Share

What's So Funny About Washington?

by: Michael Winship, t r u t h o u t | Perspective

photo
President Barack Obama and Jay Leno chat before the president's appearance on The Tonight Show in March. (Photo: Reuters)

    A joke is a sometime thing, as wide as a church door or as delicate as a rose. The right or wrong word, too many or too few, their placement or emphasis can determine whether it's a total dud or fall down funny; the difference, as Mark Twain said, between the lightning bug and lightning.

    Too much explanation or thought can whip a joke to death, so it was with trepidation that I went down to Washington last week with some fellow members of the Writers Guild of America, East, the union of which I'm president. I moderated a panel discussion of writers from The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, The Colbert Report and Late Show with David Letterman, among others, to discuss news and late night comedy.

    The driving impulse for all of this was the White House Correspondents' Dinner last weekend, "The Nerd Prom," as it's become known, when inside-the-Beltway journalists and their chummy government sources cement their unholy alliance over rillettes and risotto. Over the last few years it has become an Oscar-like event, with Hollywood migrating east to hobnob with the stars of politics and commentary, distracting each other into a trivial frenzy. And you wonder why we can't get universal health care passed.

    Toward the end of our strike last year, the Guild presented a successful event on Capitol Hill, a mock debate in which a team of Daily Show writers representing the Guild went up against a Colbert team posing as the studios and networks. Former White House Press Secretary Dee Dee Myers moderated. Hilarity and mirth ensued.

    This time we thought we'd hitch a ride on the hoopla around the Correspondents' Dinner and succeeded. A crowd of several hundred showed up at the Newseum on Pennsylvania Avenue. The Huffington Post streamed live video and C-SPAN, which hadn't covered anything as funny since the last hearings on horticulture and organic food safety standards, videotaped the whole thing.

    Not that you saw all of it. Parts of an hour of stand-up comedy by Guild writers apparently were deemed a little too raunchy for the followers of Brian Lamb and so when telecast, C-SPAN cut right to the chase - our panel discussion.

    People have been making jokes about the news and having an impact on it since the Greek playwright Aristophanes cracked wise about Socrates. Now, the late-night shows are affecting traditional journalism and mainstream coverage of events, and influencing public opinion more than ever, whether it's John McCain dissing Letterman and appearing on Katie Couric's newscast instead, President Obama on Jay Leno, or Tina Fey imitating Sarah Palin to devastating effect on Saturday Night Live.

    In March, a Rasmussen poll reported that nearly one-third of Americans under 40 say they get more of their news from Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert and other late night comedy shows than they do from traditional sources of news. The poll also found that 39 percent of the public says the late-night shows are making Americans more informed; 21 percent said they're having the opposite effect.

    Recently, in The Nation magazine, media critic Eric Alterman noted that the late-night programs have been responsible for three of the most important and cathartic media moments of the last decade: Jon Stewart's evisceration of confrontational talk shows posing as political dialogue when he appeared on the CNN show Crossfire in October 2004 (which many believe hastened the program's demise); Stephen Colbert's controversial speech at the Correspondent's Dinner three years ago (in which he attacked the White House press corps' cuddly relationship with President Bush); and Jon Stewart's recent assault on CNBC's Jim Cramer and the misleading, uncritical coverage presented by financial television news in the months leading up to the crash.

    Alterman wrote, "It's a sad - almost terrifying - comment on the state of the American media that we have come to rely on these two funnymen to tell us the truth about our country in the same way we relied on Murrow in the '50s and Walter Cronkite in the '60s."

    But, as we began the panel, buzzing in my head were the sage and terrible words of the late, great New Yorker magazine essayist, E.B. White: "Analyzing humor is like dissecting a frog," he wrote. "Few people are interested and the frog dies of it."

    Nonetheless, we plunged ahead. So, I asked, is late-night comedy telling us a truth that news can't? Are audiences turning to you for news because you ask questions and make points the mainstream media can't or won't?

    "No," said my friend Tim Carvell from The Daily Show. "On some level, I'd like to think so, but I don't think that's the case. We're dessert at the end of the news menu. I actually think people who say they're getting their news from us say that as a way of protesting what they see in the news. But I feel the media isn't a monolith; there's good media and bad. We're just off to the side of it, sitting at the back of the class making comments."

