Share

A Give and Take on Immigration

by: Ann Friedman  |  The American Prospect

photo
An immigration raid in Iowa last year led to the arrest of these mothers, who were later released to care for their children. (Photo: Richard Sennott / The Minnesota Star Tribune )

    One year after the largest raid in US history, we rarely hear stories of small towns suffering in the absence of immigrants.

    The dominant anti-immigrant narrative in this country - despite paeans to the mythical "melting pot" we read about in grade-school social-studies textbooks - is that immigrants take. They come here to take our jobs. They take up social services. They take formerly pristine street corners and make them disorderly by standing around looking for work. They take their earnings back home rather than spend them in the local community. These are the things I hear repeated on crap cable shows like Glenn Beck's or when I sit down to dinner with my conservative relatives.

    Several years ago I did some reporting in a small town - Milan, Missouri - where around 50 percent of the 2,000 or so residents were recent Latino immigrants who had come for jobs at the town's pork-processing plant. The fascinating thing about Milan (pronounced Mi-lan, not Mi-lan like the city in Italy) was that, prior to the pork plant opening and the immigrant influx, the tiny burg had been all but dead. A small chicken processor provided jobs for a few hundred residents, but most businesses were shuttered, young people were moving away to find work in other cities, and the downtown consisted of a series of empty storefronts. While it was by no means a seamless transition from a town of mostly white, longtime residents to one that was nearly half Latino newcomers, at the time of my visit it was undeniable that Milan was more alive and more vibrant because of its new residents - despite what some of the old-timers said about immigrants "taking" resources from their community.

    This narrative wasn't in the forefront of my mind as I watched the news unfold last May about the largest immigration raid in U.S. history. In Postville, Iowa, a town the same size as Milan, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officials detained almost 400 undocumented workers. In the wake of the raid, I followed the stories of the separated families and deplorable detention practices. But it never occurred to me that something horrible was happening to everyone in Postville and the surrounding area.

    Nearly one year later, the lingering effects of the raid make depressingly clear how misleading the "immigrants take from our communities" narrative really is. Postville Mayor Robert Penrod, who recently stepped down, told a reporter from Mother Jones, "Before, it was all hustle bustle, and you'd see people walking up and down the streets and driving and listening to music. Then all of a sudden, boom! I mean nobody was walking the streets." Formerly thriving restaurants were boarded up within months. Landlords began complaining of too many empty units. Even the big-box stores, which often seem like the only businesses that can survive in economically depressed rural counties, took a hit.

    After watching what happened in Postville, folks in Milan worried they would face a similar fate after an immigration raid. "I hate to think what we'd do without them," Jerry Hollon, a local prosecutor, told The Kansas City Star.

    A Homeland Security official recently told The Washington Post that Secretary Janet Napolitano was delaying a number of ICE raids until such raids could be directed toward businesses and executives rather than workers. Still, broader policy changes are a long way off. President Barack Obama promised the Congressional Hispanic Caucus he would make a public statement in support of legalizing many of America's 12 million undocumented workers, but such a statement (or, heaven forbid, accompanying legislation) hasn't come.

    That's disappointing but not surprising. In a time of economic crisis and job loss, the anti-immigrant narrative of "those outsiders are taking our jobs" has all the more resonance. Vice President Joe Biden conceded as much. "It's difficult to tell a constituency while unemployment is rising, they're losing their jobs and their homes, that what we should do is in fact legalize and stop all deportation," he said at a late March press conference in Costa Rica.

    It's easy to acknowledge in big, sweeping terms that our economy depends on immigrant labor. But we rarely hear the stories of small towns in places like Iowa and Missouri suffering in the absence of immigrants. These are stories of immigrants not taking but giving life to their adopted communities, stories of how deporting workers actually weakens local economies.

    As we push Congress to enact comprehensive immigration reform, we must think of this issue holistically. When it comes to immigration, everyone who lives in America - immigrant or not - has something both to gain and to lose, to give and to take

    -------

    Ann Friedman is deputy editor of The American Prospect.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Cheap immigrant labor is

Cheap immigrant labor is like a narcotic, a habit to be kicked. So it's no surprise that towns that have grown dependent -- or so they think -- on the labor of illegal immigrants suddenly "miss" them. In the end, there really is no such thing as cheap labor. The true price will be exacted, sooner or later. Mayor Penrod's bemoaning of the quieting of his town in the aftermath of an ICE raid begs the question of how the native residents (yes, native, as in "nativist") viewed the omnipresent strains of foreign music, or the incomprehensible throngs on the streets. Many Americans do not wish to live in areas with growing populations of Third World immigrants, as being colonized, we can all agree, is not a pleasant experience. Municipalities trying to shake their cheap labor jones might want to try marketing their towns to said citizens, particularly young families, and in the process grow a truly native economy. All it takes is will, but local governments and Chambers of Commerce unfortunately tend to think in purely economic terms, and short-run terms at that. And, for the nth time, folks, there are not 12 million illegal immigrants in the US, but more like 30 million.

Stop this crap of conflating

Stop this crap of conflating legal immigration and illegal!

Politicians must fear for

Politicians must fear for their lives to say anything realistic about immigration. Immigration won't change until the drug war changes. Of the U.S,, Canada, and Mexico, it is hard to say which is hurt most by the drug war. Canadians can grow and sell hemp, so I'm tempted to think they are less hurt, except I've been in Canadian cities haunted by drug crime. Cities that do better at harm-reduction suffer somewhat less. Maybe if some big corporate cartels get broken in the economic mess, we can get real about immigration and the drug war. D.C. has got to change in a radical way, and that means changing the corporations who own the present government.

Ending the drug war, Jade

Ending the drug war, Jade Queen, would have negligible effect on immigration, legal or otherwise. I'm not sure why you only mentioned hemp a/k/a pot, since cocaine is almost certainly the king of imported controlled substances. Also, 90% of the world's population would improve their standard of living by moving to a developed nation, so there’s the incentive right there. It's not going away, so the only alternative is to act as if national borders exist and enforce immigration laws.

First of all Ann, don't sit

First of all Ann, don't sit down to dinner, or anything else with your conservative relatives. Conservatives are the people humanity has been fighting since day one. Don't give them any credibility. They are pariahs. Treat them as such.

Let me ask you this: you

Let me ask you this: you seem to advocate illegals in small towns as beneficial, but how can we have separate rules based on the size of the city? If you haven't lived in a border town, you don't really know immigration. Phoenix has areas that were decent even 10 years ago, for example, one where one of my sons had a lovely townhome. Today I wouldn't drive down that street because it's so dangerous. It's also trashed, and there are cases in which several families live in two bedroom housing. Illegals dominate in the most violent crimes in the state. They've ruined wages & prejudiced employers against natives because they will have to pay more, let's face it. Companies are working outside the law and that saves all kinds of bucks on bennies & fair treatment. It is a fact that much of the money earned in Phoenix is spent in Mexico. I have worked with several women 'married' to illegals who travel back and forth between families and countries. Janet Napolitano made great strides with a computer system where workers have to register, and employers now have to clear anyone to work in AZ through it first. No legality, no working here. They went home in droves. Luckily, Phoenix is experiencing one of the worst recessions in the nation so the loss of immigrant workers merely helped put the citizens back to work.

I'm sick to death of greedy

I'm sick to death of greedy white people trashing immigrants (documented or not) and blaming them for all the ills of society. I'm a white lady myself; can I really be the only one in America who remembers that WE WERE ALL ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS TO BEGIN WITH? If our ancestors had never come to blight this fair land, one has to wonder if the country that we now name it would have become a police-state skidding ever more rapidly toward imperial obsolescence.