Share

Laying the Groundwork for Violence

by: Dahr Jamail, t r u t h o u t | Perspective

photo
Members of the Sahwa militia, who were promised jobs, have instead been targeted by the Iraqi military. (Photo: Ali Yussef / Getty Images)

    Throughout history, those who collaborate with the occupiers of their country tend to end up hung out to dry, or dead. The occupation of Iraq is no different - collaboration and the poison fruits that come of it are on full display for the history books once again. Only now, the rapidity with which this is happening is staggering.

    On May 5, the Iraqi military killed Basim Mohammed and detained his brother. Mohammed was a member of the Sahwa, the 100,000-strong Sunni militia composed mostly of former resistance fighters that the US created in order to use them to battle al-Qaeda in Iraq, as well as paying them off to draw down the number of attacks against occupation forces.

    The Sahwa, who were supposed to be given government jobs either in security or in civil services, have been betrayed. Instead of being given the promised jobs, they have been consistently targeted by the Iraqi military, and at times the US military, which has left them vulnerable as well to attacks from al-Qaeda. As a result, they are walking off their security jobs for lack of pay, and have largely ceased their military operations against al-Qaeda. The predictable result is what we have been witnessing over the last months - a slow but steady increase in the number of attacks against Iraqi and US forces and a dramatic rise in the spectacular car bomb attacks in largely Shia areas that kill scores at a time.

    The obvious solution would be for the Obama administration to pressure its client government in Baghdad to fulfill promises to incorporate the Sahwa into its ranks, as well as applying pressure to Prime Minister Maliki to lay off targeting the Sahwa and its leadership.

    Instead, Sahwa members like Mohammed are being killed and their family members detained, and the attacks continue. On May 3, Iraqi forces arrested Nadhim al-Jubouri, a Sahwa leader in the volatile Salahadin province. In March, Iraqi forces detained Adil al-Mashadani, head of another Sahwa group in the Fadhil neighborhood of central Baghdad - which ignited clashes between US, Iraqi and Sahwa forces that left three men dead and set the stage for more bloodletting.

    Let us be clear - the US military knew, when the Sahwa were formed back in mid-2006, that most of the members were either former resistance fighters or members of al-Qaeda. Promises were made to these men that if they took the $300 monthly paycheck and promised to stop their attacks against occupation forces, they would be granted amnesty from any Iraqi government reprisal. The latter was necessary because from the beginning of the Sahwa's creation, the Maliki government has opposed them, and spoke in bellicose terms that there would be measures taken to exact revenge on Sahwa members who had been in the Ba'ath Party, or who were former resistance fighters, which describes the vast majority of its members.

    Sahwa leaders are complaining about this, to little or no avail. After his arrest on May 3, Sahwa leader Nadhim al-Jubouri, a former al-Qaeda militia leader, told reporters that his arrest by Iraqi police violated the amnesty deal he'd signed with the US military last year. Shame on al-Jubouri for putting any faith in the occupiers of his country. Clearly, he believes he lives outside of history. Jubouri told AFP, "We signed a cease-fire agreement with American forces, just as we signed an agreement to grant us immunity from the courts, even if we killed half the American army or shot down a plane."

    Clearly, he believes the occupiers, and their client government in Baghdad, would hold true to their word. Jubouri must read about as much news as Sarah Palin, or he would have known better. In a classic good-cop/bad-cop routine, while the US military played good-cop and offered immunity and money to the Sahwa, the Maliki government promised there would be no immunity, and the attacks began. The US military issued a statement after Jubouri's arrest by the Iraqi government, saying, "Coalition forces had a very minor role in this as the warrants originated from the Iraqis." It's clear who has held true to their word.

    Violence across the country continues unabated. On the same day the Iraqi military killed Basim Mohammed, nearly 40 Iraqis were killed, 31 of them "suspected militants" (read Sahwa members) killed by the Iraqi military in Diyala province.

    In the last 72 hours, most of the violence is due to Iraqi government operations that are in full swing to take out as many Sahwa members as possible.

    On May 4, at least 15 Iraqis were killed and 24 wounded. Four of the dead were policemen (read Sahwa) in the Dora area of Baghdad (security in Dora is run by the Sahwa) who were killed when someone threw a grenade at their checkpoint.

    The day before this, the Times of London reported that a leading member of the Political Council of Iraqi Resistance, which represents six Sunni militant groups, said, "The resistance has now returned to the field and is intensifying its attacks against the enemy. The number of coalition forces killed is on the rise."

