Share

The Barbary Wars, Continued

by: William Rivers Pitt, t r u t h o u t | Columnist

photo
(Photo-illustration: Everett Bogue / t r u t h o u t)

    Where there is a sea, there are pirates.
    - Greek Proverb

    It's a very odd time to be alive in the United States today. Two wars, a staggering economy, domestic political upheaval, and now, what, pirates? America was still in short pants the last time piracy got this much attention around here. Back then, what came to be known as the Barbary Wars were waged against African piracy by presidents George Washington and James Madison. According to GlobalSecurity.org:

    The four Barbary States of North Africa - Morocco, Algiers, Tunis, and Tripoli - had plundered seaborne commerce for centuries. Surviving by blackmail, they received great sums of money, ships, and arms yearly from foreign powers in return for allowing the foreigners to trade in African ports and sail unmolested through the Barbary waters. They demanded tribute money, seized ships, and held crews for ransom or sold them into slavery. American merchant ships, no longer covered by British protection, were seized by Barbary pirates in the years after United States independence, and American crews were enslaved. In 1799, the United States agreed to pay $18,000 a year in return for a promise that Tripoli-based corsairs would not molest American ships. Similar agreements were made at the time with the rulers of Morocco, Algiers, and Tunis.

    In 1805, Marines stormed the Barbary pirates' harbor fortress stronghold of Derna (Tripoli), commemorated in the Marine Corp Hymn invocation "To the Shores of Tripoli." Following the War of 1812, two naval squadrons under Commodores Decatur and Bainbridge returned to the Mediterranean. Diplomacy backed by resolute force soon brought the rulers of Barbary to terms and gained widespread respect for the new American nation. Decatur obtained treaties which eliminated the United States paying tribute. In the years immediately after the Napoleonic wars, which ended in 1815, the European powers forced an end to piracy and the payment of tribute in the Barbary states.


    Washington and Madison, meet Barack Obama, the newest American president forced to deal harshly with murder and mayhem on the high seas. Over the last week, virtually all news in America was dominated by an attack on the unarmed cargo ship Maersk-Alabama by pirates off the coast of Somalia. The crew managed to fight off the attack, but the pirates made off with the ship's captain, Richard Phillips, and were demanding $2 million for his release.

    Pirates attacking an American ship off the Horn of Africa, pirates repelled by the crew of that ship, pirates with an American hostage at gunpoint, well, that's just great theater. The TV news media broke out the banners and brass bands and bird-dogged the situation relentlessly. The conclusion, however, vaulted this crisis into a made-for-TV movie waiting to happen. According to The Washington Post:

    The operation to rescue Capt. Richard Phillips involved dozens of Navy SEALs, who parachuted from an aircraft into the scene near dark Saturday, landing in the ocean. The SEALs were part of a group of Special Operations forces involved in the effort, according to military officials. The SEALs set up operations on the USS Bainbridge, which had been communicating with the four pirates via radio and had used smaller boats to make deliveries of food and water to their lifeboat.

    US military observers thought that Phillips was about to be shot. SEAL snipers, who were positioned on a deck at the stern of the Bainbridge, an area known as the fantail, had the three pirates in their sights. The on-scene commander gave the snipers authority to fire. "As soon as the snipers had a clear shot at the guy who had the rifle, they shot him and the other two in the hatches," the senior military official said. A member of the Special Operations team slid down the tow line into the water and climbed aboard the lifeboat. Phillips was then put in a small craft and taken to the Bainbridge.

    Coming soon to a network near you, but really, you don't need to wait, because it's already there. Every news organization - with the unsurprising exception of Fox, which probably didn't want to be seen giving credit to President Obama for fear of outraging their already-anti-Obama audience - exploded into a journalistic version of the "USA! USA! USA!" chant most often heard at sporting events and NRA rallies.

    Make no mistake, there was much to celebrate here from the top right on down. President Obama gave authorization for the use of force if Captain Phillips' life was judged to be in immediate peril. Obama did not grandstand or wallow in the media spectacle - indeed, during the five days of the crisis, he was asked specifically by reporters about the situation and declined to comment - nor did he engage in the kind of hyper-violent military overreach that defined the previous administration.

