Share

Changing the Rules of the Blame Game

by: Bill Moyers and Michael Winship, t r u t h o u t | Perspective

photo
Lawrence Summers, director of the National Economic Council, received $5.2 million last year working for a $30 billion hedge fund. (Photo: Brendan Smialowski)

    A cartoon in the Sunday comics shows that mustachioed fellow with monocle and top hat from the Monopoly game - "Rich Uncle Pennybags," he used to be called - standing along the roadside, destitute, holding a sign: "Will blame poor people for food."

    Time to move the blame to where it really belongs. That means no more coddling banks with bailout billions marked "secret." No more allowing their executives lavish bonuses and new corporate jets as if they've won the mega-lottery and not sent the economy down the tubes. And no more apostles of Wall Street calling the shots.

    Which brings us to Larry Summers. Over the weekend, the White House released financial disclosure reports revealing that Summers, director of the National Economic Council, received $5.2 million last year working for a $30 billion hedge fund. He made another $2.7 million in lecture fees, including cash from such recent beneficiaries of taxpayer generosity as Citigroup, JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs. The now defunct financial services giant Lehman Brothers handsomely purchased his pearls of wisdom, too.

    Reading stories about Summers and Wall Street, you realize the man was intoxicated by the exotic witches' brew of derivatives and other financial legerdemain that got us into such a fine mess in the first place. Yet, here he is, serving as gatekeeper of the information and analysis going to President Obama on the current collapse. We have to wonder when the president asks, "Larry, who did this to us?" is he going to name names of old friends and benefactors? Knowing he most likely will be looking for his old desk back once he leaves the White House, is he going to be tough on the very system of lucrative largess that he helped create in his earlier incarnation as a deregulating treasury secretary? ("Larry?" "Yes, Mr. President?" "Who the hell recommended repealing the Glass-Steagall Act back in the 90s and opened the floodgates to all this greed?" "Uh, excuse me, Mr. President, I think Bob Rubin is calling me.")

photo
Bill Black, an expert on the savings and loan scandal, comments on how deregulation has also led to today's financial crisis. (Photo: UMKC)

    That imaginary conversation came to mind last week as we watched President Obama's joint press conference with British Prime Minister Gordon Brown. When a reporter asked Obama who is to blame for the financial crisis, our usually eloquent and knowledgeable president responded with a rambling and ineffectual answer. With Larry Summers guarding his in box, it's hardly surprising he's not getting the whole story.

    If only someone with nothing to lose would remind the president of that old story - perhaps apocryphal but containing a powerful truth - of the Great Wall of China. Four thousand miles long and 25 feet tall, intended to be too high to climb over, too thick to break through and too long to go around. Yet, in its first century of the wall's existence, China was successfully breached three times by invaders, who didn't have to break through, climb over or go around. They simply were waved through the gates by obliging watchmen. The Chinese knew their wall very well. It was the gatekeepers they didn't know.

    Shifting the blame for the financial crisis to where it belongs also means no more playacting in round after round of Congressional hearings devoted more to posturing and false contrition than to truth. We need real hearings, conducted by experienced and fiercely independent counsel asking the tough questions, or an official commission with subpoena power that can generate evidence leading, if warranted, to trials and convictions - and this time Rich Uncle Pennybags shouldn't have safely tucked away in his vest pocket a "Get Out of Jail Free" card.

    So far, the only one in the clink is Bernie Madoff and he was "a piker" compared to the bankers who peddled toxic assets like unverified "liars' loan" mortgages as Triple-A quality goods. So says Bill Black, and he should know.

    During the savings and loan scandal in the 1980s, Black, who teaches economics and law at the University of Missouri, Kansas City, was the federal regulator who accused then House Speaker Jim Wright and five US senators, including John Glenn and John McCain, of doing favors for the S&L's in exchange for campaign contributions and other perks. They got off with a wrist slap, but Black and others successfully led investigations that resulted in convictions and re-regulation of the savings and loan industry.

