Share

Involuntary Military Service Under the Radar

by: Sarah Lazare, t r u t h o u t | Perspective

photo
Sgt. David Johnson returns from Kirkuk, Iraq, after having his tour extended due to stop-loss. A lesser-known form of involuntary military service is occurring in the Individual Ready Reserve. (Photo: Ben Bloker / S&S)

    "I felt like I was being robbed of everything," Matthew Dobbs said over the phone from his home in Houston, Texas. "I had visions of military police banging down my door and dragging me back to war."

    Dobbs, a 26-year-old former soldier who served a tour in Afghanistan from 2003-2004, was recounting a story that has become familiar in the ongoing Global War on Terror. It is the story of a soldier who, after serving a tour overseas and being discharged from active duty, received involuntary orders to redeploy to Iraq or Afghanistan years later.

    Dobbs was not a victim of stop-loss, the policy of involuntarily extending a GI's term of service, sometimes after multiple tours in combat zones. This practice has recently garnered widespread negative attention and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates claims that it will be phased out.

    Rather, Dobbs was a victim of reactivation orders from the Individual Ready Reserves (IRR), a lesser-publicized form of involuntary service that has been fueling troop supply for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. While there has been a strong reaction to stop-loss, IRR recall has slipped under the radar, creating the illusion that the problem of involuntary military service has been solved.

    The IRR is composed of troops who have finished their active duty service but still have time remaining on their contracts. The typical military contract mandates four years of active duty and four years in the IRR, but variations exist and an individual's IRR stint might be longer or shorter. IRR members live civilian lives, are unpaid and are technically required to show up for periodic musters. Many have moved on from military life and are enrolled in college, working civilian jobs or building a family.

    The catch is that, at any point, IRR members can be recalled into active duty to serve in a "state of emergency." This policy has translated into the involuntary reactivation of tens of thousands of troops to fight the ongoing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Since September 11, 2001, about 28,000 IRR members in the US Army have been mobilized, according to Maj. Maria Quon, Army public affairs officer. There have been 3,868 Marines involuntarily recalled and mobilized during that time, according to Major O'Connor, Marine Corps spokesman.

    Dobbs was issued his reactivation orders in 2008, over four years after he had completed his tour in Afghanistan and been discharged from active duty. At the time, he was enrolled in school at Texas State University. The orders were sent to his mother's house, and he says that hearing her read them over the phone was, "one of the scariest moments in my life."

    Dobbs says that his tour in Afghanistan left him with psychological scars that he struggled for years to overcome upon his return. He was deployed to Afghanistan as a communications specialist and bore witness to "firefights, rockets, and mortars," with two people from his unit killed in combat. When he returned from his deployment, Dobbs learned that his father was gravely ill. He got compassionate reassignment to Fort Sill so that he could be with his dying father. Meanwhile, the rest of his unit was stop-lossed and forced to serve another tour in Iraq.

    After his discharge from the military and his father's death, Dobbs struggled with depression and alcoholism. He moved several times, first living with his mother in Texas, then eventually getting a place of his own and enrolling in school. He says he was finally getting his life "to a happy place" when he got the reactivation orders in the mail.

    The IRR provides a ready supply of troops who already have military experience, many of whom have already seen combat. With US forces stretched thin in Iraq and Afghanistan, this pool of GI's has played a role in boosting military capacity. Even though recent reports suggest that the military is reaching its recruitment targets for the first time in years, likely due to growing unemployment, Army IRR reactivation rates remain "steady state," according to Major Quon.

    Critics charge that the IRR forces already overextended troops to serve yet another deployment, pushing them beyond exhaustion. "If people thought this was a just war, if soldiers believed that fighting these wars was making the world a better place, the Army wouldn't have to involuntarily drag them out of civilian life," said Seth Manzel, executive director of GI Voice, an advocacy organization for soldiers who are mistreated by the military, and an active member with Iraq Veterans Against the War, an organization comprised of military service people who have served since September 11, 2001. "The IRR is nothing more than a backdoor draft."

    But military officials say that recruits know exactly what they are getting into when they sign up for military service. "When you sign your contract, you know you have to serve time in the IRR and that there is a possibility you will get called up," said Major O'Connor. "I would hope they read the contract that they signed."

    Veteran advocates cast doubt on these claims. "I can say, in my own personal experience, my military recruiter never went through the effort to explain what the IRR is," said Jeff Paterson, former Marine and current project director for Courage to Resist, an organization that supports troops who refuse to fight in Iraq and Afghanistan. "Military recruiters are expert at avoiding inconvenient details of the military agreement. In my case, there was no indication that recall during the inactive term would be a realistic event."