    When the decision to use violence arrived, it was executed with unimaginable precision, and when it was all over, not one civilian was dead, injured, scratched, bruised or even lightly ruffled. The cool, calm, drama-free manner in which the rescue of Captain Phillips was undertaken is good news for America and the world, for it demonstrates, finally, that this nation is once again in the hands of responsible people. Most important, perhaps, is the fact that a man held prisoner at gunpoint, who was beaten by his captors repeatedly according to reports, was rescued and sent home to his family.

    But, of course, nothing is that simple. Even the word "piracy" itself is not entirely accurate, as Johann Hari explained in a January article for the UK Independent:

    As soon as the government was gone, mysterious European ships started appearing off the coast of Somalia, dumping vast barrels into the ocean. The coastal population began to sicken. At first they suffered strange rashes, nausea and malformed babies. Then, after the 2005 tsunami, hundreds of the dumped and leaking barrels washed up on shore. People began to suffer from radiation sickness, and more than 300 died.

    Ahmedou Ould-Abdallah, the UN envoy to Somalia, tells me: "Somebody is dumping nuclear material here. There is also lead, and heavy metals such as cadmium and mercury - you name it." Much of it can be traced back to European hospitals and factories, who seem to be passing it on to the Italian mafia to "dispose" of cheaply. When I asked Mr. Ould-Abdallah what European governments were doing about it, he said with a sigh: "Nothing. There has been no clean-up, no compensation, and no prevention."

    At the same time, other European ships have been looting Somalia's seas of their greatest resource: seafood. We have destroyed our own fish stocks by overexploitation - and now we have moved on to theirs. More than $300 million worth of tuna, shrimp, and lobster are being stolen every year by illegal trawlers. The local fishermen are now starving. Mohammed Hussein, a fisherman in the town of Marka about 62 miles south of Mogadishu, told Reuters: "If nothing is done, there soon won't be much fish left in our coastal waters."

    This is the context in which the "pirates" have emerged. Somalian fishermen took speedboats to try to dissuade the dumpers and trawlers, or at least levy a "tax" on them. They call themselves the Volunteer Coastguard of Somalia - and ordinary Somalis agree. The independent Somalian news site WardheerNews found 70 percent "strongly supported the piracy as a form of national defence".

    Evidence of this kind of illegal dumping taking place has been mounting for many years now, ever since the Somali government disintegrated after 1992. "Local fishermen in the coastline of Somalia," stated an AlterNet report on Tuesday, "have been complaining of illegal vessels coming to Somali waters and stealing all the fish. And since there was no government to report it to, and since the severity of the violence clumsily overshadowed every other problem, the fishermen went completely unheard. But it was around this same time that a more sinister, a more patronizing practice was being put in motion. A Swiss firm called Achair Parterns, and an Italian waste company called Progresso, made a deal with Ali Mahdi, that they could dump containers of waste material in Somali waters. These European companies were said to be paying Warlords about $3 a ton, whereas to properly dispose of waste in Europe costs about $1,000 a ton."

    A BBC report from March 2005 states, "Tsunami waves could have spread illegally dumped nuclear waste and other toxic waste on Somalia's coast, a United Nations spokesman has said. Nick Nuttall of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) told the BBC that December's tsunami appeared to have broken barrels and scattered waste. Mr. Nuttall said a preliminary UN report had found that Somalis in the northern areas were falling sick as a result. Some firms have been dumping waste off Somalia's coast for years, the UN says. It says international companies have taken advantage of the fact that Somalia had no functioning government from the early 1990s until recently."

    The sudden spike in media coverage on the issue of piracy was entirely due to the fact that Americans were involved. These pirates, many of them teenagers, have been active for quite some time now. The reasons why there are pirates attacking ships off the Horn of Africa in the first place, either as profiteers or to block illegal waste dumping, has everything to do with the ongoing economic, social and political upheaval currently ravaging that region; Somalia, in particular, is anarchy defined, and the utter absence of any government in Mogadishu explains why the Somali coastline is swarming with pirate enclaves. One hostage was rescued, but many others from many countries remain in captivity.

    And the hijackings continue. Four more ships were attacked - the Lebanese cargo ship MV Sea Horse, the Greek bulk carrier MV Irene E.M. and two Egyptian fishing boats - in the aftermath of the Maersk-Alabama incident, and more than 60 crew members have been taken hostage by pirates who vowed revenge for the killing of their comrades.