    Bill Black wrote a book about his experiences with a title that fits today as well as it did when he published it four years ago - "The Best Way to Rob a Bank Is to Own One." On last Friday night's edition of "Bill Moyers Journal," he said the current economic and financial meltdown is driven by fraud and banks that got away with it, in part, because of government deregulation under prior Republican and Democratic administrations.

    "Now we know what happens when you destroy regulation," Black said. "You get the biggest financial calamity for anybody under the age of 80."

    What's more, the government ignored warnings and existing legislation to stop it before the current crisis got worse. "They didn't even begin to investigate the major lenders until the market had actually collapsed, which is completely contrary to what we did successfully in the savings and loan crisis," Black said. "Even while the institutions were reporting they were the most profitable savings and loans in America, we knew they were frauds. And we were moving to close them down."

    There was advance warning of the current collapse. Black says that the FBI blew the whistle; in September 2004, "there was an epidemic of mortgage fraud, that if it was allowed to continue it would produce a crisis at least as large as the savings and loan debacle."

    But after 9/11, "The Justice Department transfers 500 white-collar specialists in the FBI to national terrorism. Well, we can all understand that. But then, the Bush administration refused to replace the missing 500 agents." So today, despite a crisis a hundred times worse than the savings and loan scandal, "there are one-fifth as many FBI agents" assigned to bank fraud.

    Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner "is covering up," Black said. "Just like Paulson did before him. Geithner is publicly saying that it's going to take $2 trillion - a trillion is a thousand billion - $2 trillion taxpayer dollars to deal with this problem. But they're allowing all the banks to report that they're not only solvent, but fully capitalized. Both statements can't be true. It can't be that they need $2 trillion, because they have massive losses, and that they're fine ...

    "They're scared to death of a collapse. They're afraid that if they admit the truth, that many of the large banks are insolvent, they think Americans are a bunch of cowards, and that we'll run screaming to the exits ... And it's foolishness, all right?

    "Now, it may be worse than that. You can impute more cynical motives. But I think they are sincerely just panicked about, 'We just can't let the big banks fail.' That's wrong."

    Black asked, "Why would we keep CEOs and CFOs and other senior officers that caused the problems? That's nuts ... We're hiding the losses instead of trying to find out the real losses? Stop that ... Because you need good information to make good decisions ... Follow what works instead of what's failed. Start appointing people who have records of success instead of records of failure ... There are lots of things we can do. Even today, as late as it is. Even though we've had a terrible start to the [Obama] administration. They could change, and they could change within weeks."

    He called for a 21st century version of the Pecora Commission, referring to hearings that sought the causes of the Great Depression, held during the 1930s by the US Senate Committee on Banking and Currency.

    Ferdinand Pecora was the committee's chief counsel and interrogator, a Sicilian émigré who was a progressive devotee of trust-busting Teddy Roosevelt and a former Manhattan assistant district attorney, who successfully helped shut down more than a hundred Wall Street "bucket shops" selling bogus securities and commodity futures. He was relentless in his cross-examination of financial executives, including J.P. Morgan himself.

    Pecora's investigation uncovered a variety of Wall Street calumnies - among them Morgan's "preferred list" of government and political insiders, including former President Coolidge and a Supreme Court justice, who were offered big discounts on stock deals. The hearings led to passage of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

    In the preface to his 1939 memoir, "Wall Street Under Oath," Pecora told the story of his investigation and described an attitude amongst the Rich Uncle Pennybags of the financial world that will sound familiar to Bill Black and those who seek out the guilty today.

    "That its leaders are eminently fitted to guide our nation, and that they would make a much better job of it than any other body of men, Wall Street does not for a moment doubt," Pecora wrote. "Indeed, if you now hearken to the Oracles of The Street, you will hear now and then that the money-changers have been much maligned. You will be told that a whole group of high-minded men, innocent of social or economic wrongdoing, were expelled from the temple because of the excesses of a few. You will be assured that they had nothing to do with the misfortunes that overtook the country in 1929-1933; that they were simply scapegoats, sacrificed on the altar of unreasoning public opinion to satisfy the wrath of a howling mob...."

