Share

Obama: Beyond Savior or Trickster

by: Norman Solomon, t r u t h o u t | Perspective

photo
At Georgetown University, President Obama speaks about the economy. (Photo: Reuters)

    As President Obama enters his fourth month in office, two tendencies among progressive-minded Americans seem most hazardous to the political health of the country. The gist of one approach is that Obama can't do anything seriously wrong; the other is that he can't do anything seriously right.

    Among the tendencies, the first is more widespread and more dangerous. All kinds of atrocious policies - from Lyndon Johnson's war on Vietnam to Jimmy Carter's midterm swerve rightward to Bill Clinton's neoliberal measures such as NAFTA, "welfare reform" and Wall Street deregulation - were calamities facilitated by acquiescence or mild dissent from many left-leaning Democrats.

    Some historical analogies are acutely relevant, and the LBJ/Vietnam Obama/Afghanistan comparison is one of them. During the first couple of years after Johnson's inauguration in January 1965, with few exceptions, liberal members of Congress and leaders of liberal-oriented groups routinely voiced support for the war escalation; others mumbled their misgivings as the president ordered more troops and firepower to Vietnam. Today, similar mumbling about Afghanistan attests to the repetition compulsion disorder of the US warfare state.

    Whatever can be said for avoidance of ruffling feathers in the new administration is greatly outweighed by the dire long-term effects. We can't build a vibrant progressive movement - or strengthen a base capable of moving the country in progressive directions for the long haul - by winking and nodding at Democratic policies that would have drawn our sharp criticism if they were being implemented by a Republican administration.

    Another destructive dynamic: A corporatized Democratic administration helps Republicans put on populist costumes and pose as opponents of corporate elites. For instance, when Democratic officials and progressive allies act as though the massive federal giveaways to banks are no cause for outrage, demobilization of the party's progressive base is predictable.

    With the November midterm elections now 18 months away, the specter of the post-NAFTA 1994 election that gave control of Congress to Republicans is an ominous poltergeist that's already haunting Capitol Hill. Rather than serving, yet again, as enablers for a Democratic administration to pursue a corporate-friendly course, progressives should be pushing hard in the opposite direction.

    Among the Democratic base, the widespread eagerness to put Obama on a very high pedestal is emblematic of a depoliticized culture. Fixating on his impressive personal qualities is a way of turning the overall political picture into a fuzzy background.

    Oft-cited, yet still worth recalling, is the spot in his book, "The Audacity of Hope," where Obama wrote: "I serve as a blank screen on which people of vastly different political stripes project their own views." At least as important, Obama is a master of speaking and acting in ways that move to the center of political gravity.

    We should be hard at work at the grassroots to move that center of political gravity in progressive directions, which requires speaking truth about power - a far different endeavor than reflexively defending or vilifying Obama.

    It should be axiomatic - for commentators who refuse to be partisan hacks, for activists with progressive commitments, for anyone determined to elude Orwellian doublethink - that presidential actions and policies should be assessed and supported or opposed on their merits.

    Rejecting Obama iconography and demonology is necessary for a healthy progressive movement. We won't get far by trying to leapfrog the actual political conditions of the country. Our task is to change them.

    Obama's corporate and military policies are reflections of anti-democratic imbalances of power that are part of the political economy. We shouldn't let him off the hook any more than we should refuse to acknowledge his positive actions, such as progressive aspects of his proposed budget.

    The possibilities for progressive solutions will be bound up in propelling change from the grassroots - the methodical, often-tedious and essential tasks of talking and listening and organizing in communities across the country. When President Obama takes a progressive step, it has been made possible by progressive activism. When President Obama takes an anti-progressive step, it has been facilitated by progressives muting their criticism. The antidote to political poisons is to intelligently raise our voices.

  

»


Norman Solomon is co-chair of the national Healthcare NOT Warfare campaign, launched by Progressive Democrats of America. He is the author of a dozen books including "War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death." For more information, go to: www.normansolomon.com.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

well said - completely agree

well said - completely agree

>Hello, grass? >>Yeah? >This

>Hello, grass? >>Yeah? >This is the roots. >>okay >Grass, Max Baucus's posterior should be you, but he is skating by happily proclaiming that there will be no comprehensive, universal, single-payer health insurance in the U.S. for the next thousand years. >>Well, yes, I've heard that. >Grass, >>yes, roots? >Let's get going!

This attitude that Obama can

This attitude that Obama can do no wrong is enabled by a media machine that markets personality over policy or principle. I agree that progressives must continue to tell the truth to power at all levels, local, state, and national. We must continue to work to end the war on terror and stop trying to "win" it. When in history has anyone ever won a war on terror, Israel has been trying to win one for 50 years.

