Share

Kennedy Affirms Support for Public Health Care Plan

by: Jeffrey Young  |  The Hill

photo
Sen. Ted Kennedy and his wife, Vicki Kennedy. Kennedy is co-sponsoring a resolution that demands that any health care reform include a public insurance option. (Photo: Alex Wong / Getty Images)

    Liberals pushing for the creation of a federally run health insurance plan won a major victory Thursday when Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) strongly indicated his commitment to the policy, one of the most controversial elements of healthcare reform.

    Kennedy has co-sponsored a resolution introduced by Sen. Sherrod Brown (Ohio) and 26 other Democratic senators that declares the healthcare reform legislation the Senate will consider this summer must include a public plan option people can choose instead of private insurance. Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) also co-sponsored the resolution.

    Though purely symbolic, this show of strength by 28 Democratic senators sends a clear signal to liberals that a public plan, one of the left's top priorities and a component of President Obama's healthcare platform, will be part of reform.

    Kennedy's unequivocal support for the public plan marks a return of sorts to the front lines of the battle for healthcare reform.

    Kennedy has been absent for much of the year as he undergoes treatments for a brain tumor. Democrats are hopeful he will return next month to oversee his Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee's markup of healthcare reform legislation.

    Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) also indicated Thursday that his panel's version of the healthcare reform bill also will include some type of public plan.

    "I do suspect that a version will be there," Baucus said. "Now, by saying that, I don't want to frighten people, particularly on the industry side. ... All I'm saying is, there are ways to skin a cat. There are ways to find a solution."

    The same group of Democratic senators, not including Kennedy, penned a letter to Kennedy and Baucus earlier this month stating their support for the public plan. The resolution does not specify what form the public plan must take.

    "Resolved, That the Senate recognizes that any efforts to reform our Nation's health care system should include as an option the establishment of a federally-backed insurance pool to create options for American consumers," the "Sense of the Senate" resolution reads, in part.

    "This is about consumer choice and introducing competition in the health insurance market," Brown said in a statement. "Private health insurers always manage to stay one step ahead of the sheriff" finding new ways to limit care and pass costs along to the consumer. Giving Americans the choice of a quality, federally backed, health insurance option will keep private insurers honest and make healthcare affordable."

    The options range from establishing a Medicare-like program to Sen. Charles Schumer's (D-N.Y.) bid to set up a plan that must abide by the same regulations as private insurers' to Sen. Olympia Snowe's (R-Maine) proposal to establish a "fallback" public plan that would kick in if private insurers fail to meet certain benchmarks.

    Both committees plan to mark up legislation next month; the Senate is slated to vote on a combined bill in July.

    HELP Committee members Kennedy, Brown and Democratic Sens. Chris Dodd (Conn.), Jeff Bingaman (N.M.), Barbara Mikulksi (Md.), Tom Harkin (Iowa), Jack Reed (R.I.), Sheldon Whitehouse (R.I.), Bob Casey Jr. (Pa.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Jeff Merkley (Ore.) are sponsors of the resolution.

    Among Finance Committee members, Democratic Sens. Schumer, Jay Rockefeller (W.Va.), Debbie Stabenow (Mich.) and Robert Menendez (N.J.) are co-sponsors. Bingaman is also a Finance Committee member.

    Democratic Sens. Barbara Boxer (Calif.), Carl Levin (Mich.), Patrick Leahy (Vt.), Kirsten Gillibrand (N.Y.), Tom Udall (N.M.), Daniel Inouye (Hawaii), Ted Kaufman (Del.), Roland Burris (Ill.), Frank Lautenberg (N.J.), Claire McCaskill (Mo.), Jeanne Shaheen (N.H.) and Benjamin Cardin (Md.) also co-sponsored the resolution.

  

»


Comments

This is a moderated forum.  It may take a little while for comments to go live. Be civil and on-topic, don't threaten or advocate violence, please keep it under 300 words. Thanks for participating.

Gosh, Max, you sure wouldn't

Gosh, Max, you sure wouldn't want to upset the insurance industry. They might stop paying you your bribe money. So what if 20,000 Americans die every year for lack of affordable health care? It's no one you know.

I plan to contribute money

I plan to contribute money to the most progressive opponent in the next democratic primary Max Baucus runs in.

I'm frightened Max Baucus,

I'm frightened Max Baucus, Olympia Snowe, or Chuck Schumer will get their way, and I will continue to be uninsured or underinsured. It's obvious to the casual observer that the Mass. plan so loved in Congress and by lobbyists is not doing what it was intended to do: cover everyone. In addition, the prospect of being required to purchase insurance or pay a penalty is egregious, and un-American. That to me sounds more like Communism.

This is great news! The

This is great news! The public plan changes everything. Without it we will actually have an even worse system; no job, no money, etc., but required to buy insurance. The most positive thing about this move is that liberals, the left, is getting its back up and fighting back. Without a fight we'll never beat the insurance co's. Everyone interesting in this struggle should get on the buses and attend the Rally for Health Care for ALL< being held in DC on June 25. (for the emailer above---Communists org'd the fight for social security, unemployment comp & many of our major gains. All socialist nations have natl. health care. I'm sure you, actually, meant to say was that it "sounds like capitalism," or "fascism!")

The HELP plan has merit. I

The HELP plan has merit. I note that it is endorsed by Sen. Bernie Sanders who had earlier introduced a universal/single payer plan. As a long time supporter of single payer, I must admit, that in the Senate with a great number of members bought and paid for by the insurance industry, there is little chance of its passage. Hence, I will go along with Sen Sanders (a Socialist !) and trust in his judgement. There are those who would delegitamize the HELP plan by dividing it into areas of state control, and this must be opposed, as well as any suggestions of relating its functions to that of the insurance industry. It must be an out and out government run insurance plan with financial subsidies for those who require same. NO requirements that participants buy insurance, as in Massachusetts---this is in all probability unconstitutional if tested. Basically it must be Medicare For All.

Me, Me, poison Me, too! Our

Me, Me, poison Me, too! Our health care system is neither safe nor effective, while the science was done long ago and other countries use nutritional therapy that our docs are carefully instructed to stay away from. We are living in medieval times with treatments that amount to butchery, poisoning and torture at insane expense. Watch the documentary: Deconstructing the Myth of AIDS for a sample - this is just the tip of the iceberg. We could easily afford universal health care if corrupt science were rooted out of the culture of medicine - it would be a major wrenching revelation if the other side of the argument got a little coverage - but with all those pharmaceutical ads, ain't gonna happen in our media. As far as the vaccines - do your homework: look up vaccine ingredients and watch the regulators like a hawk.

Max Baucus is the roadblock

Max Baucus is the roadblock to including a public plan in health care reform. Why? Because he relies on very large donations from the health care and pharmaceutical industries, so he is beholden to them. It is a huge conflict of interest and yet he has stonewalled multiple requests to include a public option and have had advocates arrested during his sham hearings on health care reform. Rather than include them at the table, he ordered them arrested. These hearings have only included the Usual Suspects in the health care debate. It is time that Baucus realizes that he works for us, not the health care and pharmaceutical lobbyists. I plan to contribute to his progressive opponent when he next comes up for re-election.