    The Barbary Wars of the 18th century make for a rattling good yarn or two, but the truth behind those stories is no less complex than the truth behind today's grand tale of thwarted piracy half a world away. It is a complicated, dangerous and developing situation that no banner headline, news network or made-for-TV movie appears capable of fully explaining. There was plenty to be happy about after last Monday's events, but plenty more to be worried about. Yarr.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Thank you, Mr. Pitt and

Thank you, Mr. Pitt and TruthOut, for coming out with more of the story. There's still one question regarding the particulars of the Maersk Alabama that I suspect we don't have an honest answer for, what was she carrying? She was flying an American flag, perhaps the only freighter in the Maersk fleet to do so, and rumors have said this was because she had been chartered by the U.S. Department of Defense. Up until this incident the U.S. government wasn't taking much interest in the Somali piracy. Some say it was food relief but that makes no sense... was she bait to teach the pirates a lesson? Was she carrying arms? There's still more to this story that isn't being told... And up until this incident no one had been harmed by the "pirates" (other than the harm of detention) and I fear that as this continues to unfold, there will be a great deal of harm. Next we should expect the U.S. to invade another country...

Thank you Mr. Pitt. I am

Thank you Mr. Pitt. I am very pleased to hear the story form the other side. I knew they had good reason to risk they're lives in piracy. If Fox did cover this, I am sure it would be one sided kneejerking as usual. The truth calms the spirit as always. What is the difference between what the Somalis are doing and what the nations do with tariffs. They have a right to protect themselves by whatever means. Just as we do.

Very interesting. However,

Very interesting. However, Thomas Jefferson was president in 1805 and was responsible for dispatching the military in order to thwart the Barbary Pirates.

Certainly this gives a more

Certainly this gives a more complete perspective on the issue of Somali "piracy." However, I would feel the actions were more justified if the Somalis targeted fishing vessels or vessels that might be found dumping waste rather than cruise ships and cargo ships carrying totally unrelated cargos.

thank you, as always, for

thank you, as always, for giving us information that is not heard on CNN or other networks. There is always more to the problem, and you have given us some needed perspective.

Want to "stop the

Want to "stop the pirates"..then have the Europeans stop dumping toxic garbage in the Indian Ocean. After the 2004 Tsunami 1000's of tons of barrels with medical and radioactive waste washed up on Somali shores. Subsequently whole coastal villages were devastated with radiation sickness and weird incurable diseases. The Somali's have no manner to defend themselves against this. What we call pirates, they call heroes. Don't believe the BBC balderdash , they have no interest in doing any "real "investigative journalism ". Our "Media" is once again lying and failing us.

Thanks, Will, for helping us

Thanks, Will, for helping us to see history repeating itself. The capture of a merchant vessel (The Betsy) by Barbary pirates who held the crew and passengers for ransom actually gave birth, under Thomas Jefferson, to the United States Navy, created to protect merchant ships passing through Gibraltar from the Barbary pirates. The exploits of Captain Stephen Decatur during that time, the American-Tripolitan War of 1801-1804 are some of the boldest in the annals of American naval warfare and make fascinating reading. Too bad we've learned practically nothing about the geo-politics of that region in more than two centuries!

I regret to say that this

I regret to say that this comment probably won't make it onto your post, because it is not what you want to hear. It shocks me, however, to see a story about a man who was willing to sacrifice his life for his crew, and about the heroes, who are fighting battles that you will never know about, for your freedom, used to glorify President Obama. It was not a tough decision to make. There was only one answer, if he made it at all. Even worse is the aristocratic and naive logic displayed by so many people whose only experiences with such cultures and regions are through media cameras and journalists who fancy themselves pioneers of the 1st amendment. In the humble view of someone who has been in those places, I recommend you speak only on what you have actually seen to be true.

Thanks for filling in the

Thanks for filling in the blanks on this piracy mess. I noticed a bump in the number of people driving around with American flags attached to their cars over the weekend, due to the rescue I assumed. A neighbor was bragging to m about the greatness of the United States. Pretty stupid, I thought. As with many of the problems we face, there is more to the story than meets the eye. Too bad so many Americans are too busy with American Idol and Dancing with the stars to educate themselves outside the mainstream media. If they did, they might learn that one man's hero is another man's terrorist. Until something is done to remedy the injustices that lead to pirates and piracy, the problem will fester.

