Share

A New Strategy for Afghanistan and Pakistan

by: President Barack Obama, t r u t h o u t | Transcript

photo
President Barack Obama with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates. (Photo: Reuters)

    Prepared Remarks of President Barack Obama
    Transcript
    White House Press Office
    Washington, DC

    Good morning. Today, I am announcing a comprehensive, new strategy for Afghanistan and Pakistan.

    This marks the conclusion of a careful policy review that I ordered as soon as I took office. My Administration has heard from our military commanders and diplomats. We have consulted with the Afghan and Pakistani governments; with our partners and NATO allies; and with other donors and international organizations. And we have also worked closely with members of Congress here at home. Now, I'd like to speak clearly and candidly to the American people.

    The situation is increasingly perilous. It has been more than seven years since the Taliban was removed from power, yet war rages on, and insurgents control parts of Afghanistan and Pakistan. Attacks against our troops, our NATO allies, and the Afghan government have risen steadily. Most painfully, 2008 was the deadliest year of the war for American forces.

    Many people in the United States - and many in partner countries that have sacrificed so much - have a simple question: What is our purpose in Afghanistan? After so many years, they ask, why do our men and women still fight and die there? They deserve a straightforward answer.

    So let me be clear: al Qaeda and its allies - the terrorists who planned and supported the 9/11 attacks - are in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Multiple intelligence estimates have warned that al Qaeda is actively planning attacks on the U.S. homeland from its safe-haven in Pakistan. And if the Afghan government falls to the Taliban - or allows al Qaeda to go unchallenged - that country will again be a base for terrorists who want to kill as many of our people as they possibly can.

    The future of Afghanistan is inextricably linked to the future of its neighbor, Pakistan. In the nearly eight years since 9/11, al Qaeda and its extremist allies have moved across the border to the remote areas of the Pakistani frontier. This almost certainly includes al Qaeda's leadership: Osama bin Laden and Ayman al-Zawahiri. They have used this mountainous terrain as a safe-haven to hide, train terrorists, communicate with followers, plot attacks, and send fighters to support the insurgency in Afghanistan. For the American people, this border region has become the most dangerous place in the world.

    But this is not simply an American problem - far from it. It is, instead, an international security challenge of the highest order. Terrorist attacks in London and Bali were tied to al Qaeda and its allies in Pakistan, as were attacks in North Africa and the Middle East, in Islamabad and Kabul. If there is a major attack on an Asian, European, or African city, it - too - is likely to have ties to al Qaeda's leadership in Pakistan. The safety of people around the world is at stake.

    For the Afghan people, a return to Taliban rule would condemn their country to brutal governance, international isolation, a paralyzed economy, and the denial of basic human rights to the Afghan people - especially women and girls. The return in force of al Qaeda terrorists who would accompany the core Taliban leadership would cast Afghanistan under the shadow of perpetual violence.

    As President, my greatest responsibility is to protect the American people. We are not in Afghanistan to control that country or to dictate its future. We are in Afghanistan to confront a common enemy that threatens the United States, our friends and allies, and the people of Afghanistan and Pakistan who have suffered the most at the hands of violent extremists.

    So I want the American people to understand that we have a clear and focused goal: to disrupt, dismantle, and defeat al Qaeda in Pakistan and Afghanistan, and to prevent their return to either country in the future. That is the goal that must be achieved. That is a cause that could not be more just. And to the terrorists who oppose us, my message is the same: we will defeat you.

    To achieve our goals, we need a stronger, smarter and comprehensive strategy. To focus on the greatest threat to our people, America must no longer deny resources to Afghanistan because of the war in Iraq. To enhance the military, governance, and economic capacity of Afghanistan and Pakistan, we have to marshal international support. And to defeat an enemy that heeds no borders or laws of war, we must recognize the fundamental connection between the future of Afghanistan and Pakistan - which is why I've appointed Ambassador Richard Holbrooke to serve as Special Representative for both countries, and to work closely with General David Petraeus to integrate our civilian and military efforts.

