Share

Schools Prepare for Devastating Losses of Funding

by: Seema Mehta and Jason Song  |  The Los Angeles Times

photo
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger meets with state lawmakers to grapple with California's budget shortfall a day after voters chose not to support the governor's rescue plan. (Photo: Rich Pedroncelli / AP)

    With California in ever-more-dire financial straits, many districts are facing further layoffs, school closures, bigger classes and possibly shortening the school year. Some may even face insolvency.

    After voters rejected ballot measures that would have restored state funding for schools, educators across California on Wednesday braced for $5.3 billion in cuts over the next 13 months. State and district officials predicted increased class sizes, additional teacher layoffs, more school closures and fewer arts and music offerings. Some districts could face insolvency.

    "When there are such ludicrous amounts of money being cut, I don't know what other choice they are going to give us," said Steve Fish, superintendent of the Saddleback Valley Unified School District in south Orange County, which is already planning to shutter libraries and computer labs, lay off 100 teachers and eliminate nearly half its high school guidance counselors.

    Voters on Tuesday overwhelmingly rejected five ballot measures intended to shore up the state's finances, leaving legislators to bridge a $21.3-billion budget gap. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has proposed cutting education funding by $1.6 billion for the remainder of this fiscal year, which ends June 30, and nearly $3.7 billion for next year.

    Unpleasant Options

    Districts could tap their reserves and federal economic stimulus dollars to lessen the effect of the cuts, said H.D. Palmer, a spokesman for Schwarzenegger's finance department. He said these reductions will be difficult but noted that schools are bearing 30% of the cuts even though they account for 40% of the state's general fund.

    State officials will probably loosen regulations - such as allowing districts to cut seven days off the school year, delay replacing old textbooks and divert class-size reduction funds to other purposes.

    California already has received about $4.3 billion in education funding from the economic stimulus package approved by Congress earlier this year, but there remain billions more that will be dependent on how California uses the first round of money. States that use the money to reform troubled schools will be rewarded.

    "Actions speak louder than words," said U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan, who will meet with educators in San Francisco on Friday. "The state is at a fork in the road and they will either decide to have the courage to do the right thing by its children and create the possibility of bringing in literally hundreds of millions of dollars in competitive grants at a time of tremendous financial need, or the state can choose to perpetuate the status quo and leave those resources on the table."

    He was particularly dismayed by the proposal to clip seven days off the 180-day school year.

    "The school day, the school week and the school year I think are all too short, and particularly hurt children who come from tougher economic backgrounds," he said in an interview.

    Educators and state officials - already reeling from years of state cuts, including $7.4 billion this year - seemed frustrated yet resigned to the inevitability of new reductions.

    Los Angeles Unified School District Supt. Ramon C. Cortines anticipates $131 million in new cuts this year and up to $273 million next year.

    The district has already cut almost $560 million from this year's budget and is considering laying off up to 2,500 teachers. The school board is scheduled to vote on a final budget by July, and district officials are generally prohibited by state law from laying off more instructors, so the cuts will have to occur elsewhere. The district may eliminate summer school, reduce after-school programs and switch some employees to a 10-month work year.

    Cortines said he was worried about the district's ability to remain solvent.

    "Here's where we are, right on the precipice," he said. "I am telling you I cannot balance the budget at this moment for the [next] three years."

    Lacking Backup

    Fish, the Saddleback Valley superintendent, said he expects many districts to declare themselves unable to meet their financial obligations, including possibly his own. In the past, such a move would have led to a state loan and intervention.

    But Supt. of Public Instruction Jack O'Connell said he doesn't know how the state will be able to help districts facing bankruptcy. "We don't have any money for a loan," he said.

