Share

Plan for Palestinian State Is "Dead End," Israel Tells US

by: Dion Nissenbaum  |  McClatchy Newspapers

photo
US Middle East envoy George Mitchell (left) talks to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (right) during a meeting in Tel Aviv. (Photo: AP)

    Jerusalem - In a direct challenge to President Barack Obama's commitment to rejuvenate moribund Mideast peace talks, Israel on Thursday dismissed American-led efforts to establish a Palestinian state and laid out new conditions for renewed negotiations.

    Leaders of Israel's hawkish new government told former Maine Sen. George Mitchell, the special U.S. envoy, that they aren't going to rush into peace talks with their Palestinian neighbors.

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said that he'd require Palestinians to accept Israel as a Jewish state in any future negotiations - a demand that Palestinians have up to now rejected - Israeli government officials said.

    Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman told Obama's envoy that past Israeli concessions led to war, not peace.

    These were Mitchell's first meetings with Israeli leaders since Netanyahu's center-right government took power two weeks ago.

    Palestinian leaders have said they won't open peace talks with Netanyahu's government until it agrees in principle to the idea of a two-state solution and imposes a freeze on building Jewish housing in the West Bank.

    As expected, Mitchell made it clear that the Obama administration sees the two-state solution as the foundation for future talks.

    "U.S. policy favors - with the respect to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict - a two-state solution, which would have a Palestinian state living in peace alongside the Jewish state of Israel," Mitchell said before meeting with Lieberman.

    Netanyahu has refused to embrace that formula and has instead floated the idea of offering Palestinians limited rights that would fall short of independence.

    Netanyahu reiterated his stand in his meeting with Mitchell, said one Israeli government official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to publicly discuss the details of the conversation.

    Netanyahu also indicated that Palestinians would have to accept Israel as a Jewish state in negotiations.

    "For us, this is a crucial element," the official said. "It's a fundamental element in peace talks."

    In recent years, Israeli leaders have been pushing this demand as a way to ensure that the nation retains its Jewish identity. However, compelling Palestinians to accept the idea would all but require them to abandon their demands that Palestinian refugees be allowed to return to homes they abandoned when Israel was established in 1948.

    Yossi Alpher, a former official with Israel's Mossad spy agency and a co-founder of the bitterlemons.org Middle East political Web site, said that Netanyahu's conditions could be a poison pill that prevents any peace talks from getting under way.

    "The position he took today cannot in any way generate a peace process," Alpher said. "The Palestinians are not going to offer him this recognition. It could be a deal-breaker, but it could be an opening gambit. It's too early in this whole new process to tell."

    Mitchell also faced resistance from Lieberman, an ultranationalist Israeli leader who began his tenure as foreign minister by declaring the death of the U.S-led peace talks that then-President George W. Bush launched in November 2007.

    Lieberman told Mitchell that 15 years of faltering peace talks with Palestinians "brought neither results nor solutions," the foreign minister's office said after the meeting.

    Real stability, Lieberman said, would require an American focus on preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.

    Israeli President Shimon Peres, who sought to quash growing concerns that Israel might attack Iran if international diplomacy fails, echoed that sentiment.

    "Wide international cooperation must be created on the Iranian issue but, at the same time, all the remarks about a possible attack on Iran by Israel are not correct," Peres said. "The solution with Iran is not military."

    Peres called 2009 "a decisive year in the Middle East. We do not have time to waste."

    Mitchell will meet Friday with Palestinian leaders, who are expecting the Obama administration to put more pressure on Israel to negotiate seriously.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Follow the money!! It is

Follow the money!! It is time for the USA to cut all funding to Israel. No more financial support, i.e. 50 billion+ per year and no more military aid. Plus a prohibition of the sales of all US military equipment to Israel. Only then will Isreal become serious about negotiating a fair peace. It was Israel who broke the Oslo 1967 agreement, continued the illegal construction of settlements on Palestinian land and was told by the World Court to uphold the signed agreement. Israel refused to abide by the World Court decision.

So when do Americans stop

So when do Americans stop arming and paying these enemies of peace?

The comments below are

The comments below are right. Pull the foreign aid-to hell with the special interest lobby. This is the only language these folks understand.

Propaganda aside, Israel is

Propaganda aside, Israel is the agressor, the occupier, the annexor of neighboring land, and, if one believes major media propaganda, anyone advocating for the principles of international law and the Geneva Conventions is anti-semitic (a curious term because Arabs are semites, too).

The US government is not

The US government is not interested in world peace. The US is the largest exporter of weapons in the world along with the nation that has started the most wars (in fact, between 1945-9/11/2001, the US started 201 military offensives - resulting in 36 regime changes, several genocides, etc.) Most of this has to be kept from the American people. Israel is merely an extension of that arm. Might is right. That has been US military doctrine now ... since before the turn of the century (think war with Spain in 1898).