Share

All-Electric Cars About to Be Resurrected

by: Michael Taylor  |  The San Francisco Chronicle

photo
An electric car recharging. (Photo: Getty Images)

    The all-electric car, which had a brief heyday less than a decade ago and then went the way of the dodo, killed off by the car companies, is about to make a comeback.

    Charged up with lighter, more sophisticated and efficient batteries, and competitively priced with gasoline-driven and hybrid vehicles, the new offers will be marketed and sold primarily as second cars - for running errands, taking kids to school and the like. These silent electric autos will be plugged into home outlets at night and during the day will be able to travel 100 miles or more without stopping for a charge.

    Nissan said recently it has developed a mass-market electric car, due out by the end of next year, that will seat five and can have its battery charged to 80 percent of capacity in 26 minutes. It will have all the amenities car buyers want, Nissan says, such as navigation, super stereo and heated seats, and will cost between $20,000 and $30,000.

    The company is not alone in pushing the resurgence of all-electric cars. On the drawing boards are cars and trucks scheduled to be introduced over the next year or so by Ford, Mitsubishi, Chrysler and Subaru, among others, according to the Electric Drive Transportation Association, a trade group.

    "The electric car is clearly on its way back," said Ron Cogan, editor and publisher of the magazine Green Car Journal, which covers the alternative energy auto industry. "Every automaker and battery company has been making incremental breakthroughs" in technology.

    Who Killed the EV1?

    For a few years, into the beginning of this decade, several major automakers produced electric models to satisfy a California law mandating that a small percentage of new cars sold in the state be pollution-free. Perhaps the best-known was General Motors' EV1, which was sleek and fast and attracted a cultlike base of fans.

    The GM cars, along with other electrics made by Honda, Ford, Nissan, Chrysler and Toyota, were for the most part available only on leases of about $500 a month. These vehicles were powered by heavy, inefficient batteries that cost as much as $30,000 apiece.

    When the law requiring automakers to sell these cars was changed, the manufacturers essentially closed up their electric-car shops, recalled the cars, crushed many of them, and offered a smattering of gasoline-electric hybrids instead.

    Electric car aficionados were outraged - they were given voice in the popular 2006 documentary "Who Killed the Electric Car?" - but that was the end of it.

    Until now.

    Field Testing Cars

    The car companies, allied with battery manufacturers, say they have figured out how to mass produce an electric car that will fit into most people's lives in the same way as ordinary cars - you can buy them, charge them at home, use them for commuting and they will be modestly priced. But one thing the automakers have learned is that it helps to have widespread field testing of unfamiliar cars by fleet operators before trying to sell them to the public.

    To that end, they have joined up with public agencies around the nation to provide electric vehicles for government fleets. Selling to the government allows automakers to monitor the performance of their new cars closely. It also gives them a built-in market.

    In the Bay Area, for example, Nissan will provide 1,000 all-electric cars to Sonoma County within the next year.

    Sonoma Signs On

    Cordell Stillman, Sonoma County's point man for the project and a devotee of electric cars - he's converting his 1958 Volkswagen to all-electric - says the partnership with Nissan started with a letter in August from the car company, asking if the county wanted to come to a talk about electric cars. Stillman didn't have to be asked twice.

    He said staffers will use the Nissan electric cars to travel around the county, attend meetings, conduct field inspections and carry out other day-to-day business. The cars' batteries will be charged up at stations installed in fleet parking lots at night, "when the rates are cheaper," Stillman said.

    "Nissan will get a lot of data on use patterns (of the cars)," Stillman said. "It's a little research laboratory for them."

    For its part, Nissan has already done enough research to say it's at the point where it can sell electric cars to the public by the end of 2010.

    "We believe the market exists for these cars," said Mark Perry, Nissan North America's director of product planning, "and we'll be making about 100,000 cars."

    Better Batteries

    Perry said the secret to making the cars efficient and affordable lies in the batteries, developed jointly by Nissan and battery maker NEC.

    "Batteries now are getting twice the power for half the weight and half the size," Perry said. The new batteries will be made of laminated lithium ion, an improvement, Perry said, over the nickel metal hydride and lead acid batteries of old.

    Batteries still need to be charged, however. That is the ultimate tether, compared with the relative freedom of a gasoline-driven car.

    That problem could be eased by a 2-year-old state law providing as much as $120 million a year over seven years to set up charging stations around California. The idea is that if these stations were at, say, every rest stop on Interstate 5, drivers could pull in, take a half hour break while the car is being recharged, then continue along for another hundred miles.

    Ultimately, however, all-electric cars will probably be used mostly for short jaunts within a few miles of home, which is what most people do with their cars anyway.

    In fact, according to Ken Kurani, a research engineer for the Institute of Transportation Studies at UC Davis, studies conducted over a 10-year period showed that some users of electric cars "figured out the car could actually be used for most of their trips, and it became unclear what the term 'second car' meant."

