US Future Depends on Torture Accountability
Thursday 16 April 2009
by: Keith Olbermann | MSNBC Countdown

A guard wearing a protective face shield inside "Camp Five" detention center at the US military prison facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. (Photo: Reuters Pictures)
Olbermann: We cannot let mistakes of the past haunt our future.
As promised, a Special Comment now on the president's revelation of the remainder of this nightmare of Bush Administration torture memos. This President has gone where few before him, dared. The dirty laundry - illegal, un-American, self-defeating, self-destroying - is out for all to see.
Mr. Obama deserves our praise and our thanks for that. And yet he has gone but half-way. And, in this case, in far too many respects, half the distance is worse than standing still. Today, Mr. President, in acknowledging these science-fiction-like documents, you said that:
"This is a time for reflection, not retribution. I respect the strong views and emotions that these issues evoke."
"We have been through a dark and painful chapter in our history.
"But at a time of great challenges and disturbing disunity, nothing will be gained by spending our time and energy laying blame for the past.
Mr. President, you are wrong. What you describe would be not "spent energy" but catharsis.
Not "blame laid," but responsibility ascribed. You continued:
"Our national greatness is embedded in America's ability to right its course in concert with our core values, and to move forward with confidence. That is why we must resist the forces that divide us, and instead come together on behalf of our common future."
Indeed we must, Mr. President. And the forces of which you speak are the ones lingering - with pervasive stench - from the previous administration. Far more than a criminal stench, Sir. An immoral one. One we cannot let be re-created.
One, President Obama, it is your responsibility to make sure cannot be re-created. Forgive me for quoting from a Comment I offered the night before the inauguration. But this goes to the core of the President's commendable, but wholly naive, intention. This country has never "moved forward with confidence".without first cleansing itself of its mistaken past.
In point of fact, every effort to merely draw a line in the sand and declare the past dead has served only to keep the past alive and often to strengthen it. We "moved forward" with slavery in the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. And four score and nine years later, we had buried 600,000 of our sons and brothers, in a Civil War.
After that war's ending, we "moved forward" without the social restructuring - and protection of the rights of minorities - in the south. And a century later, we had not only not resolved anything, but black leaders were still being assassinated in our southern cities.
We "moved forward" with Germany in the reconstruction of Europe after the First World War.
Nobody even arrested the German Kaiser, let alone conducted war crimes trials then. And 19 years later, there was an indescribably more evil Germany and a more heart-rending Second World War.
We "moved forward" with the trusts of the early 1900s. And today, we are at the mercy of corporations too big to fail. We "moved forward" with the Palmer Raids and got McCarthyism.
And we "moved forward" with McCarthyism and got Watergate. We "moved forward" with Watergate and junior members of the Ford administration realized how little was ultimately at risk.
They grew up to be Paul Wolfowitz and Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney. But, Mr. President, when you say we must "come together on behalf of our common future" you are entirely correct. We must focus on getting things right in the future, as opposed to looking at what we got wrong in the past.
That means prosecuting all those involved in the Bush administration's torture of prisoners, even if the results are nominal punishments, or merely new laws. Your only other option is to let this set and fester indefinitely. Because, Sir, some day there will be another Republican president, or even a Democrat just as blind as Mr. Bush to ethics and this country's moral force. And he will look back to what you did about Mr. Bush. Or what you did not do.
And he will see precedent. Or as Cheney saw, he will see how not to get caught next time. Prosecute, Mr. President. Even if you get not one conviction, you will still have accomplished good for generations unborn. Merely by acting, you will deny a further wrong - that this construction will enter the history books: Torture was legal. It worked. It saved the country.
The end. This must not be. "It is our intention," you said today, "to assure those who carried out their duties relying in good faith upon legal advice from the Department of Justice that they will not be subject to prosecution." Mr. President, you are making history's easiest, most often made, most dangerous mistake - you are accepting the defense that somebody was "just following orders." At the end of his first year in office, Mr. Lincoln tried to contextualize the Civil War for those who still wanted to compromise with evils of secession and slavery. "The struggle of today," Lincoln wrote, "is not altogether for today. It is for a vast future also."
