Share

Fratricide at Camp Liberty

by: Camillo "Mac" Bica, t r u t h o u t | Perspective

photo
Framed photo of Sgt. John M. Russell. Russell has been charged with five counts of murder after opening fire at a counseling clinic in Iraq. (Photo: Jessica Rinaldi / Reuters Pictures)

    Sgt. John Michael Russell, 44, was a career soldier with over twenty years of honorable military service in places like Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina. He was on his third tour of duty in Iraq, however, when it all went terribly wrong. On Monday, May 11, 2009, Sergeant Russell walked into a stress-counseling center at Camp Liberty in Baghdad and shot five American soldiers to death.

    Everyone seemed shocked by the murders. What could possibly have caused a soldier to commit such a heinous act, to murder five of his own? Some said, "fratricide was a phenomenon of the Vietnam War, of draftees and dope addicts. Today's soldiers don't do that, you know, they're volunteers and professionals." Army Chief of Staff Gen. George Casey Jr., while recognizing that "Combat deployments are, by their nature, stressful," noted that killing and dying in war has a positive influence on most soldiers. "The vast majority of people that go to combat," the general said," have a growth experience because they are exposed to something very, very difficult and they succeed." Others wondered what Sergeant Russell's childhood was like: "Surely he came from a broken home," they speculated, "or was toilet trained too early." Searching for answers in all the wrong places, never the obvious. Never thinking that killing is what war is about, that life loses its meaning in war - all life, every life.

    Gen. S.L.A. Marshall, a respected Army combat historian, concluded in a series of articles and in his landmark World War Two study, "Men Against Fire," that "the average and healthy individual - the man who can endure the mental and physical stresses of combat - still has such an inner and usually unrealized resistance towards killing a fellow man that he will not of his own volition take life if it is possible to turn away from that responsibility."

    Consequently, following the Second World War, warrior preparation - basic training/boot camp - was modified to shift its focus from acquainting soldiers with tactics and weaponry to rather sophisticated techniques of value manipulation, moral desensitization and psychological conditioning, aimed at destroying/overriding the recruits' moral aversion to killing. Further studies indicate that this indoctrination and conditioning program proved successful indeed, as the percentage of soldiers in battle who fired their weapons at the enemy - soldiers who would kill - increased from fifteen percent during WWII to 55 percent during the Korean War and to 95 percent during the Vietnam and Iraq wars. Sergeant Russell, then, was not a killer by nature, but had to be created.

    According to a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine, during the Iraq war 56 percent of soldiers and Marines have killed or participated in the killing of another human being, 20 percent admit being responsible for noncombatant deaths, and 94 percent had seen bodies and human remains. According to Col. Charles Engel, MD, MPH, director of the deployment health clinical center at Walter Reed Army Medical Center, between 15 and 29 percent of soldiers serving in and returning from Iraq and Afghanistan will suffer from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Because of multiple deployments with inadequate dwell time, experts say that the PTSD rate among servicemen and women serving in and returning from Iraq and Afghanistan could well eclipse the 30 percent lifetime rate found in a 1990 national study of Vietnam veterans. Every day five soldiers/veterans try to kill themselves. In 2008, one hundred and forty were successful, up from one hundred and twenty-two in 2007.

    Sergeant Russell's behavior in killing other than the enemy is not an aberration if one includes the 20 percent who admit to killing noncombatants. While apologists search for answers in issues of professionalism, family, relationships, finances, etc., there is a far more reasonable explanation of the conditions that led to these murders - one that is straightforward and foundational. Military training - creating soldiers who will kill - reinforced by combat, the "growth experience" that General Casey referred to, and impacted by multiple tours with inadequate dwell time, traumatized and dehumanized Sergeant Russell and the others turning them into murderers capable of such atrocity. This is why war is an outrage and unnecessary war sacrilege. This is why we cannot accept the military programming our young people to kill. This is why we cannot support the architects of war, no matter their political party. This is why we cannot not tolerate the Army Experience Center, a multi
million-dollar recruitment video-game arcade in Philadelphia, where children as young as thirteen are manipulated into believing that war is a game. This is why we cannot sit back and be patient while war and occupation continue. This is why we must reject the "Obama is doing his best with the wars he inherited" excuse and be out there in the streets yelling and screaming for peace.

    Think for a moment how you would feel should an Army representative show up at your front door and tell you that your son or daughter will be coming home piecemeal in a box. Would you still think patience was a virtue? Or would you forever regret accepting that continued violence was necessary and ending war takes time?

    Think for a moment how you would feel should your child be killed by an occupier's bomb and then hear her murderers render her death insignificant as collateral damage. Would you still welcome the invaders as liberators? Or would you strap dynamite to your chest to avenge your child's slaughter?

    RAVE TO THE GRAVE! Demand an end to war and occupation. Now, not later. Someone's child is dying while we wait. You copy?

