed"...just delayed in its arrival at the "owner's" location....no? Bob

I am speechless. It's just

I am speechless. It's just absurd. It's a prelude of the wars and the stupidest things to come. If you thought that a war over fossil fuel in the Middle East was OK because it's far away from your kids' school; wait till you hear gunshots in your own backyard over water and food. Oh yes! It's coming to a "theater" near you. Good luck America! I've noticed that the stupidest ideas and actions always have more than 50% support from the general public. In this particular case, all you need to say to convince folks to go along is simply "harvesting water will kill jobs in America". Simple isn't it?

The West has some unique

The West has some unique issues and laws and all that. I think the Bigger Picture should have ALL of us concerned about water - clean water -- and how we allow and even encourage the Big Polluters to just do their thing. Take the coal burning power plants and their storage of the coal waste and the "ponds" and what happens when one of them has a failure: CATASTROPHIC POLLUTION OF THE WATERWAYS. "Shift" flows downstream and so does that crap and ALL of it eventually gets polluted. There is only so much drinkable water on this planet - so why is it that the Repugnicans care so little about Clean Air and Clean Water?

What does this most

What does this most laughable/insidious (delete as applicable) regulation have to say about someone with a leaking roof. If It is the state's water which is causing damage to the resident's house contents, can the resident then sue the state? Is it the state's resposibility to repair the roof? - - I'll take a wild guess that it won't be their water. It is the politicians mantra all over again. We have any right we can lay claim to, but don't even think about trying to place any responsibility on us.

I will take exception to

I will take exception to rainwater being likened to gray water. We have 100% rainwater harvesting for our home outside of Austin, TX. It is filtered three times and then goes through a UV light and is as clean as what is used for dialysis. There is a company near us that collects rainwater and bottles it as "fresh squeezed cloud juice." Richard is, to our knowledge, the first rainwater bottler in the nation. Rainwater encourages conservation of water, because when you know that all the water you have is in your cistern, you don't waste it. Colorado's law is ridiculous and needs to be changed.

Thisis more government

Thisis more government stupidity. Rain water saved for irregation is returned to the aquifers. How about all the swimming pools that collect the rain?

Don't blame the politicians,

Don't blame the politicians, blame the megacorps that own the water rights and their lobbyists. Time to return all water rights to the general public and dispense water to the most beneficial means, and raise the costs for it. Rainwater excepted of course., for all the reasons above. Then, make water conservation mandatory in all SE, SW, and MW and western states (except for those in the NW). Water IS the next battle, as is food.