    Let me start by addressing the way forward in Pakistan.

    The United States has great respect for the Pakistani people. They have a rich history, and have struggled against long odds to sustain their democracy. The people of Pakistan want the same things that we want: an end to terror, access to basic services, the opportunity to live their dreams, and the security that can only come with the rule of law. The single greatest threat to that future comes from al Qaeda and their extremist allies, and that is why we must stand together.

    The terrorists within Pakistan's borders are not simply enemies of America or Afghanistan - they are a grave and urgent danger to the people of Pakistan. Al Qaeda and other violent extremists have killed several thousand Pakistanis since 9/11. They have killed many Pakistani soldiers and police. They assassinated Benazir Bhutto. They have blown up buildings, derailed foreign investment, and threatened the stability of the state. Make no mistake: al Qaeda and its extremist allies are a cancer that risks killing Pakistan from within.

    It is important for the American people to understand that Pakistan needs our help in going after al Qaeda. This is no simple task. The tribal regions are vast, rugged, and often ungoverned. That is why we must focus our military assistance on the tools, training and support that Pakistan needs to root out the terrorists. And after years of mixed results, we will not provide a blank check. Pakistan must demonstrate its commitment to rooting out al Qaeda and the violent extremists within its borders. And we will insist that action be taken - one way or another - when we have intelligence about high-level terrorist targets.

    The government's ability to destroy these safe-havens is tied to its own strength and security. To help Pakistan weather the economic crisis, we must continue to work with the IMF, the World Bank and other international partners. To lessen tensions between two nuclear-armed nations that too often teeter on the edge of escalation and confrontation, we must pursue constructive diplomacy with both India and Pakistan. To avoid the mistakes of the past, we must make clear that our relationship with Pakistan is grounded in support for Pakistan's democratic institutions and the Pakistani people. And to demonstrate through deeds as well as words a commitment that is enduring, we must stand for lasting opportunity.

    A campaign against extremism will not succeed with bullets or bombs alone. Al Qaeda offers the people of Pakistan nothing but destruction. We stand for something different. So today, I am calling upon Congress to pass a bipartisan bill co-sponsored by John Kerry and Richard Lugar that authorizes $1.5 billion in direct support to the Pakistani people every year over the next five years - resources that will build schools, roads, and hospitals, and strengthen Pakistan's democracy. I'm also calling on Congress to pass a bipartisan bill co-sponsored by Maria Cantwell, Chris Van Hollen and Peter Hoekstra that creates opportunity zones in the border region to develop the economy and bring hope to places plagued by violence. And we will ask our friends and allies to do their part - including at the donors conference in Tokyo next month.

    I do not ask for this support lightly. These are challenging times, and resources are stretched. But the American people must understand that this is a down payment on our own future - because the security of our two countries is shared. Pakistan's government must be a stronger partner in destroying these safe-havens, and we must isolate al Qaeda from the Pakistani people.

    These steps in Pakistan are also indispensable to our effort in Afghanistan, which will see no end to violence if insurgents move freely back and forth across the border.

    Security demands a new sense of shared responsibility. That is why we will launch a standing, trilateral dialogue among the United States, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Our nations will meet regularly, with Secretary Clinton and Secretary Gates leading our effort. Together, we must enhance intelligence sharing and military cooperation along the border, while addressing issues of common concern like trade, energy, and economic development.

    This is just one part of a comprehensive strategy to prevent Afghanistan from becoming the al Qaeda safe-haven that it was before 9/11. To succeed, we and our friends and allies must reverse the Taliban's gains, and promote a more capable and accountable Afghan government.

    Our troops have fought bravely against a ruthless enemy. Our civilians have made great sacrifices. Our allies have borne a heavy burden. Afghans have suffered and sacrificed for their future. But for six years, Afghanistan has been denied the resources that it demands because of the war in Iraq. Now, we must make a commitment that can accomplish our goals.

