Share

Torture

by: John Cory, t r u t h o u t | Perspective

photo
"Abu Ghraib 57" (Artwork: Fernando Botero)

    They say that the first casualty of war is truth, but they are wrong. The first casualty of war - is reality. In war, the unreal becomes real and the lie becomes truth.

    - John Cory

    On Tuesday evening, I watched Anderson Cooper and Bill O'Reilly utter the same euphemism for torture. "Harsh" techniques, they said. And then, to each of their guests they posed the question of whether or not these "harsh interrogation techniques" worked and shouldn't that be an important part of judging their merit? I felt dirty just listening to them.

    Harsh interrogation techniques, coercive tactics, enhanced techniques - These are the rebranding tools for torture. In order to avoid turning our eyes away or burying our heads in the sand, we grab politically acceptable words and terms to diminish the sting and shame of actual torture, so we can brag about being a moral society open to the discussion of stressful questioning of enemy combatants. Sterile words remove us from the very real sins of torturing human beings. And the more we become adept at anesthetic language, the easier it becomes to talk without vomiting when we speak our sins aloud. The easier it becomes to torture. The easier it becomes to maintain the nobility of torture as a tool of patriotism.

    The talking heads on television now preen and prep to define reality. Torture is not the issue, they say. The politics of torture is the issue and that is the shiny object we should all be focused on. This is political. Right versus left, not right versus wrong.

    The Republicans tell us that torture is legal if the Justice Department and the president say it is. Nixon said if the president does it, it is not illegal. But the ensuing investigations and judgments proved him wrong. This time around, the president generated supportive judicial opinions, so that everyone could wave a paper in America's face and say, "See, it's all legal. The Justice Department says so. It is not torture in the strictest legal definition because there is no organ failure or death. God bless America. Amen."

    If torture (harsh interrogation) works - why does it take 183 times to get results? Does it wear off after the first five times? Like a bad inoculation? Or did the prisoner just forget the question while he was choking to death and so you had to keep repeating everything?

    Republicans and FOX News tell me that President Obama has disgraced and endangered America by smiling and shaking hands with Hugo Chavez, a particularly despicable character. But incorporating the practices of the KGB and Communist China in our interrogation of enemy combatants is the American thing to do. We hate the Evildoers of the world except for those wonderfully effective torture techniques they use.

    They tell us that torture is the only way to avoid another 9/11. Haven't we kept America safe since that awful day? Thanks to torture, no one has attacked us since. Never mind that we didn't pay attention to the threat previously, or that we lost focus because the warnings came from Clinton and he was not a real President. Or that Richard Clarke and others shouted about their hair being on fire over the possibility of an attack. No one could have imagined such a thing. No one. Except of course the people who put it in memos that were ignored.

    But that was the past and this is the present. Do not look back in anger. Look to the future. Torture is the only way to protect us, to keep us safe. Torture will teach them not to dare think of another attack. It is revenge for what the Evildoers have wrought upon democracy, but even more importantly, it is the sword of justice that will lay waste to our enemies.

    We are all Jack Bauer now. The ticking time bomb is out there and we need torture to save America. The threat is imminent. Be afraid. Be very afraid.

    There are voices telling us that "enhanced interrogation techniques" work, that multiple plots and potential attacks have been averted, secret incidents that cannot be revealed for reasons of national security. Voices intone the gravity of having released these memos authorizing torture that now tell the enemy what to expect and how to defend themselves against these "harsh" techniques. But these warnings and complaints come from the same men who willing revealed the identity of a covert CIA agent for political gain, an agent who was protecting America.

    For 60 years, America has denounced the torture tactics of our enemies as being criminal. From WWII, the Korean War, Vietnam to the Iraq War, torture was evil. We invaded Iraq and overthrew Saddam because he was evil and tortured his people. We denounced the torture of POWs in Hanoi and pointed out that torture only served a propaganda purpose. And now, we say torture is not torture because we do it humanely. If America tortures, it is not the same as Communists and tyrants and Islamic fundamentalists. There is good torture and bad torture. America defines the difference.

    And so, the great talking heads and pundits of the media village will inoculate us against guilt and anger by explaining the game of politics and morality. The game of semantics will numb our indignation if we just listen to their soothing voices in the darkness that has become America. They will calm our troubled hearts. They will ease our pain and whisper the words we so desperately want to hear, "There, there, you are America. You are good. You are special. You do not torture. You simply protect us from the monsters under the bed. Hush now, don't look in the mirror; just close your eyes and everything will be all right."

  

»


John Cory is a Vietnam veteran. He received the Purple Heart and Bronze Star with V device, 1969 - 1970.

Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

This article says it well,

This article says it well, however, it doesn't clearly state the evil that these criminals are capable of. We need to go back to 9/11 and have an independent investigation. Just look at all the evidence and arguments that the 9/ii truth movement has put together and then you get the idea of who the real evil doers are and then everything else comes clearer into view: the illegal invasion of Iraq,The murder of hundreds of thousands of innocent women and children, the shredding of the constitution, the torture, the 'black' sites, suspension of Habeus Corpus, lies from beginning to end! And we like to call Chavez evil because he is helping his people and the whole south american continent from the evil of corporate fascism! Just how screwed up the US will become is still an open question. One would have thought that we really had reached the bottom of the dark pit of moral depravity and ethical bankruptcy!

the author makes it sound

the author makes it sound like the U$ just started torturing under Bush and Cheney - what a joke... ask anyone who was in combat in Korea, Vietnam or the first Iraq invasion under Bush's father... torture has been an instrument of U$ policy since day one when the 'savages', whose land we stole, were tortured, it just wasn't called torture - it was called doing God's will...

What an excellent article.

What an excellent article. Thank you so much for putting into such eloquent words what I think most "Real Americans" feel deep in their hearts and souls. The entire previous administration was a shameful blight on our country. Let those who approve of the torture move to some other country where it is honestly practiced.

Anderson just can't get

Anderson just can't get himself to criticize his old employer, the C.I.A.

I wish everyone could read

I wish everyone could read this. I fear sometimes, when I see people talking the way these talking heads do, that they have become the Pod People, and that all of us are in danger of following in their footsteps. I want to warn someone, but is there anyone left to warn? Are the Pod People looking around for honest horror and disgust in our faces, and plotting the next placement of their seeds? Can we ever sleep again?

Bravo, John Cory! Write on!!

Bravo, John Cory! Write on!! Words matter, and you should be decorated for so skillfully wielding your pen in the fight to expose the falsehoods and fears at the core of the argument for torture, and for exposing the profound and pervasive ugliness in and of the hearts and minds of the people that harbor and broadcast those lies and fears.

Thank you, John Cory for

Thank you, John Cory for writing this. We need people to understand morally corrupt reasoning and you did a fine job of illustrating it. I am reminded of what I learned in a university class on the history of Nazi Germany. Hitler was able to do the horrors of what he did by making it legal. Once it was legal it was easy for Germans to either either enthusiastically accept or turn a blind eye towards massive injustice and human slaughter. Harsh enforcement of those who opposed the Nazi plan guaranteed the death or silence of dissent. The Bush torture policy was leading us down the same path. We need to step back, restore real justice, end the wars for power and oil and learn to respect the rights of people and nations.

Euphemisms have abounded,

Euphemisms have abounded, especially recently: murder and genocide have been called "ethnic cleansing" carrying the implication that the "race" being "cleansed" is "foul". And this "definition" is now an accepted term! Indeed it's true, whatever the evil deed, it's OK if it's "us" and damnable if "they" do it. Amazing, isn't it, that the "argument" passes muster anywhere, any time!

Great article which should

Great article which should be read by all.

So many good things in this

So many good things in this article. The U.S. has been in a moral sewer since 2001, at least, and it is time for a housecleaning (to mix metaphors).As to previous torture cited by another post, yes, but it was never official government policy before.Another euphemism I'd like to see eliminated: collateral damage: i.e. civilian deaths. We need to keep up pressure on liberal and progressive lawmakers to expose misdeeds and prosecute criminals. Call the apologists what they are: soft on crime, criminal facilitators, and criminal co-conspirators.

very well done. we can't let

very well done. we can't let this go away. raise your voices to bring an end to the madness of torturing human beings in the name of god.

Right vs. Left, eh? Then

Right vs. Left, eh? Then why has Obama's consistent position been "we need to look forward instead of backward" - sounds to me like it's business as usual with no accountability for war crimes - Right vs. Left is theater to keep us distracted - wake up, this man and his administration are singing the same tune as the past - no 'change' - the fact that he acquiesced in the final hour means nothing - he should have been leading us on holding torturers accountable, along with a repeal of all of Bush's 'signing statements' that dismantled the Bill of Rights and created dictatorial powers - something he hasn't seen fit to undo yet for some reason. How about declaring a restoration of Posse Comitatus - "I promise not to ever use armed Federal Forces (read "national security force") domestically" - shouldn't be that hard for him to say that, should it? Don't be conned by his constitutional studies - it looks like he's using his authority to dismantle the Bill of Rights while we sit complacently.

