Share

Washington State, California Ponder High-Speed Rail Line

by: Les Blumenthal  |  McClatchy Newspapers

photo
California and Washington State are carefully considering building a high-speed rail in their states similar to this one in Milan. (Photo: Reuters)

    Washington - Washington state and California officials have held preliminary discussions about a high-speed, state-of-the-art rail line that would connect San Diego and Vancouver, B.C., with trains that could travel in excess of 200 miles per hour.

    The talks come just weeks after Congress approved a $787 billion economic stimulus bill sought by the White House that included $8 billion for high-speed rail in the Northwest and nine other corridors around the nation.

    Washington state will seek nearly $900 million in federal money to double to eight the number of daily roundtrips from Portland to Seattle in the next three years or so. Even with the improvements, the trains will be able to travel at 110 mph over only limited sections of track.

    But Scott Witt, director of the Washington state Department of Transportation's rail and marine program, said that though he and others are focused on the "here and now," high-speed trains running nearly the length of the West Coast aren't just a fantasy.

    "They would go like a son of a gun," he said.

    Witt envisions trains like the Shinkansen, the bullet trains in Japan, or France's TGV trains that regularly travel at near 190 mph. The bullet trains, in tests, have traveled at 277 mph, and the TGV trains have been tested at 320 mph. Both countries and others are working on Maglev or electromagnetic propulsion trains that could cruise at speeds approaching 400 mph.

    Constructing a truly high-speed West Coast rail corridor wouldn't be easy. It would require entirely new rails and a new corridor that smoothed out grades and corners. Picking a route and deciding where the trains would stop would be politically bruising. And the cost could be astronomical.

    The 1,500-mile line, by some estimates, could cost between $10 million and $45 million per mile to build.

    Witt said he has been talking with his counterpart in California for about three weeks.

    "It's very, very preliminary," Witt said. "But it makes a lot of sense."

    An alliance with California and perhaps Oregon would make it easier to leverage federal planning funds, he said.

    "We've been a highway culture in the West," Witt said. "It could be time for a change."

    California voters last year approved the sale of nearly $10 billion in bonds for a San Diego to Sacramento high-speed train. In Japan and France, however, high-speed rail is funded not by borrowed money but with revenue from a steep gas tax, which also encourages people to take trains rather than drive.

    Yet the reality in the Northwest, at this point, has more to do with the little engine that could than a bullet train speeding up the Interstate 5 corridor at near airplane speeds.

    In including $8 billion in the stimulus package for high-speed rail, President Barack Obama said it would be a "down payment" on bringing the nation's rail system into the 21st century.

    "This is not some fanciful, pie-in-the-sky vision of the future," Obama said. "It's been happening for decades. The problem is it has been happening elsewhere, not here."

    The stimulus funding initially will provide grants for ready-to-go projects. The first of the grants could be awarded before the end of summer. Follow-on funding would be used for more extensive corridor programs and longer-range planning.

    Federal officials estimate the existing intercity passenger rail service uses one-third less energy per passenger-mile than cars. If high-speed rail lines were built on all the federally designated corridors, the officials said it could reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 6 billion pounds annually.

    Congress also has approved spending an additional $5 billion over the next five years on high-speed rail projects.

    "We make no bones about it, this will not fund a high-speed rail network," said Robert Kulat, a Federal Railroad Administration spokesman. "But it kicks it down the track."

    Since 1994, Washington state and Oregon have invested $1.1 billion in the rail corridor from Portland to Seattle, Witt said. Federal funding would help pay for some long overdue upgrades that could allow the trains to travel up to 110 mph near Kelso and Centralia.

    The Talgo trains, built in Spain with a suspension system that allows them to lean going through corners, are capable of speeds up to 125 mph. But the trains are mostly limited to 79 mph until track, crossing and train control improvements are made.

    Federal stimulus money will not allow an increase in service from Seattle to Vancouver, B.C. There is now one train a day, but that will increase to two a day prior to the 2010 Winter Olympics.

    The passenger trains share the tracks with freight trains on a BNSF mainline.

    Last year, the Portland-Seattle line carried 750,000 passengers, an 82 percent increase over the past 10 years.