    While the rhetoric is laden with hubris, there is a rising trend of US soldiers being killed in Iraq. At least 18 soldiers were killed last month - making it the deadliest month since September for US occupation forces. This, coupled with the large uptick in Iraqi deaths, prompted Richard Haass, president of the US Council on Foreign Relations, who returned from a visit to Iraq last week, to state, "It is obvious there are still multiple fault-lines in society. In my view, Iraq and the United States are going to have to adjust the timelines and leave a residual force of tens of thousands beyond 2011."

    Sahwa groups around Baghdad and other areas of Iraq are now reporting that half their members are leaving their posts to rejoin the resistance. Others are reporting that 75 percent have already left.

    On May 2 in Hilla, south of Baghdad, over 120 members of a Sahwa group abandoned their posts at dozens of checkpoints south of the capital city, on the grounds that they had not been paid their monthly salaries. "This strike is going to continue until we get our April salaries, and some of the Sahwas have not been paid for March either," Nazar al-Janabi, one of the militiamen, told AFP. This is becoming common.

    I suspect it will take some time for new resistance groups being formed of disenfranchised Sahwa members to reconstitute themselves. Sporadic, yet increasing, attacks against US forces will continue in the meantime, and the Iraqi people, who always bear the brunt of failed US policy in Iraq, continue to die in the hundreds with each passing week.

  

»


Dahr Jamail, an independent journalist, is the author of "The Will to Resist: Soldiers Who Refuse to Fight in Iraq and Afghanistan," (Haymarket Books, 2009), and "Beyond the Green Zone: Dispatches From an Unembedded Journalist in Occupied Iraq," (Haymarket Books, 2007). Jamail reported from occupied Iraq for nine months as well as from Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and Turkey over the last five years.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Violence begets violence -

Violence begets violence - it is about revenge or retribution for believed wrongs. How can anyone ever justify a War for Democracy -- the very notion of this makes no sense. Yet, this nonsense continues... Get the heck out of Iraq and Afghanistan since we only continue to make things worse. We all know that if it was not for oil... "The Surge"; what a bad joke that was on the whole world.

Thanks to the Bush

Thanks to the Bush administration who invaded Iraq and our continuing presence there, we may have to endure a permanently broken Iraq where Al Qaida persists. Is it worth the cost? The US military can't fix it and should leave no matter the consequences. This is going to be the outcome anyway.

The US is faced with a

The US is faced with a choice: either it leaves the field to the sectarian Shiite government and allows the Sunnis and Shiites to battle it out, (having handed the Shiites the advantage) or ...it doesn't. In the latter case the US will have to not only NOT withdraw, but will have to escalate its forces and ignore or override the "democratically elected" government to "protect" the embattled minority Sunnis. After all, the government has said that no delay or exceptions in the withdrawal plans are acceptable. And it's the one arresting Sahwa leaders, attacking their militia. The problem with Obama's policy is that it doesn't face this choice--or perhaps it does and just doesn't want to say so. In any case, if US withdrawals continue, then our committments to Sahwa forces are dead letters. That's what they're recognizing. And Dahr is right: occupiers, when they leave, leave all supposed pledges of support behind them; they don't take them with them. Look to a hot time in Baghdad tonight, to paraphrase the old saying. The only hope is that the Shiite government's forces have been built up enough that there won't be a long bloody civil war, because it will be able to defeat the insurgents quickly. It's not clear that such a hope would be realistic.

Some want war and will cause

Some want war and will cause turmoil in other nations to insure that profits from weapons for the profiteers continue. Iraq is no different. And it seems that some are playing games to insure that the war continues to keep dollars flowing into pockets of some.

I could never understand why

I could never understand why the option of partitioning Iraq into three countries was never seriously considered. We need to admit that we never had and apparently still don't have a clue and then get the heck out!

NY Times headline today, as

NY Times headline today, as Iraqi militaiman Mohammed Saleh Hamadi kills US soldier Anthony Davis: "Ambush by an Ally Chills Trust in Iraqi Units". Is this a surprise, after the apocalyptic treatment the US has handed out for seven years to innocent Iraqis? Is the US fervently pursuing the berserker Blackwater murderers of Iraqi civilians in the courts? As for the 'ambush', Canadian soldiers in Afghanistan know all about that - when the Americans do it, it's called 'friendly fire'; the perpetrators are given a slap on the wrist & go home as heroes. Sow blood, reap blood.

The REALLY obvious solution

The REALLY obvious solution would be to get the hell out, but the job isn't done--Iraqis still control their own oil.

