Share

US Shares Blame in Mexico Drug Violence, Senators Say

by: Josh Meyer  |  The Los Angeles Times

photo
A body lies in the street in Tijuana, Mexico. (Photo: Reuters pictures)

    Washington — Efforts by Mexico and the United States to stem the skyrocketing border drug and weapons trade are failing, and both countries are to blame for the rise of violent cartels responsible for more than 6,000 deaths in Mexico last year, lawmakers and experts said in a Senate hearing Tuesday.

    For years, elected officials in Washington portrayed Mexico as being largely responsible for the problems spawned by the increasingly powerful crime syndicates -- and for fixing them.

    But at an unusual hearing of the Senate judiciary subcommittee on crime and drugs and the Senate Caucus on International Narcotics Control, lawmakers from both parties said repeatedly that Washington's inattention to decades of drug use by Americans had played a central role in the crisis.

    Many also acknowledged that their own government's failure to stop the southbound stream of weapons and laundered cash had fueled the multibillion-dollar drug trade just as much as the northbound flow of cocaine, heroin, marijuana, methamphetamine and smuggled humans.

    "Mexico and America are in this together, and there is enough blame to go around," said Sen. Richard J. Durbin (D-Ill.), the subcommittee chairman and assistant majority leader of the Senate. "The insatiable demand for illegal drugs in the United States keeps the Mexican drug cartels in business."

    He also said lax U.S. gun laws and poor enforcement had created an "iron river of guns" that had armed "Mexican drug cartels to the teeth."

    Durbin was one of several lawmakers who said Congress would begin considering ways to reduce U.S. demand for drugs through treatment and other methods.

    The Department of Homeland Security and other U.S. agencies are preparing to deploy more federal agents to the border in response to the drug cartels, one law enforcement official said on condition of anonymity because the plan was not public.

    "The number of agents has not been determined," the official said.

    Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa), co-chairman of the narcotics caucus, said in the hearing that corruption in Mexico remained a crucial problem. But he also said U.S. authorities needed to share more intelligence and do more investigations with Mexico.

    He also said it was important to get rid of overlapping authorities between the Department of Homeland Security and the Drug Enforcement Administration.

    Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), the other caucus co-chair, said the U.S. government and Congress needed to do much more to help Mexico. She said the U.S. must continue to fund the security aid package known as the Merida Initiative established by the Bush administration.

    She said the promised U.S. delivery of several helicopters and surveillance equipment had been delayed until 2011, and that Washington needed to reinstitute a ban on assault weapons and give U.S. law enforcement officials greater authority to dismantle gun and drug trafficking rings.

    The hearing was the first by the Senate in this Congress to focus on the drug cartels; it followed several hearings last week in the House. It focused on how U.S. law enforcement agencies can better assist Mexican President Felipe Calderon's efforts to combat drug trafficking and related violence and corruption.

    Arizona Atty. Gen. Terry Goddard said federal agencies needed to work far better with one another, with state and local authorities, and with their Mexican counterparts.

    "We are not winning the battle," Goddard said, adding that the drug gangs easily sidestep U.S. efforts by finding new trade routes and methods of smuggling, and by using hard-to-detect methods of financing such as "stored value" debit and credit cards that can hold huge sums of money.

    "Congress can and should play a significant supporting role," Goddard said. "We can't do this alone. We need federal cooperation, coordination and resources."

    Several top U.S. officials defended their agencies' work, saying improvements were necessary but that they were cooperating better than ever with one another and with Mexico.

    William J. Hoover, assistant director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, cited numerous statistics to show how many weapons traffickers and guns had been seized on both sides of the border. But he acknowledged that 90% of the guns found in Mexico came from the U.S.

    Kumar Kibble, deputy director of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, conceded that there were "a lot of intelligence gaps" in what U.S. authorities knew about how the cartels were moving their drugs, weapons and money.

    But Anthony P. Placido, the DEA's chief of intelligence, said the increase in violence was actually a sign of success. He described the cartels as "wounded, vulnerable and dangerous organizations."

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Way to go, Congress! Keep

Way to go, Congress! Keep the drug laws in place, do selective enforcement, look the other way when favored strata of society stuff the drug of the day up their ivy-league noses and blame all the ensuing mayhem on Blacks and immigrants. Worked like a charm during Prohibition, right?

Nothing that full

Nothing that full legalisation would stem...but of course you have to have the political (and personal) guts to push the most logical, scientific and health conscious solution...

Ahem... The US government

Ahem... The US government (CIA/Wallstreet) are the ones doing the smuggling of the drugs and drug money into the US and the financial markets. Please wake up American "dopes". (pun intended). Some of Madoff's biggest losers where large global drug money laundering operations. But the CIA and SEC didn't know this? -- are they just stupid or possibly supportive? One could start here for more background: http://www.ciadrugs.com/?b1b7cb08 for more information. Here is a report from Reuters News regarding drug money: http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idUSLP65079620090125

It's good to see, from the

It's good to see, from the comments so far, that people aren't necessarily falling for this utter bull from those in power. Start with the neoliberal NAFTA that destroyed the livelihoods of most of Mexico's agrarian poor. Add some CIA involvement to sell weapons south of the border and sell drugs north of the border to finance their myriad wars all over the planet. Toss in a new assault weapons ban to keep the arms out of the hands of US citizens (and truth be known these weapons are almost never used in crimes, and the weapons going to Mexico are not being sold by individual US citizens- these weapons are coming from illegal arms dealers). Then propose that the military is the only solution... because to America the military and militarization is ALWAYS the only solution. It's an excellent recipe to further oppress both US and Mexican citizens while fixing nothing and sating only the corrupts' desires for more power and wealth.