One thing that strikes me is

One thing that strikes me is that torture, and all of its euphemisms, is something that the media and the public experiences as an impersonal activity - we, the US, do it to "them" because we are in a "war on terror". On TV we see, over and over again, the disheveled countenances of a couple of "high value" subjects, and somewhere in our minds, a disconnect occurs. Yes, we know this happened, but, as with war itself (unless we have personal experience of it) our imagination cannot conceive of how intensely personal torture (and war) really is. One human being - someone's son, husband, father, daughter, mother or sister - is consciously choosing to do absolutely unspeakable things to another simply because a superior officer ordered it. And the superior officer orders it because in an office somewhere in Washington, a couple of smart lawyers sitting around a table found the words to make those unspeakable acts legal. The individual being tortured is forever changed by the experience. (Close your eyes for a moment and try to visualize the many words we've been told by the talking heads.) Whether guilty of terrorist acts or not, s/he will forever hate this country and support with even more fervor the very groups we are trying so desperately to defeat. And the son or daughter participating in the torture is also changed forever, degraded by the experience and cast aside by the very powers who commanded him/her to do these unspeakble, inhumane and immoral things. In the end, torture has only moved us further from our goal of ending terrorism and has the disastrous side effect of distorting our collective and individual moral compasses.

The distortion of language

The distortion of language in the service of nefarious enterprise has become epidemic, though, as some writers point out, it is an old practice. The name of the game is vigilance, truthtelling and investigative journalism via newspapers! Thank you, John Cory.

And by calling captives and

And by calling captives and prisoners "enemy combatants" we are assigning guilt to them. What happened to "innocent until proven guilty"? I suggest we stop using terms meant to disguise. When we say "collateral damage" do we think about the bodies of dead women and children? When we use the cute term "Gitmo" do we think about the the horrors perpetrated at the Guantanamo Bay Prison Camp in our names? Thanks for starting a discussion on the words we use without thinking about their implications

I just finished writing to

I just finished writing to the NYTimes to complain about the (mis)use of "harsh interrogation" instead of torture. ("Highly Placed Resistance to Interrogation Panel," A1, April 24) If we don't name it we won't deal with it. John Cory says it all. Thank you.

And where are the religions?

And where are the religions? I have heard nothing from any religious leaders about torture. Is their moral leadership totally gone? Terrorists and Torturers. Is one worse than the other?

One could write the shortest

One could write the shortest essay in the world to sum up the subject of torture; Torture is wrong. Period. My complete and total contempt is for the lawyers who continuously choose crafty, disingenuous languaging and framing for their totally crap "arguments. Next in line are the morally spine-less members of the House & Senate... The only way that I see 'justice' being served is by prosecuting the very people at the top who asked (demanded???) the Justice Dept to create this ugly, immoral situation in our policies. Those people? Why the Bu$hCo, Inc. perps.

Each time I hear or read one

Each time I hear or read one of the euphemisms, "EndlΓΆsung" comes to mind, Final Solution. That was the euphemism for mass murder, for genocide, for shooting, gassing, beating to death and hanging from meat hooks. The method may differ, the (im-)moral message is the same. Use a neutral, clean word devoid of meaning to sanitize your immorality.

My hat gos off to the

My hat gos off to the author! Well said and so very, very true!

We have endured torture for

We have endured torture for years, it's called right wing 'news'. They poked us with PC, rephrasing, repetitive lies, smoke screens and now-torture on a guilted platter! All my life I heard the congress yell at China about they're human rights issues. We need to shut up about that. We're still prosecuting Hitler's advisers. We need to push past the pundits and just say no!

I am not really sure why

I am not really sure why Truthout put John McCain's picture with this article, but it does serve to remind us what John McCain said, specifically about waterboarding, in Iowa back in October of 2007: "Anyone who knows what waterboarding is could not be unsure. It is a horrible torture technique used by Pol Pot and being used on Buddhist monks as we speak," said McCain after a campaign stop at Dordt College here. "People who have worn the uniform and had the experience know that this is a terrible and odious practice and should never be condoned in the U.S. We are a better nation than that." This is not a left vs. right issue, it seems to be more of an issue between those who know what they are talking about, and those who don't.

i am so tired of hearing

i am so tired of hearing that the "ends justify the means"; that it is disgraceful that we even contemplate making these things public; that this is hurting america; that we are wrong in looking back and evaluating; admittedly there are things known as statutes of limitation, i am not sure that is a valid premise that we should embrace. accountability should know no statute of limitation, and to say otherwise is nothing more than hypocrisy.