It is a shame that sectarian

It is a shame that sectarian collaboration and the seemingly intractable societal and religious fault lines of Iraqi society have conspired to deny the Iraqi people a united front of total resistance against American imperialism, which can only be driven out by force. Now they have bequeathed themselves a client government– steeped in collaboration– and an archipelago of permanent American military bases. This, despite the charade of any 'agreements' or the hypocritical entreaties of the scabrous Barack Obama to the contrary. Only the destruction of the puppet Maliki government and the intensification of the resistance struggle against America can revivify the Iraqi peoples. Unfortunately, as Jamil correctly points out, the collaborators 'made their beds' with imperialism, and now they must sleep in them.The sleep of the mortuary.

Sadly, the Obama

Sadly, the Obama administration has a Nixon-like take on Iraq. Nixon claimed he was getting out of Vietnam but took 5 long years to do it-meanwhile bombing Cambodia into the stone age and creating the conditions for the Pol Pot terror. As far as Obama is concerned he can't leave Iraq and he can't stay. This Hamlet like stance is telling, and killing, as Jamail notes. Out best bet to is to get out of there now--all troops out--the longer we stay , the more chaos we bring to this hell-ravaged (by us) country. Dahr Jamail has been telling it as he sees it for many years now. He's unembedded and unsupported by the main stream media. His is a refreshing voice. I only wish that Fox News or NPR would allow him to speak. Some Americans think we are a force for good in the world, Jamail knows better. We created hell in Iraq, more of the same in Afghanistan and utter turmoil wherever our imperial war-machine takes us. Looks like we're going broke--the world will be better off for it!

Things are going as planed

Things are going as planed by the neocons and the war profiters (is that redundent?) Keep the war going, scuttle the withdrawal plan, make Obama look bad. These people are dancing in there ivory towers, as of course, more people die.

Having flown troops in and

Having flown troops in and body bags out of Vietnam I am more cynical than most. It is my firm belief that the war in Nam was prolonged for domestic political considerations and I believe that Bush/Cheney went to war in Iraq so that GW would be a war time President when he ran for his second term, and it worked. Of course, the mission wasn't over when he flew onto the carrier, it is not over now and won't be over 20 years after every one of our troops are gone.

Iraq needs to stand unified.

Iraq needs to stand unified. I can't believe how some people in this country (mainly Zionists) talk about dissecting Iraq into three pieces (they are trying to simulate British occupation). Iraq never had this sectarian problem until the Americans entered the equation and it seems that the US plan all along was to split it up. I hope for the sake of Iraq that does not happen.

"Iraq needs to stand

"Iraq needs to stand unified." Why? The Sunni and Shia have been at each others throats forever. What is gained from forcing them to meld into a single people? As for there not being sectarian violence before the US occupation, that's only a Sunni point of view. The fact is that Saddam (a Sunni) brutally repressed both the Shia and the Kurds!

Those who believe that The

Those who believe that The US will just "get out" of Iraq and Afghanistan– or anywhere else the American imperium seeks dominance– will remain befuddled in a hopeless näiveté, and blinkered thought. What is betrayed here is a monumental ignorance and a complete un-willingness to see imperialism and America for what it is, and draw cogent, inviolable conclusions. These insights are long past the time for 'civilized' debate. American 'order' is an order of war and state terror; even when America is not at war, it is really at war. The very fundament of the American ethos recognizes no discontinuity: War and peace for America are inherently indistinguishable and grounded in a nihilism of abject power, which is an end in itself. Such lethality for the world's non-Western peoples is not something that can be mitigated by America, unless it becomes other than what it now essentially is. Anyone who takes in the American political landscape– with the slightest moral acumen– is not in the least auspicious that such hopes will fructify of their own, benign accord.

Obama is not going to undo

Obama is not going to undo what the previous administration has done in Iraq. Anyone who actually believes he will..or can..is deluding him/herself. As long as we are dependent on ME oil ...we will support the illegal occupation and continued war against Iraq and any other Arab/Muslim country who have the audacity to think they ought to control and profit from their own natural resources. We will also continue to support the state of Israel as our greatest ally in ensuring things go according to plan. We don't really give a crap about what we are doing to the people of Iraq or any other nation who dares oppose our needs and demands...because frankly..we don't really recognize them as people. And that is the reality whether some choose to believe it or not. Before the Bush administration began their unprovoked.. illegal..and immoral war against the people of Iraq... it was clearly demonstrated by experts in ME history exactly what would happen. Many Americans remain ignorant ..(I would suggest by choice) considering how things have gone sinse this neo-con sponsered war and occupation began..and actually continue to believe the disproved theories put out by the Bush administration and the right-wing 'news' media who make sure these lies remain alive.