Share

Why Isn't Obama Turning to the Credit Unions?

by: Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman  |  The Free Press

photo
America has 10,000 not-for-profit credit unions that are controlled by the people who deposit their money there. (Photo: The Fresno Bee)

    As hundreds of our hard-earned billions are being poured into corrupt, greed-driven, lethally inefficient banks, the administration, Congress and corporate media have studiously avoided the one sector of the banking industry that actually works - the credit unions.

    Throughout the United States there are hundreds of these people-powered banks that have succeeded and prospered while all around them the traditional banking has collapsed into ruin, taking our general economy with them.

    Why?

    Because unlike those private banks, the America's 10,000 not-for-profit credit unions are controlled by the people who deposit their money there. Loans are made only to members. The deposits are federally insured, and investments are monitored by the depositors and, allegedly, by federal regulators.

    For the most part, their decisions are made democratically. Their boards of directors are elected. Increasingly those decisions have been oriented funneling resources into new green industries whose future is bright, and that actually serve that public rather than raping it.

    To be sure, there are those credit unions that are plagued with problems. Like all institutions, they all have their flaws. As creatures of the democratic process, they are capable of making wrong decisions while driving those involved stark raving mad.

    But by basic mandate, credit unions are ACCOUNTABLE, a concept almost completely lacking from those mega-banks "too big to let fail."

    In fact, Obama's fiscal 2010 budget contains $234.6 billion in Community Development Financial Institution funds. Some $113 billions is earmarked for "financial issues in underserved communities," according to the Treasury Department, along with another $80 million for the new Capital Magnet Fund aimed at "enhancing investments in affordable housing opportunities for the very poorest Americans." This money, says a May 7 Treasury Department release, "should be a boon to credit unions."

    The numbers are a great improvement over the Bush era. But they pale alongside the torrent of cash slushing into failed private banks.

    Since the founding of the first true credit unions in Germany beginning in 1852, the institutions have spread throughout Europe, India and North America. The first came to the US in New Hampshire in 1909.

    Edward A. Filene, the Boston merchant whose famous basement offered bargain clothing to working people, Basic principles include the idea that only members can borrow money from a credit union, and that the loans must be "prudent and productive." Because loans involve the money of a close-knit group, and must be approved by members whose money is at risk, the credit unions are a model of how the banking system might be remade.

    On average about 10 of the nation's 10,000 credit unions fail each year. Because depositors' money is federally guaranteed, they may lose their bank, but not their deposits.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Credit unions make too much

Credit unions make too much sense and operate on sounder principles, therefore, they will absolutely be rejected. Single payer makes too much financial sense, so it's rejected. The EFCA makes too much sense, so it's gotta fail too. Capping exec pay? Way too logical, so it's gotta fail. Getting off oil and becoming self-sufficient through independent energy production? Gotta fail too. Controlling global warming for the sake of survival? That makes way too much sense. Limiting credit cards' rate-jacking abuse? That makes too much sense too, so they vote to fail it. In a neoconized world, if an idea, policy, product or make any sense, they meet the sure hand of destruction.

Some credit unions paid

Some credit unions paid CEO's too much. Local media some times catch that. Also, many credit unions kept the loans on local property, rather than selling them away to consolidators. If few people patronize large banks, it will become more difficult for congress to shovel dollars into them. I have found less employee turnover in the credit union than when I have used banks in the past. Employee-retention is a good sign, though it does not necessarily mean management isn't screwing up.

It's obvious. CUs don't

It's obvious. CUs don't employ or need lobbyists. They're not trying to get away with anything. Of the ten or so that fail each year, most failures are due to pressures from banks. If your company borrows ten million from Big Dumbo Bank, then Big will try to undue the companies CU and force the labor to save at Dumbo. Even offering (usually for the first time) to cash the payroll checks. For a fee, of course, unless you open an account with them. But that's another fee.

At last someone is asking

At last someone is asking the right questions about the need for local control over banks. As a member of credit unions for decades, I have wondered why anyone uses banks. They offer most of the same services as banks and often at better rates, and they are more service oriented. I was recently a member of a focus group inquiring about the images of banks and the satisfaction experienced about the services of financial institutions. Those of us who used credit unions were unanimous in their praise; those who used commercial banks were vitriolic in their complaints; those who used both commended the credit unions and criticized the banks. The degree of complaints were directly proportionate to the size of the banks, the larger the bank the more angry the complaints. Forget about the greater democratic control credit unions afford; they simply work better, and their financial stability has been proven in this latest crisis.

The banks recognize the

The banks recognize the threat that credit unions pose to their business - so the banks are continually pushing for new restrictions on how credit unions can operate. Like unions, they give us ordinary working folk a way to counter overwhelming corporate power.

I will forward this to the

I will forward this to the Credit Unions that I belong to.

Sen. Dick Durbin says the

Sen. Dick Durbin says the financial sector owns Washington. Gov't is the conduit that allows big business to tap into other people's money, even if the people don't want them to. Gov't and big business function together, are staffed by the same people. How else would AT&T have gotten so big? Subsidies, incentives, tax breaks, favorable legislation, etc. Gov't is the sword and the shield of big business, collecting and funneling taxes to big business, protecting big business from citizen action, such as we see in the healthcare "debate". Some debate: single-payer, the choice of a majority of Americans and doctors, isn't even "on the table". Funny how right wingers are always talking about smaller gov't. They wouldn't stand a chance in their fantasy "free market".

Does the author of "Credit

Does the author of "Credit Unions Make Too Much" see a pattern here? It's time to get ALL THESE CLOWNS in DC out of there, with the key word ALL!! Look at all of their years on the "job" vs the lack of experience in getting things done - CORRECTLY.

My wife and I were recently

My wife and I were recently declined by Wells Fargo on a home loan literally hours before signing our closing documents. This was supposedly due to a confusing and last-minute claim that home-owner occupancy rates had changed and our community was no longer satisfactory. They put us through a great deal of agony and never followed up on several requests for an appraisal refund. A family member recommended a local credit union instead; with phenomenal customer service, clearly stated terms, and swift action, our loan was approved and with high 700 credit rating scores and a strong household income, we closed on the house in less than a month. I now proudly support our local credit union and my only regret is I didn't find them sooner!

We use a small bank in our

We use a small bank in our community which stayed out of the mess the big banks got themselves into. If we didn't have such good relationships there, I certainly would look at a credit union. There is a credit union in our small town.