When plunder becomes a way

When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living in society, they create for themselves, in the course of time, a legal system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it. ~ Frederic Bastiat, The Law (1850)

What I find interesting

What I find interesting (read, outrageous) is that in all the finger pointing, all the arguments and queries as to who is to bear the brunt of responsibility for these despicable acts, nobody has taken the time to explain the military chain of command to John Q. citizen. Granted the CIA interrogators don't fall under this category, but as for the soldiers, from CIC on down, the military chain of command is IMMUTABLE. It does not change, ever. Orders come from on high, and are passed down as far as need be to accomplish the objective. Specialist so-and-so may have done the actual deed, but the responsibility lies squarely on the shoulders of the commanding officers, all the way back up the chain. Wait, that would be the Commander in Chief, ie Bush. Uh, nevermind, can't have HIM responsible for anything, now can we? It's just that cut and dried where the military is concerned. Specialist so-and-so is still guilty, but so is everyone above him. So where's all the confusion about who's responsible?? This school of thought where political position supersedes ones being subject to the Law is one we need to abolish once and for all. Nobody is above the law, and lawbreakers must be held accountable, no matter who they are or what their position. Otherwise, our entire legal system becomes nothing more than a passing joke.

Just perhaps we should pay

Just perhaps we should pay closer attention to the people we elect. From several sources I understand that George W. Bush defended, in print, the practice of branding fraternity pledges with red hot coat hangers when he was in college. It isn't a huge jump from there to the things he felt were simply "enhanced interrogation" techniques while he was president. Our media does us no favors in the way it reports the background of our candidates.

Naomi Klein's Shock Doctrine

Naomi Klein's Shock Doctrine clearly explains how many of the 'techniques' employed in enhanced interrogation result in breaking the ego of the subject. The military's SERE program (source of torture techniques) has the simple goal of training the subject to resist making false confessions. Add together 'breaking' people and extracting false confessions and the Bush administration motive for torture becomes obvious. By the way, John, I wonder why you insist on following the right-wing line that Hugo Chavez is "a particularly despicable character." He is not.

A rose by any other name ...

A rose by any other name ... Torture is torture. We've never before had trouble recognizing torture for what it is -- call it what you may. Thank you John Cory for telling it like it is.

Americans DON'T GET about

Americans DON'T GET about torture:IF ACCEPTED,SOMEDAY THIS MAY BE USED AGAINST US CITIZENSd what court procedure??It has happened --defined as 'terrorist'--by who, and in what court.What prevents this step. It has happened in other countries & nothing is to prevent it happening from here. Remember the Republican party is cohesive because of fear, that all political assassinations in this country have been of democratic/progressive leaders or those not supportive of the extreme right agenda--now the larger picture should form...

Yes, words matter and the

Yes, words matter and the lie becomes the truth. A perfect example is depicting Chavez as "despicable". What incredible irony in view of the subject of this article. It was Chavez who refused to use the military to repress his own people -- setting a precedent in Venezuelan history. Chavez has brought the majority of his people literacy and health care fir the first time, despicable indeed! Chavez has won election after election with the highest margins in Venezuelan history. When and why does democracy become so despicable? When people refuse to look at the facts.

Bravo Mr Cory! Why is there

Bravo Mr Cory! Why is there not more of this info in the mainstream media? How long do we have to wait until those who sanctioned these appalling practices, ie. Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and their poodle Blair are put on trial? Is it surprising that there are those who oppose the US, its allies and their values? These revelations about torture by so-called "civilised" nations are the best recruitment agencies for the opposition or those who are usually referred to as "terrorists" but... who are the terrorists?? One correspondent mentioned the euphemism of "ethnic-cleansing. What about the ethnic cleansing of the islanders of Diego Garcia in order to construct a US air-base? When the British High Court ruled in favour of the islanders' return, Tony Blair overturned the ruling by a sneaky Order in Council which was slipped past the Queen in between two innocuous OiCs for her approval. So he stooped low enough to mislead his sovereign!

Remember the Nurenburg

Remember the Nurenburg Trials? What makes our country great isn't the might of our mili8tary but our ideals. These Bushies have morally corrupted our great nation. We can't move forward without dealing with the past. Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, et. al. need to be held accountable - no matter how inconvenient the truth is!!!!!

I think the King of Jordan

I think the King of Jordan put it well. People though out the Middle East are looking to see if the rule of law is real or not in America. Just like many of our closet friends, that stopped working with us on intelligence issues, are wondering if America has turned a corner or not. McCain is a good example of someone saying they are against torture, but do not want anyone held accountable nor want talk about it. Amazing and real. Let's see... I read that there had been over 400 Armed Services cases against military personnel... and 4000 dead US people overseas, 100,000 dead Iraqis, and 2,000,000 refuges Nothing like torture to try and get a link to justify the Iraq war!!!! Sure torture works...