Here in Europe, information

Here in Europe, information concerning the other side of this phenomena has been floating around for some time, not only on the net but in nation wide presses. One could only hope that in America, a country that wields so much power all over the globe, that the general population could be better informed. Great job Mr. Pitt!

Dr. Bill. Why on Earth

Dr. Bill. Why on Earth would they risk sinking a ship full of toxic cargo? You didn't say what kind of doctor you are. Did the med school tell you that toxic cargo ships carry big neon signs advertising them selves?

Thanks for this great

Thanks for this great article - very interesting indeed.

A short remark to 05:08 β€” Anonymous "...actually gave birth, under Thomas Jefferson, to the United States Navy, created to protect merchant ships passing through Gibraltar from the Barbary pirates"

I thought the US navy started with a dozen frigates under John Adams to fight off French navy and privateers who had been capturing a total of about 300 US ships during the quasi-war. The French were also called pirates at the time. The war itself had started as a retaliation for the resumption of preferential trade routes between England and the US, at the detriment of commerce with the new French Republic even though the French rightfully claimed they were on the US side during the independence war. (How else could have the synchronized naval and land operations been pulled off at Yorktown or the treaty been signed in Paris?)

By the way this is the reason why Adams signed the alien act - to have a legal right to muzzle the French element of the US population.

No one seems concerned that

No one seems concerned that three men were summarily executed outside of any local legal framework. Nullem crimen, nullum peina sine lege - no crime and no punishment without law - is a basic legal principle. Piracy is wrong but so is dumping of toxic waste. Who will punish the punishers? No one. So we shouldn't be surprised if hostages are now treated more harshly. So far the Somalis have treated them humanely.

Curt: your argument that it

Curt: your argument that it "makes no sense" for pirates to attack a vessel carrying humanitarian aid for Kenya is logical only if you assume that the pirates would have scruples about seizing food and medicine bound for another country. Let's not forget that they are pirates, and their goal is to seize anything of value. When they couldn't get the cargo, they took the captain instead, hoping to turn a profit off him.

Carlo: your concerns about the "summary execution" of the three pirates need to be put in context. The snipers were given orders to fire only if the hostage's life appeared to be in imminent danger. A police officer would also have the authority to fire on a criminal in such a situation. It was not an "execution," a punishment for a convicted criminal; rather, it was the use of deadly force to prevent a murder by the only possible means.

While the mainstream media can be too quick to assume that Americans are always the good guys, I think we who are distrustful of the mainstream media can sometimes be too quick to assume that Americans must always be the bad guys. The European companies dumping toxic waste off Somalia's coast have indeed behaved reprehensibly and must certainly be brought to justice. But to suggest that their actions somehow justify an attack on an American ship carrying humanitarian aid strikes me as absurd.

Once again we are made to

Once again we are made to believe that violence is a justifiable tool in the resolution of violence. If this fable were true, war would have been made obsolete centuries ago.

My sentiments exactly:

My sentiments exactly: "Certainly this gives a more complete perspective on the issue of Somali "piracy." However, I would feel the actions were more justified if the Somalis targeted fishing vessels or vessels that might be found dumping waste rather than cruise ships and cargo ships carrying totally unrelated cargos." --- Attacking cruise liners and cargo ships with rockets is not protecting fishing grounds just like Bush cronies torturing people for national security is not "information gathering."

Anonymous, I don't believe

Anonymous, I don't believe this incident has been used to "glorify" Obama. However, I feel quite sure that had things gone badly you (and Fox News) would have assigned ALL the blame to Obama. Thanks Truthout for reporting the other side of the story; I had heard nothing about toxic waste being dumped and fish being stolen.