    By 2023, the trains could be carrying 3 million passengers a day on 13 daily roundtrips between Portland and Seattle and four between Seattle and Vancouver, B.C., according to the state's rail master plan. Corridor improvements could reduce travel times from Portland to Seattle by almost an hour, from three hours and 25 minutes to two hours and 30 minutes.

    But the cost - $6.5 billion - could be prohibitive.

    Even so, Witt said, federal stimulus funding was a start.

    "It's a huge opportunity," he said.

    Washington state has one other ace in the hole: Democratic Sen. Patty Murray. As chair of the Senate transportation appropriations subcommittee, Murray is positioned to help.

    "This is real stuff about moving people, creating jobs and reducing greenhouse gases," Murray said.

    As for a high speed San Diego to Vancouver run, Murray said not to dismiss it out of hand.

    "Obviously it would be in the future and it would be great," she said. "But if this (stimulus spending) can lead to that, it would be amazing."

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Yes! The San Diego to

Yes! The San Diego to Sacramento high-speed train is a brilliant first step to finally bring a sane solution to the problem of dependency on automobiles. --One cannot encourage the general population sufficiently to choose to travel by rail rather than automobiles. --Once an established fact the San Diego to Sacramento model will pave the way to the San Diego to Vancouver, B.C. to carry forward more intelligent ideas for the future.

A high-speed rail line on

A high-speed rail line on the Pacific Coast is a great idea. But keep it regional; have the three states operate it. Just don't turn it over to Amtrak. It's worth considering another idea: break up Amtrak and create a few regional railroads to replace it. Either groups of states or a public-private group might operate these. The current system's costs have been astronomical.

And how much more

And how much more "astronomical" have maintaining all the airports (including the ones only kept alive by the EAS massive subsidy--Extended Air Service program), air traffic controllers, the roads that run just to the airports & all the other infrastructure necessary for commercial air flights that are NOT paid for by the airlines, than that of maintaining Amtrak? I'd bet that the cost per capita has been less. Especially when you consider how all the small private planes and helicopters are effectively subsidized by taxpayer dollars. The small airport in my area is muncipally owned (taxpayer dollars) & have received multiple federal grants for upgrades (taxpayer subsidy) and is currently a recipient of 1/2 of a 4.5 million state grant (taxpayer dollars) for 2 commercial flights/day to Portland, OR, in a nine passenger plane. So, where are YOUR figures demonstrating that Amtrak is more heavily subsidized, per capita, than the much less energy efficient/more polluting passenger rail?

To 00:37: you are

To 00:37: you are right-every form of transportation infrastructure is government-subsidized. One of Amtrak's major problems is that it has to maintain its own rail bed; this is costly. But Congress has poured a huge amount of money into every aspect of Amtrak and should have had stronger results. Amtrak has very much the "federal agency" attitude. It's Big Brotherish, too: it demands "government-issued ID" to buy a ticket since "9/11". You certainly have a right to travel freely in your own country . "ID" effectively is government permission to travel. Rail transit is an excellent, energy-efficient way to move people. The concern is that if it's managed poorly, it becomes a target for right-wingers who want to kill it. People may then believe the propaganda that these folks babble. A possible solution is for the federal government to maintain the track network (the same way it subsidizes highways and air travel). This can then be used by regional and local transit; these systems have a greater chance to be more people-responsive.

Absolutely wonderful! A

Absolutely wonderful! A fantastic sleek, new high speed rail line from Vancouver to San Diego! Bravo!! Huzzah! Forget about the old, slow, disjointed existing system of trains that run the same route. Instead of spending any money on the existing system, lets build a shiny NEW one! Never mind the fact that the US Empire that will put up the money is totally insolvent; i.e., dead flat broke and in hock up to its grandchildren's eyeballs. Rather than rehabilitating and improving the existing system of freight and passenger service, it is deemed appropriate to enter into a dream state in which whatever available capital remains is dissipated in a whirlwind of "consultants" and government "contracts" before even one rail is laid. Now how is it that Italy can have a real high speed rail system? France? Germany? Japan? and all we can come up with is dilapidated and antiquated rail service? Even Slovenia had a great working rail system. Hell, even Kenya is in better shape than we are. The answer lies in the grubby halls of our Empire's crumbling castles in Washington. Greed, theft and bribery are in the final phases of murdering the United States of America. Few doubt that they will succeed.