Share

Antibiotics Pose Concern for Minnesota Ethanol Producers

by: The Associated Press  |  Mark Steil

photo
The main by-product of ethanol is sold as livestock feed. Studies have recently linked it to elevated rates of E. coli in cattle. (Photo: Ed Zurga / The New York Times)

    Ethanol's main by-product, which is sold as livestock feed, has raised potential food safety concerns.

    Several studies have linked the byproduct, known as distillers grain, to elevated rates of E. coli in cattle. And now, distillers grain is facing further scrutiny because the Food and Drug Administration has found that it often contains antibiotics left over from making ethanol.

    Ethanol production relies on enzymes, yeast and sugar to convert corn into fuel. And just as the wrong bacteria in the body can sicken people, it can also cause a variety of ailments in a batch of ethanol.

    Mark von Keitz with the University of Minnesota's Biotechnology Institute said in ethanol production, the main enemy is a bacterial bug that makes lactic acid.

    "What these organisms do is they also compete with the yeast for the sugar," said von Keitz. "But instead of making alcohol, they make primarily lactic acid."

    If enough of the bacteria are present, von Keitz said fermentation can be ruined.

    "It gets acidified to the point that the yeast is no longer able to properly produce ethanol, and then you're stuck with a big batch of corn mash," said von Keitz.

    If that happens, there's no ethanol and no profit. To prevent the problem, producers rely on medicine.

    "What people operating these plants are trying to do is to keep these lactic acid bacteria in check," said von Keitz. "And one way of doing that is with the help of antibiotics."

    Ethanol producers use penicillin and a popular antibiotic called virginiamycin to kill bacteria. And that raises two potential concerns.

    One is that these treatments might promote the growth of bacteria that are resistant to antibiotics. The development of these "superbugs" is a major concern in health care because they reduce the effectiveness of medicines.

    Von Keitz found some bacteria that were, in fact, resistant when he sampled bacteria at four Midwest ethanol plants several years ago.

    The second concern is that the antibiotics could find their way to humans through the food chain.

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has taken a mostly hands-off approach to the use of antibiotics in the ethanol industry. But amid increasing concerns over food safety in recent years, the agency is taking a closer look.

    "A year ago we put a survey out to the FDA field people to collect samples of those distillers grains, and start analyzing for antibiotic residues," said Linda Benjamin, a chemist with the FDA's Center of Veterinary Medicine.

    Samples were requested from 60 ethanol plants, including some in Minnesota. She said testing showed that many contained antibiotics, mainly four types.

    "Penicillin, virginiamycin, erythromycin and tylosin," said Benjamin.

    At this point the story gets murky. Benjamin won't say if any of the antibiotics exceeded federal guidelines.

    Those guidelines are part of the problem; they're a patchwork and far from definitive on what levels of antibiotics in distillers grain are safe.

    If the FDA decides to restrict antibiotics in the ethanol industry, it could have far-reaching consequences.

    Distillers grain is a major source of low-cost livestock feed. Any restrictions on its sale and use as feed will hurt the profit-scarce ethanol industry and the livestock farmers who rely on it.

    Charlie Staff, executive director of the Distillers Grain Technology Council, said distillers grain is one of the few dependable moneymakers left for the ethanol industry.

    "If they didn't have distillers grain as a revenue, many more of them wouldn't be able to operate," said Staff.

    Meanwhile the regulatory process continues to play out. The FDA will test more distillers grain samples, and expects to issue a final report this summer.

    The maker of virginiamycin declined to comment, but the company is expected to ask the FDA to approve the antibiotic as a human food additive.

    Depending on how this regulatory battle winds up, it could change the way Minnesota's 18 ethanol plants distill their product.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

I have just written to the

I have just written to the FDA to express my negative opinion to the approval of the virginamycin antibiotic for human consumption. This is an end run to prevent the FDA from stopping the use of or changing the practices in the use of this dangerous, MRSA forming antibiotic. I encourage all of you truthout readers to go to the FDA website, find your local office and write to them about this concern. We do not need any more of these medical products fouling our food and causing dangerous aftereffects in the treatment of diseases. PRF

They don't need to add

They don't need to add antibiotics to grapes when they are fermented to make wine. Why do they need to add antibiotics to the corn when they ferment it? Why is the process so different? While tylosin and virginiamycin and especially erythromycin are of concern in stimulating formation of resistance of human health concern, penicillin by now has so few pathogenic bacteria susceptible to it that it really doesn't matter. Another thing to take into account is that practically every antibiotic in use will encounter species of bacteria that just naturally are resistant to it because they lack whatever the antibiotic interferes with. For instance, penicillin never, ever was very effective against Gram neg bacteria because its mode of action is to interfere with construction of the Gram pos cell wall, which is completely different from Gram neg cell walls.

Another pitfall in the

Another pitfall in the movement to turn food into SUV mobility while people starve even here in the U.S., a bad idea from the start. The rampant use of antibiotics in the entirety of agriculture is an extremely myopic trend that should be vehemently discouraged. I suspect the lactobacteria thrive partly due to the low sugar content in the source materials and partly due to the methods used for fermenting, as I understand it they thrive in environments lacking oxygen.

Two things jumped out at me:

Two things jumped out at me: 1. the comment that cows fed this stuff have higher rates of E.coli. 2. Bad bacteria is growing in the mash, necessitating antibiotics. I would like to know if this corn is Bt corn, genetically modified to kill corn borers by paralyzing their digestive tracts. Bt in GMO corn is part of the corn kernel, not something sprayed that can be washed off. So, two questions: 1. Is the Bt in the corn killing the good bacteria that they need to make ethanol? And 2. is the Bt by-product fed to cows likewise killing the beneficial gut bacteria in the cows, leading to the elevated levels of E.Coli?