    I have already ordered the deployment of 17,000 troops that had been requested by General McKiernan for many months. These soldiers and Marines will take the fight to the Taliban in the south and east, and give us a greater capacity to partner with Afghan Security Forces and to go after insurgents along the border. This push will also help provide security in advance of the important presidential election in August.

    At the same time, we will shift the emphasis of our mission to training and increasing the size of Afghan Security Forces, so that they can eventually take the lead in securing their country. That is how we will prepare Afghans to take responsibility for their security, and how we will ultimately be able to bring our troops home.

    For three years, our commanders have been clear about the resources they need for training. Those resources have been denied because of the war in Iraq. Now, that will change. The additional troops that we deployed have already increased our training capacity. Later this spring we will deploy approximately 4,000 U.S. troops to train Afghan Security Forces. For the first time, this will fully resource our effort to train and support the Afghan Army and Police. Every American unit in Afghanistan will be partnered with an Afghan unit, and we will seek additional trainers from our NATO allies to ensure that every Afghan unit has a coalition partner. We will accelerate our efforts to build an Afghan Army of 134,000 and a police force of 82,000 so that we can meet these goals by 2011 - and increases in Afghan forces may very well be needed as our plans to turn over security responsibility to the Afghans go forward.

    This push must be joined by a dramatic increase in our civilian effort. Afghanistan has an elected government, but it is undermined by corruption and has difficulty delivering basic services to its people. The economy is undercut by a booming narcotics trade that encourages criminality and funds the insurgency. The people of Afghanistan seek the promise of a better future. Yet once again, have seen the hope of a new day darkened by violence and uncertainty.

    To advance security, opportunity, and justice - not just in Kabul, but from the bottom up in the provinces - we need agricultural specialists and educators; engineers and lawyers. That is how we can help the Afghan government serve its people, and develop an economy that isn't dominated by illicit drugs. That is why I am ordering a substantial increase in our civilians on the ground. And that is why we must seek civilian support from our partners and allies, from the United Nations and international aid organizations - an effort that Secretary Clinton will carry forward next week in the Hague.

    At a time of economic crisis, it is tempting to believe that we can short-change this civilian effort. But make no mistake: our efforts will fail in Afghanistan and Pakistan if we don't invest in their future. That is why my budget includes indispensable investments in our State Department and foreign assistance programs. These investments relieve the burden on our troops. They contribute directly to security. They make the American people safer. And they save us an enormous amount of money in the long run - because it is far cheaper to train a policeman to secure their village or to help a farmer seed a crop, than it is to send our troops to fight tour after tour of duty with no transition to Afghan responsibility.

    As we provide these resources, the days of unaccountable spending, no-bid contracts, and wasteful reconstruction must end. So my budget will increase funding for a strong Inspector General at both the State Department and USAID, and include robust funding for the Special Inspector General for Afghan Reconstruction.

    And I want to be clear: we cannot turn a blind eye to the corruption that causes Afghans to lose faith in their own leaders. Instead, we will seek a new compact with the Afghan government that cracks down on corrupt behavior, and sets clear benchmarks for international assistance so that it is used to provide for the needs of the Afghan people.

    In a country with extreme poverty that has been at war for decades, there will also be no peace without reconciliation among former enemies. I have no illusions that this will be easy. In Iraq, we had success in reaching out to former adversaries to isolate and target al Qaeda. We must pursue a similar process in Afghanistan, while understanding that it is a very different country.

    There is an uncompromising core of the Taliban. They must be met with force, and they must be defeated. But there are also those who have taken up arms because of coercion, or simply for a price. These Afghans must have the option to choose a different course. That is why we will work with local leaders, the Afghan government, and international partners to have a reconciliation process in every province. As their ranks dwindle, an enemy that has nothing to offer the Afghan people but terror and repression must be further isolated. And we will continue to support the basic human rights of all Afghans - including women and girls.