    Opus Moreschi, who writes for The Colbert Report, agreed. "I think if anyone's getting the news from either of our shows then that's unfortunate. Because we're not there to provide news, we're there to provide entertainment, obviously. But it may be that people who see something on our show and want to learn more find their own news sources and make up their minds. That to me is a pleasant side effect of having comedy that informs. But if all they've got is our punchline, they may walk away thinking Denny Hastert is apparently a crossdresser and that's not accurate information ... Wait, sorry, I'm being told that he is."

    J.R. Havlan, a comic who writes for The Daily Show added, "I feel like comedy shows and satire, what they do is not inform so much as help people learn how to watch and decipher the news. It's not about watching us to learn what's going on but learning to see what's going on and take it with a grain of salt - that not everything they see is the truth."

    And so it went. There's lots more - war stories, background on how the shows are put together, interesting questions from the audience. You can go to the C-SPAN website to view the whole thing.

    But in the end, for all the analysis and commentary that have been written about the late-night shows, the bottom line remains: it's all about the funny.

    By the way, we didn't actually attend the White House Correspondents' Dinner the next night, but we did go to one of the after-parties at the Corcoran Galley of Art, mobbed with more than 600 guests and roaring with music at an ear-splitting pitch. We met a berobed Arabian prince who had two of the most formidable bodyguards I'd ever seen, big and impassive, like the statues on Easter Island.

    Then we were straight-armed aside by an even larger phalanx of black-suited security men. Who's coming through, we wondered - a cabinet member, Joe Biden, the president?

    No, it was Eva Longoria, the diminutive but self-important star of Desperate Housewives.

    Now that's funny.

  

»


Michael Winship is senior writer of the weekly public affairs program Bill Moyers Journal, which airs Friday nights on PBS. Check local airtimes or comment at The Moyers Blog at www.pbs.org/moyers.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Humor works when it exposes

Humor works when it exposes the Sacred Cows, that we are all tired of bowing to, for what they are. Bill Maher got his gig abruptly ended not long after 911 when he quipped 'hey c'mon - you tellin' me that all those fighter jets couldn't stop a few slow-moving commercial airliners...' or something to that effect - his little probe into just one of the absurdities of the official 911 account violated a great big Sacred Cow. Substantive criticism of Obama (as Stewart engaged Bush) is a Sacred Cow. Whether the people laugh is indication that they have already gotten the news - whether they've already seen through the hype, it is not the source of the revelation if they laugh - only when they don't.

I'd agree that latenight

I'd agree that latenight comedy isthe dessert of the news, which makes pbs and the bbc the vegetables, stuff we all know about but ignore, and all the other Fox and CNN crap, the self important junkfood we all fill up on. Then I wonder what's that make the newspaper industry, uh , oh yea fiber i guess. good article

If Washington is owned by

If Washington is owned by Wall Street, and Wall Street lives in fantasy-land, propped up by worthless paper, then it is better to laugh than cry. Thank you Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert, you provide us sanity and balance.

When as the story above

When as the story above indicates the White House press corp gets too "chummy" with the Bush Administration that it is supposed to be covering. And when the media in general was doing the same. The late night humor provides reinforcement that there are other legitimate points of view not being "covered" by the media. IMO this function is both funny, and important.

