Share

Democrats Vow Not to Bend to Credit Card Companies

by: Anne Flaherty  |  The Associated Press

photo
Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd (D-Connecticut). (Photo: Getty Images)

    Washington - Senate Democrats on Tuesday vowed not to back down to credit card companies, as the banking industry warned that legislation imposing tough reforms would make it harder for responsible customers to get credit.

    Sen. Christopher Dodd, chairman of the Banking Committee, said he hoped the legislation would pass this week. President Barack Obama has said he supports the measure and wants a bill on his desk to sign by Memorial Day.

    "It's been a long time coming," said Dodd, D-Conn., of the proposal, which would prohibit arbitrary credit card rate hikes and make it harder for people under 21 to get a card.

    Democrats - particularly Dodd who faces a tough re-election fight next year - have clung to credit card reform as an easy way of providing voters a tangible benefit in the economic downturn.

    Obama is expected to focus on the issue at a town hall meeting in Albuquerque, N.M., this week. He has said that while free-flowing credit is important, "we can't tolerate profits that depend upon misleading working families."

    The banking lobby is pushing back. On Tuesday, the American Bankers Association warned senators in a letter that the measure could restrict credit at a time when Americans need it most.

    If enacted, the bill would "have a dramatic impact on the ability of consumers, small businesses, students, and others to get credit at a time when our economy can least afford such constraints," the ABA wrote.

    Lawmakers seemed unmoved by the argument. Sen. Richard Shelby, the top Republican on the Banking Committee, said he would support the bill, while Democrats accused lenders of exploiting the recession.

    "In this record-low interest rate environment, it is indefensible for card issuers to be charging struggling American families record-high interest rates, and their attempts to do so explain why so many people are so angry at credit card companies," said Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y.

    A primary provision in the bill addresses the concept of "universal default." Credit card companies often increase a person's interest rate on past balances if the person is late paying that bill or others.

    Under the Senate bill, a person must be more than 60 days behind on payments before being subject to retroactive rate hikes. Even then, the credit card company would be required to restore the previous, lower rate after six months if the consumer pays the minimum balance on time.

    If a lender believes the person poses an increased risk because they have defaulted on that account or others, it could still increase the interest rate on future purchases. But the lender would have to provide the customer an explanation and 45 days' notice. The lender also must review the account terms again in six months and lower the rate if appropriate.

    The bill also would prohibit lenders from giving cards to people under 21 unless a parent or guardian accepts responsibility for the debt or the individual can prove they have the means to pay it back.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Reasonable-priced fees were

Reasonable-priced fees were upgraded to make the B$CEO bonuses->this is how the spoils of usury are taken.

These so-called bankers are

These so-called bankers are nothing more than bloated ticks, sucking the blood of the average working person with usurious interest rates, high fees and draconian penalties. Yet this group has received billions of taxpayer dollars to bail out colleagues that had wildly speculated in financial instruments known to be fraudulent and worthless! None have any right to complain about bringing back some usury laws and needed regulation of the massive financial excesses that have been perpetrated on America's hard-working middle class.

ACTUALLY I GET A LITTLE

ACTUALLY I GET A LITTLE NERVOUS WHEN ANY DEMOCRAT GETS BEHIND PROGRESSIVE LEGISLATION AND THEN FALLS THROUGH TO DROP IT. ESPECIALLY WITH A REPUBLICAN WITH THEM. WE NEED REAL PROGRESSIVE CREDIT CARD BUTT KICKING LAWS FOR THE PEOPLE. NOT CORPORATIONS

wow, what a load of garbage

wow, what a load of garbage the banking association tried to drop on the american people...it seems that any conservative agenda is wrapped in a threat. The credit card companies want MORE, more, more--- they want even more after that and when they do not get as much more as they think they are entittled to they threated the economy....what more can they do

I get a kick out of them

I get a kick out of them saying that it will be harder for responsible customers to get credit. That is almost an admission on their part that they have targeted the irresponsible customers for credit cards. God knows that they hate the responsible credit card users like me who pay off everything by the end of the 25 day period allowed. Last year I paid a total of $2.50 in finance charges.... They love to target the irresponsible, immature (high schoolers and others) ...those who they can lure with the 0% for 6 month scam ...those who max out and end up paying 25% and more interest after the 6 months is over.

There is a record of

There is a record of excellent bank-and-consumer-friendly practices dating back to the 1980s. I think all we have to do is restore some of that to restore faith in our credit system. Even the banks could benefit, if they stop thinking only of their bottom-lines. People (including me) would have some respect for them.

IT`S CALLED RICO ACT PEOPLE

IT`S CALLED RICO ACT PEOPLE & THEY DON`T WANT IT USED ON THEMSELVES BECAUSE IT WON`T LEAVE A CLOSETED BONE UNRATTLED OR SO MUCH AS A CRUMB FOR THEIR MISTRESSES MICE AND IT`S LONG PAST TIME TO DEMAND IT BE APPLIED!

Hmm.... I don't remember

Hmm.... I don't remember credit card rates being an issue back when the States were allowed to pass legislation that regulated them and set caps on interest rates. I wonder who took that away? Oh, yeah. The federal government.

I guess they don't make

I guess they don't make money by giving to responsible lenders, or else they wouldn't predict that is at risk. Either they are fibbing, or they are admitting they make their money off of fees they generate through shady practices. But until people are really willing to take back the power we have steadily been fooled into giving to corporations, nothing will really change. As long as people can be frightened into voting against their own economic interest through the simple use of buzz words and sound bytes, I am not sure we deserve the change anyway.

SPINE. We need the Democrats

SPINE. We need the Democrats to show some spine and stand up for what needs to be done to correct the vast imbalance between Money and Politics and the needs of this country's people. Thanks for this and let's continue to hold our elected representatives accountable to the American Public.

All of the above, PLUS the

All of the above, PLUS the fact that greed has made us a country of gamblers. Part of that is LOTTO and the other even more SUPER ways to get rich, including default swaps. Now, check out where the most profitable stores for lottery tickets are. You guessed it - in poor neighborhoods. We have lost the notion of work for bettering our lot in life, and substituted gambling. True for both the rich and the poor. There is a REASON that there is Gamblers Anonymous. I can think of a number of banking types who could profit from it.

None have any right to

None have any right to complain about bringing back some usury laws and needed regulation of the massive financial excesses that have been perpetrated on America's hard-working middle class.sfox

A primary provision of the

A primary provision of the bill is "universal default". A lot of people don't understand what this is. It means a credit card company can look at your record of payment with other credit card companies, auto loans, house payments, utility bills, etc - then determine if you are a risk of non payment and hike your interest rate. The universal default law was passed in (I think), S. Dakota but only for companies that were headquartered there. The governor and state legislature thought it would bring jobs to the state. It did, most of the major credit card companies moved their headquarters to that state to take advantage of the new law. And the rest is history. The then governor of the state now says its one of the worst decisions he ever made.