    Others say that the very premise of the IRR is unfair, regardless of one's awareness at the time of signing the military contract. "No company in the world could make an employment contract like what the military has," said Seth Manzel. "Could you imagine IBM indenturing its workers in the same way? The only reason the contract is upheld is because it is with the government."

    After returning from Afghanistan, Dobbs began questioning the ongoing wars. His own research led him to conclude that the war he had fought in was unjustified. "After a lot of reading and questioning, I found out this is not an honorable war, and I came to disagree with what I had done," he said. "Afghanistan did not attack us. This had nothing to do with the people of Afghanistan."

    Dobbs became involved with a local chapter of IVAW, where he met his now fiancΓ©e. He became an outspoken critic against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and cites his activism as a key component that helped him get his life back on track.

    It was in the midst of his burgeoning antiwar activism that Dobbs received his reactivation orders. He was furious. "Doesn't the military realize that if I get deployed again, that could be the end of my life?" he asked, his voice booming. "I have already served in combat. I started living a life of peace when I got out. I didn't ever think they would ask me to go back."

    Dobbs told his mom to rip up his activation orders, and he hasn't looked back since. The military made several attempts to contact him, but he ignored them every time. On April 19, 2009, Dobbs was discharged from the IRR. He is still waiting to receive his papers.

    GI counselors at Courage to Resist note that, up to this point, the US military has not attempted to apply the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) to IRR members who refuse to report. This means that the military has not had jurisdiction to go after IRR members who refuse recall. IRR members can receive a less than honorable discharge from the IRR, but so far this has not affected active duty discharge and has had no bearing on military benefits. Furthermore, the military does not arrest IRR resisters or force them to show up for activation, though they do resort to pressure via letters, phone calls and even home visits.

    However, many troops are not aware of this, and tens of thousands show up for recall. This dilemma was made famous by Ryan Conklin of MTV's "The Real World," who, in front of millions of TV viewers, reported back to duty after receiving reactivation orders from the IRR. The recent case of Matthis Chiroux, an IRR resister who pushed for an upgrade in his discharge from the IRR, also garnered widespread media attention.

    Many troops also join the military reserves, in hopes of avoiding an IRR recall that will land them in a combat zone. "The IRR ultimately is a tool for military retention," says Jeff Paterson. "Many people are strong-armed into joining the reserves under threat of IRR recall."

    Dobbs said that now that he has been discharged from the military, he is prepared to speak out against IRR recall, a practice that he says is indicative of the military's broader policy of using troops up and destroying their minds and bodies through multiple deployments.

    "My heart goes out to all of those people showing up for recall," said Matthew Dobbs over the phone. "When you are in a combat zone, you live through the hardest stuff you ever thought you would have to. It is not just physically exhausting, it is also mentally exhausting not to know if this tour is going to be the tour where you die. And now, after making it through alive, they tell you you have to go back."

    -------

    Sarah Lazare is the project coordinator for Courage to Resist, an organization that supports troops who refuse to fight in Iraq and Afghanistan.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum. Β It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

One of the most unfair

One of the most unfair aspects of the IRR is that if you don't ever sign up for the military, you have NO obligation to serve in the military. But, if you DO sign up, you have an 8-year obligation and you belong to them until the end of that 8 years. I'm truly surprised this isn't more well-known. They used to let people know about it because a person in IRR was supposed to maintain one full set of uniforms in case of recall. Maybe they just write off the cost and provide new uniforms now-a-days? But they can only take a very limited number of people out of IRR. Maybe the people who get those letters should ask how many people have already been recalled ... it couldn't hurt, if it's the only option you have.

It's in the contract, clear

It's in the contract, clear as day. If one only serves one enlistment they're still on the hook. If it's not acceptable don't sign the contract, pretty simple really. I honestly don't have any sympathy for someone who doesn't read what they sign.

About that contract

About that contract mentioned. Anybody know what being IRR really means? It means you are now under contract without rights. I have a friend whose 3 children are full-time military. Her kids serve 3 months on and 5 months off active duty. Once, her son in Delta Force was deployed for 4 months because of the surge and it was horrifically hard on him. My son was a National Guardsman on IRR and deployed as a medic. He was on active duty, away from home, for 18 months. Of that 18 months he was in Iraq 14, and got two weeks R&R. When he was two weeks away from his contract's end date he was notified that he would be returning to Iraq. He had to respectfully decline because he was blinded in Baghdad. The repercussions included a cessation of benefits until we had to do the whole fight with the military thing. All we ever seem to do now is continually fight with the military factions over his benefits. Once approved, apparently always on the table for review and revocation.

this is just a part of the

this is just a part of the Bush legacy. Obama should get rid of Gates as a part of the house cleaning as well as the IRR

I think the most the salient

I think the most the salient point in the article is that no one has been prosecuted who refused to activate from the IRR. That's pretty amazing, given the need for trigger pullers. So it would appear that if you don't want to go, you still don't have to, at least not from the IRR.