    Going forward, we will not blindly stay the course. Instead, we will set clear metrics to measure progress and hold ourselves accountable. We'll consistently assess our efforts to train Afghan Security Forces, and our progress in combating insurgents. We will measure the growth of Afghanistan's economy, and its illicit narcotics production. And we will review whether we are using the right tools and tactics to make progress towards accomplishing our goals.

    None of the steps that I have outlined will be easy, and none should be taken by America alone. The world cannot afford the price that will come due if Afghanistan slides back into chaos or al Qaeda operates unchecked. We have a shared responsibility to act - not because we seek to project power for its own sake, but because our own peace and security depends upon it. And what's at stake now is not just our own security - it is the very idea that free nations can come together on behalf of our common security. That was the founding cause of NATO six decades ago. That must be our common purpose today.

    My Administration is committed to strengthening international organizations and collective action, and that will be my message next week in Europe. As America does more, we will ask others to join us in doing their part. From our partners and NATO allies, we seek not simply troops, but rather clearly defined capabilities: supporting the Afghan elections, training Afghan Security Forces, and a greater civilian commitment to the Afghan people. For the United Nations, we seek greater progress for its mandate to coordinate international action and assistance, and to strengthen Afghan institutions.

    And finally, together with the United Nations, we will forge a new Contact Group for Afghanistan and Pakistan that brings together all who should have a stake in the security of the region - our NATO allies and other partners, but also the Central Asian states, the Gulf nations and Iran; Russia, India and China. None of these nations benefit from a base for al Qaeda terrorists, and a region that descends into chaos. All have a stake in the promise of lasting peace and security and development.

    That is true, above all, for the coalition that has fought together in Afghanistan, side by side with Afghans. The sacrifices have been enormous. Nearly 700 Americans have lost their lives. Troops from over twenty other countries have also paid the ultimate price. All Americans honor the service and cherish the friendship of those who have fought, and worked, and bled by our side. And all Americans are awed by the service of our own men and women in uniform, who have borne a burden as great as any other generation's. They and their families embody the example of selfless sacrifice.

    The United States of America did not choose to fight a war in Afghanistan. Nearly 3,000 of our people were killed on September 11, 2001, for doing nothing more than going about their daily lives. Al Qaeda and its allies have since killed thousands of people in many countries. Most of the blood on their hands is the blood of Muslims, who al Qaeda has killed and maimed in far greater numbers than any other people. That is the future that al Qaeda is offering to the people of Pakistan and Afghanistan - a future without opportunity or hope; a future without justice or peace.

    The road ahead will be long. There will be difficult days. But we will seek lasting partnerships with Afghanistan and Pakistan that serve the promise of a new day for their people. And we will use all elements of our national power to defeat al Qaeda, and to defend America, our allies, and all who seek a better future. Because the United States of America stands for peace and security, justice and opportunity. That is who we are, and that is what history calls on us to do once more.

    Thank you, God Bless You, and God Bless the United States of America.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

I'm sorry but this doesn't

I'm sorry but this doesn't work for me. We cannot afford this constant militarism, we have no business policing the world, we are bankrupt and have enormous problems here. The "goals" in that part of the world does nothing for us. Militarism and empire don't work. Never have and never will. This is wrong.

Nearly 8 years on and the

Nearly 8 years on and the world still doesn't have any hard evidence that Usama bin Laden was responsible for the attacks of 9/11. Those ubiquitous 3 digits continue to be used to justify illegal wars for empire. If the FBI admits that it doesn't have "hard evidence" that UBL was responsible for 9/11, what is it that Obama knows?

I guess Barack doesn't get

I guess Barack doesn't get it after all of our hard work. Continuing failed bushie strategies is evil and doomed for further failure. So he has war monger Gen Jones, crew cut Marine, as his advisor and Gates as SoD and Petraus as OIC. They all were architects and cheerleaders of Iraq and the surge. What happened to the idea of an intelligent General like Wesley Clark o r any of several others.??????? Damn! I was assigned in Viet Nam to teach them how to fight an insurgency in their country. Pathetic - they taught me, as an Army Capt. - and now we are going to do the same thing for Afghans in their country?? Stupid! Arrogant!!

