Share

Specter Casts Another Vote Against Democratic Agenda

by: J. Taylor Rushing  |  The Hill

photo
Sen. Arlen Specter (D-Pennsylvania) voted against legislation that would allow bankruptcy judges to revise mortgage agreements. (Photo: Getty Images)

    Newly minted Democratic Sen. Arlen Specter is already asserting his famous independence, casting his second straight vote against his new party's agenda.

    Specter (Pa.) on Thursday voted against a controversial bill that would have rewritten bankruptcy laws - a bill cherished by Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) - just a day after voting against the Democratic-written budget.

    Specter shocked Capitol Hill on Tuesday by announcing his switch to the Democratic Party ahead of his reelection next year. He was welcomed to the White House on Wednesday, where he told President Obama he was "a loyal Democrat" but also warned reporters he "would not be an automatic 60th vote" for Democrats.

    Specter downplayed the significance of his vote Thursday, noting that he has opposed the bankruptcy provision for more than a year.

    "It's a position I've always held," he said.

    Democratic leaders said Specter's "no" votes simply confirm his independence.

    "This is very premature," said Democratic Conference Vice Chairman Charles Schumer (N.Y.). "Sen. Specter's views fit within our caucus on many, many, many issues."

    Specter told reporters Wednesday night that he opposed the budget because it contained the controversial parliamentary maneuver known as reconciliation, "as well as some other things."

    In an April 2 floor speech, Specter had announced he was opposing the budget because of spending concerns - and referred to himself as "the loyal opposition."

    "These budget votes are all going to be determined by the Democratic majority largely on party lines, so my vote is really a protest vote and to show there is substantial concern, at least with the loyal opposition, to limit federal expenditures," Specter said at the time.

    Specter has also already announced his opposition to another key Democratic priority: the Employee Free Choice Act, also known as the "card-check" bill.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Specter is a Republican

Specter is a Republican plant, get rid of him! If the Democratic leaders haven't got that, get rid of them too!

To paraphrase, "with

To paraphrase, "with Democrats like Specter, who needs Republicans?" because these three bills are very important to citizens, especially to those who want good schools and clean energy, who want a chance to keep their homes and unionists who want fair treatment. His opposition is not loyal to Pennsylvania's working people--his head should be hanging as he shambles down that hallway.

I agree with both of you. I

I agree with both of you. I predict that Specter will NOT be the Democratic senate nominee in 2010. I heard that Rendell, Obama, Biden, et al made some kind of deal to support him in the primary. This caused my house member, Alison Shwartz, a Rendell crony, to drop out. BUT, Joe Sestak says he's still running. I think I'll send him some money... For Specter, in the GOP, one vote against the party line, every couple of years, gets him branded a RINO, and driven out of the party (after his "yes" vote on the stimulus, Steele told several RW radio hosts that the RNC would be funding specter's challenger - Toomey) Toomey CAN'T win in PA - he's to the right of Santorum. Either way, we'd get the seat in 2010. We don't need Specter - and he's proving how little he offers, right now! ..