Share

Iraq in Fragments

by: Dahr Jamail  |  Foreign Policy In Focus

photo
Iraqi children, (L-R) Rebaz, 12, Omer, 7, Muhammad, 12, Hussein 7 and Imad, 11, who were injured during the Iraq war. (Photo: Reuters Pictures)

    "[W]hat lengths men will go in order to carry out, to their extreme limit, the rites of a collective self-worship which fills them with a sense of righteousness and complacent satisfaction in the midst of the most shocking injustices and crimes."
     -Love and Living, by Thomas Merton

    On Wednesday, March 25, Major General David Perkins of the U.S. military, referring to how often the U.S. military was being attacked in Iraq, told reporters in Baghdad, "Attacks are at their lowest since August 2003." Perkins added, "There were 1,250 attacks a week at the height of the violence; now sometimes there are less than 100 a week."

    While his rhetoric made headlines in some U.S. mainstream media outlets, it was little consolation for the families of 28 Iraqis killed in attacks across Iraq the following day. Nor did it bring solace to the relatives of the 27 Iraqis slain in a March 23 suicide attack, or those who survived a bomb attack at a bus terminal in Baghdad on the same day that killed nine Iraqis.

    Having recently returned from Iraq, I experienced living in Baghdad where people were dying violent deaths on a daily basis. Nearly every day of the month I spent there saw a car bomb attack somewhere in the capital city. Nearly every day the so-called Green Zone was mortared. Every day there were kidnappings. On good days there were four hours of electricity on the national grid, in a country now into its seventh year of being occupied by the U.S. military, and where there are now over 200,000 private contractors.

    Upon returning home, I experienced the disconnect between that reality, lived by roughly 25 million Iraqis, and the surreal experience of living in the United States - where most media pretend the occupation of Iraq is either not happening, or uses the yardstick of decreased U.S. military personnel deaths in Iraq as a measure of success. In the words of Major General Perkins, "If you take a look at military deaths, which is an indicator of violence and lethality out there, U.S. combat deaths are at their lowest levels since the war began six years ago." But it's a less useful metric when one looks at the broader picture inside of Iraq: the ongoing daily slaughter of Iraqis, the near total lack of functional infrastructure, the fact that one in six Iraqis remains displaced from their homes, or that at least 1.2 million Iraqis have died as a result of the U.S.-led invasion and occupation of their country.

    Seventy-two months of occupation, with over $607 billion spent on the war (by conservative estimates), has resulted in 2.2 million internally displaced Iraqis, 2.7 million refugees, 2,615 professors, scientists, and doctors killed in cold blood, and 338 dead journalists. Over $13 billion was misplaced by the current Iraqi government, and another $400 billion is required to rebuild the Iraqi infrastructure. Unemployment vacillates between 25-70%, depending on the month. There are 24 car bombs per month, 10,000 cases of cholera per year, 4,261 dead U.S. soldiers, and over 70,000 physically or psychologically wounded soldiers.

    There 's no normal life in Baghdad. While it's accurate and technically correct to say there is less violence compared to 2006, when between 100 and 300 Iraqis were slaughtered on a daily basis, Iraq resembles a police state more than ever. U.S. patrols consisting of huge, lumbering mine-resistant vehicles rumble down streets congested with traffic. It's impossible to travel longer than five minutes without encountering an Iraqi military or police patrol - usually comprised of pickup trucks full of armed men, horns and/or sirens blaring. Begging women and children wander between cars at every intersection. U.S. military helicopters often rumble overhead, and the roar of fighter jets or transport planes is common. There's no talk of reparations for Iraqis for the death, destruction and chaos caused by the occupation.

    Neighborhoods, segregated between Sunni and Shia largely as a result of the so-called "surge" strategy, provide a blatant view of the balkanization of Iraq. Neighborhoods of 300,000 people are completely surrounded by 10-foot high concrete blast walls, rendering normal life impossible. The fear of a resurgence of violence weighs heavy on Iraqis, as the current so-called lull in violence feels tenuous, unstable, and possibly fleeting. Nobody there can predict the future, and to hope for a sustained improvement in any aspect of life feels naive, even dangerous.

    The title of the film "Iraq in Fragments" by James Longley, which was nominated for Best Documentary Oscar at the 2007 Academy Awards, best describes Iraq today. The country has been destroyed by decades of U.S. policy that has plagued Iraqis. Looking back only to 1980, we see the U.S. government supporting both Iraq and Iran during their horrible eight-year war. In 1991 we see George H. W. Bush's war against Iraq, and his, Bill Clinton's, and George W. Bush's oversight of 12-and-a-half years of genocidal economic sanctions that killed half a million Iraqi children. Today, under President Barack Obama, what is left of Iraq smolders in ruins, with no real end of the occupation in sight.

    All of the recent talk of withdrawal from Iraq is empty rhetoric indeed to most Iraqis, who see the giant "enduring" U.S. military bases spread across their country, or the U.S. "embassy," the size of the Vatican City, in Baghdad. The gulf between the rhetoric of withdrawal and the reality on the ground spans the distance between Iraq and the United States, while the reality is pressed in the face of the Iraqi people each day the occupation continues.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

It's so horrible what the US

It's so horrible what the US has done to all these innocent people that I can find no words to describe my distress and repulsion for this EVIL!!!!

