Share

Ex-Bush Official Says Waterboarding Is Torture

by: Pamela Hess  |  The Associated Press

photo
Richard Armitage, the former deputy secretary of state under George W. Bush, recently called waterboarding torture. (Photo: AP)

    Washington - A former No. 2 State Department official in the Bush administration says he would have resigned if he had known the CIA was subjecting terrorism suspects to waterboarding, an interrogation technique that simulates drowning.

    Richard Armitage, the former deputy secretary of state, told Al Jazeera English television in an interview airing Wednesday that waterboarding is torture. However, he said he does not believe CIA officials who engaged in waterboarding and other forms of harsh interrogation should be prosecuted.

    The CIA has acknowledged using waterboarding on three high-level terror detainees in 2002 and 2003, with the permission of the White House and the Justice Department.

    "Had I known about it at the time I was serving, I would've had the courage to resign. But I don't know. It's in hindsight now," Armitage said in the interview.

    Armitage left the Bush administration after President George W. Bush was re-elected in November 2004. He announced he was leaving the day following the resignation of Colin Powell, Bush's secretary of state.

    Armitage told Al Jazeera English television that no one at the State Department knew prisoners were being abused until the Abu Ghraib scandal revealed it to the world in April 2004.

    Congress is at least as much to blame as Bush administration officials for prisoner abuse, he said, because lawmakers failed to conduct rigorous oversight of the detention, interrogation and rendition programs.

    "They weren't doing their job," he said.

    In one of his first acts in office, President Barack Obama ended the CIA's harsh interrogation program, limiting the agency to methods approved by the military. He also approved the closure of the jail at Guantanamo Bay Naval Base in one year.

    CIA Director Leon Panetta told Congress last week that the secret sites where CIA prisoners were waterboarded and interrogated by other harsh means are being closed down, and that he has no intention of prosecuting any CIA employees for their role in the secret program that was deemed legal at the time.

    Attorneys for one of the three prisoners who was waterboarded asked Panetta this week to preserve the black sites to be used as evidence in his trial.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Oh Sure! Only three high

Oh Sure! Only three high level detainees were waterboarded! The rest were served roast duck for dinners and given massages when they were feeling down! Because the US really takes good care of the people it illegally renders to these black sites without the protections of Habeus Corpus! Of course, Richard would have resigned had he known that a few bad apples were misbehaving! It took the whole world to learn what happened before Richard knew and he still only knows that just THREE detainees were tortured! How does this guy function?! How stupid and ignorant can a man be and still get out of bed in the morning?!!

If waterboarding is torture

If waterboarding is torture (and it is), and torture is a crime against humanity (and it is), and we hanged Japanese officers in the 1940s for waterboarding (and we did), why does Armitage (and Panetta and, by extension, Obama) think that there should be no prosecutions?

don't suppose he's heard of

don't suppose he's heard of the School of the Americas renamed Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation SOA/WHINSEC where thugs & torturers have been trained for decades? or Bagram Airbase torture center in Afghanistan? http://is.gd/klft note also how torture now only refers to waterboarding - not mention of isolation, dogs, stress positions, sleep deprivation, and much else all used together to destroy people.

It is simply

It is simply incomprehensible that a guy like Armitage didn't know. In his position, after decades in the govt with all the connections that brings, he knew. He's rewriting history to make himself look good.

HAHA Anonymous 13:13 I was

HAHA Anonymous 13:13 I was going to say just the same thing!

History records that early

History records that early forms of waterboarding were extremely effective in getting detainees to reveal the identities of witches and persons under contract to Satan. Evidence is much weaker for other applications.

Yeah, quite a believable

Yeah, quite a believable statement from a Bush Administration official. Believability has always been the dominant trait of those guys.Yeah, let's appoint him Ambassador to Spain or something...

I appreciate Mr. Armitage's

I appreciate Mr. Armitage's (new found?) convictions against torture. However, I find his blame of congress to be more than a little disingenuous when he was part of an administration that stonewalled every attempt of congress to seek information. He would have some credibility today if he had spoken before the second Bush term - not waiting until now to try to cover his ...

As the Washington Post

As the Washington Post observed http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/07/16/AR2008071601786.html Armitage was always in the thick of high crimes and misdemeanors. Along with General Wayne Downing, Armitage has been involved in some of the most egregious violations of US and international law for decades. Google Armitage on NPR and Wikipedia to get started.

Against prosecutions?

Against prosecutions? Whatever happened to the American sense of justice we saw at Nuremberg?

He didn't know??? Oh

He didn't know??? Oh really. D.C., being the gossip center of the US universe? Oh really? Torture is 'wrong', but we needn't go after the perps? Especially the ones giving orders??? Oh really? What utter and complete bullshite.