Share

Climate Chaos Predicted by CO2 Study

by: Steve Connor  |  The Independent UK

photo
The sun rises over the Department of Water San Fernando Valley power generation station. (Photo: Getty Images)

    World will have exceeded 2050 safe carbon emissions limit by 2020, scientists say.

    The world will overshoot its long-term target on greenhouse gas emissions within two decades. A study has found that the average global temperature will rise above the threshold that could cause dangerous climate change during that time.

    Scientists have calculated that the world has already produced about a third of the total amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) that could be emitted between 2000 and 2050 and still keep within a 2C rise in global average temperatures.

    At the current rate at which CO2 is emitted globally - which is increasing by 3 percent a year - countries will have exceeded their total limit of 1,000 billion tons within 20 years, which would be about 20 years earlier than planned under international obligations. "If we continue burning fossil fuels as we do, we will have exhausted the carbon budget in merely 20 years, and global warming will go well beyond 2C," said Malte Meinshausen of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany, who led the study, published in Nature.

    "Substantial reductions in global emissions have to begin soon - before 2020. If we wait longer, the required phase-out of carbon emissions will involve tremendous economic costs and technological challenges. We should not forget that a 2C global mean warming would take us far beyond the variations that Earth has experienced since we humans have been around."

    It is the first time scientists have calculated accurately the amount of greenhouse gas emissions that can be released into the atmosphere between 2000 and 2050 and still have a reasonable chance of avoiding temperature rises higher than 2C above pre-industrial levels - widely viewed as a "safe" threshold.

    The scientists found the total amount of greenhouse gases that could be released over this time would be equivalent to 1,000 billion tons of CO2. This is equivalent to using up about 25 percent of known reserves of oil, gas and coal, said Bill Hare, a co-author of the study.

    The study concluded that the world must agree on a cut in carbon dioxide emissions of more than 50 percent by 2050 if the probability of exceeding a 2C rise in average temperatures is to be limited to a risk of 1 in 4.

    "With every year of delay [in agreeing on further cuts], we consume a larger part of our emissions budget, losing room to manoeuvre and increasing the probabilities of dangerous consequences," said Reto Knutti of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich, a member of the research team.

    Myles Allen of Oxford University said the total emissions of CO2 that have accumulated in the atmosphere since the start of the Industrial Revolution in the mid-18th century are the really important figure for future climate change.

    "Mother Nature doesn't care about dates. To avoid dangerous climate change we will have to limit the total amount of carbon we inject into the atmosphere, not just the emission rate in any given year," Dr Allen said.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Has anyone been listening to

Has anyone been listening to or reading James Lovelock? His book The Vanishing Face of Gaia is very sobering relevant reading and should be covered by Truthout. Keep up the good work.

I was an Environmental

I was an Environmental Science major and I studied the theory of CO2 Global Warming, along with Global Dimming (then called Albedo Effect) and GeoEngineering back in the mid seventies - several years after they were theorized - these are old theories that were presented as emergencies forty years ago. Search for Great Global Warming Swindle to get a balanced view on the science behind GW on a BBC documentary. That policymakers and media claim that there is no dissent or no 'real' scientists who frankly doubt the CO2 theory is a total distortion - it is an out and out lie. God help us if we are led to accept the GeoEngineering (read aerial spraying of climate modifiers - no kidding). Just think about the insanity of all of this. SAY NO!

Actually I've always really

Actually I've always really liked James Lovelock. Lately however, I've chosen to ignore his predictions. He says it is already too late and that the only thing that will save us is nuclear power. Studies show that nuclear power is just as much a dead end future as anything else. It's not going to be an easy ride into an ever more uncertain future. But I still would rather not give up hope yet.

Dismantle globally, renew

Dismantle globally, renew locally. It is time to let go of the consumer society, car culture, industrial capitalism, the "global economy", economic growth, and dreams of a techno-fix. What we have been doing is not working and will not work. Our task is basically to dismantle industrial civilization as we know it. Few are willing to even contemplate the end of industrial capitalism, but it will happen whether we like it or not. There is an ancient saying that "The fates guide him who wills, others they drag." How many people think that this culture will voluntarily adopt a sane and sustainable way of life? How many are willing to act on that belief? Drive as many holes as you can into the Titanic folks, and build lifeboats at the same time.

forget the arguing about

forget the arguing about which climate science is the "right" climate science. Burning stuff is bad news on a planet as crowded as this. Let's burn less stuff! Let's do use more direct solar and indirect solar (wind).

My local newspaper recently

My local newspaper recently conducted a poll in which over 50% of respondents thought global warming was a hoax! Thanks for helping to get the Truth out.

Global warming isn't a hoax

Global warming isn't a hoax just Al Gore's version of it. It's not about CO2 it's about cap and trade taxes. Al Gore's own lead scientist which he fired because his views didn't match his own claims we are actually in a CO2 deprived environment. This global warming is a natural part of life on earth and that is that. Don't get me wrong we need to lower pollution, but Al Gore much like Prince Charles is just a friendly face on the same group Bush, Cheney, Obama, Pelosi and the whole crew work for.

Environmental Science

Environmental Science Major, Maybe you should have studied a hardcore science, like physics, instead. CO2-caused warming has been studied for over 100 years, and unfortunately it's quite real. The physics is inescapable, and from week to week the measurements indicate a situation getting worse and worse.

The "skeptics" of global

The "skeptics" of global warming are simply imbeciles- they've now extended the highest CO2 number to the last 6 million years from ocean sediment readings; and every single new piece of science indicates it will be twice as bad as the worst case estimates. We will pay attention when a 500sq mile strip of 2 miles high ice cracks of of Antarctica (or Greenland) on a steep slope and tobaggons into the deep ocean at 100mph, creating a 50-100 ft worldwide tsunami that kills tens or hundreds of millions.

We simply for any number of

We simply for any number of reasons cannot continue to consume as we have been. Conjure up whatever theory motivates you to change your habits and push for change from others. I happen to believe that we are in a period of rapid warming-induced climate change, as I believe I have seen evidence of it in my lifetime. Rainfall patterns are shifting, the procession of the seasons as I knew them has been altered, extremes are becoming more frequent, even plant and wildlife patterns are changing. If you don't think humans are causing this, then fine, find another reason to justify conservation of energy and consumables. But we simply must not continue to be so greedy and thoughtless and profligate about our consumption of nonrenewable natural resources. We must lead by example.

The amazing thing about this

The amazing thing about this story is that it has been COOLING since 2002. The real "deniers" are the ones who claim the Sun has nothing to do with it. I suggest a bit of remedial reading. It’s the Sun, stupid! By Willie Soon, solar and climate scientist http://www.iceagenow.com/Its_the_Sun_stupid.htm Solar Activity Lowest in Almost 100 Years, Implications for Climate Potentially Significant http://www.stormx.com/agriculture/weather-risk/2009/04/solar-activity-lowest-in-almost-100-years-implications-for-climate-potentially-significant/