It's not unfair at all.

It's not unfair at all. It's the deal you are fully informed of when you sign up. Contracts you are not informed of, like Social Security (which also registers you for selective service), are another matter.

To those who feel it's a

To those who feel it's a perfectly fair situation: Have you ever actually read a military contract? There's a reason that recruiters are necessary. That reason is to help a potential recruit understand what's being put in front of them. Flatly put, it is the recruiter's job to make sure that anyone who wants to enlist knows exactly what's going down, to the letter. As it stands, a lot of what's put down on paper isn't clear, nor inviting. Legal contracts never are. It's ironic. Those being called back into service are expected to do their jobs, yet the recruiters are allowed to leave out important tidbits of information? Get real, and better yet, go visit a recruiter and see what the common recruit is up against. Yeah, you might get lucky and find yourself a solid recruiter, but chances are you're going to get left high and dry.

It's time to end the war,

It's time to end the war, bring our soldiers home, and become a nation of laws once again. Except that the mess Bush/Cheney and their thugs created by destroying Iraq and copping out in the hunt for Bin Laden, whom they needed running free in order to use fear of him to win re-election, has made it likely we'll need soldiers in the field. Maybe it's time to put the Blackwater mercenaries on the front lines in place of the lesser-paid involuntary IRR people. After all, the mercenaries really DO want to fight. Let 'em, and let 'em come back maimed or dead, but richer than they deserve to be.

I'm sorry but this isn't an

I'm sorry but this isn't an unclear or difficult issue. The IRR is not involuntary, it's part of the contract that the individual signs on entry. If you want to refuse to serve, then do it honestly - refuse to serve on an simple clear statement of "I know it's in my contract, but I am refusing to obey the terms of the contract." Then, at least, there is the exercise of the the fundamental right of all people to refuse to obey what they may perceive as an unjust law. Civil disobedience is straightforward and part of the democratic tradition. I would prefer that the military prosecute these folks to add meaning to their protest, but unfortunately the military has chosen not to do so. Whinging about the nature of the contract they signed and how this is "pushing them beyond exhaustion" is confuses the issue, and makes the "protest" seem like the act of an immature individual who didn't think through the decision they were making.

Volunteers for today's armed

Volunteers for today's armed forces have no problem taking recruitment bonuses of thousands and, sometimes, tens of thousands of dollars. They have no problem taking GI Bill educational benefits and other payments when their contractual service is over. They have no reason to cry "foul" when the government asks them to comply with their contract. That said, the past eight years have seen unconscionable abuse of our armed forces as we've undertaken military actions with fewer than a quarter of the forces needed. The result: damaged personnel, damaged organizations, military failure.

I agree, @DPatrick...if

I agree, @DPatrick...if you're going to refuse to serve, don't pretend you didn't sign the contract obligating you to do so. I flatly refused to continue service after I got railroaded in the Navy, and got court-martialed for it, but it was a matter of principle that I'll uphold again. Then, I did serve two tours in Vietnam as a volunteer both times, and I believe volunteers lose their right to complain when they open their mouths.

How many of you saying you

How many of you saying you should honor an unjust contract have ever put your life on the line to honor a contract yourselves? It's easy to judge someone from a cozy armchair in front of a computer. How many of you have read every word in the contract for your home mortgage? I'll bet none. At least you had the advantage of having an attorney look it over and explain it to you. How many of you have done a combat tour(besides rbsingleton - who also admits to not honoring his contract with the Navy on principle without stating the nature of that principle) only to go back and do it again, against your will. I think it is a travesty that war veterans(heroes!) be asked to sacrifice more after they have continued their lives and tried to put the war behind them. All of you contract lawyers should know that any civilian contract with the content of a military enlistment contract would be unenforceable. I've got an idea. Walk in someone Else's shoes before you pass judgment.

Bring back the Draft. The

Bring back the Draft. The burden of this war is falling on a much too small segment of our society. Where are those who support this war? Why aren't they signing up? If they won't sign up, doesn't that show that there is no reason to pursue this stupidity any longer

Active duty members of the

Active duty members of the U.S. military are invited to teach sessions of U.S. history classes at Lewis and Clark High School in Spokane. At another Spokane High School, Havermale, the military has a dedicated section in the library for its recruitment propaganda. Military recruiters are on high school campus around town and find students during their lunch hours and frequent places they hang out. These contracts are often accompanied by lies and deceptions from the start, facts that are well documented. This is no different than the contractual fraud we are seeing throughout U.S. society in mortgages and investment. And the fraud has something in common--one is in the name of capitalist profit and the other is in the name of sending young men to fight in "defense" of capitalist profit.

