Share

Expectations for the Fifth Summit of the Americas

by: Tom Loudon, t r u t h o u t | Perspective

photo
From left to right, Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega, Venezualan President Hugo Chavez and Bolivian President Evo Morales at the Bolivian Alternative for the Americas Summit in February. (Photo: Getty Images)

    There are high expectations for the upcoming Summit of the Americas, happening April 17-19 in Trinidad and Tobago. It will be President Obama's first opportunity to dialogue with Latin American and Caribbean presidents. Many hold out hope for a new direction for United States policies towards our neighbors in the hemisphere.

    We continue to look for signs as to what the administration has in mind. At an event last week in Washington, Jeffrey Davidow, coordinator of the Summit for the Obama administration, offered a few clues. Davidow said that the US would "focus more on dialogue and collaboration, be pragmatic, and look for concrete results, social inclusion and look to reduce extreme poverty." It is not clear yet how these words will translate into actions and if they will mean new policy directions.

    Davidow also said that instead of international treaties, the US will be looking for "ad hoc" groupings, of governments, NGOs and businesses, and varied forms of collaboration, depending on the interests of each country.

    In a subsequent press conference, Davidow responded to a question about free trade agreements (FTA's) by saying that the Summit may not be the best place to take on bilateral issues, but that they want to "move rapidly in relation to Panama and getting the Panama trade deal approved by Congress," and "to move ahead on the Colombian trade deal as well, and that this will be done probably more slowly because there are still some benchmarks that have to be met."

    These statements confirm what we had previously suspected, this administration will move forward on FTA's. In other words, little has changed from the days of the Bush administration in that respect. Rather than questioning the model, which has clearly served to increase inequalities, the administration proposes minor "fixes." We need to continue insisting on a change to the model.

    When asked about reestablishing diplomatic relations with Bolivia, Davidow said, "We do have diplomatic relations. We just do not have ambassadors." He went on to say: "I think we need to have more communication, and certainly as a goal, we would like to see the kind of diplomatic relationship that we've had for quite a long time with Bolivia and Venezuela restored." Again, encouraging words, but the proof will become evident shortly.

    To date, the signs indicate that the administration's actions aren't corresponding to their words. The recent trip of Vice President Biden to Chile and Costa Rica reveals a preference for a conquer-and-divide strategy - a historical tactic of the United States. The Chilean government is the most right-leaning of the South American leftist trend in recent elections. The decision for Biden to visit Costa Rica, with the attempt to convene all Central American countries, was a diplomatic affront to the Central American Integration System (SICA) established in 1991. Because Nicaragua currently holds the pro tem presidency of SICA, the proper course of action for Mr. Biden would have had SICA host the meeting. As a result, Presidents Ortega of Nicaragua and Zelaya of Honduras boycotted the meeting in Costa Rica.

    Another disturbing signal: President Obama has chosen to spend the two days prior to the Summit in Mexico, with one of the few conservative presidents left in Latin America. Concurrently, Hugo Chavez has convened a meeting for presidents of the ALBA countries, where he will be joined by the leaders of Nicaragua, Honduras, the Dominican Republic, Paraguay and a representative from Cuba. They have stated that they will be working to develop common positions to bring to the Summit.

    President Obama will likely be surprised by what he encounters in Port of Spain. The dramatic changes which have happened in the region over the last several years have not yet been internalized by our State Department. Formulas from the past are doomed to fail. Unless he begins to accept this reality, US relations will continue to be out of touch.

    -------

    Tom Loudon is Co-Director of the Quixote Center in Washington, DC.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Intelligent Analysis!! At

Intelligent Analysis!! At last!! The bobbing Obama Juggernaut is throwing foreign fans off faster than anything the Republicans could come up with. Fortunately, Latinamericans have learned much more about our political life than it seems we ever will and they are not buying the snake oil salesman version of Bozo Bush coming down the aisle as a Democrat. It is soooo sad to see our leaders sooooo far away from reality during such dangerous times. Thank God that all these countries are so much more mature than ours and will probably learn to just wait until we grow up...