Right you are emberAZ. This

Right you are emberAZ. This is the same old crap -- different day. This line of stuff will go on as long as the Pipeliners and the MIC want it to.

Almost the same language

Almost the same language used about Vietnam in 1967, especially Walt Rostow. There are other ways of meeting the threat of terrorism. We cannot do for other people what they must do for themselves.

I agree that we don't have

I agree that we don't have any business bringing our war machine into Afghanistan. Is it the Taliban we're after or control of the poppies/ opium trade?

Its Obama's quagmire now.

Its Obama's quagmire now.

Oh, just witnessed HOPE

Oh, just witnessed HOPE being crushed by DESPAIR! HOPE is something that always seems to be on the horizon, about to appear. DESPAIR is the constant cloudy day that appears just as HOPE appears.

Endless war. War all my

Endless war. War all my life, it's never stopped. Pipelines for oil across a war zone as large as half the United States. Endless war to maintain ever faster growth to infinity on a finite planet. Smiling politicians in black suits, they have all smiled as they said endless war to me, all my life. Endless war is an ugly drag on everything good.

Claiming that the American

Claiming that the American people are threatened from the mountains of Afganistan is about as rational as claiming we are threatened by men on the moon. Just how long-range are the weapons of "the enemy"? Harold

These comments are so

These comments are so unanimous. And what makes politicians think they know better? And why should I be convinced by this speech that it isn't unreasonable paranoia? And what is the basis of the intelligence agencies' credibility? Do these "safe havenists" have inercontinental planes or rockets or warheads? There always are going to be some people who hate America. Must we root them out? Won't this create more? And what is this continuation of Bush's preventive war nonsense? Okay, I'm tired of hearing my own rant. Just consider the following: "I like to believe that people in the long run are going to do more to promote peace than our governments. Indeed, I think that people want peace so much that one of these days government had better get out of the way and let them have it." --Dwight D. Eisenhower

Why not make a concerted

Why not make a concerted effort to find out who was really responsible for 9/11? Obama would not have to send people anywhere. The answer is right is his own backyard. When is the Government going to admit that this whole thing is a domestic affair and the only people that have to be investigated are already on American soil?

I am disappointed ...

I am disappointed ... exrtremely disappointed.

Let's face it, this smells

Let's face it, this smells of co-option to the neo cons. Nothing is changing despite his brave new world rhetoric. Why is this? Because he is not in control. Bush was nuts but Obama is trying to be smart. He may not be smart enough. If these 4,000 trainers are who I think they are the School of the Americas is now going to Afghanistan. Death squads can not be far behind. Is any of this Democracy or cram it down your your throat until you die. Who really is this for? Somebody else.

At last! Actual intelligent

At last! Actual intelligent reasoning on the world stage. I am SO tired of the puffing and preening of militant warmonger. Obama has it right. Please have the small amount of trust you need to take a deep breath and listen with your mind rather than scream your fear all over everyone. We must regard the humans around the globe with respect, especially those who show signs of valuing freedom. We must work to build relationships of trust, creating and rebuilding alliances, rather than allowing the last years of misguided brutal tyranny to continue. We cannot afford to try to win through might. We don't have enough militant power or fear mongering to do the job, and wouldn't like the result in any case.

September 11th happened 8

September 11th happened 8 years ago. Get over it. The majority of "hijackers" were from Saudi Arabia if they were from anywhere at all. Why does Pres. Obama continue these myths. We want the Truth Out now. We have had enough war. War doesn't decide who's right only who's left. We're going to the White House for the Mother's Day Vigil to protest continuation of Occupation and escalation. Women and Children are the constant victims of these barbaric policies. The only role I see for the Military now is to protect women,children and elders. NO MORE OFFENSE. NO MORE MONEY FOR WAR!!!! Maybe the First Lady can help us.

