Share

Shut Out at the Polls

by: Editorial  |  The Washington Post

photo
(Photo: Mark Hertzberg / AP / Journal Times)

    A registration system that disenfranchises millions needs judicious repair.

    None of the fears that preceded last year's historic election were realized. There was no widespread fraudulent voting, electronic machines overall performed well and the vote was not too close to call. Nonetheless, the election was marred because millions of Americans were not able to cast ballots for candidates of their choice. At fault is the antiquated way voters are registered. Congress must work with the states to fix the problems that end up disenfranchising far too many citizens.

    According to a study by the Cooperative Congressional Election Survey, an estimated 4 million eligible voters couldn't cast ballots in the 2008 presidential election because they encountered problems with their registrations. Another 4 million to 5 million people reported administrative procedures as the reason for not registering. Senate Rules Committee Chairman Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) recounted at a recent hearing how people were unable to vote through no fault of their own: a man whose name was mistakenly confused with that of an ineligible convicted felon; a woman whose registration was never turned in by a third-party registration organization; a serviceman who was moved from base to base and couldn't meet the deadline to register. Many never received the absentee ballots they requested.

    It is clear from the study as well as from the testimony of other experts that the cumbersome, paper-based system of voter registration needs to be overhauled. Not only is it the prime reason that many voters are blocked from casting ballots, but it diverts local election officials from more critical tasks such as training poll workers or processing absentee ballots. Voting rights advocates make a strong case for shifting the onus for registration from voters to the state, using technology and existing databases (such as tax records and motor vehicle lists) to build a permanent roster. Voters should have a convenient way of verifying that they are properly registered, and there is no reason that they should lose their right to vote simply because they move to another block or state or change their names.

    The Rules Committee hearing was billed as just a start in laying out the issues. Congress is right to tread carefully in coming up with effective solutions. But, by the same token, it shouldn't allow another election in which so many citizens are shut out.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

There was massive voting

There was massive voting fraud. Caging lists were used by Republicans in Colorado, Florida and Ohio, to name just a few. It's just like The Post to try to bury this issue as deeply as possible - by assuring us it no longer, or never did, exist. It's just that so many people voted for Democrats that the cheating techniques/technology did not display their results, except in the Coleman and Chambliss races. I believe the Republicans successfully fixed 40 to 50 races in the House and 7 Senate seats in the past election. We really need federal regulations in place soon - very soon. Obama better get this done.

Computerized voting machine

Computerized voting machine fraud was massive and cost the Democrats a number of seats in both houses. The mainstream media is still in the pocket of those corporations who are in the process of stealing our democracy through the secret unverifiable voting machines. Instead of listening to the Post propaganda, check out http://www.blackboxvoting.org/

Because Obama won by such a

Because Obama won by such a comfortable margin, the result in the presidential race matched the will of the voters. When I heard that McCain had conceeded I wept with relief. It is clear that if the race had been close it would have been stolen by Republican operatives. It's not especially hard, since they control the machines, the software and the maintenance and the software is secret. As for the use of the word "fraud" I would suggest not using it, since it seems to suggest that voters commit fraud in significant numbers. They simply don't. But there was a lot of voter disenfranchisement and vote manipulation.

Why can't the US use paper

Why can't the US use paper ballots like (most of) the rest of us democracies? It is clear to all that the 2000 election was given to Bush via the Supreme Court and via absurd voting machines and other irregularities that don't happen with one paper vote on real voter. And you don't need to believe every word of Greg Palast's Armed Madhouse on the 2004 election to know that there were such grave irregularities then that Kerry may well have lost because of them. We outsiders care an awful lot for US democracy - it decides our lives (and our fortunes!) We've all had it tough watching our security and financial interests go down the drain during eight years of Mr G W Bush. So please, Americans, demand paper ballots. And clean up voter registration - can't you get this done by Federal law? Thank you!