Very good article from

Very good article from Solomon-again. Some of Obama's policies so far are disastrous. But-he can probably be pushed in the right direction, especially if it's clear to him these might ruin his presidency.

Three-pronged practice is

Three-pronged practice is best. Lobby if your uncle is in government or if you own a share in a legislator. Step Two is to explain why you are dumping a product. I got two pages, snail, back from Dannon, for a post card. So, it's boilerplate. Somebody had to spend some time on it. Step Three is supporting non-government organizations. This is tricky. NGO's and NPO's get bought. You can end up supporting bad stuff. Nonetheless, the possible benefits outweigh the risks. You can make friends who will ask questions if you disappear or organize your wake if you turn up dead. Consumers can no longer decipher much about an organization by its form. Bad actors cloak themselves in garb that suits their tasks at hand. They need to be caught in one of those nutcrackers where you put the nut in and turn three different screws until it cracks and you can see the seed. Preferably, the sources should like being screwed; the information is better. Obama can say to one of his patrons, "Look, I am getting feedback from these groups, I've got to do something." If the perps are getting the same info from their customer-service departments, they are likely to talk and to deal. In a three-pronged pincer, with no escape, a perp-walk might yield some relief for us all.

After a casual reading of

After a casual reading of Solomon's piece it appears to me that he’s a highly intelligent person. I consider myself to be reasonably intelligent also (in the normal range at least) but I’d have to read his piece several more times to be clear on exactly what he's saying and what his position is. Can someone put it in simpler and fewer terms for me? Thanks!

I didn't campaign for this

I didn't campaign for this disaster-so-far. And it is very troubling to me to hear other faithful people letting him off the hook for packing the Executive Branch with the very same people who brought us both financial and military disaster - we were CONNED. A friend who is one of the faithful talks about how 'he's playing three dimensional chess' and 'you don't understand the rear point guard thing' (why O let Bush and Cheney off the hook for treason and torture with his repeated 'we need to look forward' talk). These are like the excuses that family members in denial make about their Father, the sexual abuser. It is time to take off the blinders and flush the kool-aid. It was very hard for the W supporters to choke down the mistake they made - let's be at least quick about it and limit further damage - start by demanding an audit of the Federal Reserve Bank. That's who owns Obama, in case you haven't figured it out yet - FRB and Wallstreet. This is an emergency, btw.

The "power elite" to use C.

The "power elite" to use C. Wright Mills' terminology, staked out their territories in the Obama administration long before there was one. This was clear from the cast of characters that became advisers as the campaign progressed, and was unequivocally confirmed by his subsequent appointments of close advisers: Summers, Geithner, Petraeus, Jones Brsyzenski (sp?), Blair, Gates; some of his Cabinet appointments, on the other hand, seem reasonably progressive and promising. Jury is still out on Panetta and Holder. Not only do progressives/liberals need to keep the heat on re: both the economic mess and the military adventures, but also on Congress. There is where the elites have the most influence (many members of the House and Senate are wholly-owned subsidiaries of entrenched anti-progressive and anti-democratic elites), and will need constant reminders of how they got their seats and how they will have to keep them, regardless of the obscene campaign contributions. So the battle has to be waged on two fronts: pressure on both Obama AND on Congress. Obama can't do the job of turning the country around all by himself. Blue Dogs and numerous Nazi-leaning Rethugs need to be sent packing in 2010, and replaced with devoted progressives.

There is certainly a chess

There is certainly a chess match going on. How well it is being played is not presently apparent. No one that I can think of would be playing it with as much integrity as Obama. We are in it deep dear friends and we are not going back to business as usual. No way, no how, never. Better get used to it. And remember, this is not Obama's fault any more than it is yours or mine. Be glad that the parachute opened when it did. We are still going to a hard landing.

It's Robert Redford's The

<> It's Robert Redford's The Candidate incognito.

When are we going to let

When are we going to let failure be acceptable again? Failure is not doom, or gloom, or wrong, or illegal. But, according the super-positivity movement, the uber-happy backers of Obama's Hope Image, to fail is to do just that--and be branded a doomsayer, a Debbie-Downer. It's okay to think that Obama might screw up. I hope he does. Not because I want to see him fail, but to see him work through it. Who in the hell on this planet could possible whip any nation, democratic or otherwise, into tip-top shape without anything to work on? Um, where's that utopia? Oh, by definition of the word: Nowhere. Obama should be carefully scrutinized, but as this article's author says, not categorized as saint or sinner. He's got a way about him, a cerebral track that makes his moves far harder to read even if they read like what everyone else does. Maybe he's just warming up, placating those who have long been entrenched in the Capitol. Maybe he has to, to work at them from the inside, whittling away at their core while seeming their friend. I don't know. Go ask him. But since that is next to impossible, even with his openness, just be reassured that Obama will do his best to succeed--and fail.