Share

Cracking the Corporate Media's Iron Curtain Around Death at Three Mile Island

by: Harvey Wasserman  |  The Free Press

photo
Three Mile Island. (Photo: Courtesy of NRC)

    Chernobyl exploded and Three Mile Island missed by a whisker. They both killed people.

    But thirty years after the Pennsylvania melt-down, a Soviet-style Iron Curtain has formed between the corporate media and the alternatives, with nuclear power at its center.

    The Soviets denied for days that the Chernobyl accident had happened at all. America's parallel corporate media says "no one died at TMI."

    Take National Public Radio's Scott Simon. On March 28, Simon smirked on air that "no one was killed or injured" at Three Mile Island, "not so much as a sprained ankle."

    Except when people are fleeing them, as they did 30 years ago, radiation releases have never been linked directly to joint sprains.

    But cancer, leukemia, birth defects, stillbirths, malformations, spontaneous abortions, skin lesions, hair loss, respiratory problems, sterility, nausea, cataracts, a metallic taste, premature aging, general loss of bodily function and more can be caused by radioactive emissions of the type that poured out of TMI. And all such ailments have been documented there OUTside the corporate media.

    Simon and everyone else INside the corporate media missed the well-organized, well-executed press event in the statehouse at Harrisburg on March 26. Despite solid publicity from Eric Epstein and the long-standing Three Mile Island Alert, not a single corporate reporter covered presentations by nuclear engineer Arnie Gundersen and University of North Carolina epidemiologist Dr. Stephen Wing.

    Once a top industry executive, Gundersen has shown that the containment at Three Mile Island Unit 2 did not completely hold, and that far more radiation was released than previously believed.

    Dr. Wing reports that levels of radiation-related disease significantly rose in the downwind area. Wing and three co-authors looked at statistics used in a major study by Columbia University and other sources. They concluded that - despite official denials - the numbers clearly indicate serious potential health effects.

    Gundersen and Wing were neither hiding nor alone. University of Pittsburgh radiology Professor Emeritus Dr. Ernest Sternglass and health researchers Joe Mangano and Jay Gould have long since documented that public health catastrophe. House-to-house surveys from local residents Jane Lee and Mary Osborne confirm the damage. Massive anecdotal evidence collected in a book and radio show by Robbie Leppzer appears at www.turningtide.com. Published in 1982 by DellDelta, KILLING OUR OWN (http://www.ratical.org/radiation/KillingOurOwn/KOO.pdf) correlated the death toll at TMI with that from other mis-uses of radiation. Other books have followed with similar conclusions.

    This tidal wave Madison), KBOO (Oregon), KDKA (Pittsburgh), radioornot.com, and more. Websites like Huffington Post, CommonDreams, Alternet, FreePress.org, NukeFree, CounterPunch, BuzzFlash, Smirking Chimp, Daily Kos, and dozens more got the story out, as did environmental groups like Greenpeace, NIRS and Beyond Nuclear. (If your website, radio show or organization also carried it, please contact me).

    But the word never crossed the conceptual chasm between the "mainstream" media and the "alternative." Despite a federal class action lawsuit filed by 2400 Pennsylvania families claiming damages from the accident, despite at least $15 million quietly paid to parents of birth-defected children, despite three decades of official admissions that nobody knows how much radiation escaped from TMI, where it went or who it affected, not a mention of the fact that people might have been killed there made its way into a corporate report.

    Nuclear opponents commemorated the day throughout the United States - most visibly at the gates of the plant itself - while Simon and others piously intoned that the opposition was dead and gone.

    Simon concluded his 11-minute smarm by interviewing Dan Reicher from Google, whose "green" vision somehow includes new reactors. Not a peep was allowed from an epic grassroots No Nukes movement that has sustained itself nonstop (and nonviolently) since long before TMI melted, and is as strong as ever.

    From the Associated Press and other corporate outlets, the parroted mantra that "nobody was killed" rang out as if a melt-down was no big deal, and turning a $900 million asset into a multi-billion-dollar liability was a "success story."

    Few assertions more clearly divide our parallel media universes than this one. Stolen elections and WMDs, corporate thievery and hemp/marijuana prohibition are all part of the Great Divide. But people (and animals) dying unreported in our most infamous industrial accident cut to the heart of our dis-informational dilemma.

    Newspapers and TV networks are dying because they cannot attract advertisers because they are losing audience.

    In some ways, we will miss them. But their self-interested omissions and deceptions have disemboweled their usefulness. Even the legendary CBS News anchor Walter Cronkite bought into the line that there was no danger of an explosion at TMI that week.