    According to Politico.com, at his March 27 White House meeting with the nation's top bankers, President Obama heard similar arguments and interrupted, saying, "Be careful how you make those statements, gentlemen. The public isn't buying that.... My administration is the only thing between you and the pitchforks."

    Stand aside, Mr. President, and let us prod with our pitchforks to get at the facts.

  

»


Bill Moyers is managing editor and Michael Winship is senior writer of the weekly public affairs program, "Bill Moyers Journal," which airs Friday nights on PBS. Check local airtimes or comment at The Moyers Blog at www.pbs.org/moyers

Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Finally. Pin it on the

Finally. Pin it on the repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act by Pres. Clinton in 1999. This should be shouted from the rooftops - people will understand that, as it is really quite a simple explanation, and factually true. It seems to me it is also clear that it is necessary to simply re-instate the Glass Steagall Act, as without this "firewall" the same game will continue forward.

P.S. Unless this

P.S. Unless this Glass-Steagall Act topic is not beaten on the drums, the march to governmental takeover of banks and financial institutions, and who-all knows what, will proceed while the people sleep. Bad - very bad.

Now which mouse is going to

Now which mouse is going to hang the bill on the cat's neck? The corrupt part of the economic elite will get their way by hook or CROOK!

Call it what it is --

Call it what it is -- corruption and fraud.

So when and how does this

So when and how does this perception generate into a full-fledged groundswell?Will it simply cool and harden like last week's rice... as have many "good ideas" by well meaning intelligentsia? Certainly Obama has both the intelligence and clarity of vision to see this plain as day-- what's he waiting for?

The flight to regulation as

The flight to regulation as the answer to problems always amuses me. We have plenty of regulations. It is not regulations that we need, it is oversight. The two are different. Under regulations, you are either in compliance, or not in compliance. The government has proven time and again that it cannot effectively monitor compliance, but even when it does, compliance does not necessarily divert catastrophe. Most people in the mortgage and finance business were and are compliant, but if the rules don't make sense, complying with them will not avert problems. Oversight is the answer. Oversight is not rule based, but sense based. Without regard to rules, and oversight tries to make sense of trends, figures, facts, anecdotes, and investigates based on logic and thought, rather than compliance. We need less regulation, fewer rules, but much more oversight. There is a difference.

Larry Sommers and Tim

Larry Sommers and Tim Geitner must step down Mr. President and in their place put Professor Bill Black who was more straight forward and convincing on the current financial calamity and what to do about it.

stagnant wages since the

stagnant wages since the seventies, increased worker productivity, average credit card interest rate 18 %. sooo much money spent on bailouts and more war, no money for single payer healthcare and other changes now, hmmmmmmm?

We need to enact the Special

We need to enact the Special Prosecutors Full Employment Act and look into everything that has happened and is happening and find the evil doers and take action. No one is above the law and we need to identify and expose the many questionable acts done and being done. One would think that the Media, the Fourth Estate, would be clamoring for this but no, we get FOX News -- that oxymoron of media blaming the New Guys for all the old problems. We should be demanding special prosecutors and congressional investigations and jailing those who (continue to) refuse to honor congressional subpoenas. No Immunity. Let's simply get at the truth!!!

There are a lot of white

There are a lot of white collar criminals who should be contemplating jail time. You have to wonder how much power the criminals still have and how long they can continue to push the rest of us around with their schemes.

The sorriest fact is that

The sorriest fact is that the bank perpetrated frauds will probably continue over the next 5 years. New rules haven't been adopted, and when they are, there will be new ways to screw the pooch. The reform needed is only being talked about by the American people, not the ones in charge. They give it lip service, but I have seen no serious effort so far.

Bill and Michael have

Bill and Michael have written a good passionate piece. I have a question, where are all of those so called 'tough on crime' a-fiction-adios?