The answer is simple. Get

The answer is simple. Get All US forces out of the Middle East and stop supporting the murderers in Israel. Then the Muslims would have no one to hate. Bin Laden may have carried out the 9/11 "attack", but it was his bosses "The Bushies"who ordered and profited from it. They haven't him caught because he'll blow the whistle on the whole bunch and expose the our government's plan to enslave the American people . Get real and get the hell out of the Middle east.

OBL is as dead as Jacob

OBL is as dead as Jacob Marley was in A Christmas Carol. He is Zapata in the mountains. This is send the money overseas so they can steal it on the way back a la Mr. Jensen's speech in Network. The reason we are not using nat gas is because, being domestic, they can't steal it on the recycle run whether by Saudis buying weapons systems, pallet s full of 1oos disappearing in Iraq, etc. Think big picture. Follow the money, they bought us by misdirection. Got CDS still hiding its salamis and trading crap (Collateralized by Rejected Assets Plan) for gold in the dark? Yes you do! And you know they know how to stop it, but they don't. Now we know. Good thing Toto pulled down the curtain..Good dog!

the charge of the Light

the charge of the Light Brigade all over again! if President Obama wants peace,he must talk peace and make peace with peoples of the world.

Why are people surprised?

Why are people surprised? He's been talking about getting out of Iraq in order to go into Afghanistan for 2 years. He is a warmonger, too. And he has never shown himself to be any different. Not to mention, where is the pressure from the left? There is none. The left is sitting back and waiting for Obama to wave his magic wand. If the left wants him to enact progressive policies, then he has to feel the pressure to do so. Trst me he is getting plenty of pressure from the right. That has been clear all along.

The "new policy" is the old

The "new policy" is the old policy, with MORE WAR, escalation. The "new policy" on Afghanistan is Pakistan. Declare victory and get out. OUT. Bring the troops home. This is the "LBJ-ing" of Obama. I voted for Obama. I will dissent from this policy, which has NOT been discussed with the US public, nor has Congress debated the policy. The drones/missiles into Pakistan are another batch of war crimes. Dennis Kucinich: please holler loud!

Hmmm... So the US will be

Hmmm... So the US will be giving Pakistan billions of dollars to support them while they supposedly help us fight this BS GWOT. But in the meantime, Pakistan cedes control of parts of their country to the Taliban and their Pakistani counterparts and allows them to institute the very repressive control that we say we are against. And in the meantime, Pakistan's ISI actively aids and supports the Taliban, who continue to kill US and allied soldiers. There is something seriously wrong with this picture. As other commenters have mentioned, and as I have previously, the rhetoric spewed by our "leaders" as it relates to our engagement and "strategy" in Afganistan is so eerily similar to the lies that we were forced to listen to in the 60s regarding Vietnam that it is uncanny. The Vietnam war was unwinnable, and the situation in Afganistan is even worse, as Afganistan can be compared to an amalgam of the conditions in both Vietnam (then) and Somalia now. If we are truly interested in removing the Taliban and Al Qaeda as threats, then the ISI must be destroyed, and the Wahabists in Saudi Arabia and Yemen who are the principle supporters of Al Qaeda must be neutralized. But what is it that the PTB are really after in Afganistan? That is the trillion dollar question.

Endless war is wrong. I

Endless war is wrong. I second that. I think the reasoning is wrong. The idea that you can kill a few bad guys and the rest of the people will come around did not work in Vietnam, and seems not to work in Iraq. The idea that terrorists cannot act without their leaders is wrong. The selective concern about the wellbeing certain parts of the world (the middle east) and ignoring of troubles in others (Darfur, Congo, Gaza) is sickening cynicism.

so lets face the reality

so lets face the reality this is the continuation of the fundamentalist neo con strategy conflated as the 'afpak' war which now is transformed into a 'bushbama' doctrine which has largely been treated -quite correctly- as 'moo poo' by regional analysts. there is nothing new here except a recognition of blairspeak being employed by obama. its as deceitful and dishonest as anything blair and new labour have produced in the last 10 years. its what has always been promised, a war to take control of pakistan in pakistan. a neo cons wet dream. regardless of aspirations of the neo conservative alliance, the uk-usa allies its a war that cannot be won, the bbc news propagandist told us of a new word being introduced 'afpak' maybe i should reintroduce the words 'viet nam' and 'quagmire'. pakistan is not iraq nor is it afghanistan and its people arent about to surrender its sovereignty.