Obviously, Somalia has to be

Obviously, Somalia has to be put back together again. Putting the US in charge of this is another story--it would be like asking Michael Jackson to babysit your 8- year old. Sure, everyone stole their coastal fish and dumped radioactive waste on their waters--would Larry Summers think this is wrong? Here's the solution --give them whatever they take in on piracy--with the proviso that they have to start building up some legit economy. After a few years they might have something going. Heck, do this with Haiti as well. Moldova would be good too. Slogans from the war front: "Why are you a pirate?" "That's where the money is," said the young Somali native. "Why do you turn toxic sub-prime mortgages into AAA rated securities?" That's where the money is, answered the young Wall Streeter. From Dr Wu's latest book: "Your Pirates and Mine"

I was sickened by the

I was sickened by the reaction of so many to the execution...lets call it what it is..of the Somali 'pirates' by the Americans. Even the usually relatively well-informed Jon Stewart appeared eager to jump on the hail to America bandwagon. Somalis see the 'pirates' differently...They fulfill the job of coast-guards..trying to protect the shores and waters of Somalia from illegal international fishermen poaching in their waters..and from theillegal immoral dumping of toxic waste in Somali waters. Thanks to the U.S. over-reaction..an escalation in violence is virtually guaranteed. Food relief my sorry ass. Thanks for the informative article

The latter part of the

The latter part of the article is a nice exposΓ© of the exploitation and destruction of the third world, Africa in particular, by western corporations, and of associated deception by American corporate media - honor among thieves. The situation in Somalia is not accidental or arbitary. It exhibits the modus operandi of western corporations that operate under automatic guidance from inhuman, amoral algorithms 'optimized' for maximum short term profit and personal gain for their executives. Similarly, have you the reader not been mystified your whole life long concerning the causes of widespread famine, poverty, and human degradation in many parts of Africa? You will be very hard pressed to find any honest reportage in the western corporate media, televangelist shows, etc, about the following status quo in Africa. Understand that in many African countries western corporations, with the backing of their home governments, are simply clearing Africans off their native lands en masse, wholesale. That way, there is nobody to file legal disputes over mining, ranching, logging, fishing rights, etc - there are only unrepresented, mercilessly exploited, starving refugee populations, denied the birthright of their sustaining environments (communities, cultures, advocates and representatives, agricultural lands, forests, rivers, lakes, etc) and forced into 'satanic mills', slums, shanty towns,refugee camps, illegal emigration - if they're relatively 'lucky' - otherwise into starvation, slavery, and other forms of being genocided. Will you, reader, wake up and do something effective to elevate humanity around the world - or will you chant another legalisitic/ideological retort and rationalization for your pension/401K/similar investments in predatory corporations? How well do you think you'll sleep at night during the retirement you're hoping for?

How rare to have such a warm

How rare to have such a warm discussion triggered by unconventional look at what happened with Pirates in terms of context of place and times. I found a short but fascinating history of Pirarcy -- with a slant toward non-hierarchical workers rights -- buried in online Independant and within the songs and conversational riffs of hip-hop artist Ca'ann (sp.?). And Pirates played a role in the trans-Atlantic Slave Trade.

Reagan helped to

Reagan helped to destabilize Somalia by arming the warlords giving rise to widespread violence which destroyed the government, which lead to economic exploitation. This sad story repeated itself over and over in Reagan foreign policy and seems to have originated from a Jeanne Kirkpatrick Enterprise Institute study that should have been called "from petty dictators do great democracies rise", but was titled "Dictatorships and Double Standards". And more notably after being the basis for Reagan foreign policy, the thesis proved to be completely wrong. Conservative rant that this is a blame America first. But, when the facts speak to the issue that we have met the enemy and it is us, we need to change our ways. This is simply another example where political belief enhanced the problem over time. See ref to Iraq, Taliban, Iran, middle East, Central, sought America, etc.

The first pirates in Somalia

The first pirates in Somalia were the corporations with their factory fishing boats that stole the fish and the livelihoods of thousands of people who they left to starve. It clearly shows that unless there is an economic incentive, i.e. natural resources for American corporations to exploit, the US government will not truly intervene as it has in Afghanistan and Iraq and Pakistan. Why is there so little mention in the press of the destruction being wreaked across the globe by these corporate pillages of the seas, like Red Lobster with the destruction it leaves in its wake of destroyed fisheries, destroyed economies, and destroyed lives.

The problem with this

The problem with this article and the others commenting, is that the narrative is from a very aloof position with no first hand experience. Those of you who believe the pirates act in the best interest of the people, are very, very misled. I am also not one to support the corporate destruction that most likely is happening, however, these 'pirates' would just as soon attack their own people if there was any profit to it. Take it from someone who has been there. And Nancy, I am sorry to disappoint you, but I voted for President Obama, and I abhor Fox News. Just trying to be realistic.