I have this nagging

I have this nagging thought... First, I think that those at John Stewart's Daily Show never thought for a moment when they began that they would become an ACTUAL SOUGHT AFTER SOURCE FOR REAL NEWS, let alone by so many people. I use the term, 'REAL NEWS' to imply a National Craving which is obviously going unfulfilled in a large percentage of the population in this era of 24/7 access to what is often called 'NEWS'... That so many people turn to such shows for 'NEWSWORTHY INFORMATION' should also perhaps be a wake up call to the VERY FEW CORPORATE CONGLOMERATES WHO OWN AND OPERATE ALMOST ALL THE OVERLY-CONSOLIDATED '''NEWS''' OUTLETS IN AMERICA while they may be making money and perhaps even laughing all the way to the bank, they are failing America in the worst way...AND HOPEFULLY, such a noticeable trend by Americans towards such Comedy shows for their ACTUAL, REAL and hopefully TRUTHFUL NEWS, might also WAKE UP OUR SO CALLED GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLE FOR THE PEOPLE AND BY THE PEOPLE and set them to promptly put a Legislated End to the terrible, tragic CORPORATE MONOPOLY GRIP ON OUR NATION'S MEDIA OUTLETS AND SO CALLED FREE PRESS... And while they are at it, WE THE PEOPLE could most certainly use another, more modern version of THE FAIRNESS DOCTRINE IN MEDIA... Freedom of Speech is a Right and Freedom of the Press is considered essential to the health of the Republic.. With that in mind, think of this... What does it mean to all of that Freedom if All of the outlets for Free Speech and Freedom of the Press are owned, operated and readily exploited for whatever reasons by just a few gigantic Corporate Conglomerates with one singular legally required mandate--- To increase shareholder wealth through any and all legal means...???

I don't watch Leno, Colbert,

I don't watch Leno, Colbert, or Stewart to get my news; I watch Link TV and Free Speech TV on my Dishnetwork satellite. I watch Leno, Colbert, and Stewart to be able to laugh instead of crying, to see them cut down the Washington popinjays that seem determined to send the USA to hell in a handcart. God bless them; they say truths that the media should be saying but won't for fear of losing their cushy jobs--or worse.

Comedians are the new bards.

Comedians are the new bards. They're speech should be as protected as the old bards songs were. Nothing is funnier than the truth. It would be truly funny to see makers and shakers wind up in court because of they're funny business. Well, that will be another laugh best enjoyed over brimstone and nightshades.

Sometimes the very best

Sometimes the very best strategy is to point and laugh.

"Because we're not there to

"Because we're not there to provide news, we're there to provide entertainment" Well, la de da. I don't know what news program the author is watching but the ones I occasionally watch are there for the entertainment value and news is of secondary importance. Compare a TV news program to a newspaper for real news. oya

It was true before, it's

It was true before, it's still true now- The court jester can shout the truth that a kings adviser dares not whisper.

The truth will set you free.

The truth will set you free. What intelligent person would not believe that? I believe that ‘Transparency’ is the key to Freedom and Democracy. I believe that the only way to solve difficult problems is through honest discussion and debate. Things are never fixed until all the facts are put on the table and analyzed. Mainstream Media needs to stop manipulating the facts to justify or effect policy. We need to reinstate the intent of our Constitution to maintain a free press and free speech as a vital tool to safeguard Freedom and Democracy. At this rate, every person on the planet will be carrying a gun in the next few decades. We should all be carrying cameras instead. We should ship ten thousand video cameras to Iraq. And maybe twenty thousand to Washington.

Maher, Stewart (real name

Maher, Stewart (real name Leibowitz); Leno, et al serve to trivialize the crimes. They make jokes and we laugh or growl-- and cheer-- "That's telling em!" and we feel we've done something. its part of the Calculated Deception.

All these guys are

All these guys are unfortunately totally underestimated themselves completely! People REALLY are getting their news information from late night comedy!! They should be more conscious of this and be more informative with their comedy! People want to know whats going on, but in a funny way! Information and satire are not mutually exclusive items! In fact, they are the education we are seeking!!

Good and bad media? If the

Good and bad media? If the implication is two relevant and nominally equal parts, no such luck. The vast majority of the American and British media is useless local non-news, no news about the world we live in, calculated misinformation, deliberate half truths and misdirection based on deceit or general ignorance. A huge amount is unapologetic corporate or government sponsored propaganda. Only a small segment is intentionally informative and comprehensive enough to be useful in a democratic society. There is no free press in the corporate controlled press. The idea that there is a functioning 'free press' in America is a fundamental part of the presses cover story and little more than baseless and oft repeated propaganda. It is one of the BIG LIEs that props up all the secret will to power structures and the behind the scenes manipulation of events we 'citizen pawns' will never, ever see on TV or read about in the daily papers.