President Obama’s stated

President Obama’s stated rationale for sending more troops and providing additional aide to Afghanistan is that we're there to prevent Al Qaeda/Taliban from attacking the US. This rationale begins to wear thin after hearing it so many times over the years in regard to: Russia, China, Korea, Cuba, Vietnam, Nicaragua, San Salvador etc. Moreover, if we’re afraid of a terrorist attack on US soil from Afghanistan, we need to also consider possible attacks from any number of teetering-on–the-brink countries: Haiti, Somalia, Moldavia, Mexico, etc. In this globalized age a Bin Laden can operate from anywhere and short of going to war with the entire world, we need a smarter strategy than invading and occupying. Strangely, there’s never a mention energy (oil, gas) and Afghanistan in the same sentence. The country is strategically located atop major energy routes. In the past the Bush administration negotiated with the Taliban on delivery routes for these vital resources. Is this a current possibility? I'm no expert but I can tell you the Obama plan of re- invading Afghanistan is DOA. Just ask the master of foreign armies dying in that country, Rudyard Kipling. The place is still part of the "Great Game"--countries near and far want a piece of the action--energy routes, geopolitical control. So India fights Pakistan (solve this one and the whole region will quiet down!), the Taliban/ Pushtuns fight Russia, USA, Iran. The place needs a grand bargain--make it neutral like Switzerland, offer a little something to everyone.

One can't help feeling that

One can't help feeling that Obama does not see out of the box. On the economy I think i can follow him. But the war in Afghanistan continues the old thinking. There is one burning question in my mind. Who is getting the contracts for the civilian force that is being sent there? How have these contracts been assigned? Has congress been consulted and are there oversight committees that have real teeth? Who is benefitting? Billions of dollars have been wasted under Bush and many more benefitted the war mongers (Cheney in Haliburton). Why is this not being discussed?

Nobody I know wants an

Nobody I know wants an escalation of hostilities in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and Obama must know that it is becoming increasingly difficult for Americans to support a policy that will lead to the continued indiscriminate killing of innocent women and children and to the steady erosion of America's reputation around the world. Also, we can use our votes to avert war. It should not be surprising to anyone that Obama wishes to retain and increase American forces in Afghanistan as he repeatedly said this during his recent run for the presidency. So why did we vote for him in the first place? We trusted Obama, but we didn't trust Kucinich who promised to remove all American forces from both Iraq and Afghanistan. We produce something with our votes, and then we complain about that which we produced.

Unanimous comments above,

Unanimous comments above, they sound as though the writers are all horrified! No one is supporting this travesty, and hardly anyone will! What a disappointment it was to read the article above. My instinct, as i read it was, lies, lies, he's lying. It is the first time I have felt him lie. So degrading. Who got to him? Did THEY get to him? Threaten his daughters? I think we are all so sick of the lies and excuses for more money-making nonsense. Let's call a spade a spade, its all about the oil and the pipelines. That is the beginning and the end of it. Does anyone still believe these old stories?

I'm sorry for anyone who

I'm sorry for anyone who feels a disappointment in our new president. It confirms the NAIVITY of the American people who will sit in conformity through anything presented to them, war, hopes of peace, inflation, destruction of the planet, etc...Obama is part of a big circus. The New World. Anyone who thinks he is here to change anything is in for big disappointment. The only one who will change anything is YOU!! Stop waisting, driving you fat car, and further, believing anything presented to you(on a silver plater). Next time there is a demonstration go out to the street. Next time troops are deployed, don't show up to work...