Does this mean that our

Does this mean that our government is as corrupt as the governments that we demolished in order to make new ones in our image? What in the world are we doing marching into Viet Nam, Iraq, Afghanistan, et al? Get home and straighten up our own mess. And get our President to both ask and tell the truth about his recent appointments who cannot pay their own taxes properly, but are in charge of ours.

As long as "money equals

As long as "money equals free speech" and the myth of corporate personhood remains and we don't have public campaign finance reform the crooks, liars and thieves known as the oligarchs will continue to control both parties and our political system. We must have real structural changes, reign in corporate power as FDR did, heavily regulate and tax them. We will then have the chance of having another era of redistribution of wealth and sanity in our political/economic life.

We have a "fractional

We have a "fractional banking system” The Federal Reserve, a private bank formed in 1913 by 13 original investors (banks & insurance cos.), is at the top of a banking hierarchy of banks in the U.S. Regional Fed Res Banks fall directly below the main bank, down to familiar β€œretail banks” with tellers, loans, etc. Ponzi & the bankers: if the top bank has $100 to lend, it lends the *SAME* $100 to each regional bank. $100 legally became $600. Each regional bank lends the *SAME* $100 to Commercial Banks, banks that lend to banks below and borrow from banks above them. Commercial banks then lend the *SAME* $100 to retail banks. This scheme works if retail customers keep borrowing money to buy houses, etc. The more credit banks extend the more dollars they "have" as assets, i.e. all those cash payment promises. It stops working when people default on their loans and depositors want to withdraw their money. Ooops!! A liquidity and credit access crisis that goes uphill. Retail banks become bad risks, cannot get credit, and so on up the line. It’s the Medici 800lb gorilla in the room, dressed in a pinstripe suit. It gets β€˜better’. Aside from the usually accepted financial-variable factors, in 1999, Slick Willie quietly passed legislation allowing non-transparent banking, i.e. extremely leveraged & complicated derivatives trading, legally hidden transactions, including those that yielded MegaMillions Winnings on the way down if the financial house of cards fell, even partially. Now you know why no one is telling you where the TARP $B went. It went to reward those who made sure the system had failed, just before Obama got elected. And you thought welfare recipients gamed the system? I propose that we base the dollar on something that doesn’t inherently change by definition, but can change in value, a unit of energy called the watt. Period.

This disaster was

This disaster was orchestrated to have no good solution. I do not question the advice of Elizabeth Warren, Paul Krugman or Bill Black, but the tangential repercussions of their prescriptions need to be considered. It took the uber wealthy 70 years to get back in the saddle. We can endure their spurs until President Obama knocks them on their assets.

Not exactly. Pin it mostly

Not exactly. Pin it mostly on the Republican controlled Congress of 1999. True, Clinton signed the repeal of Glass-Steagall, but the real tragedy is that while toxic Ninja loans became the modus operendi of Freddy Mac and Sally Mae during the early and mid-90s, all eyes were on the Kenneth Starr investigation into Slick Willy's bedroom behavior. True, Clinton's bad behavior provided the cover, and true, Summers, Rubin, and Greenspan had their agendas of de-regulation, but the legislation--or rather de-legislation originated in Congress. 'Nuf said.

Five essential things that

Five essential things that must be done, and aren't being proposed by the Administration or Congress (or anyone outside of the progressive blogs): 1) Reinstate the Glass-Steagall Act. 2) Stop the exemption for over-the-counter derivatives. 3) Rescind the Bankruptcy Bill of 2005. 4) Temporary "nationalization" (or call it another word) of the "too big to fail" zombie banking houses. Break them up again. "Too big to fail" is to big to exist in a sustainable healthy economy. 5) Look into closing the Fed, and let the gov't "own" the money supply, not a private unaccountable front for the very wealthy and more than average power/status-hungry elite using The Fed.) no. 6) is perhaps the most essential - public funding of campaigns.

Obama is a WILLING tool of

Obama is a WILLING tool of the big banking houses, period. Sorry to disillusion those still clinging to the belief that he is being duped.