Mr. president, you have now been handed the beginning of that future. Use it to protect our children and our distant descendants from anything like this ever happening again - by showing them that those who did this, were neither unfairly scapegoated nor absolved. It is good to say "we won't do it again." It is not, however...enough.



Comments
This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.
Bravo again, Mr. Olberman!
Sat, 04/18/2009 - 16:21 β radline9 (not verified)Keith and Rachel are the
Sat, 04/18/2009 - 17:12 β Anonymous (not verified)Well put Mr Olberman! If
Sat, 04/18/2009 - 17:13 β Anonymous (not verified)Heck, it's protect ourselves
Sat, 04/18/2009 - 17:41 β NYCartist (not verified)K.O. is absolutely right. If
Sat, 04/18/2009 - 17:50 β badbf (not verified)Thank you Mr. Olbermann once
Sat, 04/18/2009 - 17:51 β Hosea W. McAdoo, M.D. (not verified)It seems to me that to not
Sat, 04/18/2009 - 18:31 β Jill Godmilow (not verified)Again Mr Olberman, you have
Sat, 04/18/2009 - 18:32 β rhaywood (not verified)Until we end corporate
Sat, 04/18/2009 - 18:38 β ToLo (not verified)I too say Bravo Mr
Sat, 04/18/2009 - 18:50 β Anonymous (not verified)As always, Keith has hit the
Sat, 04/18/2009 - 18:52 β Devon Noll, MPA (not verified)Spot on, KO, except... think
Sat, 04/18/2009 - 19:45 β Frank Allen (not verified)Olbermann is one of the few
Sat, 04/18/2009 - 20:34 β Anonymous (not verified)It is absolutely vital to
Sat, 04/18/2009 - 20:47 β voice of dissent (not verified)i deeply appreciate your
Sat, 04/18/2009 - 21:49 β Isa Kocher (not verified)Did anyone else notice that
Sat, 04/18/2009 - 22:47 β PicklingTheBeast (not verified)KO is right again but is
Sun, 04/19/2009 - 01:18 β Anonymous (not verified)Thank God for Keith and
Sun, 04/19/2009 - 01:56 β Anonymous (not verified)PrezObama '..nothing is to
Sun, 04/19/2009 - 12:45 β Anonarcmous (not verified)Bravos are fine. But the
Sun, 04/19/2009 - 13:13 β granny (not verified)KO needs to check for what
Sun, 04/19/2009 - 17:34 β Anonymous (not verified)Witch hunts do not clear the
Sun, 04/19/2009 - 17:37 β Anonymous (not verified)He is going to go down in
Sun, 04/19/2009 - 17:40 β Anonymous (not verified)Germany seeks to prosecute a
Sun, 04/19/2009 - 18:51 β dtroutma (not verified)Even the Spanish court
Mon, 04/20/2009 - 02:20 β Anonymous (not verified)The Nazi leadership was
Mon, 04/20/2009 - 06:45 β Anonymous (not verified)Great corporate
Mon, 04/20/2009 - 19:57 β Anonymous (not verified)Generally commendable
Mon, 04/20/2009 - 20:21 β Anonymous (not verified)Written in the best
Tue, 04/21/2009 - 18:15 β Arnie McConnell (not verified)When people have asked me
Fri, 04/24/2009 - 00:21 β Ariel Ky (not verified)"Lap dog" media? No
Fri, 04/24/2009 - 03:20 β askwhy (not verified)Rule of Law. Olberman has
Fri, 04/24/2009 - 17:19 β Anonymous (not verified)Has anybody considered the
Sat, 04/25/2009 - 04:48 β Anonymous (not verified)