An excellent article but

An excellent article but what was not written about is the psychological damage this war/ occupation is doing to the Iraqi children. Severe trauma can cause irreversible changes to the brain and does long-lasting psychological damage. We see this in traumatized people everywhere. It is time we began to treat other human beings decently, as we want to be treated! But there is no money in peace! WHAT CAN WE DO WITH THIS EVIL, POWERFUL BULLY?

I'm sorry but would you not

I'm sorry but would you not consider the predecessor regime of Saddam Hussein to be EVIL? Do you not know the horrific atrocities that he committed against the Northern Kurds and the Southern Shiites? To call the U.S. the evil in this moral equation is absolute absurdity. The U.S. are there to stop these evils from the Iraqis so don't be so smug in saying "There's no talk of reparations for Iraqis for the death, destruction and chaos caused by the occupation." GET REAL! The Iraqi people are going against the Islamic theocratic fascism every day and you have the gull to blame the U.S. What a shame! Support the troops!

Dahr Jamil has been telling

Dahr Jamil has been telling it as he sees it for many years now. He's unembedded and unsupported by the main stream media. His is a refreshing voice. I only wish that Fox News or NPR would allow him to speak. Some Americanos think we are a force for good in the world, Jamil knows better. We created hell in Iraq, more of the same in Afghanistan and utter turmoil wherever our imperial war-machine takes us. Looks like we're going broke--the world will be better off for it!

Ian Orwell's "I'm

Ian Orwell's "I'm sorry....." remarks are so out of touch with reality I do not know where to begin. There have always been evil people and that will never change. But who are we, America, to pass judgment and decide who is a good leader or a bad leader of their country? In trying to understand the drama that Dahr Jamil wrote about, is so bewildering for any American to comprehend what we have done to this country is beyond our ability to understand. I am truly saddened because our young men in our armed forces are dying for what? Not forgetting the millions of innocent Iraqi’s who have died for what?

If you want to support the

If you want to support the troops bring them home, Ian. I am a veteran of Operation Iraqi Liberation and I have seen the inside of the beast. This war is a hegemonic war of aggression. What we are doing right now is very digressive and in my opinion we are making scars much like the scars made in Germany in 1961...

Ian, if you want to support

Ian, if you want to support the troops bring them home. I am a veteran of the recent Iraq war. An Iraqi child is just as precious as an American child ... in an atmosphere of hatred, anger and violence, no lasting peace can be achieved. (HHDL)

Dahr Jamail has written the

Dahr Jamail has written the truth about Iraq. Not only has Iraq been destabilized, much of the middle east has become more unstable because of our occupation of Iraq. When we invaded Iraq, no one was thinking about who would replace Saddam Hussein's regime. The fact is that if the US leaves Iraq, the fight for control of Iraq will go on. It's time to let Iraq find that out for themselves and then see what we have to deal with.

Ian seems to forget that

Ian seems to forget that Sadaam was only in power because he was supported by the U.S. for decades. He was our c.i.a. puppet. Not until he invaded Kuwait did the fighting start. We couldn't let him take control of that much oil now could we. When he gassed the kurds and killed the shiites, the chemical and the weapons were payed for with U.S. taxpayer money.

You can see for yourself how

You can see for yourself how much the US has been involved with Iraq, including Reagan's involvement and the US approval of dual-use licenses for chemical weapons, here: http://usiraq.procon.org/viewresource.asp?resourceID=000676

The outside fundamentalists

The outside fundamentalists forces that attempt to destroy Iraqi, sectarian society are funded by the Saudi royal family and others who do not want to see Iraq democratized. Who funds the Saudi regime? Americans, who with their oil as drug of choice, pays them gladly to have 3 cars, 4 tvs, etc. The West in general fuels the hand that finances terriorism. SO, if you are determined to see the Iraqi people, get on with their lives, then start with your own lifestyle. How much stuff do you have? Do you own a car? Do you live in a community that is complete with all your basic needs, right within your community? Please check out The Ethics Man BBC video series about a BBC journalist who goes across America talking with Americans about their orgy of waste and the Century of Self. Again, you finances the Saudis? You supports the puppet regime of Egypt, et al? The West. Cheap resources for the West. Now enter China and India? Just as governments are puppets on the string of multinationals. I have lived in many countries and this one is so wasteful it will go down with this wastefulness. Its economic chase to the material wasteland is echoed throughout the world. I think this will be corrected when mother nature says: enough of the greedy human animal. I can't help but also think of Freud's thought about how the human has a death wish.

Too the many objections of

Too the many objections of my view, I'll deal with Mr. Anonymous who claim that I seem to forget "Sadaam was only in power because he was supported by the U.S. for decades". Sorry comrade, but this is the essential reason why I make my argument. Would it not be downright immoral for the U.S. not to have done anything for its past sins of alliance with Saddam's regime. Or would of it been better to let the evil continue? YOU seem to be the one trying to forget this and thinking there would have been no consequences otherwise. Once again: GET REAL! Then Binnsb4tyrs asks who is the U.S. to pass judgement, on what's good or bad. Do you have no moral compass to distinguish between secular American military and Islamic jihad. We can damn right make a distinction between this and make no apology about it! Then the final question of "FOR WHAT?" What could this all be for? How about the Sunnis, the Shiites, the Kurds, democracy and dare i say "peace in the Middle East". That's what's worth it! And no friends Saddam's regime did not qualify as "peaceful".