    Higher education will also be affected. The University of California system faces up to a $531-million shortfall next year as a result of the failed measures and other factors. And the California State University system faces a $410-million shortfall for next year.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

I am a teacher in the

I am a teacher in the California schools (only a sub at the stage of my life) and this situation bodes ill for ALL! New educational slogan: "Dumb & Dumber!" Suffering already under the onslaught of the Anti-Intellectualism of the past several decades, we do NOT need cutbacks in educational funding and resources. . .Yet, that is what is in store for the immediate future! Who is going to train the future "Masters of the Universe?" Are they to get their education from the blather on the internet; or, from their iPods? The blame lies with both the legislators AND the Public. . .Several years ago, the idiots who pushed through the Infamous Prop 13, also, misinformed the California electorate to the point they passed a virtual Universal "deadbolt" on budgetary considerations in the state by requiring ALL budget bills to pass the state Legislature by a 2/3 majority! Democratic efforts went out the window because this allows a small minority of 34% to control how ANY moneys can be spent in California! The ghosts of Jarvis and Gann have to rolling in laughter at how successful their "flat earth" ideas have triumphed! As the song says, "Come on, People! Let's all get together!" . . .and, put an end to this nonsense!

In my opinion, there is a

In my opinion, there is a fairly easy solution to this budget shortfall. If you are not working IN the classroom, then you are one of the 90% of the drones that are unnecessary at the school site or in the downtown main office or anywhere else for that matter. I was a teacher in the LAUSD in Region G in the mid 1980's and what I saw then was some of the worst waste of resources ever. I was there when the Los Angeles Police department 'tried' to arrest the staff at the main supply for stealing everything from toilet paper to office equipment and selling it at the local swap meets, but couldn't - there were no accounting or inventory records; the principal and registrar at the school that I was at spent all the School Site Council's annual funds for parties for themselves over a summer- that was $25,000; A principal being moved to the valley from a Region G school after being caught stealing money from the five different budgets that that school had to a school with only one budget; five 90 passenger buses and the necessary subs for coverage of classes to take the kids to a circus and no funds to take kids to the high dessert for a science field trip; one administrator getting $57,000 annual salary and having no job - a janitor's storage closet was fitted with a nice brass sign on the door that made it his office - but remained a janitor's closet; or the teacher that threw a full sized stapler at a student and missed - but hit another student and was promoted to Dean of Discipline the very next week. And I have soooooooo many more stories about LAUSD, but I think you get the idea. Dump the deadwood! I found a much better 'district' to teach in - I moved overseas shortly after quitting LAUSD in 1986. Now with a very good tax free salary, I also get free housing, total medical coverage, respect as an educated person and teacher, students that are really students and want to learn, and so much more!

I did forget one of the

I did forget one of the biggest apparent wastes of money inside LAUSD --- In 1984 the in-house LAUSD newspaper had banner headlines about new teacher salary!!! OH YEAH, we now can pay just over $1800 a month and then 8 million column inches on why they cannot pay a living salary. A side note here -- one of my 14 year old students 'earned' $2000 a month as one of the local crack house lookouts and he paid no taxes! Let me continue with this brief story on LAUSD and waste. In that same edition, but buried on page three, was a nice little item. It seems that the Chief Director of all of LAUSD's maintenance departments daughter was hired as an apprentice locksmith. And her qualifications for this excellent job - 3 years as a waitress in a cafe somewhere. Now, remember that teachers have a minimum of 5 years of university education and are MOST fortunate to get a little more than $1800 a month (under $19,000 a year) and this apprentice locksmith's salary without any experience or education --- $33,000 a year! So, this extremely wasteful, bloated, deadwood filled, burden on the Los Angeles tax payers, and over extended bureaucracy can now live like the rest of the American people -- with a lot less! And too bad for the kids because of the greed of the leaders and superintendents.

Today's children are bearing

Today's children are bearing the heaviest burden. It's not a coincidence; it's because children can't vote, and there is currently no social or legal mechanism that compensates for that vast injustice. Someday we'll have a social contract that guarantees justice for all children, but not while we have our present plutocracy. The plutocrats regard all children (except for their own, of course) as consumable resources. Will non-plutocrats wake up and realize how stupid they've been about this? I think it's possible, but it won't happen without sustained effort.