Well, hold your horses

Well, hold your horses there, pardner! Changing the rules means changing the rules of capitalism, which ultimately produce greed and corruption. Only way to change the rules is to destroy capitalism, which may not be possible given human nature. However, we need a break, some respite from the ravages of US-style capitalism. The way to do that is to dissolve the US. Professor Thomas Naylor of Second Vermont Republic says the US is quote unqote unfixable. Break up the US and we may get a ten, twenty-year breather, maybe longer. Otherwise - oh boy! Pete Edler, Stockholm

All this analysis is so much

All this analysis is so much 'Oh, look what happened!' What is it going to take for people to get into the streets and just shut this down? They can do it in Guadalupe but we can't do it here? Did everyone miss the Obama lie about the AIG bonuses? Everyone was so OUTRAGED for a week, the bonuses were rescinded and then 'the administration' woke Chris Dodd up in the middle of the night, had him change the language so that they were reinstated and Obama signed it in the morning claiming that he didn't know. Dodd lied, then confessed and Obama finally said 'The buck stops here'. It's not that Obama is intrinsically evil, it's that the system is patently corrupted and a sham and if he didn't do exactly what AIPAC, the banks, the insurance industry and the military industrial complex told him to do he would meet the same fate as JFK in a nano-second. The only thing that is going to change any of this is a revolution.

"Be careful how you make

"Be careful how you make those statements, gentlemen. The public isn't buying that.... My administration is the only thing between you and the pitchforks." --Barak Obama Wow, that's an interesting comment! Worth noticing and thinking about. I hope that guy is as smart as I hope he is!

"Time to move the blame to

"Time to move the blame to where it really belongs. That means no more coddling banks with bailout billions marked "secret." No more allowing their executives lavish bonuses and new corporate jets as if they've won the mega-lottery and not sent the economy down the tubes. And no more apostles of Wall Street calling the shots."........ JEEPERS CREEPERS..!!! YOU GUYS ARE JUST TOO EASY ON THE ''''SCHMUCKS OF ECONOMIC DESTRUCTION'''.... I wonder what would happen in a Future (Healthy?) Economy if CEOs then could look back during these Dark Economic Middle Ages and see where at least a hundred or so of the High Falootin 'WallStreetCEOBankerGANGSTAS' who sent the world economy into the abyss were stripped of their plunder and sent wearing electronic ankle bracelets to cleaning up roadside garbage for 8-10 years in orange jumpsuits while wearing signs that read--- 'I'm one of the GREEDY S.O.Bs that ruined your all your retirement plans'....??... :-D

Money = Free Speech???

Money = Free Speech??? Carol Lutness is right about the absolute crux of this problem, and so many related problems....Even Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson couldn't function in this quagmire. The banks are way too strong; they control our "elected reps"......

"We need real hearings,

"We need real hearings, conducted by experienced and fiercely independent counsel asking the tough questions, or an official commission with subpoena power that can generate evidence leading," I want to know WHO you would recommend for these jobs. Geithner and Summers have given up their cushy jobs to work for the government - an "who needs this grief" job. Who else will step up to do this? Will you send President Obama a list of those who would be able to do this with impunity? Would you volunteer? I understand the criticism. I don't think President Obama is ready to change course just yet. But if our economy can be turned around with the plans of these two, then I will be satisfied even if I don't agree with the journey. And I would like more than just criticism from those that oppose the President's choices. Right now all this criticism just give the Right Wing more ammunition for their fodder.

Obama is not as liberal as

Obama is not as liberal as he presented himself to be during the campaign; he's governing solidly from the center. Don't look for any real reforms from him, just enough cosmetic surgery to keep the people from bringing out their pitchforks, while leaving the moneybags in charge. Of course, McCain and the GOP would have been even worse; Obama and the Dems are simply the lesser of two evils.

Swift independent

Swift independent investigations, followed by criminal prosecution. Should the names of prominent, beloved elected officials rise, and we know they will, let them face justice. We all know this will never happen, but doesn't it feel good to write about it.