With respect to

With respect to "Latinamericans have learned much more about our political life than anything the Republicans could come up with." Yankee Snake Oil salesman versions have been prevalent for well over 100 years. It is neither a Republican nor a Democratic trait. It is both. The real US Foreign Policy is dreamt up and directed from much higher than President /Whit House level and put into effect via secret CIA and other agencies, long before the everyday American begins to get whiff of some more sick Foreign Policy Tactics going on. i have learned to read the news from around the world on the World Wide Web, Not the local TV or Newspapers. (That's where it just ain't). Another source can be found in books like " Confessions of an Economic Hit Man, All the Kings Men, 100 years plus of Regime Change, Beyond the Green Zone, Crossing the Rubicon. and many others) Maybe the Latin Americans read foreign news and books profusely and minimize the US TV programs and news. I find it hard to imagine "real change" with the present administration having a total old school staff of advisors. Yes! There's lots of snake oil in this day and age. To sort it from bonefide news, go elsewhere for your foreign policy up dates. You don't have to wait long to grow up if you'll only read other folks news and apply some grey matter. René

I'm not an expert on

I'm not an expert on Latin/Caribbean issues but President Obama's agenda doesn't augur well.

Venezuelan President Hugo

Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez just returned from a highly successful circumnavigation of the world with visits to Qatar, Iran, Japan, China and Cuba, returning with billions of dollars of bilateral agreements and having proposed significant proposals for restructuring global institutions and economic mechanisms. Latin American governments are working within exciting new structures and alliances such as the ALBA, TeleSurTV, UNASUR, and others. The FMLN in El Salvador just joined the FSLN in Nicaragua as ex-guerrilla movements now in power. The influence of OAS, World Bank, and IMF has been severely and appropriately diminished. The two principal US allies remain Alvaro Uribe's narco-state of Colombia and Mexico's right wing Felipe Calderon who came to power by stealing the 2006 elections. CIA agent Luis Posada Carilles has just been indicted in Texas for bombings in Cuba, obstruction of a terrorism investigation, and for perjury. Otto Reich, who ran disinformation operations and other illegal operations in support of the Nicaraguan contra terrorists in the 1980s, is about to have slander charges filed against him by Honduran President Zelaya. Argentine president Cristina Fernandez Kirchner has just called in the U.S. Ambassador to protest statements by the new US CIA chief specifically designating Argentina, Venezuela and Ecuador as Latin American economies at risk of collapse due to global crisis precipitated by US capitalism’s failures. It is clear to me that U.S. ruling class has tasked the Obama regime with “dealing” with Latin America, i.e. undermining popular democracy. Certainly we can expect to see continued CIA meddling and destabilization as have been revealed recently in Ecuador and Bolivia and elsewhere. Latin Americans are on the march. The US needs to keep its hands off. Solidarity is the word and work of the day for citizens of the hemisphere. Good sources: UpSideDownWorld.org, RethinkVenezuela.com, and TeleSurTV.net

Cuba had to cope with abrupt

Cuba had to cope with abrupt withdrawal from oil and is poised to do well to help neighbors in the coming environment. I am especially intrigued by energy micro-grids and small markets in Cuba. Allowing ordinary people to know where their food and energy come from can knit together neighborhoods, making stress and commuting less and making a place less of a target to the too-big-to-fails (TBTF's). Some Brazilian examples of local politics have great stories as well, in particular Curitiba. Places able to keep out undue influence from the worst actors of the multi-national corporations' are inspiring. Subcultures in the U.S. are onto this and are working to emulate best practice, not only from South America, but also from parts of India where small farmers are organizing to practice safe, diverse agriculture to promote local resilience.

How long will take for

How long will take for President Obama to listen to the progressive people of South and Central America?