  

»


Camillo "Mac" Bica, Ph.D., is a professor of philosophy at the School of Visual Arts in New York City. His focus is in ethics, particularly as it applies to war and warriors. As a veteran recovering from his experiences as a United States Marine Corps Officer during the Vietnam War, he founded, and coordinated for five years, the Veterans Self-Help Initiative, a therapeutic community of veterans suffering from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. He is a long-time activist for peace and justice, a member of the Vietnam Veterans Against the War, and the coordinator of the Long Island Chapter of Veterans for Peace. Articles by Dr. Bica have appeared in Cyrano's Journal, The Humanist Magazine, Znet, Truthout.org, Common Dreams, AntiWar.com, Monthly Review Zine, Foreign Policy in Focus, OpEdNews.com, AfterDowningStreet.org and numerous philosophical journals.

Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Without minimizing the

Without minimizing the stresses experienced by many soldiers in war zones, a few points need to be recognized: (1) According to the Army Times, SGT Russell's total service was approximately 15 years. This needs to be checked/verified. (2) The Army has/had a regulation limiting a SGT/Pay Grade: E5 to 12 years' total service. If the SGT is not on a promotion list for SSG/E6 by that time, he/she can be administratively discharged. A SSG is allowed to serve 20 years and be eligible for a pension, while the discharged SGT receives nothing. SGT Russell's actions could have been precipitated by a banal notification to him that he would be discharged at the end of his current deployment. "Thank you for your service, but you can go now!" (3) SGT Russell's Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) is in the Engineer branch and as such he is not likely to have received the degree of combat training/battle drills given to those in the Infantry and Armor MOS's. Any real combat training re received was more likely on-the-job. (4) The decorations visible in his photograph show nothing higher than an Army Commendation Medal and none recognizing particular acts of bravery or actual combat. (5) So far, SGT Russell's actions in Iraq are more akin to those of a recently-fired employee killing people at his workplace - and we have those, too.

The U.S. military has become

The U.S. military has become an abusable "commons", as in "tragedy of the commons". The atrocity of sacrificing our children on the altar of this modern-day Moloch will begin to abate only when military service becomes a requirement for all American citizens, because, then, the majority of voters simply won't put up with being crushed and discarded like beer cans. Until that happens, soldiers will continue to be overexploited and used up. Soldiers are a commodity resource presumably held in common by all American citizens, but legally exploitable by whomever is in a position to exploit them. As the economic doctrine of "tragedy of the commons" predicts, the supply of soldiers will be exhausted for profit by whomever can use them up the fastest. Everyone who is thinking about volunteering to become a beer can should be made to understand this. Mac, I wish you had pointed out that the "all-volunteer" feature of the American military is the primary vulnerability of the whole abusive system. Dry up the supply of volunteers by educating them about reality, and things will begin to change for the better, and America will be much safer, much more prosperous, and just be a much nicer place to live. It will be a community we can all be proud to serve, and for which we have each made personal sacrifices. Personally, I don't see any other way forward than drying up the supply of military volunteers. And this is an achievable objective! If you have qualms about actually doing it, then you're really a supporter of the system as it is, and therefore of the destruction of our youth by corporations intent on profit. And on the destruction of the military itself, which, under the doctrine of "tragedy of the commons" is *inevitable*. Any supporter of a strong American military, therefore, should be working to convince would-be volunteers *not* to volunteer.

Ret. Army N.C.O., As you

Ret. Army N.C.O., As you most probably know, in time of 'war' and particularly, in the 'theatre of battle' the policies of the 'peacetime forces' no longer need be enforced. They're amended on a day by day basis by the SecDef and CinC to meet 'operational requirements.' Waivers, extensions, promotions, and force policy in general, becomes very 'fluid.'

Excellent explanation, not

Excellent explanation, not necessarily limited to the military. No longer living near Philadelphia, I had not heard of the recruitment arcade there (Penn's "City of Brotherly Love"--indeed), but I am reminded of the Move (black religious sect or cult) incident I watched on TV as the mayor ordered the group's house BOMBED and the fire company acted so late that an entire block of homes was destroyed while most of the residents of the Move house died. Violence, real and fictional, is a staple of our media, especially TV, and hardly any relationship is immune to its use as a solution particularly since our leader was the top user (and the current leader has not stopped the action).

How would you feel of a Army

How would you feel of a Army member showed up telling you your spouse or offspring was killed in Iraq or Afghanistan. How ould you feel if that member came home with PTSD and could not sustain loving relationships, could not keep employment, flew off in anger at the drop of a hat and was depressed most of the time. That's PTSD. Either dead or with PTSD are trajedies that no family deserves. If our leaders had to endure this they would be less willing to commit our young people to war for questionable circumstances. We need the draft so more soldiers are available and some don't have to serve repeated tours in the war zone. We need it to to bring these wars home to more households in the US. To all who supported or now support these wars, let them experience the loss it causes.

The whole Sgt. Russel thing

The whole Sgt. Russel thing breaks my heart for all families involved. I believe that the military leaders need to become more aware of what Post Traumatic Syndrome looks like and get help for these soldiers. A friend of mine started coming down with PTSD symptoms after returning from Iraq. Fortunately her son had heard of PTSD and decided to take matters into his own hands. He purchased her a great book that offers a lot of techniques to help people block out bad experiences and feelings of depression. The book is titled, "No Open Wounds" and is written by Dr.Robert Bray who focuses on traumatic stress therapy. I have seen a world of difference in her. I don't even want to think what would have happened had her son not stepped in to take matters into his own hands.