    But in fact there was. Was the omission due to haste in a murky nightmare? A fear of causing panic? A fear of retribution from major sponsors? Or merely an unhealthy willingness to take the authorities at their word?

    Whatever the case, the bad news is that the dominant media cannot handle this story and too many others like it. Millions of Americans are thus dangerously misinformed.

    The good news is, there is new media - including wherever you're now reading this - that WILL report it. And that's growing stronger because it reports the truth to power.

    Izvestia and Pravda are still being televised. But people did die at Three Mile Island. And it's the "alternative" media that now brings reality to the mainstream.

    ---------

    Harvey Wasserman edits NukeFree.org and is senior editor of http://FreePress.org, where this article originally appeared. His books, including "SOLARTOPIA! OUR GREEN-POWERED EARTH", are available at http://harveywasserman.com.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

"cancer, leukemia, birth

"cancer, leukemia, birth defects, stillbirths, malformations, spontaneous abortions, skin lesions, hair loss, respiratory problems, sterility, nausea, cataracts, a metallic taste, premature aging, general loss of bodily function" all occur in the general population unexposed to radiation. What are the DATA showing a statistically significant increase in the 3-mile island region?

Thank you Mr. Wasserman. I

Thank you Mr. Wasserman. I too heard Scot Simon and his cheery report of the aftermath of TMI. I was stunned. I find that I can no longer support NPR as their so-called news is simply "he said -she said. Blah Blah. You are right, if you want to know what is going on, forget most of the corporate media. One has to go to the Internet.

One detail that slipped out

One detail that slipped out about 5 years later was a 3 times increase in infant mortality in the surrounding region, for 3 years after the event - but try to find that now...

Thank you, Mr. Wasserman. It

Thank you, Mr. Wasserman. It never fails to amaze me that humans, even when faced with the facts and dangers, still will poison themselves and irrationally choose to live (and die) under the specters of rampant pollution and harmful conditions. Of course it helps to keep them ignorant of it all. The corporate media monster serves such a great purpose to that end, one wonders how, if ever, we will survive. Certainly not by being distracted by all the mindless, meaningless programming that the majority of people accept as their brain fodder and daily emotional bread. Add to that a crisis mentality dominating our psychological architecture, furthered by the very same media.... and we remain both ignorant and unmotivated to effectively do anything to free ourselves from its grasp. We should ban nukes....and TVs.

Excellent article. I hope

Excellent article. I hope a few of those w/power inside the Beltway read your article & pay attention to the researchers's results. Before it's too late.

Another reason to never

Another reason to never trust the official word. When they said the air was ok to breathe at ground zero at the world trade center, I knew this was one of the worst lies that was ever perpetrated on the American first line defenders. Now many of them are dying and have died from the air they breathed while they cleaned up ground zero.

I for one am not too worried

I for one am not too worried about meltdowns and radiation leaks with the latest nuke designs. However the last nuclear plant built in Kansas cost much more than expected and raised the power bill for those it served(KCPL). Besides this we need a permanent place to keep the radio active waste, which is currently keept in barrels at the plants. Until we open a national disposal site, no new nuclear plants. L. Seib

I attended a lecture by an

I attended a lecture by an environmental engineer on Love Canal. He had gone on for quite a while when I asked, "What were the long term health effects? Were epidemiological studies done?" His answer was that there were no long term health effects. Our very own Department of Health certifies regularly that no ill-effects have been noted. noted... or recorded... or investigated...

It is well known by ionizing

It is well known by ionizing radiation health experts that there was virtually no monitering of the radiation fallout from the 3 mile island disaster. This was indeed a massive coverup. Of course without exposure data there can be no long term dose response epidemiologic studies. Despite this excess leukemia and birth defects, and animal deaths were found. The old story if you do not systematically look, you can proclaim that no health effects were found.

This saddens me, but does

This saddens me, but does not surprise me. Mr. Simon's behavior reinforces my unwillingness to support NPR since 2000, when they were too cowardly to report on the stealing of the election. I give all my support now to independent media, who blessedly still have the courage to seek out and tell the truth.

Sister Rosalie Bertel, an

Sister Rosalie Bertel, an anti-nuclear activist, once told a group of us that the leakage of radiation from the 3-mile island plant caused cancer before the accident. That statement indicated to me that increased cancer recorded after the accident would be skewed by any comparison with pre-accident figures. Of course, if no competent investigation occurred, your Anonymous respondent can denigrate the damage symptoms, as do the pro-nuclear profiteers who declare that ordinary surfaces give us as much radiation as their nuclear behemoths--"the general population unexposed to radiation"? indeed. "Let's get the truth out."