Pure stupidity? Pure

Pure stupidity? Pure Insanity? No, it's government corruption and cultural deterioration....the fall of an empire! It's a long way down and you Americans have just begun the main descent! Fasten your seat belts because it's going to get faster and steeper with each passing day! The awe-filled truth is that you are starting to reap what you have sown. It is a natural law and no one can protect you from that!

If you have a cold, you can

If you have a cold, you can only treat the symptoms...the virus must run its course. Drug addiction is a societal disease, and treating the symptoms isn't enough here either. VietNam, and now Iraq and Afghanistan, should be proof enough that we can't cure violence with more violence. As long as addiction exists, ways will be found to profit from it. We must come to terms with the fact that Americans are addicted, both to drugs and to violence. The only way to break these cycles is to rid ourselves of the addictions, but this can only be achieved in a healthy society. We obviously have a long way to go...

The Subcommittee apparently

The Subcommittee apparently failed to consider two other key points: first, that the economic policies foisted on Mexico over the last twenry-five years, NAFTA being the crown jewel, have led to the mass abandonment of farming as a means for anything but the barest of subsistence living, spurring, obviously, migration and the drug trade. And second, that the current regime in Mexico is illegitimate, the product of a crude electoral fraud in July of 2006, and is thus using the terror and fear of a "drug war" in a desperate attempt to keep itself propped up. And if you keep sending them more helicopters and surveillance equipment, Senator Feinstein, they may just succeed in doing that, See: www.deconstructingmexico.blogspot.com.

It seems odd, I keep hearing

It seems odd, I keep hearing references to a river of "automatic" guns flowing into Mexico from the US. For those unfamiliar with the law here in the US, it is almost impossible to legally acquire a fully automatic weapon in the US. It is very expensive and requires a background investigation. These kind of weapons are not commonly available at the average gun shop. If we are indeed talking about semi-automatic weapons, sold in quantity and smuggled into Mexico, we are dealing with a border control and law-enforcement issue. Restricting the constitutional right to keep and bear arms in the US, is not an answer to issues in Mexico. Mexico has very strict gun control. It is illegal to smuggle the weapons in, which suggests Mexico needs to do a better job controlling their border. A purchase made in the US with the intention of suppling a weapon to a person NOT eligible to purchase is already covered under federal law. We don't need new laws, we just need to enforce the ones we have. Perhaps our law enforcement would be better utilized dealing with these issues, rather than tracking down the master-criminal who released a bootleg copy of the latest Guns and Roses album.

LEGALIZE DRUGS AND PUT THE

LEGALIZE DRUGS AND PUT THE BURDEN BACK ON THE INDIVIDUAL WHERE IT BELONGS AND WAH LAH..!! END OF DRUG WAR, CRACK HOUSES, DRUG LORDS, NARCO GOVERNMENTS, DRUG DEALERS, TALIBAN HEROIN INCOME, ELIMINATION OF BILLIONS UPON BILLIONS IN ANNUAL TAX PAYER COSTS, A DROP IN THE PRISON POPULATION OF AT LEST 60%--- AND LAST BUT NOT LEAST---- BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN NEW TAX REVENUE... PERHAPS EVEN A BALANCED BUDGET...!....

It's odd that we heard no

It's odd that we heard no more about the corporate jet which was forced down in northern Mexico, the crew had vanished but it was found to be carrying several tons of cocaine. It was also found to be operated by the CIA. Surprise, surprise!!

Feinstein has a gun,but

Feinstein has a gun,but wants everyone to turn in theirs. When she was mayor of San Francisco, only she would possess a carry permit while denying others the same right. This is the same idiocy as Israel being allowed to steal and produce WMD's then act aghast at any other country wanting the right to defend itself (from Israeli invasion) The so called authorities have no problem pointing guns at the people as long as they are disarmed. This shrill PR story for the criminals that have raped our country is the necessary lead in to their next act of total control over our populace. Never give up your guns to a politician who is pointing one back at you. They revealed their "care" for We the People during their test exercise-Katrina. Where are the 5,000 missing citizens? Maybe a mass grave will be found 20 years after Feinstein.

Why not address the issue of

Why not address the issue of Drug (marijuana) Prohibition and the role that it is playing in the Mexican carnage! During alcohol prohibition, the same thing happened; the provision of the illegal substance (alcohol) was provided to willing consumers by organized crime, law enforcement and government were thoroughly corrupted and the fight among competing gangs to dominate the market by eliminating competitors caused the streets to run red with blood! What is now happening in the streets of Nuevo Laredo, Juarez and other Mexican border towns is little different from what happened in the streets of New York, Chicago, Boston and Detroit in the 1920's and 1930's! In 1933, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt had the foresight to push for the 21st Amendment to end alcohol prohibition! Why can't the current President follow his example? It will save numerous lives and restore the public's faith in government!

The answer is

The answer is straightforward: huge profits fuel this violence. Because drugs are illegal, the underground economy provides them at an inflated price. The same thing happened during Prohibition with alcoholic beverages. Decriminalize drugs and the excess profit disappears.

Major Barbara is right. The

Major Barbara is right. The Arms manufacturers have won the war on drugs.

We have more people

We have more people incarcerated per capita than any other country, largely due to incarceration of drug users and sellers. Is this effective? Who would argue that it is when we are spending so much money that it is cuasing these problems in Mexico. Who defends this drug war? People on the take from it, that's who. Law enforcement, penal systsem workers, congressmen and others in government. They have the citicenry duped into thinking that the drug war is effective. Point to anything effecitve about it, I challenge anyone who wants to defend it. Challenge the assumptions, such as tje senator from Iowa who recently said that Marijuana was a gatewary drug. Where is his proof. Why does he make such an unfounded statement. Thank of the $600 Billion a year that US drug users spend for your answer.