Share

Obama Wants Fed to Be Finance Supercop: Sources

by: Anne Flaherty  |  The Associated Press

photo
President Obama and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner considering single independent regulator for finance oversight. (Photo: Getty Images)

    Washington - The Federal Reserve could become the supercop for "too big to fail" companies capable of causing another financial meltdown under a proposal being seriously considered by the White House.

    The Obama administration told industry officials on Friday that it was leaning toward making such a recommendation, according to officials who attended a private one-hour meeting between President Barack Obama's economic advisers and representatives from about a dozen banks, hedge funds and other financial groups.

    Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner and other officials made it clear they were not inclined to divide the job among various regulators as has been suggested by industry and some federal regulators. Geithner told the group that one organization needs to be held responsible for monitoring systemwide risk.

    "Committees don't make decisions," said Geithner, according to one participant.

    Officials from the Treasury Department and National Economic Council, which hosted the meeting, told participants that the Fed was considered the most likely candidate for the job, according to several officials who attended or were briefed on the discussions.

    The administration officials said a legislative proposal would likely be sent to Capitol Hill in June with the expectation the House Financial Services Committee, led by Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., would consider the measure before the Independence Day recess.

    The officials requested anonymity because the meeting had not been publicly announced and they were not authorized to discuss it.

    A Treasury Department statement provided to The Associated Press on Friday confirmed Geithner's position that he wants a "single independent regulator with responsibility for systemically important firms and critical payment and settlement systems."

    A spokesman said Geithner also is open to creating a council to "coordinate among the various regulators, including the systemic risk regulator."

    The Fed itself hasn't taken a position on whether it should have the job, although Chairman Ben Bernanke has said the Fed would have to be involved in any effort to identify and resolve systemwide risk.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Is it my imagination or is

Is it my imagination or is this like putting the fox in charge of the chickens?

As I understand it, the

As I understand it, the Federal Reserve is a major part of the problem. It is not a government agency, it is a private enterprise! What a wise decision to have the bankers look after the bankers.

This is now becoming more

This is now becoming more than a joke. This path to the New World Order is being ushered in right before everyone on this planet, not just North America, or even Americans themselves. The more I study this anomaly named Barack Obama, the more I see the wolf in sheep's clothing. This journey to a so called peaceful and prosperous world seems to be written in stone only for the elite.

If we are to have a

If we are to have a regulator of the banks and quasibanks, it must be a governmental regulator, not the Fed. We have dabbled in quasi-governmental corporations like the Fed since Alexander Hamilton's first National Bank. All have traded on the faith and credit of the nation to enrich private stockholders. None have put the national interest first. That's not government of the people by the people and for the people.

And just how long are the

And just how long are the American people going to be dumb enough to believe the two party system is good? Anybody can see that it is not working. We need all independent candidates. Then we know what each one stands for. Let them show us what they will do at a lower level, and then vote for what we want with some knowlege at the higher levels. And enough of voting for people who are rich spoiled brats with no real world know-how.

Not quite right. Its a

Not quite right. Its a private fox in charge of the private chickens.

It's hanky-panky. We need

It's hanky-panky. We need real people to oversee the financial sector, not idiots. Mr. Obama, shuffle Geithner, Sumners, Bernanke, et al out and get some advisors in who love their country and will support the constitution and the citizens of the U.S.

Audit the Federal Reserve

Audit the Federal Reserve NOW. Call your congressman or woman today and ask them to co-sponsor HR 1207 to audit the Federal Reserve. What more will it take for all of us to wake up and sick the dogs on these pirates, before the dollar collapses and we're all bankrupt and under the dictatorial rule of some foreign bank? This story elicits grave doubt as to the integrity or competency (take your pick) of this President. All this Global Warming and Swine flu theater is the distraction from the looting - the burglars are in the house, and they've found all your credit cards, checks and cash and they're using your phone to make the transfers and rip off everything you own before you wake up.

Dear President Obama: I'm

Dear President Obama: I'm praying that you personally are not interested in the Fed overseeing all the banks, any more than it now does. I am shocked and appalled at the idea that a private concern, the Fed, be given any actual or further authority over economic policy, conditions, creation, regulation or even monetary influence. Oughtn't we, the people, be in charge of the Fed - and our own currency, where it goes, how it moves and is actually valued - or not? The fed seems to be all about endless war and the related debt inuring to only the Fed's (a private enterprise) profit and benefit. I realize you're busy, Sir, but if you have the time please watch Zeitgeistmovie.com and its Addendum. Always good to have at least a second opinion, no?

Been there-Done that-Don't

Been there-Done that-Don't do it again!You're still using all the money we "don't even have" to bail the thieves out....!!! Enough already!

This is the peach that

This is the peach that killed New York! That's it, write in candidates only from now on. Any one spending more than I have in my pocket for a gov office will get ignored by me. I can't afford to go with corporate votes. Wasn't Obama grass roots? So who plucked the roots? Roundup?

Imagine not only getting the

Imagine not only getting the monopoly concession to print money for the world's largest economy, but also getting paid to run it! What a sweet deal. No money down, and an embarrassment of riches at the expense of the people who actually create the wealth. Where does one sign up?

'Too big to sustain' IS a

'Too big to sustain' IS a fossil, the correct strategy implemented by anti-trust and regulations.

I heartily agree with

I heartily agree with everything the foregoing readers have said! I just read a quote yesterday from a book I am reading,"The Rise of the Fourth Reich", by Jim Marrs. It is from Nicholas "Nick" Rockefeller.....(who) may have revealed the overall globalist agenda when he said,"The end goal is to get everybody chipped, to control the whole society, to have the BANKERS (my caps) and the elite people control the world." That was a while ago but the agenda goes on....and on.....

This would take authority

This would take authority for regulating the institutions away from Sheila Bair at the FDIC. Bair has spoken out against "Too Big to Fail"

Maybe I read this proposal

Maybe I read this proposal wrong or everyone else did it must be me. Just in case I think the proposal is suppose to be in effect be a Federal anti trust law which are some what in place, but not being followed. These support companies not monopolizing and unfair competition. So if we are to not let companies get to big we should have not bailed out the big companies and gave money to small companies to expand. Companies without debt. I am totally disgusted the way the same people that contributed to the problem are still in position and taking vacations non the less. If that is not utter disregard what is?? joe