Good article. This is a big

Good article. This is a big problem with Obama's economic team selection. Same old boys guarding the chicken coop.

This period in history is so

This period in history is so pivotal, so huge in terms of world wide upheaval, that good articles like this one are only beginning to pop the lid off a story which has been the backstory of contemporary news events for the last 20 years. Only now are many beginning to realize the depth of change which is occurring, despite major media attempts to keep that lid on it. The energies of Aquarius, which bring people everywhere together in synthesis are ensuring that protests of the status quo, the rich vs the poor, privilege vs the poor, maintained by governments will only become more widespread. Justice and Freedom are alive and well in the hearts of people everywhere. Without sharing there is no justice; without justice there is no freedom; without freedom there can be no peace; without peace there will be no future for any of us. See: http://www.share-international.org

We, as individuals, can do

We, as individuals, can do something. We can put our money into community banks and co-ops, buy from locally-owned private businesses instead of huge corporations, support local organic farmers. Right now it is difficult to find products that aren't made in China, but if enough of us demand American-made goods - and are willing to pay a little more in the short term to build a stronger and more prosperous country - stores will find and stock American-made goods. I'm not suggesting that we don't trade with other countries, but not everything in our houses has to come from China. These changes won't happen overnight. It's a process. But if we start the process now and stick with it, we'll leave a much better country and world to our kids and grandkids.

Any link to the Rich Uncle

Any link to the Rich Uncle cartoon?

Conservatives are not the

Conservatives are not the only victims of long-term memory loss. The first director of the SEC appointed by FDR was greeted with horrified scorn by the president's progressive backers. Roosevelt was accused to his face of "putting the fox among the chickens," to which the President replied, "Well, at least,he knows where the chickens are!" The demon that FDR appointed was a major Wall Street figure with a sordid past (and an unfortunate future,too), but he did know all the tricks of his trade and how to block them, which he did. Those precious regulations to which so many now want to return were his doing. His name is still familiar: Joseph P. Kennedy. (Recall that an exasperated JFK once blurted out, "my father always said that these businessmen are SOBs")

Glory, I'm so old fashioned.

Glory, I'm so old fashioned. I'm still waiting to see documentation of the swift boaters. I know one, he doesn't believe they were real either.

Why blame the politicians

Why blame the politicians when it is we voters who refuse to elect anyone who will make us bite the bullet? pay more taxes? insist on participation? A plurality of voters will not consider correcting any problem if it demands something of them: money, effort, involvement, even reading a decent newspaper to understand the issues. We haven't the right to heap all the blame on others when we have not done our job as citizens.

Credible Elders, thank

Credible Elders, thank goodness, share their experience -- and wisdom -- here, if we can only listen. Prof. Black has 'been there, done that' successfully with S&L scandal; heard him talk Fraud, Cover-up, and Illegality re current Obama 'ecomonic team' this week on kpfa.org Morning Show. We (now) have FBI on record calling for Congressional investigation into "mortgage fraud" in 2004 -- with no resulting action. Can we pester our Reps to jump on this pronto? All that's lacking from Moyers' wonderful cautionary tale: how much did the China wall-breakers pay the Gatekeepers?

Get a file, and sharpen your

Get a file, and sharpen your pitchforks.

Re-instate the Glass

Re-instate the Glass Steagall Act and properly enforce. Rinse. Repeat.

I am not sure McCain would

I am not sure McCain would have been worse, after all, McCain voted against Dick Cheney's Energy bill and Obama voted for the bill. Hillary voted against the FISA bill that prevented AT+T from being sued and Obama voted FOR that bill. Additionally, Obama has claimed that he needs wiretapping and he is sending prisoners to Bagram (where Habeous Corpus doesn't apply). Now, who said Obama was liberal? Oh, and by the way, I am not into feeding banks my money.

By the way Brooksely Born

By the way Brooksely Born predicted this mess and Summers pushed her aside. Fire Geithner, Summers and put Ms. Born in there.