    Coming Soon

    All-electric cars coming from automakers for the global market; some of the models will be introduced overseas before coming to the United States:

    2009: Subaru, Smart forTwo.

    2010: Chevy Volt, Chrysler, Miles (China), Mitsubishi iMiEV, Nissan, Ford Battery Electric Van, Tesla Roadster Sport.

    2011: BYD (China), Ford Battery Electric Small Car.

    --------

    Source: Electric Drive Transportation Association http://www.electricdrive.org

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

the sad thing here is that

the sad thing here is that we could have had all electric "second cars" years ago very cheap if we didn't "need" all the amenties. instead of trying to make an electric car do what the gas cars do better, we could have had a slow speed, short range, light, cheap "city car" that would have been more than adequate for city driving and cut greenhouse gas emissioins nationwide 10% . Americans will not save the planet because we are too stupid to give up our car fantasies.

The auto makers are so full

The auto makers are so full of it. These technical problems could have been solved long ago if they only tried. But it was just too profitable for them to do the same old thing. This is what they're all about-not making cars but squeezing the public. Interesting that GM killed its own electric car. This is the same GM that apparently did everything possible to kill off mass transit in the early 20th century. GM deserves bankruptcy.

30K? Affordable?

30K? Affordable? hahahahahaha!

Well, this is once again a

Well, this is once again a start. My issue with this whole electric car saga is that the wait is due to the charging infrastructure. No doubt the enormous oil industry has been positioning themselves to take full advantage of this through legislative lobbying and the sorts. Seems the little guy cannot get a break concerning commerce. We all wondered for the day of phones having a cord long enough to travel with. Well, hope you have some kind of preferred shares in wireless companies. Bet the farm most not. Will we wonder how long the cord will be for the electric car? Bought your preferred shares in the Tesla Wireless Electric Company? Once again, bet the farm not. Nor will any of us be able to. Wonder what will happen when you lose signal. Oh, maybe the wireless phone may work to call for help and that gas guzzling tow/push truck back into signal range. Then again, something is better than nothing, I think.

Fancy radios and GPS? Who

Fancy radios and GPS? Who the blazes needs all that crap? coberly got it right- it would be a piece of cake for them to build a 700 pound electric car that would carry two people and several bags of groceries, but then the executives couldn't make their millions-per-year salaries. $20,000 is not "affordable", it is usury, especially with over 6 million laid off and another 12 million that have fallen off the unemployment rolls. The car companies are waving their greenwashed flag while they fight for the status quo.

PBS ran a show about

PBS ran a show about electric cars last week. The Chevy Volt won't go to market for about 10 years. Its all about the battery technology. The Volt's battery as it exists now is only good for 40 miles then another kind of engine has to kick in to power the car. Either gas, hydrogen or a great big sail on the roof. China has an all electric car already on the market. (stock ticker BYDDF.PK) The car is made by an electronics company who have produced a superior battery. Are we to be last in everything?

An Indian auto company, TATA

An Indian auto company, TATA Motors, has just put on the market a two cylinder car, (gas),that's the cheapest in the world. Hardy uses any fuel at all. The NANO. $2,500. OK Detroit, get off your asses.

WOW. Nissan makes it sound

WOW. Nissan makes it sound like they are going to beat GM's Volt by a wide margin in price, and perhaps also in amenities. But that's easy to say and hard to do. Let's see what comes of this race to produce the first commercially-viable electric car since 1910.

*These vehicles were powered

*These vehicles were powered by heavy, inefficient batteries that cost as much as $30,000 apiece...* is crap. The batteries in the EV-1 were-some still ARE- good, & well-designed... so much so that the PATENT on them was bought up from GM by Chevron-Texaco! (and guess when you'll be seeing THEM again?) The new lithium-based batteries are great (lithium/polymers are incredibly light & powerful... if somewhat prone to exploding, if punctured)... but so much of the technology for these systems (like the controllers, & chargers) are having to be "re-invented" because of the industrial infighting and general obfuscation that accompanies ANY kind of major change like this. In the West the night-time-generated hydropower that aluminum companies used to buy for less than a penny per kw/h is available to charge these cars, IF the people who run the grid & their minions (BPA & regional PUDs, private power, etc) can get their act together... and propose FAIR RATES. Who's waiting for that to happen? ^..^

Mini Cooper USA was omitted

Mini Cooper USA was omitted from the list. Google it. Infrastructure is not much of an issue in that 80% of miles traveled in personal vehicles is below 50 miles round trip per day. In any business I've been in, something that solves 80% of a problem is a massive win. I can easily imagine a future of neighborhood cars and long distance cars (if someone even needs one, many don't). Long distance design? Probably serial hybrid using CNG for the ICE. Maximum efficiency with the technology we currently have, and the minimum achievable carbon footprint. Someday, all electric. For now, complete independence from foreign oil, and virtually no need for a massive increase in distribution infrastructure, i.e. most of us have natural gas in our homes or apartments right now.