I agree with the person that

I agree with the person that says walk in the shooes before critizing. I have often thought that about our leaders. Those that took us to these wars had been not been exposed to war. Look how readily Cheney says torture must be done to get answers. He didn't go to Viet Nam and he was of age to have been in Viet Nam. Yet here hs is telling the nation what should happen in war. We should not listen to these people. We should not have listened to these people. We should not have put these people in charge.

I remember when I signed my

I remember when I signed my contract I read every word. I made sure I understood everything. I also also remember when my active duty service ended (ETS, End of Term of Service) we went over the details once again. I signed up for 4 years of Active Duty and 4 years of Inactive Duty. I was given the option of Active Reserve instead of Inactive Reserve (I chose Inactive). This is not unusual and in fact is part of leaving the Army. I don't know how it works for the Marines but I'm willing to wager it's not all that different.

Everyone defending this is

Everyone defending this is suffering from a psychosis. One earlier poster put it best when he pointed out that the Soldier is under a contractual obligation during a lenghty period but receiving NO BENEFITS for having the threat of deployment always hanging over his head. Soldiers in the IRR receive no money, are not provided medical care through military hospitals or through Tricare, or any other benefit or payment as compensation for being under contract and subject to recall. But for the fact that Soldiers from the lower socio-economic classes are the victims of this and that the general US population is so completely out of touch with this war and with the military more so than at any other period in US history, there would be a mass protests going on. With all the years this war has been going on and all the revelations of Bush administration improper actions to initiate it and to use torture, it amazes me that the average person talks more about and knows more about American Idol than anything else.

All of us who sign up for

All of us who sign up for the military (I did 5yrs Marines and 3yrs Army) see that part on the contract where it points out that you are also signing up for inactive reserves after your active duty (usually 4yrs IRR), but the problem isnt that they didnt know it was there, the main problem is that recruiters downplay it as something that would only happen if WW3 happened or the continental US got attacked and say that the person signing up would have a choice weither they want to be activated (at least this is what my recruiter told me in 2000, and I think he believed it back then) But as we now see this isnt the truth and its being used because few want to stay in or join the military because they screw so many people over, instead of proposing simple answers like mandatory IRR, Stop Loss or a draft we should look at the root problems and why so few want to be in the military. The military offers so many benefits, health care, a steady paycheck and bonuses but this is nothing if a person isnt going to be respected and treated like a human being, we must address the problems of the military (and our society) at the roots and overhaul it based on that. Everyone in the military sees that it's not efficient, the average units are poorly funded and on top of it the government is always sneaking in ways to cheat soldiers out of what they are entitled to. How much does a person have to sacrifice to be respected in a legitimate non superficial way.

We are committing (assisted)

We are committing (assisted) moral suicide.

One imagines there have been

One imagines there have been no prosecutions to enforce this clause due to the harm that publicity of the issue might have on general recruitment. Where I come from history recalls recruitment practices that put this in the shade. "Press gangs" would go on the prowl and swindle people into "enlisting" by the most outrageous of pracitices. If someone got you drunk and offered you a coin under false pretences you could be considered as having taken the "King's Shilling" and be contractually bound to serve! Ultimately, if nobody signed up, they'd fall back to national service or conscription. After all, wars won't fight themselves.

It amazes me that many of

It amazes me that many of you are chiding the volunteers for this ridiculous loophole in the contract. I am making a documentary film about six seniors in an urban high school. One of the six students enlisted in the Marines. Just so happens that I was shooting in her English class the day that the Marine recruiters visited. Although this part of the commitment (IRR) was never mentioned, I witnessed many of the questions asked concerning Afghanistan and Iraq, being spun and never answered. The presentation was indeed skillful, but, did nothing more than contrast the good things about enlisting with the options available for low income kids who chose a different path. The girl in my documentary is being deployed to Afghanistan next month and although she is not here for me to ask, I bet she knows nothing about the IRR clause in her contract. And as for the chicken hawks posting here (you know who you are), I am ashamed of you!

Quite so,Sally.The contract

Quite so,Sally.The contract that the recruiter explains in detail to the recruit plainly states that you have an eight year obligation if you sign up. As for stop loss,well since the end of the Civil War,military members have not been allowed to go home in the middle of the war because their enlistment ran out.The contract these people signed includes a clause that says your enlistment can be extended during a national emergency.This happened in WWI and WWII.During Vietnam this clause was not invoked and units deploying from the U.S. to Vietnam lost some experienced soldiers because the clause was not invoked and suffered for it.

The article seems to say

The article seems to say that because the US military has had problems with getting enough people to sign up,this proves that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are unpopular and shouldn't be fought. The United States resorted to a draft in WWII even though that war wasn't unpopular.Perhaps we should have relied solely on volunteers for it too and when we couldn't find enough volunteers then we should have sued for peace with Japan and Germany.